A Critique of Western Modernity and the Narrative about Turkey as “Model State”

Türkiye uzun bir süredir laik modernleşmesi, demokrasi düzeyi ve ekonomik kalkınmışlık düzeyi itibariyle Batılı çevrelerce İslam dünyası için bir “model ülke” olarak lanse edilmiştir. Türkiye’nin bir “model ülke” olarak kavramsallaştırılması bağlamında birbiriyle bağlantılı olan üç meselenin genellikle göz ardı edildiği ya da hafife alındığı gözlenmektedir. Bu konudaki literatüre belli bir derinlik katmak amacıyla, bu çalışmada, aynı zamanda ortaya konan argümana da işaret eden şu sorulara ışık tutulmaya çalışılacaktır: Birincisi, Türk modeli ne ölçüde Batılı laik modernitenin etkisi altındadır? İkincisi, “Türk modeli”ne yapılan vurgu, büyük ölçüde emperyalizmin mührünü taşıyan ve “azgelişmiş”/ “gayrı medeni” Araplar’a ya da Müslümanlar’a ilişkin oryantalist anlatıya yaslanan Batı ile Diğerleri arasındaki söylemsel asimetrinin bir uzantısı mıdır? Üçüncüsü, bir model ülke olarak Türkiye’ye ilişkin literatürün, nispeten daha az ideolojik bir içeriği sahip olan ve daha ikna edici görünen, bir ülkenin iktisadî, sosyal ve siyasî performansını esas alan “örnek ülke” benzeri yeni bir kavramı esas alması daha isabetli olmaz mı? Bu son durumda, Malezya ve Endonezya gibi devlet-aktörler, Türkiye’yle birlikte örnek ülkeler olarak temayüz edebileceklerdir.

A Critique of Western Modernity and the Narrative about Turkey as “Model State”

Turkey has long been depicted by Western circles as a ‘model state’ for the rest of the Muslim world on account of its secular modernity, level of democracy and economic advancement. The literature about Turkey as a model-state appears to neglect or treat lightly the three interrelated themes without which this debate is bound to remain superficial. In order to expand the contours of this discussion, this study seeks to shed light on the following questions, which also point to the arguments being made: First, to what extent is the Turkish model impregnated with Western secular modernity? Second, is the stress on the Turkish model part and parcel of the overall discursive asymmetry between the West and the Rest, which involves a strong tinge of imperialism and an orientalist narrative about the “underdeveloped” / “uncivilised” Arabs or Muslims? Third, is it not proper for the literature about the model state (Turkey) to employ a new terminology such as “exemplary state” which is less ideologically-charged and more reliably oriented towards the economic, social and political performance of a given state. In the latter case, state actors, such as Malaysia and Indonesia, could likewise qualify as possible exemplary states, alongside Turkey.

