Examination of the Diversity in Rural Architecture in Kırklareli Through Factors

Examination of the Diversity in Rural Architecture in Kırklareli Through Factors

The study aims to document the settlement, spatial, constructional, and cultural characteristics of Kırklareli rural area to reveal the variations of the region. In addition, the region is a hybrid location with elements from both the Black Sea and inner Anatolia. So, the characteristics of the region are compared with the Black Sea and inner Anatolia. The method of the study is composed of two phases, first, the effect of environmental features such as natural environment, topography, climate, and the economic situation on settlement and plan and constructional characteristics and material usage of the houses in Kırklareli were documented. Second, the Thrace region's rural characteristics were compared to those of the Black Sea and inner Anatolia. As a result, the natural environment, geography, climate, and culture all had a role in the formation of rural settlements and houses. (1) Topographical features influenced daily living and agricultural productivity, resulting in changes in settlement structures. (2) The differences in plan characteristics of rural dwellings were mostly influenced by regional climate conditions. The presence, form, and size of common places and open spaces var ied based on climate conditions. (3) Local materials used in house construction were influenced by landforms and the natural environment. It has been observed that house construction strategies have altered as a result of the most widely accessible material from the surroundings. (4) Even though there were physical variances between houses due to topographical changes in the area, Turkish people's nomadic culture and Islamic beliefs provided certain similar elements in the houses, such as introversion and privacy. Thrace Rural area contains different settlement, spatial and constructional characteristics due to the differences in its geography. Many rural homes have been abandoned, and there is a risk of becoming lost. Therefore, documentation of authentic characteristics of the rural houses and sites considering environmental features will provide a base for the sustainability of original rural houses and areas.

___

  • Akış T., İnceköse Ü., Tunçoku S S. & Arslan Avar, A. (2013). İzmir Kırsal Alan Konutları. Mimarlık, 370.
  • Akyüz-Levi, E. & Taşçı, B. (2017). Research of Rural Architecture in Aegean Region: Villages of Bayındır. Megaron, 12(3), 365-384. https://doi.org/10.5505/megaron.2017.12499.
  • Alcindor M. & Coq-Huelva, D. (2020). Refurbishment, vernacular architecture and invented traditions: the case of the Empordanet (Catalonia). International Journal of Heritage Studies, 26(7), 684-699. DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2019.1678054
  • Aran, K. (2000). Barınaktan Öte: Anadolu Kır Yapıları. Ege Yayınları.
  • Başoğlan Avşar, Ö. (2016). Muğla - Yerkesik Kırsalı O�rneğinde Kırsal Mimarinin Geleceğinin Tartışılması. Ege Mimarlık, 92, 14-19.
  • Batur, A. & G ür Ş, Ö. (2005). Doğu Karadeniz’de Kırsal Mimari. Milli Reasürans T.A. Ş.
  • Batur, A. (2005). Doğu Karadeniz’de Kırsal Mimari (Rural architecture in the Eastern Black Sea Region). İstanbul, Turkey: Milli Reasürans TAŞ and Mas Matbaacılık AŞ.
  • Cardinale, N. Rospi, G. & Stefanizzi, P. (2013). Energy and microclimatic performance of Mediterranean vernacular buildings: The Sassi District of Matera and the Trulli District of Alberobello. Building and Environment, 59, 590–598.
  • Carmen Jimened Delgado, M. and Guerrero, I. C. (2006). Earth building in Spain. Construction and Building Materials, 20(9), 679–690.
  • Dağ Gürcan, A. (2017). Toroslar’da Kırsal Mı̇marlık: Bozyazı, Dereköy O�rneğı̇. [Masters thesis, KTO Karatay University, Institute of Science].
  • Deniz, B. (1992). Manisa Yöresi Köy Ev Mimarisi. Arkeoloji-Sanat Tarihi Dergisi, 6, 17-50.
  • Dickinson, R. E. (1949). Rural settlements in the German lands. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 39(4), 239–263.
