İşletmelerde Liderlik Performansının Geliştirilmesi ve Yönetsel Başarıya Etkisi

Liderler, çalışanların verimliliği, işgücü devri ve örgütsel moral üzerinde etkilidirler. Özellikle, örgütler arasında liderlik performansının geliştirilmesine ilgi güçlüdür. Literatürde, liderlik geliştirme uygulaması ve onun bilimsel temeli arasında bağlantısızlığın yanı sıra lider ve liderlik geliştirme arasındaki ayrımlar konusunda bir kavram karışıklığı bulunmaktadır. Bu araştırma, üç bağlamsal boyutla liderlik geliştirme alanını incelemektedir: (1) liderlik geliştirmeyi kavrama (kavramsal bağlam); (2) devam eden örgütsel çalışma bağlamında gelişimsel durumu (teori bağlamı); ve (3) liderlik performansının geliştirilmesinin örgütlere etkilerinin özetlenmesi (araştırma bağlamı). Bu araştırmanın kapsamlı amacı, örgütlerdeki önemini göstererek, liderlik performansının geliştirilmesi ve uygulama yöntemleri arasında bir köprü kurmaktır. 360 derece geri besleme (feedback), yönetici koçluğu, mentorluk, şebeke kurma, işlere görevlendirme ve yaparak öğrenme dahil spesifik konular incelenmektedir. Liderlik performansını geliştirme, bir sonuç değil, sistemik bir süreçtir. Etkili liderlik performansını geliştirme uygulamaları spesifik işletme zorunluluklarıyla ilişkilidir.

Development of Leadership Performance in The Firms And Its Impact To Managerial Success

Leaders have an impact on employee productivity, labour turnover, and organizational morale. Interest in leadership performance development is strong, especially among organizations. In literature there is conceptual confusion regarding distinctions between leader and leadership development, as well as disconnection between the practice of leadership development and its scientific foundation. This study review examines the field of leadership development through three contextual dimensions: (1) understanding leader development (conceptual context); (2) reviewing how state-of-the-art development is being conducted in the context of ongoing organizational work (theory context); and (3) summarizing that has implications for the organizations of leadership performance development (research context). For this study the overall purpose is to bridge the practice methods and development of leadership performance by showing the importance in organizations. Specific practices that are reviewed include 360- degree feedback and executive coaching, mentoring and networking, and job assignments and action learning. Leadership performance development must become a systemic process, not an event. Effective leadership performance development practices are tied to specific business imperatives.

