FİRMALARIN AR-GE HARCAMALARININ AKTİF VE ÖZSERMAYE KARLILIĞINA ETKİSİ: BİST TEKNOLOJİ SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR UYGULAMA

Amaç: Ar-Ge ve yenilik günümüz rekabet dünyasında, firmaların performanslarını arttırmak ve büyümek için en çok ihtiyaç duyduğu unsurların başında gelmektedir.  OECD ülkelerinin Ar-Ge harcamaları ile karşılaştırıldığında Türkiye’deki Ar-Ge payı az da olsa yıllar itibarıyla artış göstermektedir. Yenilikçi hizmet ve ürünlerin üretilmesini mümkün kılan Ar-Ge yatırımları firmalara uzun dönemli rekabet avantajı ve büyüme sağlayan ve değer yaratan faaliyetlerdir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, önemi her geçen gün biraz daha artan Ar-Ge harcamalarının firmaların finansal performansına etkisini araştırmaktır.Yöntem: Bu amaçla BIST teknoloji ve bilişim sektöründe faaliyet gösteren firmaların Ar-Ge harcamalarının aktif karlılığına(ROA) ve öz sermaye karlılığına (ROE) etkisi panel veri analizi ile test edilmiştir.Bulgular: Analiz sonuçlarına göre Ar-Ge harcamaları ile hem ROA hem de ROE arasında uzun dönemde nedensellik ilişkisinin var olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ar-Ge harcamalarından ROA ve ROE’ye tek yönlü bir nedenselliğin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Nedensellik sonucundan sonra yapılan regresyon analizinde Ar-Ge harcamasının ROA ve ROE’de anlamlı ve pozitif bir etkisinin olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Sonuç: Ar-Ge harcamalarının karlılığı pozitif yönde etkilediği düşünüldüğünde, işletmelerin Ar-Ge’ye yönelik olarak yapacakları bugünkü yatırımlar gelecekte işletmelerin çağa ayak uydurabilmesinde ve yoğun rekabet koşullarında ayakta kalabilmesine yardımcı olacaktır.

