A Critical Appraisal of Marshal Hodgson’s View of Islam Vis-à-Vis Cumulative and Discursive Traditions
Bu makale Marshall G. Hodgson’un İslamileşmiş (Islamicate) medeniyet teorisinde kullandığı İslam kavramını yakından incelemektedir. İslam medeniyet araştırmalarına yaptığı katkılar ve bu alandaki yöntemsel farkındalığına rağmen, Hodgson benzer katkıyı İslam kavramsallaştırmasında sağlayamamıştır. Çalışma, Hodgson’un İslam kavramsallaştırmasının üç unsurunu değerlendirecek ve bu kavramsallaştırmaya dahil olan iki problemi irdeleyecektir. Ayrıca, Hodgson ve Smith tarafından paylaşılan görüşün görece tesiri incelenecektir. Bu amaçla ilk olarak, Hodgson’un kavramsallaştırmasının ikilik barındırdığını iddia edeceğim. O bu ikiliğin farkında olsa bile, ikiliği İslam geleneği içinde veya tarihsel olarak açıklamada yetersiz kalmıştır. İkinci olarak Hodgson ve Wilfred C. Smith arasında teorik bir bağlantı kurmaya çalışacağım. Bu kısımda ayrıca ortaya konulan bazı önemli karşı argümanları ele alacağım. Son olarak, makaleyi Smith’in birikimli gelenek (cumulative tradition), Talal Asad’ın söylemsel gelenek (discursive tradition) ve Shahab Ahmed’in “katıksız çelişkiler” karşısında “tutarlılık” tezinin kısa karşılaştırmalı bir değerlendirmesiyle bitireceğim.
A Critical Appraisal of Marshal Hodgson’s View of Islam Vis-à-Vis Cumulative and Discursive Traditions
The article engages closely with Marshall G. Hodgson’s view of Islam in his theory of Islamicate civilization. Despite his methodological consciousness and various revisions he introduced in the study of Islamic civilization, he failed to do the same in his conception of Islam. This contribution looks at three relevant aspects of Hodgson’s take on Islam. Apart from explaining problems inherent in his conception of Islam, I examine the relative efficacy of the view shared in some important ways between Hodgson and Smith. To this end, first, I argue that Hodgson’s every allusion of Islam breathes dualism. Even though he was indeed well aware of this dualism, he barely succeeded in accounting for it, either historically or in Islamic tradition. Second, I try to make a theoretical link between this view of Hodgson and Wilfred C. Smith. I also compliment this with a review of some of the key counter arguments posited. Third, the article ends with a brief comparative assessment of W. C. Smith’s cumulative tradition, Talal Asad’s discursive tradition, and Shahab Ahmed’s “coherence” in the face of “outright contradictions” thesis.
___
- Stevens, T. (1985). Wilfred Cantwell Smith’s Concept of Faith: A Critical Study of his Approach to Islam and Christianity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Durham University, Durham.
- Smith, W. C. (1991). The Meaning and End of Religion. Minneapolis: Fortress Publisher.
- Smith, J. I. (1975). An Historical and Semantic Study of the Term “islām” as seen in a Sequence of Qurʼān Commentaries. Harvard: Scholarly Press.
- Livingston, J. (2003). “Religious Pluralism and the Question of Religious Truth in Wilfred C. Smith”. Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory, 4(3), 58-65.
- Lawrence, B. (2014). “Genius Denied and Reclaimed: A 40-Year Retrospect on Marshall G. Hodgson’s The Venture of Islam” [online]. Accessed on 13 February 2017 from http://marginalia.lareviewofbooks.org/retrospect-hodgson-venture-islam
- Islamicate Civilization: The View from Asia. (2003). In W. Brannon (Ed.), Teaching Islam (pp. 61-74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hodgson, M. (1993). Rethinking World History: Essays on Europe, Islam and World History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hodgson, M. (1974). The Venture of Islam: Conscience and History in a World Civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Gellner, E. (1981). Muslim Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Geertz, C. (1968). Islam Observed: Religious Development in Morocco and Indonesia. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Hallaq, W. (2013). The Impossible State. New York: Colombia University Press.
- El-Zein, A. (1977). Beyond Ideology and Theology: The Search for the Anthropology of Islam. Annual Review of Anthropology, 6, pp. 227-254.
- Cheema, W.A. (2013). Scholars on the Meanings of Khātam an-Nabiyyin. Journal of Islamic Sciences, 1(3), pp. 1-6.
- Cameron, L. R. (1997). The Making of Wilfred Cantwell Smith’s “World Theology” (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Concordia University, Canada.
- Burke, E. (1979). Islamic History as World History: Marshall Hodgson, ‘The Venture of Islam’. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 10, pp. 241-264.
- Bukhari, M. I. (1994). Al-Jami’ As-Sahih., (M. Muhsin Kahan, Trans.) Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Darussalam Publisher.
- Bigelow, A. (2016). “What is Islam? A Celebration and Defense of Contradiction Perplexity and Paradox”. Accessed on Thursday, October 5, 2017, from http://marginalia.lareviewofbooks.org/islam-celebration-defense-contradiction-perplexity-paradox-anna-bigelow
- Asad, T. (1986). The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Center for Contemporary Arab Studies.
- Asad, T. (2009). The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam. Journal of Qui Parle, 17(2), pp. 1-30.
- Asad, T. (2001). Reading a Modern Classic: W. C. Smith’s ‘The Meaning and End of Religion’. History of Religions, 40 (3), 205-222.
- Asad, T. (1993). Genealogies of religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
- Al-Faruqi, I. (1992). Al-Tawhid: Its Implications on Thought and Life. Virginia: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
- Al-Attas, S. (2001). Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam: An Exposition of the Fundamental Elements of the Worldview of Islam. Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.
- Al-Attas, S. (1978). Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia.
- Ahmed, S. (2016). What is Islam? The Importance of Being Islamic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Abdullah, F. (2004). Islam and the Orientalists. Intellectual Discourse, 12 (1), pp. 63-72.