İNTERNETİN GETİRDİĞİ BİR KOMPLİKASYON SİBER ZORBALIK: HEMŞİRELİK GRUBU ÖRNEĞİ

Bu araştırmanın amacı hemşirelik öğrencilerinde siber zorbalık, siber mağduriyet, siber zorbalığa ilişkin duyarlılık ve bunları etkileyen değişkenleri saptamaktır. Örneklemi, Türkiye’deki bir üniversitenin hemşirelik bölümünde eğitim alan ve çalışmaya katılmayı gönüllü olarak kabul eden toplam 254 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Araştırma tanımlayıcı kesitsel araştırma desenine uygun olarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler tanıtıcı özellikler formu, Siber Zorbalık ve Mağduriyet Ölçeği (SZÖ ve SMÖ), Siber Zorbalık Envanteri (SZE-SZÖ ve SZE-SMÖ) ve Siber Duyarlılık Ölçeği (SDÖ) ile toplanmıştır. Örneklemin %18,5’i siber zorbalığa maruz kaldığını; %11’si ise siber zorbalık uyguladığını belirtmiştir. Erkek öğrencilerin hem siber zorba hem de siber mağdur olma riskinin kız öğrencilere göre daha yüksek olduğu regresyon analizi ile saptanmıştır. Siber mağduriyet ve mağduriyet sayısının, siber zorbalık değişkenini olumlu yönde anlamlı bir şekilde yordadığı saptanmıştır. Erkek olmak siber zorbalık ve mağduriyeti arttırırken, internette daha çok zaman geçiren ve sosyal medya, oyun ve sohbet sitelerini daha sık ziyaret eden öğrencilerin siber zorbalık yapma durumlarının daha fazla olduğu görülmüştür. Siber zorbalık davranışının oluşmasında, siber mağduriyet ve mağduriyet sayısının payı bulunmaktadır. Kız öğrencilerin ve siber zorbalık uygulamadığını belirtenlerin siber duyarlılıkları daha fazladır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Siber, zorbalık, siber mağdur olma, duyarlılık, internet, Cyber, bullying, being a victim, sensitivity

CYBERBULLYING, A COMPLICATION BROUGHT ON BY THE INTERNET: THE CASE OF A NURSING GROUP

Aim of this study was to determine cyberbullying, being a cyber victim, sensitivity to cyberbullying and the variables that affect them. Study sample consisted of 254 students who were studied in Nursing Department of a university in Turkey in 2018-2019 academic year and voluntarily accepted to participate to research. Descriptive and cross-sectional research design were used. Data were collected using descriptive information form, Cyberbullying and Victim Scale, Cyberbullying Inventory and Cyberbullying Sensitivity Scale. It was determined that 18.5% of sample had been subjected to and that 11% had committed cyberbullying. Regression analysis revealed that male students had a higher risk for being both perpetrators of cyberbullying and cyber victims than female students. Being a cyber victim and the frequency of being a victim positively and significantly predicted cyberbullying variable. While being a male increased risk of committing to cyberbullying and being a victim, it was found that students who spent more time on Internet and visited social media, game, and chat sites more often committed cyberbullying more. Being a cyber victim and its frequency had a share in the development of cyberbullying behaviors. Cyber sensitivity of female students and those who stated that they did not commit cyberbullying was higher.

Keywords:

