___

• ACARA(2014). Australian curriculum: Senior secondary mathematics, general mathematics (rationale/aims). Retrieved from http://australian curriculum.org/seniorsecondary/mathematics/generalmathematics/rationaleaims.
• Ball, D., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it so special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554.
• Barham, A., & Al-Khateeb, M. (2012). Students’ levels in the mathematical thinking skills for classroom teachers at the Hashemite University and its relation to their achievement in mathematics. The Educational Journal, 26(103), 277-312.
• Bednarz, N., Fiorentini, D., & Huang, R. (2011). International approaches to the professional development of mathematics teachers. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (2012). The mathematical education of teachers II. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society and Mathematical Association of America.
• Council of Chief State School Initiatives (CCSSI). (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Council Chief State Officers. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
• Davis, B. & Simmt, E. (2006). Mathematics-for-teaching: An ongoing investigation of mathematics that teachers (need to) know. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(3), 293-319. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10649-006-2372-4.
• Evans, B. R. (2012). Editor’s perspective article: Problem-solving abilities and perceptions in alternative certification mathematics teachers. JNAAC, 7(2), 34-43.
• Evans, B. R. (2014). Editor’s perspective article: Mathematics and science teaching for new alternative certificate teachers. JNAAC, 9(2), 44-48.
• Fang, Q. (2012). A study on high school mathematics teachers’ mathematics professional literacy: What does high-quality mathematics teaching need? Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1), 136-158.
• Fuson, K. C. (1990). Conceptual structures for multiunit numbers: Implications for learning and teaching multidigit addition, subtraction, and place value. Cognition and Instruction, 7(4), 343-403. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0704_4.
• General Secretariat for Development Planning. (2008). Qatar National Vision 2030. Doha: GSDP.
• Hiebert, J., Carpenter, Fennema, E., Fuson, Wearne, Human, P. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
• Hill, H., & Ball, D. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330-351. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034819.
• Kaiser, G., Blömeke, S., König, J., Busse, A., Döhrmann, M., & Hoth, G. (2017). Professional competencies of (prospective) mathematics teachers—Cognitive versus situated approaches. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(2), 161-182. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10649-016-9713-8.
• Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99(5), 258-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17484.
• Mundry, S. (2005). What experience has taught us about professional development National Network of Eisenhower Regional Consortia and Clearinghouse Network? Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu. edu/view doc/download?doi=10.1.1.520.4079&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Highlights from TIMSS 2011. Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Highlights from TIMSS 2015. Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
• National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
• National Staff Development Council (1995). National staff development council’s standards for staff development. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
• Pisa (2012). The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/news/ data blog/2013/dec/03/Pisa-results-country-best-reading-maths-science.
• Polly, D. (2011). Examining teachers’ enactment of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in their mathematics teaching after technology integration professional development. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30(1), 37-59.
• Robinson, J., Shaver, P., & Wrightsman, L. (1991). Criteria for scale selection and evaluation in measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/ B978-0-12-590241-0.50005-8.
• Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104, 1525-1567. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/1467-9620.00212.
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1988). Problem-solving in context(s). In R. I. Charles, & E. A. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (Research Agenda for Mathematics Education, Vol. 3, pp. 82-92). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• SEC [Supreme Education Council] (2014). Education and training sector strategy 2011-2016: Executive summary. Doha: SEC Press.
• Shriki, A., & Levy, I. (2011). Perceptions of Israeli mathematics teachers regarding their professional development needs. Professional Development in Education, 38(3), 411-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 19415257.2011.626062.
• Shriki, A., & Patkin, D. (2016). Elementary school mathematics teachers’ perception of their professional needs. Teacher Development, 20(3), 329-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.115 5476.
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/ haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
• Shulman, L. S. (2015). PCK: Its genesis and exodus. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 13-23). New York: Routledge.
• Steele, M. D., & Rogers, K. C. (2012). Relationship between mathematical knowledge for teaching and teaching practice: The case of proof. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(2), 159-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9204-5.
• Superfine, A. C., & Li, W. (2014). Developing mathematical knowledge for teaching teachers development of teacher educators. Issues in Teacher Education, 23(1), 113-132.
• Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: An international review of the literature. UNESCO: International Institution for Educational Planning.
• Wood, Bower,., Brown, Skalicky, J., Donovan, Bloom, W. (2011). Professional development for teaching in higher education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 997-1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.608864.