THE EFFECT OF THE FIRMS’ R&D EXPENDITURES ON RETURN ON ASSETS AND RETURN ON EQUITY: EVIDENCE FROM BIST TECHNOLOGY SECTOR

Innovation and R&D (Research and Development) are the most important factors that firms need to grow and improve their performances in today's competitive world. According to the micro perspective, R&D is the activities of companies to produce and develop a new product to increase their sales and profitability. From a macro point of view, it covers the activities of the countries to gain superiority in foreign trade. Although the R&D expenditure in Turkey lags behind OECD countries, it has been increasing from year to year. By making it possible to produce innovative products and services, R&D investments provide long-term growth and competitive advantages and create value for corporations. This study aims to investigate the importance of the impact of the R&D expenditures which show on increasing scale day by day on the financial performance of the companies. To achieve this study’s aim, the impacts of the R&D expenditures on the return on assets and return on equity of were tested with panel data analysis for the firms operating in BIST technology and information sectors. The data set of the study covers the years 2009-2016. There are 16 companies in the BIST Technology Index during the study period. Five companies are selected from these 16 companies. R&D expenditures, return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE) of these five companies were taken into consideration in the analysis. In the study, Lin. Ge and Goh (2011), Polat and Elmas (2016), Ehie and Olibe (2010) and Choi and Williams (2013) studies were referenced. To analyze the relationship between R&D and ROA variables, two different models were employed. In both models, ARGE variable was used as an independent variable. In the first model, active profitability was used as a dependent variable (ROA). In the second model, the equity variable (ROE) was used as the dependent variable.The correlation matrix of the variables was formed primarily. There is a “0.1397” relationship between R&D expenditures and return on assets (ROA). Again, there is a “0.2152” relationship between R&D expenditures and return on equity (ROE). The correlation between R&D expenditures and ROA and ROE is very low. The time series includes the unit root. In other words, it is non-stationary. Analyzes with non-stationary time series lose their significance. In the analysis with non-stationary series, as the problem of spurious regression will emerge, the stagnation process in series is tried to be provided by difference or logarithmic transformations. Some tests were applied to the variables to determine whether the series were stationary. Levin, Lin and Chu (LLC), ADF and Im, Pesaran and Shin As a result of W-stat (IPS) unit root tests, all of the variables were stationary for constant and constant and trend. In the study, the co-integration between the series was investigated by Kao and Pedroni test. Pedroni (2004) developed seven different test statistics in order to test the existence of a co-integration relationship between variables. The null hypothesis of Pedroni and Kao test is assumed to be no co-integration between the series. According to the results of Pedroni and Kao panel co-integration test, it is decided that there is a co-integration relation of the variables for model 1 and model 2. In other words, the variables used in the model for both models act together in the long term, and the model predictions with the level values of these variables will not include the spurious regression problem. In the long term, after the co-integration results between variables, the causality relationship between the variables used in both models was investigated by Granger causality analysis. Since both model variables are co-integration in the I(0), the error correction model (VECM) is used in the established equation. The results of Granger causality analysis show that there is causality from R&D expenditures to asset profitability in Model 1. Also in Model 2, there is a one-way causality from R&D expenditures to equity profitability. Regression analysis, which is one of the most preferred estimation methods in econometric analysis, is used to calculate the effect of the independent variable or variables on the dependent variable. In this study of using panel regression analysis, two models were analyzed. In the first model, whether an increase in R&D expenditures increases the profitability of assets, and in the second, an increase in R&D expenditures increases the profitability of equity. As a result of the regression analysis which made after the causality analysis shows that the R&D expenditure has a meaningful positive effect on ROA and ROE.In today's world where the importance of R&D and innovation is increasing day by day, businesses that want to maximize their profits and increase their sales in this way have started to give importance to R&D process by making innovations in their activities, products and services. In this study, panel data analysis was performed by taking into account R&D expenditures and assets and equity profitability of 5 out of 16 companies included in BIST Technology Index. A simple regression method was chosen, and only the effect of R&D on profitability was examined. However, there are many factors that affect the profitability of the enterprise. For this reason, it can be assumed that the coefficient of R&D effect on ROA and ROE is low. The results of this study to explain the relationship between R&D and ROA and ROE are given by Scherer (1965), Hanel and Alain (2002), Çiçek and Onat (2012), Doğan and Yıldız (2013), Kocamış and Güngör (2014) and Light and colleagues (2016). When it is thought that R&D expenditures affect profitability positively, today's investments by businesses in R&D will help future businesses to keep up with the era and survive in intense competition. The establishment of units that will work for R&D in enterprises and the human capital capable of producing innovation should be strengthened. To carry out these transactions, management should allocate sufficient budget for research and development. Turkey, as a country in the developing countries as a group, giving importance to R&D activities can provide the production of high value-added products. At this point, the public should support the research and development activities in the enterprises, and the tax exemptions to the enterprises which carry out R&D activities in certain ratios will increase the motivation of the enterprises to R&D.

