___

• Abrams, P. (1994). Historical sociology. Cornell University Press.
• AHR Forum. (1999). Bringing regionalism back to history. American Historical Review, 104(4), 1156-1239.
• Bachmann-Medick, D. (1997). Übersetzung als Repräsentation fremder Kulturen. Verlag Schmidt.
• Baldwin, P. (2009). The narcissism of minor differences: How America and Europe are alike. Oxford University Press.
• Barraclough, G. (1978). Main trends in history. Holmes-Meier.
• Bender, T. (2002). Rethinking American history in a global age. University of California Press.
• Berg, E. ve Fuchs, M. (1999). Kultur, soziale Praxis, Text. Die Krise der ethnographischen Repräsentation. Suhrkamp.
• Berger, S. (2003). Comparative history. S. Berger, H. Feldner ve K. Passmore (Ed.). Writing history. Theory and practice içinde (ss. 161-179). Bloombsbury Academic.
• Berr, H. (1911). La synthèse en histoire: Essai critique et théorique. F. Alcan.
• Black, C. E. (1966). The dynamics of modernization: a study in comparative history. Harper and Row.
• Bloch, M. (1928). Pour une histoire comparée des sociétés européennes. Revue de synthèse Historique, 46, 15-50 (makalenin dipnotsuz İngilizce tercümesi için bkz. Toward a comparative history of European societies. Fredric C. L. ve Jelle C. R. (Ed.). Enterprise and Secular Change. Homewood, 1953, ss. 494-521).
• Bloch, M. (2007). Avrupa toplumlarının karşılaştırmalı tarihi için. A. Boratav (Haz.). Tarih ve tarihçi: Annales okulu izinde içinde (ss. 20-49). Kırmızı Yayınları.
• Bod, R. (2013). A new history of the humanities. The search for principles and patterns from antiquity to present. Oxford University Press.
• Bonnell, V. E. (1980). The uses of theory, concepts and comparison in historical sociology. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22(2), 156-173. Braembussche, A. A. van den (1989). Historical explanation and comparative method: Towards a theory of the history of society. History and Theory, 28, 1-24.
• Brentano, L. (1874). Die englische Charistenbewegung. Preußische Jahrbücher, 33, 431-447.
• Breuilly, J. (1992). Labour and liberalism in nineteenth-century Europe: Essays in comparative history. Manchester University Press.
• Budde, G., Conrad, S. ve Janz, O. (2006). Transnationale Geschichte: Themen, Tendenzen und Theorien. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
• Burke, P. (2005). History and social theory. Wiley.
• Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press.
• Cohen, D. (2004). Comparative history: Buyer beware. D. Cohen ve M. O’Connor(Ed.). Comparison and history: Europe in cross-national perspective içinde (ss. 57-70). Routledge.
• Cohen, D. ve O’Connor, M. (2004). Comparison and history: Europe in cross-national perspective. Routledge.
• Conrad, C. (2008). Vergleich und Transnationalitaet in der Geschichte. A. Wirsching (Ed.). Oldenburg Geschichte Lehrbuch Neuste Zeit içinde (ss. 317-322). De Gruyter Oldenburg.
• Conrad, S. (2000). What time is Japan? Problems of comparative (intercultural) historiography. History and Theory, 38(1), 67-83.
• Conrad, S. (2009). Double marginalization: A plea for a transnational perspective on German history. H. G.
• Haupt ve J. Kocka (Ed.). Comparative and transnational history: Central European approaches and new perspectives içinde (ss. 52-76). Berghahn.
• Daum, W. (1998). Fallobst oder Steinschlag: Einleitende Überlegungen zum historischen Vergleich. H. Schnabel-Schüle (Ed.). Vergleichende Perspektiven-Perspektiven des Vergleichs: Studien zur europäischen Geschichte von der Spätantike bis ins 20. Jahrhundert içinde (ss. 1-21). Kliomedia.
• Davillé, L. (1913). La comparaison et la méthode comparative, en particulier dans les études historiques. Revue de Synthèse Historique, 1, 4-33, 217-257.
• Davillé, L. (1914). La comparaison et la méthode comparative, en particulier dans les études historiques. Revue de Synthèse Historique, 2, 201-229.