Cyber, bullying, being a victim, sensitivity,

PDF

___

1. Deschamps, R., Mcnutt, K. Cyberbullying: What’s the problem? Canadian Public Administration. 2016; 59(1): 45-71.
2. Korkmaz, A. Cyber bullying: New violence from physical to virtual. Online Journal of the Faculty of Communication Sciences. 2016; 24(2): 74-85.
3. Bauman, S, Bellmore, A. New Directions in Cyberbullying Research. Journal of School Violence. 2015; 1: 1-10.
4. Smith, P.K. The nature of cyberbullying and what we can do about it.” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 2015; 15(3): 176-184.
5. Olweus, D. Cyber Bullying: A Critical Overview. Bushman, B.J. Aggression and Violence A Social Psychological Perspective. A Psychology Press Book. New York. 2017.
6. Raskauskas, J., Huynh, A. The process of coping with cyberbullying: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behaviour. 2015; 23: 118-125.
7. Basturk Akca, E, Sayımer, I. Cyberbullying, It’s Types And Related Factors: An Evaluation Through The Existing Studies.” Online Academic Journal of Information Technology. 2017; 8(30): 1-20.
8. Watts, L.K., Wagner, J., Velasques, B., Behrens, P.I. Cyberbullying in higher education: A literatur review. Computers in Human Behaviour 2017; 69: 268-274.
9. Legaree, B. A. Considering the changing face of social media in higher education.” FEMS Microbiology Letters 2015; 362(16): 1–3.
10. Eleuteri, S., Saladino, V., Verrastro, V. Identity, relationships, sexuality and risky behaviors of adolescents in the context of social media. Sexual and Relationship Therapy 2017; 32(3): 354–365.
11. Whittaker, E., Kowalski, R.M. Cyberbullying Via Social Media. Journal of School Violence 2015; 14: 11–29.
12. Tuncer, M., Dikmen, M. The New Threat Lying on Social Networks: Cyberbullying. 4. International Instructional Technologies and Teacher Education Symposium. 2016: 94-103.
13. Seren Dinc, E. Cyber bullying in social media platforms: Examinatıon of cyberbullying experiences among high school students. e-Journal of New Media 2020; 4(1): 24-39.
14. Eroglu, Y., Aktepe, E., Akbaba, S., Isık, A., Ozkorumak, E. Investigation of the Prevalence of Cyber Bullying and Victimization and Risk Factors. Education and Science 2015; 40(177): 93-107.
15. Larranaga, E, Yubero, S, Navarro, R, Ovejero, A. From traditional bullying to cyberbullying: cybervictimization among higher education students. Cassidy W, Faucher C, Jackson M. Cyberbullying at university in international contexts. New York. 2019.
16. Wozencroft, K, Campbell, M, Orel, A, Kimpton, M, Leong, E. University students’ intentions to report cyberbullying. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology. 2015; 15: 1-12.
17. Khine, A.T., Saw, Y.M., Htut, Z.Y., Khaing, C.T., Soe, H.Z., Swe, K.K. ve ark. Assessing risk factors and impact of cyberbullying victimization among university students in Myanmar: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2020; 15(1): 1-16.
18. Deep R., Suman, Tyagi N., Dahiya J. Prevalence of Different forms of Cyber bullying and Its Association with Socio-Demographic Variables among 1st Year Nursing Students. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences. 2022; 4: 480-485.
19. Deep R., Suman, Ahlawat P., Singh A., Duggal R. Social Media Usage Habits and Cyberbullying. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences. 2022; 4: 486-492.
20. Silva M.P.L., Matos B.D.S., Ezequiel O.S., Lucchetti A.L.G., Lucchetti G. The use of smartphones in different phases of medical school and its relationship to ınternet addiction and learning approaches. J Med Syst. 2018;42(6):106.
21. Bharati M, Dhakal Chalise G, Bhandari S, Gautam P., Ambu K.C., Regmi K., Adhikari B. Cyberbullying Experience of Cyber bullying among Nursing Students. Journal of Karnali Academy of Health Sciences. 2021; 4(1)
22. Eroglu, Y., Peker, A. The investigation of peer relationships and cyber bullying status in adolescents. International Periodical for the Languages. Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic 2015; 10(11): 593-606.
23. Fırat, M., Ayran, G. Cyberbullying among college students. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin 2016; 15(4): 322-329.
24. Cetin, B, Yaman, E, Peker, A. Cyber victim and bullying scale: A study of validity and reliability. Computers and Education. 2011; 57(4): 2261-2271.
