Eyüp ÇELİK

3822

Adaptation of Relationship Assessment Scale to Turkish Culture: Study of Validity and Reliability

The aim of this research is to examine validity and reliability of Turkish version of Relationship Assessment Scale. The results of exploratory factor analysis demonstrated that seven items loaded on single-factors and that the factor structure was harmonized with the factor structure of the original scale. Confirmatory factor analysis, chi-square x²=52.87, sd=13, p=0.00 significantly, while indices of fit RMSEA=.097, GFI=.98, AGFI=.97, CFI=.96, IFI=.96, NFI=.95 and RFI=.92 was found. The scale’s internal consistency is .87 and Split-half is .82 and result of t-test was significant. The scale’s corrected item-total correlations is ranked from .52 to .74. Results show that the scale is a valid and reliable instrument.
Keywords:

Relationship assessment, exploratory factor analysis confirmatory factor analysis,

PDF

___

  • Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 964–980. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741‐ 3737.2000.00964.x
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2004). Veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Akademi Yayınevi.
  • Caruna, A., Money, A.H.,& Berthon, P.R.(2000). Service quality and satisfaction:The moderating role of value. European Journal of Marketing, 34, 1338–1353.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: PegemA Akademi Yayınevi.
  • Jones, W. H., Adams, J. M., Monroe, P. R., & Berry, J. O. (1995). A psychometric exploration of marital satisfaction and commitment. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(4), 923–932.
  • Locke, H. J.,& Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital‐adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage & Family Living, 21, 251–255. DOI: 10.2307/348022
  • Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 45, 141–151. DOI: 10.2307/351302
  • Patrick, S., Sells, J. N., Giordano, F. G., & Tollerud, T. R. (2007). Intimacy, differentiation, and personality variables as predictors of marital satisfaction. Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Children, 15(4), 359–367. DOI: 10.1177/1066480707303754h
  • Renshaw, K.D., McKnight, P., Caska, C.M.,& Blais, R.K. (2011). The utility of the relationship assessment scale in multiple types of relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28 (4), 435–447. DOI: 10.1177/0265407510377850
  • Rusbult, C. E.,& Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175‐204.
  • Guerrero, L. K., Anderson, P. A., & Afifi, W. A. (2011). Close encounters: Communication in relationships (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Schermelleh‐Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness‐of‐fit measures. Methods of psychological research online, 8, 23‐74.
  • Schumm, W. R., Nichols, C. W., Schectman, K. L., & Grigsby, C. C. (1983). Characteristics of responses to the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale by a sample of 84 married mothers. Psychological Reports, 53, 567–572. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1983.53.2.567
  • Schumm, W. R., Anderson, S. A., Benigas, J. E.,McCutchen, M. B., Griffin, C. L.,Morris, J. E., & Race, G. S. (1985). Criterion‐related validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Psychological Reports, 56, 719– 722. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1985.56.3.719
  • Schumm, W. R., Paff‐Bergen, L. A., Hatch, R. C., Obiorah, F. C., Copeland, J. M.,Meens, L. D., & Bugaighis, M. A. (1986). Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 48, 381–387. DOI: 10.2307/352405
  • Spahi, B. Yurtkoru, E. S.,& Çinko, M. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS’le veri analizi. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
  • Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 38, 15–28.
  • Snyder, D. K., Heyman, R. E., & Haynes, S. N. (2005). Evidence‐based approaches to assessing couple distress. Psychological Assessment, 17, 288–307. DOI: 10.1037/1040‐3590.17.3.288
  • Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş Temel İlkeler ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks.
  • Tezbaşaran, A. A. (1996). Likert tipi ölçek geliştirme kılavuzu. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-9378
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: Mustafa ÖZGENEL
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

İbrahim DEMİRCİ, Ali Haydar ŞAR, Abdullah MANAP

Eyüp ÇELİK

Tuğba Seda ÇOLAK