• Detienne, M. (2000). Comparer l’incomparable. Seuil.
• Divitçioğlu, S. (1967). Asya üretim tarzı ve Osmanlı toplumu: Marksist üretim tarzı kavramı. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Durkheim, É. (1895). Les règles de la méthode sociologique. Félix Alcan.
• Eck, A. (1936). La société Jean Bodin pour l’histoire comparative des institutions. Recueils de la Société Jean Bodin, 1, 7-9.
• Elliott, J. H. (1991). National and comparative history. Oxford University Press.
• Elliott, J. H. (1995). Comparative history. C. B. Guimerans (Ed.). Historia a Debate. Actas del Congreso Internacional. 7-11.07.1993. Satiago de Compestola içinde (3, ss. 9-19). Historia a Debate.
• Eisenberg, C. (1989). The comparative view of labour history: Old and new interpretations of the English and German labour movements before 1914. International Review of Social History, 34, 403-432.
• Erdoğdu, A. T. (2005). Osmanlı Dahiliye Nezareti teşkilat tarihi (1836-1922) [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
• Erdoğdu, A. T. (2016). Kavram ve kavramsallaştırmada üç iddia: Eşanlamlılığın imkansızlığı, çevrilemezlik ve kavramsal dakiklik. K. B. Tirkayi ve L. Sunar (Ed.). Kavram geliştirme. Sosyal bilimlerde yeni imkanlar içinde (ss. 49-104). Nobel Yayınları.
• Erdoğdu, A. T. (2021). Doğa bilim dalları ve tarih. M. Y. Ertaş (Ed.). Tarih ve disiplinler içinde (ss. 18-48). Kronik Yayınları.
• Ergut, F. (2001-2002). Sosyal bilimlerde tartışma ortamının kurgulanması ve tarihsel sosyolojinin imkânları. Toplum ve Bilim, 91, 213-228.
• Ergut, F. ve Uysal, A. (2007). Tarihsel sosyoloji: Stratejiler, sorunsallar, paradigmalar. Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.
• Espagne, M. ve Werner, M. (1987). La construction d’une référence culturelle allemande en France, genèse et histoire. Annales Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations, 42(4), 969-992.
• Espagne, M. (1994). Sur les limites du comparatisme en histoire culturelle. Genèses, 17, 112-121.
• Espagne, M. (1999). Les transferts culturels franco-allemands. PUF.
• Fabian, J. (1983). Time and the other: How anthropology makes its object. Columbia University Press.
• Fischer, D. H. (1970). Historians’ fallacies. Toward a logic of historical thought. Harper and Row.
• Fleischer, C., Kafadar, C. ve Subrahmanyam, S. (2020). How to write fake global history. Cromohs. E. Binbaş ve T. Şen (Çev.). https://t24.com.tr/k24/yazi/uydurma-kuresel-tarih-nasil-yazilir,2860 adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Frederickson, G. (1980). Comparative history. M. Kammen (Ed.). The past before us: Contemporary historical writings in the United States içinde (ss. 457-473). Cornell University Press.
• Geary, P. (2001). Vergleichende Geschichte und sozialwissenschaftliche Theorie. M. Borgolte ve R. Lusiardi (Ed.). Das europäische Mittelalter im Spannungsbogen des Vergleichs: Zwanzig internationale Beiträge zu Praxis, Problemen und Perspektiven der historischen Komparatistik içinde (ss. 29-38). De Gruyter.
• Glotz, G. (1907). Réflexions sur le but et la méthode de l’histoire. Revue Internationale de L’enseignement, 54, 481-495.
• Granger, F. (1911). Historical sociology. Methuen & Co.
• Green, N. (1994). The comparative method and poststructural structuralism. New perspectives for migration studies. Journal of American Ethnic History, 13(4), 3-22.
• Green, N. (2002). Religion et ethnicité. De la comparaison spatiale et temporelle. Annales Histoire Science Sociale, 1, 127-144.
• Green, N. (2004). Forms of comparison. D. Cohen ve M. O’Connor (Ed.). Comparison and history: Europe in cross-national perspective içinde (ss. 41-56). Routledge.
• Grew, R. (1985). The comparative weakness of American history. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 16, 87-101.
