A Study on the Possible Mutagenicity of Different Types of Plant Growth Regulators

It is known that most chemicals, which have been increasingly used since ancient times, have carcinogenic and mutagenic effects. As an alternative to these chemicals, natural compounds, such as plant growth regulators (PGRs) have been used. However, are the PGRs used to obtain efficient plants in agriculture as harmless as it is thought today when it is essential to access natural foods in the food and agriculture sectors? Therefore, this study investigates the mutagenic activity of two plant growth regulators (Kinetin, Chlormequat chloride (CCC)) using the Ames/Salmonella short-time test system. Experiments were performed in the presence (+ S9) or absence (-S9) of metabolic activation enzymes using TA 98 and TA 100 strains of Salmonella typhimurium. 5 non-cytotoxic doses for each test substance were investigated. The results were evaluated by comparing them with spontaneous control plates. According to the results, a 2500 µg/plate dose of Kinetin was to be found mutagenic on the strain TA 98 in the presence and in the absence of S9 enzyme, and on the strain TA 100 in the absence of the S9 enzyme. The other substance CCC did not cause mutagenic effects on the bacterial strains.

A Study on the Possible Mutagenicity of Different Types of Plant Growth Regulators

It is known that most chemicals, which have been increasingly used since ancient times, have carcinogenic and mutagenic effects. As an alternative to these chemicals, natural compounds, such as plant growth regulators (PGRs) have been used. However, are the PGRs used to obtain efficient plants in agriculture as harmless as it is thought today when it is essential to access natural foods in the food and agriculture sectors? Therefore, this study investigates the mutagenic activity of two plant growth regulators (Kinetin, Chlormequat chloride (CCC)) using the Ames/Salmonella short-time test system. Experiments were performed in the presence (+ S9) or absence (-S9) of metabolic activation enzymes using TA 98 and TA 100 strains of Salmonella typhimurium. 5 non-cytotoxic doses for each test substance were investigated. The results were evaluated by comparing them with spontaneous control plates. According to the results, a 2500 µg/plate dose of Kinetin was to be found mutagenic on the strain TA 98 in the presence and in the absence of S9 enzyme, and on the strain TA 100 in the absence of the S9 enzyme. The other substance CCC did not cause mutagenic effects on the bacterial strains.

