Inscribed triumphal columns of Assyrian kings in Anatolia as a symbol of sovereignty

The main reason for the campaigns, battles and massacres organized by Assyrian kings for conquering Anatolia or at least taking the region under control has been thought to be the raw materials resources in Anatolia and the convenience of sea and land connections through which these raw material resources could be transferred. As of the beginning of 2000 BC, the policy followed by Assyria, which had been started with the commercial relations with Anatolia and in the period of Assyrian Commercial Colonies when mining reserves of Anatolia largely carried to Assyria, continued in a straight line without impeding the trade performed upon the consent of Anatolian kings. Being home to establishments that were politically, economically and socio-culturally different, and losing its civilization level with the increase of mass movements, Anatolia was ruled by small or large kingdoms which tried to exhibit Hittite characteristics in 1000 BC. In this period, Assyria that gradually gained power and tried to expand with the policy of western expansionism turned its face towards Anatolia once again to dominate on the path from being a kingdom to becoming an empire and to make this permanent. Accordingly, Assyrian kings left permanent marks on the lands they conquered during the campaigns to Anatolia. It was aimed in this study to shed light on the triumphal columns left by Assyrian kings in Anatolia after the successful campaigns by means of both philological sources and archeological finds.

Keywords:

Neo-Assyria, Neo-Hittite Kingdoms Rock Relief of Neo-Assyria,

PDF

___

Borger, R. (1956). Die Inschriften Asarhaddons Königs von Assyrien, AfO, Beiheft 9, p. 1-133.
Donbaz, V. (1990). Two Neo-Assyrian Stelae in the Antakya and Kahramanmaraş Museums, Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia Project-ARRIM 8, p. 5-20, Toronto.
Galil, G. (1992). Conflicts Between Assyrian Vassals, SAAB VI/1, p.52-63.
Günbattı, C. (1997). Kültepe’den Akadlı Sargon’a Ait Bir Tablet, Archivum Anatolicum 3, Ankara,
p. 131-155.
Günbattı, C. (2011). Anadolu’nun Politik Manzarası, Arkeoatlas, 01, İstanbul 2011, p. 252-253.
Köroğlu. K.-Yumruk. Ş. (2014). Ergani/Gisgis (Kesentaş) Yeni Asur Kabartması, Türk Eskiçağ
Bilimleri Enstitüsü Haberler 2014-38, İstanbul, p. 4-8.
Kulakoğlu, F. (2011). “Kültepe Kaniş Karumu: Anadolu’nun En Eski Uluslararası Ticaret Merkezi”,
Anadolu’nun Önsözü Kültepe-Kaniš Karumu, K.B.Ş.B. Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul 2011, p.40-51.
Özgüç, T. (2005). Kültepe-Kaniş, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul.
RIMA: K. Grayson (1991-1996) Assyrian Rulers of the Early First Millennium BC II (858-745 BC), Toronto.
Schacner, A. (2009). Assyriens Könige an einer der Quellen desTigris. Archaeologische
Forschungen im Höhlensystem von Bırkleyn und am sogenannten Tigris-Tunnel, Tübingen: Ernst Wastmuth.
Smith, S. (1938). Assyrian Sculptures in the British Museum from Shalmaneser III to Sennacherib,
London.
Szuchman, J.J. (2007). Ziyarettepe / Tušhan / Upper Tigris, London.
Taşyürek, A. O. (1975) . Some New Assyrian Rock-Reliefs in Turkey, Anatolian Studies, Vol. 25,
p. 169-180.
Taşyürek, A. O. (1979). A Rock Relief of Shalmaneser III on the Euphrates, Iraq 4, p. 47–53.
Ünal, A. (2006). “Hitit İmparatorluğu’nun Yıkılışından Bizans Dönemi’nin Sonuna Kadar Adana
ve Çukurova Tarihi”, ÇÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15-3 (Arkeoloji Özel Sayısı), p.67-102. Adana.
Weinfeld, M. (1999). Covenant Making in Anatolia and Mesopotamia”, XIV. Uluslararası
Assriyoloji Kongresi, 6-10 / VII.
Yamada, S. (2000). The Construction of the Assyrian Empire, A Historical Study of the Inscriptions
of Shalmanesser III (859-824 BC) Culture&History of the Ancient Near East, Netherlands.
Yıldırım, N. (2010). Anadolu’da Bulunan Yeni Asurca Belgeler, Ankara Üniversitesi Tarih
Araştırmaları Dergisi, XXIX, 48, Ankara, p.119-135.
Yıldırım, N. (2016). Demir Çağında Anadolu’daki Aramiler’in Politik Coğrafyası, Cappadocian
Journal of History and Social Sciences,Vol. 8, Ahlen-Germany, p. 120-137.