Özlem DEMİRKAN

An Architectural Self - Criticism:The Accessibility Analysis of Berlika Park Swimming Pool

Urban designers and architects have to clearly understand the physical features and needs of the people they are designing for. In the designing process fields such as anthropometry, biomechanics, ergonomics, biology and physics require scientific verification. But it can easily be forgotten that there are physically-challenged persons. All users have to experience any place by using their ability to move and perceive. If designers don't take into account the special circumstances for physically-challenged persons, the accessibility of the places become impossible. At the same time a sustainable and an accessible place is truly a sign of urban rights. In this context, human rights are not only important for disciplines such as law, sociology, psychology and political sciences but also they must be important for design disciplines such as architecture, urban design and interior design. This research based on the rights to exercise for physically-challenged persons aims to analyze the accessibility of the place. The Facility-Berlika Park Swimming Pool-chosen for this study-was designed by DKN Yapı and I was a member of the design team and today an active user of the facility. As a research method photographs were taken of different areas of the facility and the conformity of TSE standards -TS9111 - TS 12576 was discussed. Within this context, the structure was examined in terms of mobility constraints under the titles of accessible route, the arrangement of immediate surroundings of the building, arrangement of the entrance of the building, arrangement of the accessibility inside the building, signs, elevators, and fire emergency alert systems. The problematic areas of the building were identified and analyzed. This research aims to make case-study-building more accessible place and a new modification project has been planned. But it is necessary to examine the buildings or the environment during their design process and solve the problems without the need of renovation project. The design standards for everyone should be considered in the contracts. At the same time, the accessibility plates should be asked from the architects.

PDF

___

Abdou, S. M. I. (2011). Inclusion of Physically Disabled Children Through Environmental Rehabilitation of Urban Spaces Case Study: Al Azhar park Caario. Procedia Engineering, 21, 53-58.
Abdulkadir, S., & Jamaludin, M. (2012). Applicability of Malaysian Standarts and Universal Design in Public Buildings in Putrajava. Procedia Social and Behavirol Sciences, 36, 659- 669.
Abdulkadir, S., & Jamaludin, M. (2012). Users' Satisfaction and Perception on Accessibility of Public Buildings in Putrajava: Access Audit Story Paper presented at the Asean Conference on Enviroment-Behaviour Studies, Bangkok Thailland.
Abdulkadir, S., Jamaludin, M., & A., R. A. (2011). Building Managers' Perception in Regards to Accessibility, and Universal Design Implementation in Public Buildings:Putraja Case Studies. Procedia Social and Behavirol Sciences, 35, 129-136.
Bromley, R. D. F., Matthews, D. L., & Thomas, C. J. (2007). City Centre accessibility for wheelchair users: The consumer perspective and the planning implications. Cities, 27(3), 229-230.
Church, R. L., & Marston, J. R. (2002). Measuring Accessibility for People with a Disability. Geographical Analyses, 35(1), 83- 96.
Evcil, A. N. (2009). Wheelchair Accessibility to Public Buildings in İstanbul: Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 4(2), 76-85.
Evcil, A. N. (2012). Raising Awareness about Accessibility. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 490-494.
Goldsmith, S. (1997). The New Paradigm: Designing for Disabled. Bath, Great Britain: Architectural Press.
Harvey, D. (2012). Asi Şehirler: Metis Yayınları.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/equality-act-2010-guidance. (2010). Equality Act. Retrieved 03.2016, 2016
Lefebvre, H. (1972). Şehir Hakkı: Eğitim Bilim Toplum. Lid, I., & Solvang, K. P. (2015). (Dis)ability and the Experince of Accessibility in the Urban Enviroment Alter. European Journal of Disability Research, 366, 1-14.
Palabıyık, H. (2004). Avrupa Kentsel Şart, Avrupa Konseyi Yerel ve Bölgesel Yönetimler Kongresi Anlaşmaları: Birleşik Yayınları.
Taylor, Z., & Jozefowicz, I. (2012). Intra-Urban Daily Mobility of Disabled People for Recreational and Leisure Purposes. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 155-172.
TS 9111 2011, Institute of Turkish Standards, The requirements of accessibility in buildings for people with disabilitiesand mobility constraints, ICS 11.180.01; 91.040.30.
WHO. (2002). Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health ICF (pp. 9). Geneva: World Health Organization.
Yazıgı, S., Resende, A. E., & Yazıgı, R. (2015). Acceesibility in Soccer Stadiums:İnfrastructure and Organization in Support of People with Reduced Mobility:A Use Analysis. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 55557-55561.
URL1.https://www.gov.uk/guidance/equality-act-2010- guidance, 2010
URL2.https://intweb.tse.org.tr/standard/standard/standardara. aspx