___

  • Akman, Y., & Darıcı, C. (1998). Bitki Fizyolojisi (Beslenme ve Gelişme Fizyolojisi) [Plant Physiology (Nutrition and Development Physiology)]. Kariyer Matbaacılık
  • Ames, B.N., Lee, F.D., & Durston, W.E., (1973). An Improved Bacterial Test System for the Detection of Classification of Mutagens and Carcinogens. Proc. of the Nat. Acad. of Sci., 70, 782-786.
  • Ames, B.N., (1985). Food Constituents as a Source of Mutagens, Carcinogens and Anticarcinogens, Genetic Toxicology of the Diet, proceeding of a Satellite Symposium of the Fourth International Conference on Environmental Mutagens Held in Copenhagen, Denmark, Ed. B. knudsen, 3-32.
  • Bağcı, H., (1985). Yaz Okulu Moleküler Biyoloji Ders Notları [Summer School Molecular Biology Lecture Notes]. ODTÜ, pp 25-55.
  • Basra, A.S., (2000). Plant Growth Regulators in Agriculture and Horticulture: Their Role and Commercial Uses. Haworth Press.
  • Çetinkaya, A.M., & Baydan, E., (2006). Bitki Gelişim Düzenleyicilerin Zehirliliğine Genel Bir Bakış [An Overview of the Toxicity of Plant Growth Regulators]. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi, 77(4), 26-31.
  • Dean, B.J., Brooks, T.M., Hodson–Walker, G., & Hutson, D.H. (1985). Genetic toxicology testing of 41 industrial chemicals. Mutat. Res, 153, 57-77
  • Dökmeci, I., (1988). Toksikoloji, Akut zehirlenmelerde Tanı ve Tedavi [Toxicology, Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Poisoning]. Nobel Kitap kitabevi.
  • EFSA (2008). Conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance chlormequat (considered variant chlormequat chlorid). EFSA Scientific Report 179. pp.1-77.
  • Emig, M., Reinhardt, A., & Mersch Sunderman, V. (1996). A comparative study of five nitro musk compounds for genotoxicity in the SOS choromotest and Salmonella mutagenicity. Toxicol. Letter., 85, 151-156.
  • Ennever, F.K., & Rosenkraz, H.J. (1986). Evaluating Batteries of Short-Term Genotoxicity Tests. Mutagenesis, 1, 293-298.
  • Forman, D. & Ames, B., (1991). The Ames Test and the Causes of Cancer. Br. Med. J. Vol. 303, 428-429.
  • Güleryüz, M. (1982). Bahçe ziraatında büyütücü ve engelleyici maddelerin kullanılması ve önemi [The use and importance of growth and inhibitory substances in horticulture]. Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayınları, 279.
  • Halloran, N., & Kasım, M.U. (2002). Meyve ve Sebzelerde Büyüme Düzenleyici Madde Kullanımı ve Kalıntı Düzeyleri [Use and Residues of plant Growth Regulators in Fruit and Vegetable Production (Turkish with English Abstract)]. Gıda, 27(5), 351-359.
  • Harms, C.L., & Oplinger, E.S. (1988). Plant Growth Regulators: Their Use in Crop Production. North Central Region Extension Publication 303, Wisconsin.
  • Hofnung, M., & Quillardet, P. (1986). Recent developments in bacterial short-term for the detection of genotoxic agents. Mutagenesis, 1(5), 319-330.
  • Merck Inc. (2021a). Merck KgaA. Retrieved from https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/TR/en/product/sigma/48130?gclid=Cj0KCQiA7oyNBhDiARIsADtGRZa37fnvMOKezsUvqJThNSu-QTyIkXNEolVEP3kYNwbu3EwMX99us_4aAi08EALw_wcB
  • Merck Inc. (2021b). Merck KgaA. Retrieved from https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/substance/chlormequatchloride1580799981511?lang=en®ion=TR
  • Merck Inc. (2021c). Merck KgaA. Retrieved from https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/TR/en/product/aldrich/438456?gclid=CjwKCAiA4veMBhAMEiwAU4XRr7YCvB3B_LldPRU8gFcRhW44-sYzAJWgZ4uswFhKFcOtZVpDxA5wjBoC_ucQAvD_BwE
  • Merck Inc. (2021d). Merck KgaA. Retrieved from https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/TR/en/product/aldrich/a55500?gclid=CjwKCAiA4veMBhAMEiwAU4XRrxjiXsuivNKt3xEsz4F23jC5zSDDbdu27iccMM9_V2Bh5x_wb3fWiRoCVHsQAvD_BwE
  • Merck Inc. (2021e). Merck KgaA. Retrieved from https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/TR/en/product/aldrich/108898
  • Kappas, A. (1983). Genotoxic avtivity of plant growth regulating hormones in Aspergillus nidulans, Carcinogenesis, 4(11), 1409-11.
  • Kaynak, L., & Ersoy, N. (1997). Bitki Büyüme Düzenleyicilerinin Genel Özellikleri ve Kullanım Alanları [General Properties and Uses of Plant Growth Regulators]. Akdeniz Üni. Zir. Fak. Dergisi, 10, 223-236.
  • Maron, D.M., & Ames, B.N. (1983). Revised methods for the mutagenicity test. Mutat. Res., 113, 173-215.
  • Mc Daniels, C.C., & Stelma, G.N.Jr. (1990). Comparision of the Salmonella (Ames) test, UMU tests and SOS chromotests for detecting genetoxines. Environ. And Mol. Mutagenesis, 16, 204-215.
  • McCann, J., Choi, E., Yamasaki, E., & Ames, B.N. (1975). Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella/microsome test. Assay of 300 chemicals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 72, 5135-5139.
  • Morsünbül, T., Solmaz, S.K.A., Üstün, G.E., & Yonar, T. (2010). Bitki Gelişim Düzenleyici (BGD)’lerin Çevresel Etkileri ve Çözüm Önerileri [Environmental Effects of Plant Growth Regulators and Some Solutions Proposal]. Uludağ University Journal of The Faculty of Engineering, 15(1), 1-11.
  • Mortelmans, K., & Zeiger, E. (2000). The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay. Mutation Research, 455, 29–60.
  • Öncül, Ö., (2009). Bazı Gıda Boyalarının Mutajenik Potansiyellerinin Ames/Mikrozom Testi ile Araştırılması ve β –Galaktozidaz Üzerine Etkileri [Investigation of Mutagenic Potentials of Some Food Dyes by Ames/Microsome Test and Their Effects on β-Galactosidase] [Doctoral Thesis, Gazi University], Gazi University, Institute of Science and Technology, Ankara pp 1-50
  • Özen, H.Ç. & Onay, A., (1999). Bitki Büyüme ve Gelişme Fizyolojisi [Plant Growth and Development Physiology]. Dicle Üniversitesi Basımevi.
  • Pillco A., de la Peña E. (2014) Ames Test (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test): Why, When, and How to Use. In: Sierra L., Gaivão I. (eds) Genotoxicity and DNA Repair. Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1068-7_1
  • Quillardet, P., & Hofnung, M. (1988). “The screening, diagnosis and evaluation of genotoxic agents with batteries of bacterial tests’’, Mutat. Res., 216:251-257.
  • Sağlam, N. (1991). Bitki Büyümesini Düzenleyiciler ve Kullanım Alanları [Plant Growth Regulators and Their Uses]. Tarımda Kaynak, 2(3), 52-55.
  • Sussmuth, R., & Lingens, F. (1976). Mutagenic actions of chlorocholine chloride. Mutat. Res., 40(3):229-35
  • Tiaz, L., & Zeiger, E. (2008). Bitki fizyolojisi. 3. baskıdan çeviri [Plant physiology. translation from the 3rd edition], ed; İsmail Türkan, Palme Yayıncılık.
  • Tomatis, L., (1979). The Predictive Value of Rodent Carcinogenicity Tests in The Evaluation of Human Risks. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol, Toxical, 19, 511-530.
  • Uysal, A., Durak, Y., & Aladağ, M.O. (2010). Investigation of Mutagenic Effects of Some Plant Growth Regulators Salmonella/ Microsome Test System. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 19(12b), 3094-3099
  • Vural, N., (1984). Toksikoloji [Toxicology]. Ank. Üniv., Ecz. Fak., Yayınları, No: 56.
  • Yeşilada, E., (2000). Drosophila melanogaster’de EMS ile indüklenmiş somatik mutasyon ve rekombinasyon üzerine kinetin, gibberellik asit ve indol asetik asitin etkisi, Turkish Journal of Biology, 24, 279-284.
  • Westwood, M.N. (1993). Hormones and growth regulators. In: Westwood MN (ed) Temperate-zone pomology, physiology, and culture. 3rd ed. Timber Press Inc., Portland, 364-381
  • Zeiger, E., Haseman, J.K., Shelby, M.D., Margolin, B.H., & Tennant, R.W. (1990). Evaluation of four in vitro genetic toxicity tests for predicting rodent carcinogenicity: confirmation of earlier results with 41 additional chemicals. Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 16 (Suppl. 18), 1-14.
International Journal of Secondary Metabolite-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: İzzet KARA
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Biological activities and chemical composition of Xanthoria lichens from Turkey