25. Tanrıkulu, T, Kınay, H, Arıcak, O.T. Cyberbullying sensibility scale: Validity and reliability study. Trakya University Journal of Education. 2013; 3(1): 38-47.
26. Topcu, C., Erdur-Baker, O. The revised cyber bullying inventory (RCBI): Validity and reliability studies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010; 5: 660-664.
27. Tanrıkulu, I. The relationships between cyber bullying perpetration motives and personalty traits: Testing uses and gratificatıons theory, Unpublished doctoral thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, 2015.
28. Brown, C. F., Demaray, M. K. and Secord, S. M. Cyber victimization in middle school and relations to social emotional outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014; 35: 12–21.
29. Aboujaoude, E., Savage, M. W., Starcevic, V., and Salame, W. O. Cyberbullying Review of an old problem gone viral. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2015; 57(1): 10–18.
30. Del Rey, R., Lazuras, L., Casas, J. A., Barkoukis, V., Ortega-Ruiz, R., and Tsorbatzoudis, H. Does empathy predict (cyber) bullying perpetration, and how do age, gender and nationality affect this relationship? Learning and Individual Differences. 2015; 45: 275–281.
31. Balaban, J., Ergun Basak, B., Akca Basturk, E. Cyberbullying among Middle School Students in Turkey. Anadolu Journal of Educational Science International. 2015; 5 (2): 109-130.
32. Dursun S., Gokce A., Aytac, S. Cyber bullying: A research on university students. International Journal of Social Inquiry 2020; 13(2): 465-485.
33. Callaghan, M, Kelly, C, Molcho, M. Exploring traditional and cyberbullying among Irish adolescents. International Journal of Public Health. 2015; 60(2): 199-206.
34. Dalmac Polat, Z., Bayraktar, S. Cyber bullying and cyber victimization in adolescents. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities. 2016: 115-132.
35. Tastekin, E., Bayhan, P. Examination of cyber bullying and victimization among adolescents. Online Journal of Technology Addiction and Cyberbullying. 2018; 5(2): 21-45.
36. Baldry, A. C., Farrington, D. P., and Sorrentino, A. Cyberbullying in youth: A pattern of disruptive behaviour. Psicologia Educativa. 2016; 22(1): 19–26.
37. Gungor, B., Tingis, E., Sarol, B. Investigation of Cyber Bullying Levels of Social Studies Teacher Candidates. Journal of Innovative Research in Social Studies. 2020; 3(2): 147-160.
38. Semerci, A. Examination of High School Students’ Cyberbullying and victimization cases in terms of different variables. Kastamonu Education Journal. 2017; 25(4): 1285-1300.
39. Unver, H., Koc Z. Examining the relationship between cyber bullying and problematic internet use and risky ınternet behavior. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences 2017; 15(2): 117-140.
40. Serin, H. Cyber bullying/ cyber victimization experiences of adolescents and the awareness levels of teachers and education managers about the behaviours of the adolescents on the related topic, PhD Thesis, Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences Department of Educational Sciences, Istanbul. 2012.
41. Summak, M.E., A research on relationship between cyber victimization experience on social netwoks and social anxiety. International Journal of Euroasian Research. 2019; 7(16): 851-869.
42. Kucukkaya, B., Kahyaoglu, Sut, H., Aslan, F. The relationship between the aims of use of social network sites with cyberbullying and cyber victimization in nursing students. Online Journal of Technology Addiction and Cyberbullying. 2019; 6(1): 31-53.
43. Bayram, F., Ozkamalı, E. Investigation of cyber bullying and cyber victimization of high school students. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education 2019; 20(1): 303-318.
44. Wong, R. Y., Cheung, C. M., Xiao, B. Does gender matter in cyberbullying perpetration? An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior. 2018; 79: 247-257.
45. Lee, C., Shinn, N. Prevalence of cyberbullying and predictors of cyberbullying perpetration among Korean adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017; 68: 352-358.
46. Altan, T., Eldeleklioglu, J. Cyber-Victimization and emotional intelligence as the predictor of cyberbullying in high school students. Elementary Education Online 2019; 18 (4): 2147-2156.