___

  • Younis, M. S. (2011, Winter). Turkish Delight? The Feasibility of the ‘Turkish Model’ for Egypt. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 10 (4), 107-115.
  • Wei-Ming, T. (1996). Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity: Moral Education and Economic Culture in Japan and the Four Mini-Dragons. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  • Tuğal, C. (2016). The Fall of the Turkish Model: How the Arab Uprisings Brought Down Islamic Liberalism. Verso.
  • Tibi, B. (1995, 27 October). Indonesia, a Model for the Islamic Civilization in Transition to the 21st Century, translated from Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Retrieved from http://godlas.myweb.uga.edu/tibi.html
  • Sengupta, A. (2016). Myth and Rhetoric of the Turkish Model: Exploring Developmental Alternatives. London: Springer.
  • Secor, A. (2011). Turkey: A Model for Democracy in a Troubled Region?. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 11 (1), 157-172.
  • Sayyed, B. (2003). A Fundamental Fear: Eurocentrism and the emergence of Islamism. London: Zed Books.
  • Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. New York: Penguin Books.
  • Rudolph, L. & Rudol, S. H. (2015). Explaining Indian Democracy: A Fifty Year Perspective, 1956-2006, three volumes, Oxford University Press.
  • Rostow, W. W. (1960). The Stages of Economic Growth. A Non-Marxist Manifesto. Cambridge University Press.
  • Roberts, C. B. et al (Eds.) (2015). Indonesia’s Ascent: Power, Leadership and the Regional Order. Palgrave.
  • Noi, A. Ü. (2013). A Clash of Islamic Models. Current Trends in Islamist Ideology, 15, 92-114.
  • Musa, M. B. (2002). Malaysia in the Era of Globalization. Writers Club Press.
  • Mohapatra, A. K. (2008). Democratization in the Arab World: Relevance of the Turkish Model. International Studies, 45 (4), 271-294.
  • Mirsepassi, A. (2000). Intellectual Discourse and the Politics of Modernization: Negotiating Modernity in Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • McFaul, M. & Stoner-Weiss, K. (2008). The Myth of the Authoritarian Model: How Putin’s Crackdown Holds Russia Back. Foreign Affairs, 87 (1), 68-84.
  • Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York: Doubleday.
  • Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy. American Political Science Review, 53 (1), 69-105.
  • Lerner, D. (1958). The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. The Free Press.
  • Kohli, A. (Ed.). (2001). The Success of India’s Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kahraman, H. B. & Keyman, E. F. (1998). Kemalizm, Oryantalizm ve Modernite (Kemalism, Orientalism and Modernity). Doğu Batı, 1 (2), 63-75.
  • Jamaluddin, K. (2003, 10 March). Model Nation. Time Asia.
  • Işın, E. (2001). Istanbul’s Conflicting Paths to Citizenship: Islamization and Globalization. İn A. J. Scott (Ed.), Global City-Regions: Trends and Prospects, Policy Questions, Theoretical Debates (pp. 349-368). Oxford: Oxford University Pres.
  • Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of Civilisations. London: Simon & Schuster.
  • https://www.statista.com/statistics/572721/literacy-rate-in-indonesia/
  • Indonesia: Literacy rate from 2006 to 2016, total and by gender. 2016. Retrieved from
  • Indonesia - Gross domestic product per capita in current prices. 2017. Retrieved from https://knoema.com/atlas/ Indonesia/GDP-per-capita
  • Turkey - Adult literacy rate. 2015. Retrieved from https://knoema.com/atlas/Turkey/Adult-literacy-rate
  • Malaysia - Adult (15+) literacy rate. 2015. Retrieved from https://knoema.com/atlas/Malaysia/topics/Education/ Literacy/Adult-literacy-rate
  • “GDP per capita by country (Malaysia)”, 2017. Retrieved from https://knoema.com/pjeqzh/gdp-per-capita-by-country-statistics-from-imf-1980-2022?country=Malaysia
  • Hamdi, M. E. (1996). Islam and Liberal Democracy: The Limits of the Western Model. Journal of Democracy, 7 (2), 81-85.
  • Guha, R. (2007). India After Gandhi: The History of the World’s Largest Democracy. New York: Ecco Press.
  • Göle, N. (1998). Batı-Dışı Modernlik Üzerine Bir İlk Desen (A Preliminary Essay on non-Western Modernity), Doğu Batı, 1 (2), 55-62.
  • Göksel, O. (2012, July). Assessing the Turkish Model as a Guide to the Emerging Democracies in the Middle East. Ortadoğu Etütleri, 4 (1), 99-120.
  • Fuller, G. (2004). Turkey’s Strategic Model: Myths or Realities. Washington Quarterly, 27 (3), 51–84.
  • Erdoğan offers ‘Arab Spring’ neo-laicism. (2011, 15 September). Hürriyet Daily News, http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/default.aspx?pageid=438&n=erdogan-offers-8216arab-spring8217- neo-laicism-2011-09-15.
  • Ekşi, M. (2016). The Rise and Fall of Soft Power in Turkish Foreign Policy during JDP: The rise and fall of the ‘Turkish model’ in the Muslim world. Lambert Academic Publishing.
  • Eisenstadt, S. N. (Ed.). (2002). Multiple Modernities. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
  • Dönmez, R. Ö. (2011). Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi: İslâmcılıktan Post Kemalist Bir Anlatıya Doğru (Justice and Development Party: From Islamism towards a Post-Kemalist Narrative). Doğu Batı, 14 (58), 37-57.
  • Dede, A. Y. (2011). The Arab Uprisings: Debating the ‘Turkish Model’. Insight Turkey, 13 (2), 23-32.
  • Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
  • Blaney, D. L. & Inayatullah, N. (2002). Neo-Modernization? IR and the Inner Life of Modernization Theory. European Journal of International Relations, 8 (1), 103-137.
  • Bhambra, G. K. (2007). Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination. London and New York; Palgrave.
  • Aslan, R. (2003, 28 July). Bush’s model won’t play in Iran. New York Times.
  • Altunışık, M. B. (2005, Winter-Spring). The Turkish Model and Democratization in the Middle East. Arab Studies Quarterly, 27 (1–2), 45–63.
  • Al-Azm, S. J. (2011). The ‘Turkish Model’: A View from Damascus. Turkish Studies, 12 (4), 633-641.