___

  • Alper, D. ve Aydoğan, E. (2016) “Relationships Between R&D and Corporate Performance: An Empirical Analysis in Istanbul Stock Exchange”, Paradoks Ekonomi, Sosyoloji Ve Politika Dergisi, 12(2): 99-114.
  • Bilici, M. S. (2002) “Ülkemizin Teknolojik Gelişiminde Ar-Ge’nin Önemi”, Madencilik Bülteni, 63: 14-17.
  • Brown, T. E. ve Jan U. (2004) “Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Culture”, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, İngiltere.
  • Chauvin, K. W. ve Mark, H. (1993) “Advertising, R&D Expenditures and The Market Value of The Firm”, Financial Management, 22 (4): 128-140.
  • Choi, S. B. ve Williams, C. (2013) “Innovation and Firm Performance in Korea and China: a Cross-Context Test of Mainstream Theories”. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(4): 423-444.
  • Çiçek, H. ve Onat, O. K. (2013) “İnovasyon Odaklı Faaliyetlerin Firma Performansına Etkisinin Veri Zarflama Analizi İle Belirlenmesi; İMKB Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sos-Yal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4 (7): 46-53.
  • Doğan, M. ve Yıldız, F. (2013) “Araştırma Ve Geliştirme Harcamaları Firma Karlılığını Etkiler Mi? Türkiye Örneği”, V. International Congress on Entrepreneurship: 166-172, 5-7 Haziran, Almatı: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi.
  • Ehie, I. C. ve Olibe, K. (2010) “The Effect Of R&D Investment on Firm Value: An Examination of USA Manufacturing and Service Industries”. Int. J. Production Economics, 128: 127-135.
  • Elmas, B. ve Polat, M. (2016) BIST Kurumsal Yönetim Endeksine Kayıtlı İmalat Firmaları Özelinde Ar-Ge Yatırımlarının Firma Performansına Etkisinin Araştırılması”, Global Business Research Congress (Gbrc), May 26-27, 2016, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Gharbi, S., Sahut, J.-M. ve TEULON, F. (2014) “R&D Investments And High-Tech Firms' Stock Return Volatility”. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 88: 306-312.
  • Hajiheydari, A., Mohsen, D. ve Asghar, S. (2011) “The Effect of Research and Development Costs on The Profitability of Pharmaceutical Companies”, Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(8): 914-918.
  • Hanel, P. ve Alain, S. (2002) “Effects of R&D Spillovers on The Profitability of Firms, Review of Industrial Organization”, 20 (4): 305-322.
  • Hsu, F.J., Chen, M.Y., Chen, Y.C. ve WANG, W.C. (2013) “An Empirical Study on The Relationship Between R&D And Financial Performance”, Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 5(3): 107-119.
  • Işık, N., Engeloğlu, Ö. ve KILINÇ, E. C. (2016) “Araştırma ve Geliştirme Harcamalarının, Kârlılık ve Satışlar Üzerindeki Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul Firmaları Üzerine Bir Uygulama”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (47): 27-46.
  • Kiraci, M. ve Arsoy, M. F. (2014) “Araştırma Geliştirme Giderlerinin İşletmelerin Karlılığı Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi: İMKB Metal Eşya Sektöründe Bir Araştırma”, Muhasebe Ve Denetime Bakis Accounting & Auditing Review, 13(41): 33.
  • Kocamış, U. T. ve Güngör, A. (2014) “Türkiye’de Ar-Ge Harcamaları Ve Teknoloji Sektöründe Ar-Ge Giderlerinin Kârlılık Üzerine Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul Uygulaması”. Maliye Dergisi, 166: 127-138.
  • Lin, Z., Ge, C. ve Goh, K. Y. (2011, July) “R&D Investment and Firm Performance in IT Companies: An Empirical Investigation Across IT Industry Sectors”, In PACIS.
  • Lööf, H. ve Heshmati, A. (2008) “Investment and performance of firms: correlation or causality?”, Corporate Ownership & Control, 6(2): 268-282.
  • Morbey, G. K. (1988) “R&D: Its Relationship to Company Performance”. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5(3): 191-200.
  • Nord, L. J. (2011) “R&D Investment Link to Profitability: A Pharmaceutical Industry Evaluation. Undergraduate Economic Review, 8(1): 1-16.
  • Özcan, M., Ağırman, E. ve Yılmaz, Ö. (2014) “Ar-Ge Yatırımlarının Hisse Senedi Getirisi Üzerine Etkisi: BIST Teknoloji Ve Bilişim Firmaları Üzerine Bir Uygulama”, Maliye Dergisi, 166: 139-158.
  • Öztürk, M. B. (2008) “Araştırma-Geliştirme Yatırımlarının Firma Değeri Üzerindeki Etkisi: İMKB'de Bir Uygulama”, Verimlilik Dergisi, 1: 25-34.
  • Pantagakis, E., Terzakis, D. ve Arvanitis, S. (2012) “R&D Investments and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation of The High Technology Sector (Software And Hardware) in The E.U. Technological Educational Institute”, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2178919 or http:// dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2178919
  • Parcharidis, E. ve Nikos C. V. (2007) “Investments in R&D And Business Performance. Evidence From The Greek Market”, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Department of Economics Working Paper
  • Pedroni, P. (2004) “Panel Co-integration; Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis”, Econometric Theory, 20: 597-625.
  • Scherer, F. M. (1965) “Corporate Inventive Output, Profits and Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 73 (3): 290-297.
  • Takım, Y. (2013) “R&D, Innovation and Stock Market Performance: A Study on The Istanbul Stock Exchange”. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  • Tsai, K. H. ve Wang, J. C. (2005) “Does R&D Performance Decline with Firm Size?—A Re-Examination in Terms Of Elasticity”, Research Policy, 34(6): 966-976.
  • Ünal, T. ve SEÇİLMİŞ, N. (2014) “Satış Hasılatı Atışında Ar-Ge’nin Rolü ve Kârlılığın Ar-Ge Harcamalarına Etkisi: Gaziantep Örneği”, Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 22: 202-210.
  • Wakelin, K. (2001) “Productivity Growth And R&D Expenditure in UK Manufacturing Firms”, Research Policy, 30(7): 1079-1090.
  • Yücel, R. ve Ahmetoğulları, K. (2015) “Ar-Ge Harcamalarının Firmaların Net Kâr Değişimi ve Hisse Başına Kârlılığına İnovatif Etkisi: BIST Teknoloji Yazılım ve Bilişim Sektöründe Bir Uygulama”, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi.
  • Yücel, T. ve Kurt, G. (2003) “Araştırma-Geliştirme Ve Pazarlama Giderlerinin Firma Kârlılığı Üzerine Etkisi”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 18 (209): 18-24.
İşletme Bilimi Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Sakarya Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