• Grew, R. (1990). On the current state of the comparative studies. H. Atsma ve A. Burgière (Ed.). Marc Bloch aujourd’hui: Histoire comparée et sciences sociales içinde (ss. 322-334). Éditions de l’EHESS.
• Hampl, F. ve Weiler, I. (1978). Vergleichende Geschichtswissenschaft: Methode, Ertrag und ihr Beitrag zur Universalgeschichte. Darmstadt Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
• Hampsher-Monk, I., Tilmans, K. ve Vree, F. van. (1998). History of concepts: comparative perspectives. Amsterdam University Press.
• Haupt, H. G. (2001). Comparative history. N. J. Smelser ve P. B. Baltes (Ed.). International encylopedia of the social and behavioral sciences içinde (4, ss. 2397-2403). Elsevier.
• Haupt, H. G. (2006). Historische Komparatistik in der internationalen Geschichtsschreibung. G. Budde, S. Conrad ve O. Janz (Ed.). Transnationale Geschichte: Themen, Tendenzen und Theorien içinde (ss. 137-149). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
• Haupt, H. G. ve Kocka, J. (1996). Geschichte und Vergleich. Ansätze und Ergebnisse international vergleichender Geschichtsschreibung. Campus Verlag.
• Hayes, C. J. H. (1945-1946). The American frontier-Frontier of what? American Historical Review, 51(2), 199-216.
• Heidenheimer, A. J. (1973). The politics of public education, health and welfare in the USA and Western Europe: How growth and reform potentials have differed. British Journal of Political Science, 3, 315-340.
• Hempel, C. G. (1942). The function of general laws in history. Journal of Philosophy, 39(2), 35-48.
• Hintze, O. (1962-1967). Staat und Verfassung. Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur allgemeinen Verfassungsgeschichte. G. Oestreich (Ed.). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
• Hirschhausen, U. von ve Leonhard, J. (2001). Europaeischer Nationalismus im West-Ost-Vergleich: Von der Typologie zur Differenzbestimmung. U. von Hirschhausen ve J. Leonhard (Ed.). Nationalismus in Europa. West- und Osteuropa im Vergleich içinde (ss. 11-45). Wallstein Verlag.
• Hoerder, D. (2009). Losing national identity or gaining transcultural competence: Changing approaches in migration history. H. G. Haupt ve J. Kocka (Ed.). Comparative and transnational history: Central European Approaches and New Perspectives içinde (ss. 247-271). Berghahn.
• Hopkins, A. (1999). Back to the future: From national history to imperial history. Past and Present, 164, 198-243.
• Hroch, M. (1968). Die Vorkämpfer der nationalen Bewegung bei den kleineren Völkern Europas eine vergleichende Analyse zur gesellschaftlichen Schichtung der patriotischen Gruppen. Univarsita Karlova. (Türkçesi Avrupa’da Milli Uyanış-Toplumsal Koşulların ve Toplulukların Karşılaştırmalı Analizi. İletişim Yay., İstanbul 2011). http://edoc-histoire.univ-paris1.fr/bibliocomparatisme.pdf
• Iggers, G. G. (1984). New directions in European historiography. Wesleyan University Press.
• Jenuja, M. ve Pernau, M. (2009). Lost in translation? Transcending boundaries in comparative history. H.
• G. Haupt ve J. Kocka (Ed.). Comparative and transnational history. Central European approaches and new perspectives içinde (ss. 105-129). Berghahn.
• Kaelble, H. (1995). La recherche européenne en histoire sociale comparative. Actes de la recherche en Science Sociale, 106, 107, 67-79.
• Kaelble, H. (1996). Vergleichende Sozialgeschichte des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts: Forschungen europäischer
• Historiker. H. G. Haupt ve J. Kocka (Ed.). Geschichte und Vergleich. Ansätze und Ergebnisse international vergleichender Geschichtsschreibung içinde (ss. 91-130). Campus Verlag.
• Kaelble, H. (1999). Der historische Vergleich. Eine Einführung zum 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Campus Verlag. Kaelble, H. (2003). Interdisziplinäre Debatten über Vergleich und Transfer. H. Kaelble ve J. Schriewer (Ed.). Vergleich und Transfer. Komparatistik in den sozial-, geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften içinde (ss. 469- 493). Campus Verlag
• Kaelble, H. (2005). Die Debatte über Vergleich und Transfer und was Jetzt? Transnational, cross-regional and global connections. https://www.connections.clio-online.net/debate/id/diskussionen-574 adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Kaelble, H. (2007). Sozialgeschichte Europas. 1945 bis zur gegenwart. C. H. Beck.
