An attempt to understand the driving forces of historiography in the eurocentric perspective in southeast asia

Bu makale, Güneydoğu Asya’da, Malaya ve Doğu Hint olarak bilinen topraklarda, Avrupamerkezci yaklaşım bağlamında tarihyazımına bir giriş niteliğinde kaleme alınmıştır. Bu iki coğrafi bölgenin aynı metinde ele alınması, tarihsel ve antropolojik bağlamda ilintili olmalarından kaynaklanmaktadır. Makalede, Batılı unsurların erken dönemlerden başlayarak bölgenin sosyoekonomik ve kültürel değişim süreçlerine müdahaleleri bağlamında uygulayageldikleri Avrupamerkezci yaklaşım genel hatlarıyla ele alınacaktır. Yerlilerin tarihlerine gösterilen ilgi, salt bu toplumları anlama çabası ile sınırlı değildir, bunun ötesinde bu toplumları kimi yüce idealler adına dönüştürme çabası içermektedir. Bu çerçevede, Hint Okyanusu’nun doğusunda kalan topraklarda hâkim unsurun Müslüman topluluklar olduğu hatırlandığında, Avrupamerkezci yaklaşımın önemi daha iyi anlaşılacaktır.

An attempt to understand the driving forces of historiography in the eurocentric perspective in southeast asia

Abstract: In this paper, I will sketch the issue of historical writing in the Eurocentric perspective concerning two regions, Malaya and the East Indies in Southeast Asia. The reason to take these regions into consideration in the same text can be justified on the basis that both regions have been historically and anthropologically considered concentric. With regard to this region, this paper is an overall attempt to understand the successive efforts of Western individuals writing history from the Eurocentric perspective since the earlier period of Western intervention in the regional socio-economic and cultural changes. In fact, absorption of the native histories is not just a reflection of understanding the native, but an attempt to transform them for some supposedly higher ideals. In this context, it would be neglectful if we did not also note that the native communities in the Eastern sphere of the Indian Ocean studied in this text have historically had Muslim majorities.