FİRMALARIN AR-GE HARCAMALARININ AKTİF VE ÖZSERMAYE KARLILIĞINA ETKİSİ: BİST TEKNOLOJİ SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR UYGULAMA

Hasan Hüseyin YILDIRIM, Şakir SAKARYA

SAĞLIK PROFESYONELLERİNİN YALIN UYGULAMALARA DİRENCİNİ BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Feryal BULUT, Mehmet Selami YILDIZ

SEKTÖRE İLİŞKİN KURUMSAL İMAJ ALGILARININ KARİYER YAPMA İSTEKLERİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: TURİZM ÖĞRENCİLERİNE YÖNELİK BİR UYGULAMA

Hümeyra TÖRE BAŞAT, Makbule AKAGÜNDÜZ

GİRİŞİMCİNİN PERSPEKTİFİNDEN KENDİ GİRİŞİMSEL BAŞARI DEĞERLENDİRMESİ VE BAĞLAM TARTIŞMASI

Umut Sanem ÇİTÇİ, Oğuzhan ÖZTÜRK, M. A. Metin DİNÇER

FARKLI VERİ SETLERİ ÜZERİNDE SMO VE J48 ALGORİTMALARININ SINIFLANDIRMA SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Mehmet ALAN, Cavit YEŞİLYURT

TRAFİK KAZA DESENLERİNİN TANIMLANMASINDA K-MEANS KÜMELEME ALGORİTMASININ KULLANILMASI: SAKARYA İLİ UYGULAMASI

Samet GÜNER, Keziban SEÇKİN CODAL, Hüseyin Serdar GEÇER, Erman COŞKUN

ETİK LİDERLERDE DUYGUSAL EMEĞİN İŞKOLİKLİĞE ETKİSİ

Olgun İrmak ÇETİN

KÜLTÜR BAĞLAMINDA FAALİYET TABANLI MALİYETLEME YÖNTEMİNİN TÜRKİYE’DE BAŞARI KOŞULLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Rifat YILMAZ

E-MÜŞTERİLERİN DEMOGRAFİK ÖZELLİKLERİNE GÖRE ALGI VE MEMNUNİYETLERİNDEKİ FARKLILIKLARIN İNCELENMESİ: GAZİANTEP İLİ ÖRNEĞİ

Vildan ATEŞ, Zafer KILIÇ

ENDÜSTRİ 4.0 VE ÇAĞRI MERKEZİ HİZMETLERİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

İsa DEMİRKOL, Selami ÖZCAN