An Education Faculty Example in the Evaluation of the Distance Education Process: SWOT Analysis

This study aims to examine the perspectives of the Faculty of Education Academicians towards distance education with the help of SWOT analysis. The study was designed with the case study method, one of the qualitative research methods. The research group consists of 30 academicians working in different fields at the Faculty of Education of a state University located in the north of Turkey. A Personal information form and a semi-structured interview form developed by the researchers were used as data collection tools in the study. Descriptive and content analysis techniques were used in data analysis. Within the scope of the validity and reliability studies of the research, direct excerpts and participant confirmation were performed. According to the results of the research, we report that academicians focus on digital literacy, access-preparation of online content suitable for learning goals/courses, communication-interaction, assessment-evaluation, and distance education system during the transition to distance education during the pandemic period. According to the findings, a distance education transformation model was proposed for education faculties and suggestions were presented in this direction

An Education Faculty Example in the Evaluation of the Distance Education Process: SWOT Analysis

This study aims to examine the perspectives of the Faculty of Education Academicians towards distance education with the help of SWOT analysis. The study was designed with the case study method, one of the qualitative research methods. The research group consists of 30 academicians working in different fields at the Faculty of Education of a state University located in the north of Turkey. A Personal information form and a semi-structured interview form developed by the researchers were used as data collection tools in the study. Descriptive and content analysis techniques were used in data analysis. Within the scope of the validity and reliability studies of the research, direct excerpts and participant confirmation were performed. According to the results of the research, we report that academicians focus on digital literacy, access-preparation of online content suitable for learning goals/courses, communication-interaction, assessment-evaluation, and distance education system during the transition to distance education during the pandemic period. According to the findings, a distance education transformation model was proposed for education faculties and suggestions were presented in this direction

