Rönesans’tan 19. yüzyıla avrupa tarihyazımında ilerleme fikri, dönemselleştirme ve orta çağ avrupa tarihi algısı

Orta Çağ Avrupa tarihi bir tarihsel araştırma nesnesi olarak günümüz Avrupa tarihçisinin gözünde ya da modern Avrupalı sıradan bir insanın zihin dünyasında, Rönesans döneminden beri sürekli vurgulanarak geliştirilen klasik Avrupa tarihi dönemselleştirmesi algısının kurbanı olmuştur. Bu yazının temel iddiası, Orta Çağ Avrupa tarihine ilişkin düşünsel ve felsefi gerilimin,Avrupamerkezci Orta Çağ Avrupa tarihi algısını beslemiş olduğudur. Orta Çağ Avrupa tarihi, bir taraftan politik parçalanmışlığı ve dinsel otoritenin toplumsal yaşamı kuşatarak biçimlendirmesi ve özgür düşüncenin yeşermesini geciktirmesi gibi nedenler ileri sürülerek tarihsel ilerleme şeması ve teleoloji kavramsallaştırması içinde eleştiri nesnesi olarak görülmüştür. Diğer taraftan ise modern Avrupa tarihi yazımında modern ulus-devlete ulaşan gelişim çizgisi içinde, kilisenin merkezî otoritesine karşı daha bireyselci ve komünel dinsel yapılanmaların ortaya çıkması ve seküler bir toplumsal yaşamın zeminini hazırlaması, ulusal kültürlerin filizlenmesi için gerekli olan halk kültürünün şekillenmesi, kilise hukukunun karşısında örfi hukukun güçlü bir gelenek oluşturması gibi kimi özellikleriyle de olumlanmıştır. Böylece hem olumsuzlama hem de olumlama Orta Çağ tarihini ve modern Orta Çağ tarihçiliğini, Avrupamerkezci tarihyazımının bir parçası hâline getirmiştir..

The idea of the progress, periodisation and the perception of medieval european history from the renaissance to the 19th century in european historiography

As an object of historical research, Medieval European history has become a victim of classic European historiographical periodization, which has settled in the minds of Europeans since the Renaissance. This article argues that intellectual and philosophical tensions inherent in the perception of Medieval European history have imposed a Eurocentric view on the European Middle Ages. On the one hand, according to the essential postulates of the modern progressive and teleological historical understanding, the European Middle Ages have been sharply criticised by scholars and intellectuals for a number of reasons, such as political fragmentation, predominance of religious authority over social life, and delay in the germination of free thought. On the other hand, this period has been paradoxically affirmed due to the factors like the emergence of relatively more individualistic and communal religious practices against the spiritual authority of the Church, and the shaping of folk culture, which provided a basis for national cultures. Thus both criticism and affirmation have made Medieval European history and its modern historical scholarship a part of Eurocentric historiography.

___

  • Bentley, M. (1999). Modern historiography: An introduction. New York: Routledge.
  • Bentley, M. (2006). Modernizing England’s past: English historiography in the age of modernism 1870-1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Breisach, E. (2007). Historiography: Ancient, medieval and modern (the third edition). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Butterfield, H. (1931). The whig interpretation of history. London: G. Bell & Sons.
  • Carhart, M. C. (2007). The science of culture in enlightenment Germany. London: Harvard University Press.
  • Condorcet, M. (1795). Outlines of an historical view of the progress of human kind. London.
  • Crowder, G. (2004). Isaiah Berlin: Liberty, pluralism and liberalism. Cambridge: The Polity Press.
  • Ginzburg, C. (1999). History, rhetoric and proof. Hanover: Brandeis University Press.
  • Greenfield, C.C. (1981). Humanist and scholastic poetics, 1250-1500. Toronto: Associated University Press.
  • Grummitt, D. (2013). A short history of the wars of the roses. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Iggers, G. (1984). New directions in European historiography. The Revised Edition. Hanover: University Press of New England.
  • Kelley, D. R. (1970). Foundations of modern historical scholarship: Language, law and history in the French renaissance. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Knowles, M. D. (1961). Great historical enterprises, IV. In The roll series. TRHS fifth series 11 (pp. 137-159). London
  • Kudrycz, W. (2011). The historical present: Medievalism and modernity. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
  • Lesaffer, R. (2009). European legal history: A cultural and political perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Matthews, D. (2013). Periodisation. In M. Turner (Ed.), A handbook of middle English studies (pp. 253- 266) Oxford: Wiley, & Blackwell.
  • Mellon, S. (1958). The political uses of history: A study of historians in the French restoration. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Monastra, G. (2003). Foreward. In M. M. Zarandi (Ed.), Science and the myth of progress (pp. ix-xv). Bloomington: World Wisdom Inc.
  • Nauert, C. G. (2006). Humanism and the culture of Renaissance Europe (the second ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nisbet, R. A. (2009). History of the idea of progress (the fourth publishing). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
  • Okie, L. (1991). Augustan historical writing: Histories of England in the English enlightenment. Lanham: University Press of America.
  • Outram, D. (2005). The enlightenment (the second ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Perry, M. (2013). Western civilisation: A brief history to 1789 (Vol. I) (the tenth ed.). Boston: Wadsworth.
  • Plant, R. (2004). European political thought in the nineteenth century. In G. F. Gaus, & C. Kukathas (Ed.), Handbook of political theory (pp.380-394). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Reuter, T. (1992). Medieval ideas of Europe and their modern historians. History Workshop Journal, 33, 176-180.
  • Reuter, T. (2006). Medieval: Another Tyrannous Construct. In Medieval polities and moden mentalities (pp. 19-37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rummel, E. (2004). Desiderius Erasmus. London: Continuum.
  • Smith, A. (1978). Lectures on Jurisprudence R. L. Meek, D. D. Raphael, & P. G. Stein (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sreedharan, E. (2004). A textbook of historiography 500 BC to AD 2000. New Delhi: Orient Longman Private Limited.
  • Stubbs, W. (1870). Select charters of English constitutional history. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Sunar, L. (2012). Marx ve Weber’de Doğu toplumları. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  • Wickham, C. (1994). Making Europes. New Left Review, 208, 133-143.
  • Woodfield, A. (1976) Teleology. First Paperback Printing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.