  • ECOVAST (1996), Traditional rural architecture: A strategy for Europe. Eastleigh, United Kingdom.
  • Enayat, A. (1952). Rural settlement types in the Uttar Pradesh (United Provinces of Agra and Oudh). Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 42(3), 223–246.
  • Eres, Z. (2014). Erken Cumhuriyet Döneminde Çağdaş Kırsal Kimliğin Örneklenmesi: Planlı Göçmen Köyleri. Mimarlık, 375.
  • Eres, Z. (1999). Tarih öncesi kazı yerlerinin koruma, restorasyon, sergileme sorunu ve çözüme yönelik bir uygulama Kırklareli-Aşağı Pınar Örneği. [Master’s thesis, Istanbul Technical University].
  • Eriç, M. (1979). Geleneksel Türk Mimarisinde Malzeme Seçim ve Kullanımı. Yapı Dergisi, 33, 42–45.
  • Etlacakuş, A. & Hamamcıoğlu Turan, M. (2016). Historical Development of Darkale Rural Settlement in Soma, Manisa. A|Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 14, 13-23. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2017.83788.
  • Etlacakuş, A. & Hamamcıoğlu Turan, M. (2017). Darkale'nin Koruma Amaçlı Değerlendirilmesi. TAÇ Dergisi, 8, 4-13.
  • Fuentes, J. M. (2010). Methodological bases for documenting and reusing vernacular farm architecture. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11(2), 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2009.03.004.
  • Fuentes, J. M. (2010). Methodological bases for documenting and reusing vernacular farm architecture. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11, 119–129.
  • González, P. A. (2017). Heritage and rural gentrification in Spain: thecase of Santiago Millas. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 23(2), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2016.1246468
  • Hasgül, E., Olgun, i. & Karakoç, E. (2021). Vernacular rural heritage in Turkey: an intuitional overview for a new living experience. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 11(4), 440-456.
  • Icomos (1999). ICOMOS 12th General Assembly: Charter On The Built Vernacular Heritage. Mexico.
  • İner, G. & Erdoğan, N. (2007). Edirne/Uzunköprü/Yeniköy Kirsal Konutlarinin Mimari ve Yapisal Karakteri. TÜBA-KED, 14(2), 109 - 113.
  • İşcanı, B. & Eres, Z. (2017). Datça-Hızırşah Köyü Kırsal Sı̇t Alanı ve Geleneksel Konut Mı̇marı̇sı̇nı̇n I�ncelenmesı̇. In K. K. Eyüpgiller, Z. Eres, A. C. Bilge, M. Arslan Çinko (Ed.) Kırsal Mı̇marlık Mı̇rasının Korunması: Türkiye’den ve Dünyadan O�rnekler (pp.57-74). Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları.
  • Kabataş, E. & Kiper, T. (2021). Determination of the Natural and Socio-cultural Landscape Values of Rural Settlements: Kırklareli Kocayazı and Kula Village Examples. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 11(3): 2328-2341.
  • Kafesçioğlu, R. (1947). Orta Anadolu Köy Evlerinin Yapısı. İstanbul Technical University, Faculty of Architecture
  • Kavas, K. R. (2011). Alanya-I�ncı̇rkırı Geleneksel Kırsal Mı̇marı̇sı̇nde Doğa-Kültür I�lı̇şkı̇si. Journal of World of Turks, 3(1), 271-289.
  • Kaushik, A. (2020). The Continuity of Vernacular Architecture amidst Changes, Village Shyopura, India. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 8(2), 771-800.
  • Kazmaoğlu, M. & Tanyeli, U. (1979). Anadolu konut mimarisinde bölgesel farklılıklar. Yapı, 3(13), 13.
  • Koca, G. (2019). Evaluation of Traditional Şirince Houses According to Sustainable Construction Principles. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 7(1), 30-49.
  • Kurtuluş, B. & Şahin Güçhan, N. (2015). Tarsus B ölgesı̇'nde Geleneksel Kırsal Mı̇marı̇ ve Yaşam. TÜBA-KED, 13,101-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.22520/tubaked.2015.0006.
