THE DEVELOPMENT OF SPENCE AND ROBBINS WORKAHOLISM SCALE WITH ITS VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY MEASUREMENT

THE DEVELOPMENT OF SPENCE AND ROBBINS WORKAHOLISM SCALE WITH ITS VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY MEASUREMENT

Oates (1971) determined the first definition of workaholism as an excessive and uncontrollable need to work that permanently disturbs health, happiness and relationships. In this study, workaholism scale which was developed by Spence and Robbins and was widely used in workaholism research with its three dimensions: work involvement, feeling driven to work and work enjoyment will be assessed. So the purpose of the study is to determine the validity and reliability of workaholism scale in the conditions of our country from the perspectives of MBA Students of Yıldız Technical University (n=109) in İstanbul, Turkey. To determine the reliability and validity of the scale is important for Human Resources Managers as well as top managers in the organization since workaholism can be associated with such organizational outcomes as productivity, job satisfaction, absenteeism, organizational citizenship and organizational commitment. Also, through out this study, workaholism will be examined with their demographic characteristics

___

  • Aziz, Shahnaz and Jamie Cunningham (2008), “Workaholism, work stress, work-life imbalance: exploring gender’s role”, Gender in Management: An International Journal, Vol. 23 (8), 553-566.
  • Brady, Becca R., Stephen J. Vodanovich ve Robert Rotunda (2008), ‘‘The Impact of Workaholism on Work-Family Conflict, Job Satisfaction, and Perception of Leisure Activities’’, The Psychologist-Manager Journal, Vol.11, 241–263.
  • Burke, Ronald J. (2000), “Workaholism and Extra Work Satisfactions”, The International of
  • Organizational Analysis, Vol.7, 4, 352-364. Burke, Ronald J. (2001), “Predictors of Workaholism Components and Behaviors”, International
  • Journal of Stress Management, Vol. 8, 2, 113-127. Burke, Ronald J., Stig Berge Matthiesen and Stale Pallesen (2006), “Workaholism, organizational life and well-being of Norwegian nursing staff”, Career Development International, Vol. 11,5, –477.
  • Cecilie Schou Andreassen, Holger Ursin and Hege R. Eriksen (2007), "The relationship between strong motivation to work, ‘‘workaholism’’, and health” Psychology and Health, Vol.22, 615–629.
  • Chamberlin, Christine M. ve Naijian Zhang (2009), Workaholism, Health, and Self-Acceptance,
  • Journal of Counseling and Development, Vol.87, 2, 159-169. Douglas, Evan J.and Robyn J. Morris (2006), “Workaholic, or just hard worker?”, Career
  • Development International, Vol. 11,5, 394-417. Ersoy-Kart, Müge (2005), ‘‘Reliability and Validity of The Workaholism Battery (Work-Bat):
  • Turkish Form’’, Social Behavior and Personality, Vol.33 ,6, 609-618. Johnstone, Anna and Lucy Johnston (2005), “The Relationship between Organizational Climate,
  • Occupational Type and Workaholism”, New Zealand Journal of Psychology, Vol.34,3, 181-188. Kimberly S.Scott, Keirsten S. Moore and Marcia P. Micelli (1997), ‘‘An Exploration of the Meaning and Consequences of Workaholism’’, Human Relations, Vol.50,3, 287-314.
  • Liang, Ying-Wen and Chen-Ming Chu (2009), ‘‘Personality Traits and Personal and Organizational Inducements: Antecedents of Workaholism’’, Social, Behavior and Personality, Vol.37, 5, 645-660.
  • McMillan, Lynley H. W., Elizabeth C. Brady, Michael P. O'Driscoll ve Nigel V. Marsh (2002), “A multifaceted validation study of Spence and Robbins' (1992) Workaholism Battery”, Journal of
  • Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol.75, 357-368. Naktiyok, Atılhan and Canan Nur Karabey (2005), ‘‘İşkoliklik ve Tükenmişlik Sendromu’’,
  • Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 19,1,179-198. Ng, Thomas W. H., Kelly L. Sorensen and Daniel C. Feldman (2007), ‘‘Dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of workaholism: a conceptual integration and extension’’, Journal of
  • Organizational Behavior, Vol.28, 111–136. Porter, Gayle (2006), ‘‘Profiles of workaholism among high-tech managers’’, Career Development International, Vol. 11,5, 440-462.
  • Schaufeli, Wilmar B., Toon W. Taris and Willem van Rhenen. (2008), Workaholism, ‘‘Burnout, and Work Engagement: Three of a Kind or Three Different Kinds of Employee Well-being?’’,
  • Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol.57,2, 173–203. Snir, Raphael and Itzhak Harpaz (2006), ‘The workaholism phenomenon: a cross-national perspective’’, Career Development International, Vol. 11,5, 374-393.
  • Spence, Janet T. and Ann S. Robbins (1992), ‘‘Workaholism: Definition, Measurement and Preliminary Results’’, Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 58,1,160-178.