___

  • Aksoy, M. U., Aksu, S. P., Sözbir, Ş. Y., & Erenel, A. Ş. (2022). The effectiveness of the using scenario and video in distance nursing education during Covid-19 pandemic. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 18, 24-29.
  • Anderson, T., & Dron, T. (2011).Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 81-97.
  • Avallone, A. (2020). Practicioner's Guide to Next Gen Learning. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenlearning.org/articles/supporting-our-learning-communities-in-a-time-of-crisis Barış, M. F., & Çankaya, P. (2016). Opinions of academic staff about distance education. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 399-413.
  • Bayrak, H. U., & Önal, N. T. (2021). SWOT analysis of distance education based on preschool teacher candidates. Culture, 6(12), 189-234.
  • Bilgiç, H. G., & Tüzün, H. (2015). Yükseköğretim kurumları web tabanlı uzaktan eğitim programlarında yaşanan sorunlar [Problems experienced with web-based distance education programs in higher education institutions]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(3), 26-50.
  • Bozkurt, A. (2020). Educational technology research patterns in the realm of the digital knowledge Age. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 18 (1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.570
  • Bozok, Ö. (2019). Teknik bilimler meslek yüksekokullarında İngilizce dersine yönelik swot analizi [A swot analysis of English course in technical vocational colleges] (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Chang, N. C. & Chen, H. H. (2015). A motivational analysis of the ARCS model for information literacy courses in a blended learning environment. Libri, 65(2), 129-142.
  • Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
  • Çakır, Ö., Calp, M. H., & Doğan, A. (2015). Uzaktan eğitimde içerik geliştirme süreci: Gazi Üniversitesi bilişim enstitüsü örneği [Content development process in distance education: example of Gazi University institute of information]. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 4(1), 1-20.
  • Erfidan, A. (2019). Derslerin uzaktan eğitim yoluyla verilmesiyle ilgili öğretim elemanı ve öğrenci görüşleri: Balıkesir Üniversitesi örneği [Perspectives of lecturers and undergraduate students on university distance education courses: the case of Balıkesir university] (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Balıkesir.
  • Gökmenoğlu, T. & Eret, E. (2011). Eğitim programları ve öğretim anabilim dalı araştırma görevlilerinin bakış açısıyla Türkiye’de program geliştirme [Curriculum development in Türkiye from the viewpoints of research assistants of curriculum and instruction department]. İlköğretim Online, 10(2), 667-681. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ilkonline/issu e/8592/106829
  • Gürel, E., & Tat, M. (2017). Swot analysis: a theoretical review. The Journal of International Social Research, 10(51), 994-1006.
  • Hsu, J., Hamilton, K., & Wang, J. (2015). Guided independent learning: A teaching and learning approach for adult learners. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 17(1), 111-133.
  • Kaçan, A., & Gelen, İ. (2020). Türkiye’deki uzaktan eğitim programlarına bir bakış [An overview of the distance education program in Türkiye] Uluslararası Eğitim Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 6(1), 1-21.
  • Karakuş, N., Ucuzsatar, N., Karacaoğlu, M. Ö., Esendemir, N. & Bayraktar, D. (2020). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının uzaktan eğitime yönelik görüşleri [Turkish teacher candidates’ views on distance education]. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 19, 220-241. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.752297
  • Koloğlu, T. F. (2016). Öğretim elemanlarının uzaktan eğitime bakış açıları ve hazırbulunuşlukları: Ordu üniversitesi örneği [The viewpoints and readiness of academicians to the distance education: the case of Ordu University] (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Ordu Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ordu.
  • Lee, J. E., & Recker, M. (2021). The effects of instructors' use of online discussions strategies on student participation and performance in university online introductory mathematics courses. Computers & Education, 162, 104084.
  • Makhakhane, B., Wilkinson, A. C., & Ndeya-Ndereya, C. N. (2016). Compiling an evidence-based improvement plan for the support of distance-education students at a southern African university. Africa Education Review, 13(1), 20-36.
  • MoNE (2013). Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı 2015-2019 stratejik plan hazırlık programı. [Ministry of National Education 2015-2019 strategic plan preparation program]. Retrieved from https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2013_09/20035209_meb_20152019_stratejik_plan_hazirlik_programi.pdf
  • Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M., (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Namugenyi, C., Nimmagadda, S. L., & Reiners, T. (2019). Design of a Swot analysis model and its evaluation in diverse digital business ecosystem contexts. Procedia Computer Science, 159, 1145-1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.283
  • Özköse, H., Arı, S., & Çakır, Ö. (2013). Uzaktan eğitim süreci için swot analizi [A Swot analysis of distance education process]. Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, 5 (41).
  • Peters, O. (2000). Digital learning environments: New possibilities and opportunities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 1(1), 1-19.
  • Regueras, L. M., Verdu, E., Munoz, M. F., Perez, M. A., De Castro, J. P., & Verdu, M. J. (2009). Effects of competitive e-learning tools on higher education students: A case study. IEEE Transactions on Education, 52(2), 279-285.
  • Spatioti, A. G., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2022). A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education. Information, 13(9), 402.
  • Swazey, J. P., Anderson, M. S., Lewis, K. S., & Louis, K. S. (1993). Ethical problems in academic research. American Scientist, 81(6), 542-553.
  • Şenkal, O. & Dinçer, S. (2012). Geleneksel sınıfların uzaktan eğitim platformuna dönüştürülmesi: Bir model çalışması [Transforming traditional classes into e-learning platforms: A model study] Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 5(1), 13-18. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pu b/gazibtd/issue/6624/87968
  • Leiber, T., Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. C. (2018) Bridging theory and practice of impact evaluation of quality management in higher education institutions: a SWOT analysis. European Journal of Higher Education, 8(3), 351-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2018.1474782
  • Tibingana-Ahimbisibwe, B., Willis, S., Catherall, S., Butler, F., & Harrison, R. (2022). A systematic review of peer-assisted learning in fully online higher education distance learning programmes. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 37(3), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1758651
  • Uçar, H. & Kumtepe, A. T. (2016). Uzaktan eğitimde ARCS-V motivasyon tasarımı modelinin kullanımı [Use of ARCS-V motivational design model in distance education] Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(4), 37-54. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/auad/issue/34066/377065
  • Ustabulut, M. Y. (2021). SWOT analysis for the distance education process of lecturers teaching Turkish as a foreign language. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 16(1), 139-152.
  • Ülgen, H., & Mirze, S. K. (2014). İşletmelerde stratejik yönetim [Strategic management in business], (7. Baskı). Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş., İstanbul.
  • Vindača, O., Ļubkina, V., Abuže, A., & Ušča, S. (2021). Life with covid-19: Swot analyses for transformative digital learning in educators’ perspective. Society, I tegration, Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 249-259. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol5.6199
  • Yelken, T. Y., Kılıç, F., & Özdemir, C. (2012). The Strategic Planning (SWOT) analysis outcomes and suggestions according to the students and the lecturers within the distance education system. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 267-276.
  • Yeşiltaş, H. M., Çelikoğlu, M., Dağdalan, G., Aydın, G., & Çetinkaya, M. (2023). Akademisyenlerin dijital okuryazarlık hakkındaki görüşlerinin incelenmesi [Research on academician’s opinions on digital literacy]. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), s.-(In publishing process). Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Ankara: Seçkin Pub..
  • Zhu, C., & Mugenyi, K., J. (2015): A Swot analysis of the integration of e-learning at a university in Uganda and a university in Tanzania. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 24(5), 585-603. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2015.1093537
  • Zorlu, F. (2020). İşbirlikli öğrenme modelinin uzaktan eğitim ortamlarında uygulanmasına yönelik fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının görüş ve önerilerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the pre-service science teachers’ views and suggestions on the application of the cooperative learning model in distance education environments]. Uluslararası Sosyal ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(14), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.20860/ijoses.835074