A Model on Charter Rate Prediction in Container Shipping

A Model on Charter Rate Prediction in Container Shipping

The maritime industry has witnessed numerous challenges in recent years after the global pandemic, primarily characterized by sharp fluctuations in the daily charter rates. Considering an unpredictable business environment, this study aims to suggest a financial forecasting model on charter rates, creating added value for the stakeholders of the maritime trade business. The empirical analysis utilized the data from the Clarksons Research Portal, which encompassed 7,409 charter rental transactions of container ships from 01.01.2018 to 10.03.2023. After examining seven different linear and ensemble regressions, it was revealed that the XGBoost regressor resulted in the least RMSE value of 0.1833 with an R2 of 0.9015. The selected predictors were the TEU, container fixture type, charter time, charter time multiplied by TEU, ship age, laycan year, and laycan month, respectively. In addition to coping with the limitations of linear regression, the model revealed that the laycan years, charter time, and charter time multiplied with TEU were the essential variables in charter rate prediction. As a result, the model developed in the study can be used as an important decision support tool for stakeholders in the container shipping industry.

___

  • Chen, Y., Liu, B., Wang, T. (2021). Analysing and forecasting China containerized freight index with a hybrid decomposition–ensemble method based on EMD, grey wave and ARMA, Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 11(3), 358-371.
  • Clarksons Research (2023). Shipping Intelligence Network.
  • Hoffman, J. P. (2022). Linear regression models: Applications in R. CRC Press.
  • Fan, L. and Yin, J. (2015). Analysis of structural changes in container shipping, Maritime Economics & Logistics, 18(2), 174–191.
  • Hirata, E., Matsuda, T. (2022). Forecasting Shanghai Container Freight Index: A Deep-Learning-Based Model Experiment”, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(593).
  • Hoffman, J. P. (2022). Linear regression models: Applications in R. CRC Press.
  • Hübner, J.H. (2016). Shipping Markets and Their Economic Drivers, In: Kavussanos, M. G., Visvikis, I. D. (Eds), The International Handbook of Shipping Finance : 6-7, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jeon, J., Duru, O., Yeo, G. (2019). Modelling cyclic container freight index using system dynamics, Maritime Policy and Management,, 47(3), 287–303.
  • Koyuncu, K., Tavacıoğlu, L., Gökmen, N., Arıcan, U.Ç. (2021). Forecasting COVID-19 impact on RWI/ISL container throughput index by using SARIMA models, Maritime Policy and Management, 48(8), 1–13.
  • Kunapuli, G. (2023). Ensemble Methods for Machine Learning. Manning Publications. Lemper, B. (2008). Volkswirtschaftliche Aspekte der Schifffahrt, In: Winter, H., Hennig, C., Gerhard, M. (Eds), Grundlagen der Schiffsfinanzierung (113-162), Frankfurt School Verlag.
  • Luo, M., Fan, L., Liu, L. (2009). An econometric analysis for container shipping market, Maritime Policy and Management, 36(6), 507–523.
  • Ma, S. (2021). Economics of Maritime Business, Routledge.
  • Matloff, N. (2017). Statistical Regression and Classification: From Linear Models to Machine Learning. CRC Press.
  • Munim, Z.H. (2022). State-space TBATS model for container freight rate forecasting with improved accuracy, Maritime Transport Research, 3.
  • Otani, S. and Matsuda, T. (2023). Unified container shipping industry data from 1966: Freight rate, shipping quantity, newbuilding, secondhand, and scrap price, Transportation Research Part E, 176.
  • Petersen, H.B. (2016). Asset Risk Assessment, Analysis and Forecasting in Asset Backed Finance, In:
  • Kavussanos, M. G., Visvikis, I. D. (Eds), The International Handbook of Shipping Finance, 53-59, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Saeed, N., Nguyen, S., Cullinane, K., Gekara, V., Chhetri, P. (2023). Forecasting container freight rates using the Prophet forecasting method, Transport Policy, 133, 86-107.
  • Schramm, H.S., Munim, Z.H. (2021). Container freight rate forecasting with improved accuracy by integrating soft facts from practitioners, Research in Transportation Business & Management, 41.
  • UNCTAD. (2021). Review of Maritime Transport 2021. Geneva.
International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: 4
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: Cem GAZİOĞLU
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Ecological Risk Analysis of Lake Arin Sediments (Bitlis, Türkiye)

Sümeyye FAYDALGEL, Ahmet Evren ERGİNAL

Google Earth Engine Based Spatio-Temporal Changes of Bafa Lake from 1984 to 2022

Ömer Faruk ATİZ, Tansu ALKAN, Süleyman Savaş DURDURAN

Competitive Adsorption of Anionic Dyes from Aqueous Single and Binary Solutions with CoAl Layered Double Hydroxide

İme AKANYETİ, Jamilu ABDULLAHİ

Rainwater Storage Engineering based on Water-Sensitive Urban Design in Lapangan Pancasila, Semarang City

Qatrunnada Justitia YUMNA, Pingkan NURYANTİ

A Model on Charter Rate Prediction in Container Shipping

Tolga TUZCUOĞLU, Hüseyin GENCER

GIS Analysis of spatial-temporal variation of the ecological risk caused by element and organic pollutants in Lake Marmara (TURKIYE)

Şakir FURAL

Archaeo-geophysical Investigations in Ahlat Seljuk Square Cemetery, Bitlis, Eastern Anatolia TURKIYE

Aydın BÜYÜKSARAÇ, Mehmet KULAZ, Özcan BEKTAŞ, Oktay DUMANKAYA, Yunus Levent EKİNCİ, Sinan KOŞAROĞLU

Investigation of the Best Solution Proposals for Reducing SIRE VIQ Inspection Observations Utilizing Fuzzy TOPSIS Integrated Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach at OilChemical Tankers

Talha YALNIZ, Oktay ÇETİN

Comparison of Publicly Available Bathymetric Data with Real Measurements in the Southeastern Black Sea

Emre TÜKENMEZ, Emre GÜLHER, Ozgur KAYA

Antibiotic and Heavy Metal Resistance Patterns of Indicator Bacteria in Surface Water Bodies of Kilis

Hatice Aysun MERCİMEK TAKCI, Sevil TOPLAR