• Kafadar, C. (2004). Cemal Kafadar ile söyleşi: Osmanlı kültür tarihçiliği ve yeni yönelimler. Toplumsal Tarih, 122, 26-31.
• Kalberg, S. (1994). Max Weber’s comparative-historical sociology. An interpretation and critique. The University of Chicago Press.
• Kedar, B. Z. (2009). Explorations in comparative history. Magnes Press.
• Kelley, R. (1984). Comparing the incomparable: Politics and ideas in the United States and the Soviet Union. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26, 672-708.
• Kleinschmidt, H. (1991). Galtons Problem: Bemerkungen zur Theorie der transkulturell vergleichenden Geschichtsforschung. Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft, 39, 5-22.
• Kocka, J. (1996). Historische Komparatistik in Deutschland. H. G. Haupt ve J. Kocka (Ed.). Geschichte und Vergleich. Ansätze und Ergebnisse international vergleichender Geschichtsschreibung içinde (ss. 47-60). Campus Verlag.
• Kocka, J. (1999). Asymmetrical historical comparison: The case of the German Sonderweg. History and Theory, 38(1), 40-50.
• Kocka, J. (2003). Comparison and beyond. History and Theory, 42, 39-44.
• Kocka, J. (2007). Civil society in nineteenth-century Europe: Comparison and beyond. M. Hildermeier (Ed.). Historical concepts between eastern and western Europe içinde (ss. 85-100). Berghahn.
• Kocka, J. (2009). Comparative history: Methodology and ethos. B. Z. Kedar (Ed.). Explorations in comparative history içinde (ss. 29-36). Magnes Press.
• Kocka, J. ve Haupt, H. G. (2009). Comparison and beyond: Traditions, scope, and perspectives of comparative
• history. H. G. Haupt ve J. Kocka (Ed.). Comparative and transnational history: Central European approaches and new perspectives içinde (ss. 1-30). Berghahn.
• Köprülü, F. (1981). Bizans müesseselerinin Osmanlı müesseselerine tesiri. Ötüken Yay.
• Koselleck, R. (1975). Fortschrift. O. Brunner, W. Conze ve R. Koselleck (Ed.). Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland içinde (2, ss. 351–424). Klett-Cotta Verlag.
• Lal, V. (2004). The history of history. Politics and scholarship in modern India. Oxford University Press.
• Langlois, C. V. (1890). The comparative history of England and France during the Middle Ages. The English Historical Review, 5(18), 259-263.
• Leikin, J. (2021). From comparative to entangled histories. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 22(1), 173-182.
• Liakos, A. (2008). Canonical and anticanonical histories. N. Panourgia ve G. E. Marcus (Ed.). Ethnographica moralia. Experiments in interpretive anthropology içinde (ss. 138-156). Fordham University Press.
• Lorenz, C. (1999). Comparative historiography: Problems and perspectives. History and Theory, 38(1), 25-39.
• Manning, P. (2003). Navigating world history. Historians create a global past. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Mayer, A. (1981). The persistence of the old regime. Europe to the great war. Pantheon Books.
• McGerr, M. (1991). The price of the ‘new transnational history’. American Historical Review, 96(4), 1056-1067.
• McMichael, P. (1990). Incorporating comparison within a world-historical perspective: An alternative comparative method. American Sociological Review, 55, 385-397.
• Meillet, A. (1925). La Méthode comparative en linguistique historique. H. Aschehoug & Co.
• Middell, M. (2000). Kulturtransfer und historische Komparistik. Thesen zu ihrem Verhältnis. Comparativ, 10, 7-41.
• Middell, M. (2005). Transnationale Geschichte als transnationales Projekt? Zur Einführung in die Diskussion. Transnational, cross-regional and global connections. http://geschichte-transnational.clio-online.net/ forum/type=diskussionen&id=571&view=print adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Middell, M. (2007). Dimensionen der Kultur und Gesellschaftsgeschichte. Leipziger Universitaetsverlag.
