___

• Abbott, M., C. Doucouliagos (2003), “The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis”, Economics of Education review, 22(1), 89-97.
• Ahn T., Arnold V., Charnes A., WW. Cooper (1989), “DEA and ratio efficiency analyses for public institutions of higher learning in Texas”, Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, 5(2), 165-185.
• Altınsoy S. (2011), “A review of university facilities in Turkey”, CELE Exchange, 2011(6), 1-5.
• Avkiran, N. K. (2001), “Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(1), 57-80.
• Bayraktar, E., Tatoglu, E., S. Zaim (2013), “Measuring the relative efficiency of quality management practices in Turkish public and private universities”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(12), 1810-1830.
• Baysal, M. E., Alçılar, B., Çerçioğlu, H., B. Toklu (2005), “Türkiye'deki devlet üniversitelerinin 2004 yılı performanslarının, veri zarflama analizi yöntemiyle belirlenip buna göre 2005 yılı bütçe tahsislerinin yapılması”, Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 67-73.
• Botti, L., Briec, W., G. Cliquet (2009), “Plural forms versus franchise and company-owned systems: A DEA approach of hotel chain performance”, Omega, 37(3), 566-578.
• Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R. G., E. Thanassoulis (1991), “Applied data envelopment analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, 52(1), 1-15.
• Charnes,A., Cooper,W.W., E. Rhodes (1981), “Evaluating program and managerial efficiency:An application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through”, Management Science, 27(6), 668–697.
• Cook, W. D., L. M. Seiford (2009), “Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) - Thirty Years On”, European Journal of Operational Research, 192, 1-17.
• Çınar, Y. (2016). Research and Teaching Efficiencies of Turkish Universities with Heterogeneity Considerations: Application of Multi-Activity DEA and DEA by Sequential Exclusion of Alternatives Methods. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1701/1701.07318.pdf (Access Date: 11.10.2018)
• Dikmen, F. C. (2007), “Veri zarflama analizi ile üniversitelerin etkinliğinin ölçülmesi”, Kocaeli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 3-4(3-6), 1-22.
• Dollery, B., Murray, D., L. Crase (2006), “Knaves or knights, pawns or queens? An evaluation of Australian higher education reform policy”, Journal of Educational Administration, 44(1), 86-97.
• Erkoç, T. E. (2016). “Measuring efficiencies of Turkish public universities with non-parametric efficiency estimation method [Türkiye’de kamu üniversitelerinin etkinliğinin parametrik olmayan yöntem ile ölçülmesi]”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(3), 124-136.
• Fandel, G. (2007) “On the performance of universities in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany: government's redistribution of funds judged using DEA efficiency measures”, European Journal of Operational Research, 176(1), 521-533.
• Farrell, M. J. (1957), “The measurement of productive efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253–290.
• Girgin, M. C. (2006), “History of Higher Education Provision for the Deaf in Turkey and Current Applications at the Anadolu University”, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 5(3), 6-11.
• Günay, A., Dulupçu, M. A., K. O. Oruç (2017), “Türkiye’de devlet üniversitelerinin etkinlik ve verimlilik analizi: veri zarflama analizi ve Malmquist toplam faktör verimlilik endeksi uygulamaları”, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(3), 85-113.
• İçöz., C., H. Sönmez (2015), “Türkiye’deki istatistik bölümlerinin göreli etkinliklerinin veri zarflama analizi ile ölçülmesi”, Alphanumeric Journal, 3(1), 41-50.
• http://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/ (Access Date: 15.10.2018)
• Johnes J, G. Johnes (1995), “Research funding and performance in U.K. university departments of economics: a frontier analysis”, European Economics Review,14(3), 301-314.
• Kağnıcıoğlu, C. H., Ö. İcan (2011), “Measuring relative efficiencies of Turkish universities in 2007: A DEA case study in R”, Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 13-26.
• Kong, W. H., T. T. Fu (2012), “Assessing the performance of business colleges in Taiwan using data envelopment analysis and student based value-added performance indicators”, Omega, 40(5), 541-549.
• Köksal, G., B. Nalçaci (2006), “The relative efficiency of departments at a Turkish engineering college: A data envelopment analysis”, Higher Education, 51(2), 173-189.
• Kuah, C. T., K. Y. Wong (2011), “Efficiency assessment of universities through data envelopment analysis”, Procedia Computer Science, 3, 499-506.
• Kuah, C. T., Wong, K. Y., & Behrouzi, F. (2010, May). A review on data envelopment analysis (DEA), In 2010 Fourth Asia International Conference On Mathematical/Analytical Modelling And Computer Simulation (pp. 168-173). IEEE.
• Munoz, D. A. (2016), “Assessing the research efficiency of higher education institutions in Chile: A data envelopment analysis approach”, International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 809-825.
• Sarrico, C. S., Hogan, S. M., Dyson, R. G., A. D. Athanassopoulos (1997), “Data envelopment analysis and university selection”, Journal of the operational research society, 48(12), 1163-1177.
• Selim, S., S. A. Bursalioglu (2013), “Analysis of the determinants of universities efficiency in turkey: Application of the data envelopment analysis and panel Tobit model”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 895-900.
• Selim, S., S. A. Bursalıoğlu (2015), “Efficiency of higher education in Turkey: A bootstrapped two-stage DEA approach”, International Journal of Statistics and Applications, 5(2), 56-67.
• Tekneci, P. D. (2014). Evaluating Research Performance of Turkish Universities. PhD Dissertation, Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
• http://www.yok.gov.tr/ (Access Date: 14.10.2018)