Karyotype Analysis of Paronychia anatolica subsp. anatolica (Caryophyllaceae, Paronychioideae)

In the study, the chromosomal data of Paronychia anatolica subsp. anatolica are provided for the first time. The diploid chromosome number and karyotype formula are 2n = 2x = 18 = 16m + 2sm with metacentric chromosomes out of submetacentric chromosome 1. No all chromosomes have satellite and secondary constriction. The values of total haploid length and mean chromosome length are very low with 14.47 and 1.61 μm, respectively; because the taxon has low numbers and relatively small of chromosomes, which are range from 1.21 to 1.84 μm. The karyotype is symmetrical type. Within the scope of all the results, the data will provide important contributions to the cytotaxonomy of genus Paronychia. Especially, taxon contains very different karyotypic data from other subspecies and it is very important knowledge for cytotaxonomic point of view.

Karyotype Analysis of Paronychia anatolica subsp. anatolica (Caryophyllaceae, Paronychioideae)

In the study, the chromosomal data of Paronychia anatolica subsp. anatolica are provided for the first time. The diploid chromosome number and karyotype formula are 2n = 2x = 18 = 16m + 2sm with metacentric chromosomes out of submetacentric chromosome 1. No all chromosomes have satellite and secondary constriction. The values of total haploid length and mean chromosome length are very low with 14.47 and 1.61 μm, respectively; because the taxon has low numbers and relatively small of chromosomes, which are range from 1.21 to 1.84 μm. The karyotype is symmetrical type. Within the scope of all the results, the data will provide important contributions to the cytotaxonomy of genus Paronychia. Especially, taxon contains very different karyotypic data from other subspecies and it is very important knowledge for cytotaxonomic point of view.

___

  • Bittrich V, 1993. Caryophyllaceae. in: Kubitzki K, Rohwer J, Bittrich V, The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Magnoliid, Hamamelid, and Caryophyllid Families, Vol. 2. Springer, pp. 206-236, Berlin-Germany.
  • Blackburn KB, Morton, JK, 1957. The Incidence of Polyploidy in the Caryophyllaceae of Britain and of Portugal. New Phytologist, 56: 344-351.
  • Chaudri MN, 1967. Paronychia Mill. in: Davis PH, Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands Vol. 2. Edinburgh University Press, pp. 250-262, Edinburgh-Scotland.
  • Chaudri MN, 1968. A Revision of the Paronychinae. Tilburg H. Gianotten, Utrecht-Netherlands.
  • Diosdado JC, Pastor J, 1994. Estudio Cariologico del Gĕnero Paronychia Miller (Caryophyllaceae) en Andalucĭa (Espana). Acta Botanica Malacitana, 19: 89-95.
  • Elçi Ş, Sancak C, 2013. Sitogenetikte Araştırma Yöntemleri ve Gözlemler. Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınevi, Ankara-Türkiye.
  • Eroğlu HE, Doğan H, Altay D, Budak Ü, 2017. The Medicinal Plant of Genus Paronychia and the Karyotype Analysis of Paronychia adalia. International Journal of Secondary Metabolite, 4(3): 103-107.
  • Eroğlu HE, Altay D, Budak Ü, Martin E, 2020. Karyotypic Phylogeny and Polyploidy Variations of Paronychia (Caryophyllaceae) Taxa in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany, 44(3): 245-254.
  • Hartman RL, 1972. Paronychia pulvinata - P. sessiliflora: A Cytological and Chemical Study. Journal of the Colorado-Wyoming Academy of Science, 7(2-3): 102.
  • Hartman RL, 1974. Rocky Mountain Species of Paronychia (Caryophyllaceae). A Morphological, Cytological, and Chemical Study. Brittonia, 26(3): 256-263.
  • Küpfer P, 1980. Contribution à la Cytotaxonomie de Quelques Orophytes Iraniens. Revue de Biologie et d'Écologie Mediterranéenne, 7: 37-48.
  • Levan AK, Fredga K, Sandberg AA, 1964. Nomenclature for Centromeric Position on Chromosomes. Hereditas, 52: 201-220.
  • Lorenzo Andreu A, García Sanz MP, 1950. Cromosomas Somáticos de Plantas Espontáneas en la Estepa de Aragón. II. Anales de la Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, 2: 12-63.
  • Löve Á, 1975. IOPB Chromosome Number Reports XLIX. Taxon, 24: 501-516.
  • Martin E, Kahraman A, Dirmenci T, Bozkurt H, Eroğlu HE, 2020. Karyotype Evolution and New Chromosomal Data in Erodium: Chromosome Alteration, Polyploidy, Dysploidy, and Symmetrical Karyotypes. Turkish Journal of Botany, 44(3): 255-268.
  • Mirzadeh Vaghefi SS, Jalili A, Ghasemi FS, Ashrafi S, 2014. Chromosome Numbers of Paronychıa kurdica and Salsola yazdiana. Iranian Journal of Botany, 20(2): 230-232.
  • Paszko B, 2006. A Critical Review and a New Proposal of Karyotype Asymmetry Indices. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 258: 39-48.
  • Peruzzi L, Eroğlu HE, 2013. Karyotype Asymmetry: Again, How to Measure and What to Measure? Comparative Cytogenetics, 7: 1-9.
  • Runemark H, 1996. Mediterranean Chromosome Number Reports 6 (590-678). Flora Mediterranea, 6: 223-243.
  • Stebbins GL, 1971. Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants. Edward Arnold, London-England.
  • Suda J, Kyncl T, Freiova R, 2003. Nuclear DNA Amounts in Macaronesian Angiosperms. Annals of Botany, 92: 153-164.
Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2146-0574
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2011
  • Yayıncı: -