• Mikhail, A. (2020). God’s shadow: Sultan Selim, his Ottoman Empire, and the making modern world. Liveright.
• Mill, J. S. (1843). A system of logic. Ratiocinative and inductive. Being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation (2 Cilt). John W. Parker.
• Moore, B. (1966). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy. Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Beacon Press.
• Müller, E. W. (1993). Plädoyer für die komparativen Geisteswissenschaften. Paideuma, 39, 7-23.
• Oakeshott, M. (1933). Experience and its modes. Cambridge University Press.
• Olstein, D. (2009). Comparative history: The pivot of historiography. H. G. Haupt ve J. Kocka (Ed.). Comparative and transnational history. Central European approaches and new perspectives içinde (ss. 37-52). Berghahn.
• Osterhammel, J. (1996). Sozialgeschichte im Zivilisationsvergleich: Zu künftigen Möglichkeiten komparativer Geschichtswissenschaft. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 22(2), 143-164.
• Osterhammel, J. (2001a). Geschichtswissenschaft jenseits des Nationalstaats: Studien zu Beziehungsgeschichte und Zivilisationsvergleich. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
• Osterhammel, J. (2001b). Transnationale Gesellschaftsgeschichte: Erweiterung oder Alternative? Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 27, 464-479.
• Pamuk, Ş. (1995). 19. yüzyılda Osmanlı dış ticareti. Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.
• Patel, K. K. (2005). Transnationale Geschichte-ein neues Paradigma? Transnational, cross-regional and global connections. https://www.connections.clio-online.net/debate/id/diskussionen-573 adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Patel, K. K. (2005a). Soldiers of work. Labor services in Nazi Germany and new deal America, 1933-1945. Cambridge University Press.
• Pirenne, H. (1923). De la méthode comparative en histoire. G. des Marez ve F. L. Ganshof (Ed.). Compte rendu du Ve Congrès International des Sciences Historiques, Bruxelles 1923 içinde (ss. 19-32). M. Weissenbruch.
• Pirenne, H. (1931). What are historians trying to do? S. A. Rice (Ed.). Methods in social sciences: A case book içinde (ss. 435-445). The University of Chicago Press. (Makalenin Fransızcası için bkz. La tâche de l’historien. Le Flambeau. 14, 1931, 1-18).
• Pomeranz, K. (2000). The great divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy. Princeton University Press.
• Postan, M. M. (1971). Fact and relevance. Essays on historical methods. Cambridge University Press.
• Randeria, S. (2009). Entangled histories of uneven modernities: Civil society, caste councils, and legal pluralism in postcolonial India. H. G. Haupt ve J. Kocka (Ed.). Comparative and transnational history: Central European approaches and new perspectives içinde (ss. 77-104). Berghahn.
• Redlich, F. (1958). Toward comparative historiography: Background and problems. Kyklos: International Review of for Social Sciences, 11, 362-388.
• Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth. Cambridge University Press.
• Salvati, M. (1996). Histoire contemporaine et analyse comparative en Italie. Genèses: Sciences Sociales et Histoire, 22, 146-159.
• San, C. (1993). Karşılaştırma yönteminde zaman ve mekan boyutları. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 48(1), 155-159.
• Schieder, T. (1965). Möglichkeiten und Grenzen vergleichender Methoden in der Geschichtswissenschaft. Historische Zeitschrift, 200(3), 529-551. Schieder, T. (1966). Typologie und Erscheinungsformen des Nationalstaates in Europa. Historische Zeitschrift, 202, 58-81.
• Schriewer, J. (2003). Problemdimensionen sozialwissenschaftlicher Komparatistik. H. Kaelble ve J. Schriewer (Ed.). Vergleich und Transfer. Komparatistik in den sozial-, geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften içinde (ss. 9-54). Campus Verlag.
• Sée, H. (1923). Remarques sur l’application de la méthode comparative à l’histoire économique et sociale. Revue de Synthèse Historique, 36, 37-46.
• Sewell, W. H. Jr. (1967). Marc Bloch and the logic of comparative history. History and Theory, 6, 208-218.