___

  • Barling, J, Weber, T and Kelloway, E. (1996), Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal and financial outcomes: a field experiment, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6).
  • Boyatzis, R. (1982), The Competent Mana- ger: A Model for Effective Performance, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Burgoyne, J., Hirsh, W. and Williams, S., (2004), The Development Of Manage- ment And Leadership Capability And İts Contribution To Performance: The Evidence, The Prospects And The Rese- arch Need. London: Department For Education and Skills, p. 49, (URL: www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/up- loadfiles/RR560.pdf)
  • Campbell, D., Dardis, G. and Campbell, K. (2003), ‘Enhancing Incremental Influ- ence: A Focused Approach to Leaders- hip Leadership and Organisational Studies, 10(1). Journal of
  • Chappelow, C.T. (2004), “360-Degree Feed- back.” In Mccauley, C.D. & Vanvelsor, E. (Eds.) (1998). Handbook Of Leaders- hip Development (3rd Ed.). San Fran- cisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Conger, J. A. (1993, January), Personal Growth Training: Snake-Oil Or Path- way To Leadership, Organizational Dynamics, 22.
  • Conger J.A. and Benjamin B. (1999), Building Leaders: How Successful Companies Develop The Next Generation, Jossey– Bass, San Francisco (1999).
  • Conger, J. A., & Benjamin, B. (1999), Building leaders, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Conger, A. and Brian Fishel (2007), Leaders- hip Development, Human Resource Management Review Volume 17, Issue 4, December.
  • Conger, J. A. (1993, January), Personal Growth Training: Snake-Oil Or Path- way To Leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 22.
  • Conger, J. A. (1992), Learning To Lead, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • R.A. Burgleman, (1983), A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing In The Di- versified Major Firm, Administrative Science Quarterly 29 (1983).
  • D'Aveni, R. (1994), R. Hypercompetition: Managing The Dynamics Of Strategic Maneuvering, The Free Press, New York.
  • Day, David V. (2000), “Leadership Develop- ment: A Review in Context,” Leaders- hip Quarterly, Vol 11 Issue 4.
  • Day, David V. (1999), Leadership Develop- ment: A Review of Industry Best Practi- ces, U.S. Army Research Institute, December.
  • Douglas, C. A. (1997), Formal Mentoring Programs In Organizations: An Anno- tated Bibliography, Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
  • Drath, W. H. (1998), Approaching the future of leadership development, In C. D. McCauley, R. S. Moxley, and E. Van Velsor (Eds.), Handbook of leadership development,. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
  • Economist. (2004), Vol. 373, Issue: 8397.
  • Emerald Insight Staff(Editor) (2004), Eme- rald Insight Staff(Editor). Leadership Development, Bradford, , UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Foster R. and S. Kaplan (2001), Creative Des- truction, Doubleday, New York .
  • Froiland, P. (1994), Action Learning: Taming Real Problems In Real Time, Training, 31(1).
  • Fulmer R. M, Conger J. A.. (2004), Develo- ping leaders with 2020 vision, Financial Executive, July/August.
  • R.M. Fulmer and J.A. Conger, (2004), Gro- wing Your Company's Leaders: How Organizations Use Succession Manage- ment to Sustain Competitive Advan- tage, AMACOM, New York .
  • Gharajedaghi, J. (1999), Systems thinking: Managing chaos and complexity. Bos- ton: Butterworth Heinemann.
  • Global Reach, Virtual Leadership. (1999, September). Fast Company.
  • Hollenbeck, G. P. and McCall, M. W., Jr. (1999), Leadership development: Con- temporary practices, In A. I. Kraut and A. Korman (Eds.), Evolving practices in human resource management. San Francisco, CA; Jossey-Bass.
  • Horne, M. and Stedman Jones, D (2001), Lea- dership the challenge for all?, The Insti- tute of Management.
  • Katz, D. and Kahn, R., (1978), The Social Psychology of Organisations, New York: Wiley
  • Keys, J. B., and Wolfe, J. (1988), Management Education And Development: Current Issues And Emerging Trends., Journal of Management.
  • Kolb, D. (1983), Experiential Learning: Ex- periences As The Source Of Learning And Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Mabey, C. (2002), ‘Mapping Management Development’, Journal of Management Studies, 39(8).
  • McCall, M. W., Jr., Lombardo, M. M. and Morrison, A. M. (1988), The Lessons Of Experience: How Successful Executives Develop On The Job, New York: The Free Press.
  • Mcclenahen, J. S. (1990), Not Fun In The Sun: Bull Has A Demanding Program To Build Teamwork, Industry Week, Octo- ber 15.
  • McCauley, C. D., and Brutus, S. (1998), Ma- nagement Development Through Job Experiences: An Annotated Bibliog- raphy, Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
  • Mccauley, C. D. (2000), A Systemic Appro- ach To Leadership Development, Paper Presented At The 15th Annual Confe- rence Of The Society For Industrial And Organizational Psychology, New Orle- ans, LA, April.
  • Mckenna, J. F. (1990), Looking For – And Bu- ilding – A Few Good Heroes, Industry Week, 239, October 15.
  • Northouse, Peter Guy (2001), Leadership : theory and practice, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 4.
  • O’Reilly, B. (1994, October 17), 360 feedback can change your life, Fortune.
  • Senge, P. M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art And Practice Of The Learning Or- ganization, New York: Doubleday.
  • Sherman, S. (1995), “How Tomorrow’s Lea- ders Are Learning Their Stuff”, Fortune, November 27, 132.
  • Vicere, A. A., And Fulmer, R. M. (1998), Lea- dership By Design. Boston, MA: Har- vard Business School.
  • Vicere, A. A., and Fulmer, R. M. (1997), Lea- dership by design, Boston, MA: Har- vard Business School.
  • Watkins, M. (2003), “The First 90 Days”, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston.
  • Weick, K. E. (1993), The Collapse Of Sense- making In Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38.
  • Wenger, E. (1998), Communities Of Practice: Learning, Meaning, And Identity. Cam- bridge, UK: Cambridge University.
  • Wheatley, M. J. (1999), Leadership And The New Science: Discovering Order In A Chaotic World, Berrett-Koehler Publis- hers, San Francisco.