Muzaffer MÜKEMRE, Gokhan ZENGİN, Rabia Sena TÜRKER, Ali ASLAN, Abdullah DALAR

Investigation of in vitro Enzyme Inhibitory Properties and Antioxidant Activity of Moltkia coerulea (Willd.) Lehm. (Boraginaceae) Growing in Raman Mountain - Batman

Alevcan KAPLAN

Biological activity studies on Klasea serratuloides (DC) Greuter & Wagenitz subsp. karamanica B. Dogan & A. Duran extracts obtained with different extraction methods

Nuraniye ERUYGUR, Fatma AYAZ, Yavuz BAĞCI, Süleyman DOĞU, Tuğsen DOĞRU, Merve KOÇAK

Phenolic profile, antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activity of the ethyl acetate, methanol and water extracts of Capparis spinosa L.

Bulent KİRKAN, Olcay CEYLAN, Cengiz SARIKÜRKCÜ, Bektas TEPE

Chemical composition and antioxidant activities of essential oils and extracts from cones of Tetraclinis articulata (Vahl) Masters

Mohammed SABER, Hicham HARHAR, Latifa EL HATTABİ, Gokhan ZENGİN, Abdelhakim BOUYAHYA, Mohamed TABYAOUİ

Antidiabetic Potential and Chemical Constituents of Haloxylon scoparium Aerial Part, An Endemic Plant from Southeastern Algeria

Salah BENKHERARA, Ouahiba BORDJIBA, Samiha HARRAT, Ali Boutlelis DJAHRA

An Investigation of The Biological Activity of Monofloral Honey Produced in South-Western Anatolia

Şükrü KARATAŞ, Abdurrahman AKTÜMSEK, Mehmet Emin DURU

Structure-Activity and Antioxidant Properties of Quercetin and Its Co2+ Chelate

Aslı ÖZTÜRK KİRAZ, Fatih YALÇIN

A Study on the Possible Mutagenicity of Different Types of Plant Growth Regulators

Sevilay YAPICI, Güven URAZ, Ebru BEYZİ

Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activity of Isoflavans from the Roots of Rhynchosia ferruginea and In Silico Study on DNA Gyrase and Human Peroxiredoxin

Kalid HUSSEİN, Rajalakshmanan ESWARAMOORTHY, Yadessa MELAKU, Milkyas ENDALE ANNİSA