___

  • Aksoy, N. (1996). Batı ve başkaları. İstanbul: Düzlem Yayınları.
  • Alisjahbana, S. T. (1976). Language planning for modernization: The case of Indonesian and Malaysian, The Hague: Mouton.
  • Aljunied, S. M. K. (2004). Edward Said and Southeast Asian Islam: Western representations of Meccan Pilgrims (hajjis) in the dutch East Indies, 1800-1900. Journal of Commonwealth and Postcolonial Studies, 11, 1-2.
  • Ang, I., & Stratton, J. (1995). The Singapore way of multiculturalism: Western concepts/Asian cultures. Sojourn, 10(1), 65-89.
  • Aslam, S. M. (2006). Muslim response to the west: Muslim historiography in India: 1857-1914. New Delhi: Adam Publishers & Disributors.
  • Bolton, K. (2002). Introduction: Codifying Malaya: Nicolas B. Dennys and the descriptive dictionary of British Malaya. In N. B. Dennys (Ed.), A descriptive dictionary of British Malaya. London: Ganesha Publishing.
  • Braduel, F. (1992). Civilization and capitalism: 15th-18th century (Vol I. The structures of everday life: The limits of the possible) (Trans. S. Reynolds). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Callinicos, A. (1995). Theories and narratives: Reflections on the philosophy of history. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Chakrabarty, D. (October, 1992). Provincializing Europe: Postcoloniality and the critique of history. Cultural Studies, 6(3), 337-357.
  • Chandra, S. (1987). (ed.). “Introduction”. The Indian Ocean explorations in history, commerce and politics (pp. 11-27). New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  • Courville, M. E. (2010). Edward Said’s rhetoric of the secular. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
  • Dahlan, H. M. (July, 1976). Malay traditional society and a colonial encounter. Akademika, Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9, 1-21.
  • Federated Malay States Resident Generals. (1906). Annual Report for the Year 1905, (In. Straits Settlements, Report on the Federated Malay States for 1905, (In. Straits Settlements Reports on the Federated Malay States, 1904). London: Printed for His Majesty’s Stationary Office, by Darling & Son.
  • Federation of Malaya on education for 1954. Kuala Lumpur: Nan Yang Press.
  • Gallop, A. T. (2006). A cabinet of oriental curiosities: An album for Graham Shaw from his colleagues, London: The British Library.
  • Gupta, A. F. (2003). Th e imagined learner of Malay. In J-M. Dewaele, A. Housen, & L. Wei (Ed.), Bilingualism: Beyond basic principles, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Hall, D. G. E. (1976). A history of Southeast Asia. Hampshire: MacMillan.
  • Harrison, N. (2009). ‘A room place full of possibility’: Said’s orientalism and the literary. In R. Ghosh (Ed.), Edward Said and the literary, social, and political world (pp. 3-19). New York: Routledge.
  • Hoffman, J. E. (July, 1973). The Malay language as a force for unity in the Indonesian archipelago: 1815- 1900. Nusantara, 4, 19-35.
  • Hunt, R. A. (1994). A biography of William Shellabear: Soldier, missionary and scholar of Malaysia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
  • Hurgronje, S. (1906) The acehnese (Vol. 1-2) (Trans. A.W. S. O’Sullivan). Leiden: E.J. Brill.
  • Kratoska, P. H., Raben, R., & Nordholt, H. S. (2005). Locating Southeast Asia, in locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of knowledge and politics of space. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
  • Makdisi, S. (1998). Romantic imperialism: Universal empire and the culture of modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Marsden, W. (1984). A dictionary and grammar of the Malayan language. Singapore: Oxford University Press.
  • Milner, A. C. (1982). Kerajaan: Malay political culture on the eve of colonial rule. Tucso: The University of Arizona Press.
  • Noor, F. (2010). From Inderapura to Darul Makmur a deconstuctive history of Pahang. Kuala Lumpur: Silverfish Books.
  • Ozay, M. (1995). Westernizing the third world: The Eurocentricity of economic development theories. London: Roudledge.
  • Philip, K. (1998). English mud: Towards a critical cultural studies of colonial science. Cultural Studies, 12(3), 300-331.
  • Raffles, L. S. (1991). Memoirs of the life and public services of Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles (With an Introduction by John Bastin). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Robequain, C. (1978). Malaya, Indonesia, Borneo and The Philippines: A geographical, economic and political description of Malaya, the East Indies and the Philippiens (Trans. E. D. Laborde). London: Longmans, Green And Co.
  • Said, E. (1993). Culture and imperialism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Singapore Institituon Free School. (1838). Fourth Annual Report, 1837-38 Microfilm NL 5826, National Library of Singapore. Singapore: Singapore Free Press Office.
  • Singapore Institition Free School (1939), Fifth Annual Report, 1838-39 Microfilm NL 5826, National Library of Singapore. Singapore: Singapore Free Press Office.
  • Stjepan, G. M. (1993). The Barbarian temperament: Toward a postmodern critical theory. London: Routledge.
  • Sulayman, S. N., & Samir, A-R. (1984). Bernard Lewis and Islamic studies: An assesment. In A. Hussain, R. Olson, & J. Qureshi (Ed.), Orientalism, Islam and Islamists (pp. 259-285). Vermont: Amana Books.
  • Syed, A. (1977). The myth of the lazy native. London: Frank Cass and Company Limited.
  • The Straits Times. (November 9, 1872). Correspondence (Microfilm NL5043). Singapore: Lee Kong Chian Reference Library.
  • Turnbull, C. M. (1972). The straits settlements 1826-1867: Indian presidency to crown colony. London: The Athlone Press.
  • Winstedt, R. (1966). Malaya and its history (7th ed.). London: Hutchinson University Library.