• Siegrist, H. (2003). Perspektiven der vergleichenden Geschichtswissenschaft. Gesellschaft, Kultur und Raum. H. Kaelble ve J. Schriewer (Ed.). Vergleich und Transfer. Komparatistik in den sozial-, geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften içinde (ss. 305-339). Campus Verlag.
• Skocpol, T. ve Somers, M. (1980). The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22(2), 174-197.
• Smelser, N. J. (1976). Comparative methods in the social sciences. Prentice-Hall.
• Smith, J. Z. (1978). Map is not territory: Studies in the history of religion. Brill.
• Spiliotis, S. S. (2001). Wo findet Geschichte statt? Oder das Konzept der Transterritorialitaet. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 27, 480-488.
• Stoler, A. L. (2001). Tense and tender ties: The politics of comparison in North American history and (post) colonial studies. Journal of American History, 88(3), 829-865.
• Szeftel, M. (1956). Alexandre Eck, 1876-1953: In memoriam. The Russian Review, 15(4), 272-274.
• Tanaka, S. (2004). New times in modern Japan. Princeton University Press.
• Tekeli, İ. (1998). Tarihyazımı üzerine düşünmek. Dost Yay.
• Thelen, D. (1999). The nation and beyond: Transnational perspectives on United States history: A special issue. Journal of American History, 86(3), 965-975.
• Ther, P. (2009). Comparisons, cultural transfers, and the study of networks. H. G. Haupt ve J. Kocka (Ed.). Comparative and transnational history: Central European approaches and new perspectives içinde (ss. 204- 225). Berghahn.
• Thrupp, S. L. (1958-1959). Editorial. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 1, 1-4.
• Tilly, C. (1984). Big structures, large processes and huge comparisons. Russell Sage Foundation.
• Toynbee, A. (1934-1961). A study of history (12 Cilt). Oxford University Press.
• Trebitsch, M. ve Granjon, M. C. (1998). Pour une histoire comparée des intellectuels. Édition Complexe.
• Tütüncü, G. ve Ünal, N. (2019). Karşılaştırmalı tarih: Doğuşu, gelişimi, metodolojisi ve Türkiye’deki durumu. Al-Farabi International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(4), 79-93.
• Tyrell, I. (1991). Ian Tyrell responds. American Historical Review, 96(4), 1068-1072.
• Valensi, L. (1990). Retour d’Orient: de quelques usages du comparatisme en histoire. H. Atsma ve A. Burgière (Ed.). Marc Bloch aujourd’hui: Histoire comparée et sciences sociales içinde (ss. 307–316). Édition de l’EHESS.
• Veyne, P. (2014). Tarih nasıl yazılır? N. Özyıldırım (Çev.). Metis Yay.
• Wagner, P. (2006). The languages of civil society. Berghahn.
• Weber, M. (1985). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. J. Winckelmann (Haz.). Mohr Siebeck.
• Welskopp, T. (1995). Stolpersteine auf dem Königsweg: Methodenkritische Anmerkungen zum internationalen Vergleich in der Gesellschaftsgeschichte. Archiv für Sozialgeschichte, 35, 339-367.
• Werner, M. ve Zimmermann, B. (2002). Vergleich, Transfer, Verflechtung: Der Ansatz der Histoire Croisée und die Herausforderung des Transnationalen. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 28, 607-636.
• Werner, M. ve Zimmermann, B. (2003). Penser l’histoire croisée: Entre empirie et réflexivité. Annales Histoire Science Sociale, 58, 7-36.
• Werner, M. ve Zimmermann, B. (2004). De la comparaison à l’histoire croisée, Seuil.
• Werner, M. ve Zimmermann, B. (2006). Beyond comparison: Histoire croisée and the challenge of reflexivity. History and Theory, 45, 30-50.
• Wittram, R. (1958). Das Interesse an der Geschichte: Zwölf Vorlesungen über Fragen des zeitgenössischen Geschichtsverstaendnisses. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
• Yalansız, N. (2019). Karşılaştırmalı tarih. A. Şimşek (Ed.). Tarih için metodoloji içinde (ss. 150-158). Pegem Akademi.
• Zimmermann, B. (2010). Historie comparée, histoire croisée. C. Delacroix, F. Dosse, P. Garcia ve N. Offenstadt (Ed.). Historiographies içinde (1, ss. 155-162). Folio.