  • Ngowi, A. B. (1997). Improving the traditional earth construction: A case study of Bostwana. Construction and Building Materials, 11(1), 1–7.
  • MSGSUYUAM. (2013). Orta Anadolu Kerpiç Geleneksel Mimari Araştirma Sergisi. Msgsü Yapi Uygulama Ve Araştirma Merkezi, Msgsü Bilimsel Araştirma Projeleri Birimi.
  • Oikonomou, A. & Bougiatioti, F. (2011). Architectural structure and environmental performance of the traditional buildings in Florina, NW Greece. Building and Environment, 46, 669–689.
  • Ottoni, F. & Borghi, F. (2016). Rural Heritage and Cultural Landscape: Guidelines for Sustainable Seismic Reinforcement of Emilian Historic Rural Building in Italy. Procedia Engineering, 161, 1662-1668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.642.
  • Özgüner, O. (1970). Köyde Mimari Doğu Karadeniz. Ankara: O.D.T.Ü. Mimarlık Fakültesi.
  • Phillips, M. (1993). Rural gentrification and the processes of class colonisation. Journal of Rural Studies, 9(2), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0743- 0167(93)90026-G
  • Polat-Pekmezci I., Eres Özdoğan Z., Topçubaşı M. (2013). Trakya’da Tarihi Bir Kasaba: Kaynarca Geleneksel Yerleşme Dokusu Üzerine Ön Çalışmalar. In K. Eyüpgiller, Z. Eres (Ed.) Prof.Dr. Nur Akın’a Armağan (pp.493-509), Yem Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Postalcı-Altınkaya, E., Tekin, Ç. & Eren, Ö. (2011). Kırsal Yerleşim Bölgelerinde Sürdürülebilirlik: Çanakkale Bölgesi Ayvacık İlçesi Adatepe ve Demirciköy. Politeknik Dergisi, 12(2), 109-113.
  • Quintana, D. C. Díaz-Puente, J. M. & Gallego-Moreno, F. (2022). Architectural and cultural heritage as a driver of social change in rural areas: 10 years (2009– 2019) of management and recovery in Huete, a town of Cuenca, Spain. Land Use Policy, 115.
  • Ruda, Gy. (1998). Rural buildings and the environment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 41, 93–97.
  • Sağıroğlu, Ö. (2017). Characteristics and Construction Techniques of Akseki Bucakalan Village Rural Dwellings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 1(3) (2017): 433-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2016.1243277
  • Sümerkan, M.R. (1991). Doğu Karadeniz’de Kırsal Kesim Geleneksel Ev Plan Tiplerinin Yöresel Dağılımı. Türk Halk Mimarisi Sempozyumu Bildirileri. Kültür Bakanlığı Halk Kültürünü Araştırma Dairesi Yayınları, Ankara, pp. 173-183.
  • Turkish encyclopedia. (1982). 31. Cilt, MEB Devlet Kitapları. Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
  • Vissilia, A. M. (2009). Evaluation of a sustainable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape: Architectural typology and building physics. Building and Environment, 44, 1095–1106.
  • Yeler, S. (2021). Armutveren Köyü’nün (Kırklareli) Kırsal Mimari Özellikleri ve Koruma Önerileri. Journal of Architecture and Life, 6(2), 717-733.
  • Yüksek, İ. (2008). Geleneksel Anadolu Mimarlığında Ekolojik Uygulamalar Üzerine Bir Araştıma (Kırklareli Kırsal Alan Örneği). [PhD thesis, Trakya University, Department of Architecture].
  • Yüksek, İ. &Tülay, E. (2013). Analysis of traditional rural houses in Turkey in terms of energy efficiency. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 32(6), 643- 658. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2013.769992
  • Zorlu, T. & Faiz Büyükçam, S. (2012). Ekolojik Mimarlık: Doğu Karadeniz Kırsal Konutu. Mimarlık, 367, 56-60.
ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: KONYA TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ MİMARLIK ve TASARIM FAKÜLTESİ