Re-coding The Characteristics of Public Spaces: The Case of İstanbul

Re-coding The Characteristics of Public Spaces: The Case of İstanbul

This study proposes a quantitative assessment method to ascertainurban square potential at 12 gates of the historic city wall wheredifferent typologies, characteristics and periodic features are observedin Fatih district of Istanbul. The quantitative assessment method is basedupon a series of indexes including 7 factors in total consisting of 35indicators. The proposed method developed an “urban square potentialindex”, making use of “transport and accessibility”, “convex size”, “builtupenvironment”, “purpose of use and density”, “morphology”,“landscaping character” and “identity” factors. This index enablesassessment of a square according to a) historical-cultural heritagerichness and identity, b) functional diversity, c) accessibility, and d)vitality and spatial quality. This paper presents a base for “decisionsupportsystem” for decision-makers in determination of the mostsuitable square with a limited budget, time, labor and equipment duringurban square development, design and improvement activities.Furthermore, it allows determination and implementation of thenecessary interventions/improvements in order for the availableundefined urban spaces to gain urban square functions.

___

  • Bemanian, M., Ghasemi, Z., Saremi, H., & Sattarpour, M. (2016). Analyzing the effect of nature on social interaction in urban squares (case examples: squares of Tehran). Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 8(3), 1113–1125.
  • Brambilla, G., Maffei, L., Di Gabriele, M., & Gallo, V. (2013). Merging physical parameters and laboratory subjective ratings for the soundscape assessment of urban squares. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(1), 782–790.
  • Carmona, M., De Magalhaes, C., & Hammond, L. (2008). Public space: the management dimension. Routledge.
  • Carr, S., Stephen, C., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public space. Cambridge University Press.
  • Crouch, D. P. (1981). The historical development of urban open space. Urban Open Spaces. New York, NY: Rizzoli, 7–8. Development Type – Urban Squares. (2009).
  • Dilbaz, S. (2018). İstanbul: Roma Dönemi. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=3FBTDwAAQBAJ
  • Erten, S., Torun, A. O., Gurleyen, T., Akbas, C., & Zunbiloglu, E. (2016). Resilience abilities of urban squares: A study in Istanbul’s peripheral districts.
  • Esri. (2019). World Imagrey. Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA FSA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community.
  • Eyice, S. (1991). Ayvansaray. In Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi Cilt 4 (pp. 289–294). TDV İslâm Araştırmaları Merkezi.
  • Gözeller, A. (2013). Topkapı Semti. In İstanbul’un Kitabı Fatih I (pp. 332–337). İstanbul: Fatih Municipality, Kültür Yayınları.
  • Güncüoğlu, S. F., & Yavuztürk, Ş. P. (2013). Sulukule ve Çingeneleri. In İstanbul’un Kitabı Fatih I (pp. 368–380). İstanbul: Fatih Municipality, Kültür Yayınları.
  • Hayrullah, C. (2013). Şehremini Semti. In İstanbul’un Kitabı Fatih I (pp. 302–319). İstanbul: Fatih Municipality, Kültür Yayınları.
  • İlkay, Y. (2007). The Political Struggle on and at Public Space: The Case of Kizilay Square. Middle East Technical University.
  • Kang, J. (2005). Numerical modeling of the sound fields in urban squares. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(6), 3695–3706.
  • Krier, R. (1979). Urban Space, New York: Rizzoli. Transl. C. Czehowski.
  • Kubat, A. S., Ozer, O., & Torun, A. O. (2013). Defining a strategical framework for urban pedestrianization projects: assessment of walkability in 3 urban squares in Istanbul.
  • Liang, J., Hu, Y., & Sun, H. (2013). The design evaluation of the green space layout of urban squares based on fractal theory. Nexus Network Journal, 15(1), 33–49.
  • Madanipour, A. (1996). Design of urban space: an inquiry into a socio-spatial process. Retrieved from https://books.google. com.tr/books?id=xOPVAAAAMAAJ
  • Memluk, M. Z. (2013). Designing urban squares. In Advances in Landscape Architecture. IntechOpen.
  • Nasution, A. D., Zahrah, W., & Ginting, N. (2018). Public open space as the only urban space for walking: Sumatera Utara experience. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 126(1), 12215. IOP Publishing.
  • Nowak, D. J., Rowntree, R. A., McPherson, E. G., Sisinni, S. M., Kerkmann, E. R., & Stevens, J. C. (1996). Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover. Landscape and Urban Planning, 36(1), 49–57.
  • Omar, D., Ramlee, M., Yunus, R. M., & Samadi, Z. (2018). Urban Public Space Revitalisation Strategies for George Town World Heritage Site. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 3(7), 285–291.
  • Peacock, S., Anderson, R., & Crivellaro, C. (2018). Streets for People: Engaging Children in Placemaking Through a Sociotechnical Process. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 327. ACM.
  • Project for Public Spaces. (2005). 10 Principles for Successful Squares. Retrieved June 20, 2018, from https://www.pps. org/article/squaresprinciples
  • Rašković, S., & Decker, R. (2015). The influence of trees on the perception of urban squares. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(2), 237–245.
  • Sepe, M. (2017). Placemaking, livability and public spaces. Achieving sustainability through happy places. The Journal of Public Space, 2(4), 63–76.
  • The Mayorship of Fatih. (2013). İstanbul’un Kitabı Fatih I. İstanbul: Fatih Municipality, Kültür Yayınları.
  • Turnbull, S. (2004). The Walls of Constantinople. UK: Osprey Publishing.
  • Vroman, L., & Lagrange, T. (2017). Human movement in Public spaces: The use and development of motion-oriented design strategies. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S3252–S3261.
  • Walzer, M. (1986). Public space-pleasures and costs of urbanity. Dissent, 33(4), 470–475.
  • Xing, N., & Siu, K. W. M. (2010). Historic Definitions of Public Space: Inspiration for High Quality Public Space. International Journal of the Humanities, 7(11).
  • Yang, W., & Kang, J. (2005). Acoustic comfort evaluation in urban open public spaces. Applied Acoustics, 66(2), 211–229.
  • Yavuztürk, Ş. P. (2013a). Edirnekapı Semti. In İstanbul’un Kitabı Fatih I (pp. 340–365). İstanbul: Fatih Municipality, Kültür Yayınları.
  • Yavuztürk, Ş. P. (2013b). Eğrikapı Semti. In İstanbul’un Kitabı Fatih I (pp. 424–433). İstanbul: Fatih Municipality, Kültür Yayınları.
  • Zeka, B. (2011). The humanistic meaning of urban squares: the case of Çayyolu urban square project. Middle East Technical University.