(TANITMA) KLÁRA AGYAGÁSI (2019). CHUVASH HISTORICAL PHONETICS. AN AREAL LINGUISTICS STUDY. WITH AN APPENDIX ON THE ROLE OF PROTO-MARI IN THE HISTORY OF CHUVASH VOCALISM. TURCOLOGICA 117. WIESBADEN: HARRASSOWITZ VERLAG. 333 SAYFA.

Bu yazıda Klára Agyagási'nin (2019). Chuvash Historical Phonetics. An areal linguistics study. With an Appendix on the Role of Proto-Mari in the History of Chuvash Vocalism. Turcologica 117. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. 333 sayfa. adlı monografisi değerlendirilmiştir.

___

  • Agyagási, Klára (1982). “On the Edition of Chuvash Literary Sources”. In: Róna-Tas (ed.) Chuvash Studies, Budapest, 7-17.
  • Chavannes, Edouard (2006). Batı Türkleri Tarihi. İstanbul: Töre.
  • Daniel, Kane (2009). The Kitan Language and Script. Brill, Leiden, Boston
  • Dolgova, A. P., A. V. Kuznetsov (2020). “The development of the Chuvash linguistics at the beginning of the XXIst century: achievements, problems and pressing tasks”. Rossiyskaya Tyurkologiya 1-2: 88-95.
  • Durmuş, Oğuzhan (2014). 18. Yüzyıl Çuvaşçasının Söz Varlığı. Paradigma Akademi Yayınları: Edirne.
  • Golden, Peter B. (1980). Khazar Studies. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
  • Golden, Peter B. (2006). Türk Halkları Tarihine Giriş. Genişletilmiş ikinci baskı, çev. Osman Karatay. Ankara: KaraM Araştırma ve Yayıncılık.
  • Kincses-Nagy, Éva (2018). Mongolic Copies in Chaghatay. Turcologica 115. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
  • Levitskaya, L. S. (2014). İstoriçeskaya Fonetika Çuvaşskogo Yazıka. Çeboksarı: Çuvaşskiy Gosudarstvennıy İnstitut Gumanıtarnıx Nauk.
  • (Tanıtma) Piispanen, Peter (2019). “Agyagási, K. (2019). Chuvash Historical Phonetics. An areal linguistics study. With an Appendix on the Role of Proto- Mari in the History of Chuvash Vocalism. Harrassowitz Verlag. Wiesbaden, 2019. XII + 334 pp.” JOTS 3/2, 2019: 624: 633.
  • Rásonyi, Laszló (2006). Doğu Avrupa’da Türklük. İstanbul: Selenge yay.
  • Róna-Tas, András (1978). “An unpublished Chuvash wordlist in the Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences”. In: Jubilee Volume of the Oriental Collection 1951-1976. Budapest. 159-173.
  • Róna-Tas, András (1982). “The Periodization and Sources of Chuvash Linguistics”. Chuvash Studies 113-170. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
  • Róna-Tas, András (2005). “Turkic-Alanian-Hungarian Contacts”; CAJ 58-2: 205-213.
  • Róna-Tas, András, Árpád Berta (2011). West Old Turkic. Turkic Loanwords in Hungarian. Turcologica 84. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
  • Róna-Tas, András (2016). “Bayan and Asparux. Nine notes on Turks and Iranians in Eastern Europe”. Turks and Iranians, Interactions in Language and History. Eds. Éva Á. Csató, Lars Johanson, András Róna-Tas, Bo Utas, s. 65-78, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
  • Savelyev, Alexander (2020). “Chuvash and the Bulgharic languages”. The Oxford Guide to the Transeurasian Languages. 446-464. Ed. Martine Robbeets, Alaexander Savelyev. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schott, Wilhelm (1841). De lingua Tschuwaschorum. Berolini. http://reader.digitale-sammlungen.de/.
  • Shimunek, A. E. (2007). Towards a Reconstruction of the Kitan Language, with notes on northern late middle chinese phonology. MA tezi. Indiana University.
  • Yılmaz, Emine (1997). Çuvaşça Çok Zamanlı Sesbilgisi. Ankara: TDK.
  • (Tanıtma) Zimonyi, István (2020). “Klára Agyagási (2019). Chuvash Historical Phonetics. An areal linguistics study. With an Appendix on the Role of Proto-Mari in the History of Chuvash Vocalism. Turcologica 117. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. 333 p.” Acta Linguistica Academica 67 (2020) 4, 480-487.