KAPİTALİZMİN ŞÖVALYELERİ VE SANAYİ KAPTANLARI ÜZERİNE

Girişimci iktisadi ve sosyal yapıya “yeni bileşimler” veya “yenilikler” ortaya koyan kişi, yenilik ise bu yapılardaki değişmenin temel içsel nedeni olarak tanımlanabilir. Rekabetçi bir ekonomide yeni bileşimler, eski rekabetçi sürecin parametrelerinin ve dolayısıyla iktisadi ve kurumsal yapının değişmesine yol açar. Schumpeter’de girişimci bu nitelikteki yeniliklerin yaratıcısıdır. Veblen’de ise, girişimcinin temel işlevi teknolojik yenilikler yoluyla kurumsal değişimi sağlamasıdır. Bu çerçevede, çalışmanın amacı, Schumpeter ve Veblen’in girişimci anlayışlarından yola çıkarak girişimcinin iktisadi ve kurumsal değişimdeki rolünü incelemektir. Çalışma iki bölümden oluşmaktadır. Birinci bölümde, Schumpeter’in, ikinci bölümde ise Veblen’in girişimcisi iktisadi ve kurumsal gelişme ve değişimdeki rolleri bağlamında incelenecektir. Böylece, girişimciliğin geçirdiği evrimsel süreç, üstlendiği farklı niteliksel roller ve teknoloji ile ilişkisinin kapitalist toplum açısından ne anlam ifade ettiği araştırılacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Schumpeter ve Veblen’in analizlerinde girişimcilik, teknolojik ve kurumsal değişim, içsel dinamik gelişme

ON THE KNİGTHS OF THE CAPITALISM AND THE CAPTAINS OF INDUSTRY

On the Knigths of the Capitalism and the Captains of Industry Entrepreneur can be defined as the one who introduces the "new combinations" or “innovations” to the economic and social structure and innovations can be defined as the endogenous causes of in these structures. New combinations lead to the changes in the parameters of the old competitive process and cause changes in the economic and institutional structure. In Schumpeter, entrepreneur is the creator of this kind of innovations. In Veblen, the basic function of the entrepreneur is to provide institutional changes by the means of technological innovation. In this context, the aim of this study is to examine the roles of entrepreneur in the economic and institutional changes within the analysis of Schumpeter and Veblen. This study consists of two parts. In the first part, Schumpeter's entrepreneur and in the second part Veblen’s entrepreneur will be discussed within the context of the roles they play in economic and institutional change and development. Thus, the evolutionary process of the entrepreneurship, the different roles which they played in the economic and social structure and the relationship with the technology will be investigated under the capitalist society

Keywords:

Entrepreneur in the analyses of Schumpeter and Veblen, technological and institutional changes and dynamic endogenous development,

PDF

___

Bush, P. (1988) “The Theory of İnstitutional Change”, M.Tool, M.E. Sharpe (der), Evolutionary Economics, Vol I içinde, Inc. London, England.
Brouwer, M.(2002) “Weber, Schumpeter and Knight of Entrepreneurship and Economic Development”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12,83-105.
Edgell, S. (2006) “Thorstein Veblen’s Theory of Evolutionary Change”, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 34(3), 267-280.
Griffen, R., A. Karayiannis (2002) “T. Veblen’s Evolutionary Theory of Entrepreneurship”, History of Economic Ideas, 10(3), 61-83.
Güler Aydın D., S. Kılıç (2008) “A New Approach to the Classical Entrepreneur within the Framework of Schumpeter’s View”, Management and Behaviour in Organizations, C. Aktan, Ö. Dalbay (eds.), 2, 157-164.
Hodgson, G. (1997) “Economics and Evolution and the Evolution of Economics” Reijnders J (der), Economics and Evolution, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 9- 40.
Kirzner, I.M (1973) Competition and Entrepreneurship, The University of Chicago Press.
Marx, K. (1994) Capital, Vol. II, London: Penguin Books.
McDaniel, B.A. (2005) “A Contemporary View of Joseph A. Schumpeter’s Theory of Entrepreneur”, Journal of Economic Issues, 39(2), 485-489.
O’Donnel, L.A (1973) “Rationalism, Capitalism and the Entrepreneur: the Views of Veblen and Schumpeter”, History of Political Economy, 5(1), 199-214.
Praag van M.J. (1999) “Some Classic Views on Entepreneurship”, De Economics, 143(3), 311-335.
Rutherford, M. (1984) “Thorstein Veblen and the Processes of institutional Change”, History of Political Economy, 16(3), 331-348.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development, New York: Oxford University Pres.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1943) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy,. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
Swedberg, R. (2007) “Rebuilding Schumpter’s Theory of Entrepreunership” Conference on Marshall, Schumpeter and Social Science, Hitotsubashi University, 17-18, 1-28.
Veblen, T.B. (1898) “The instinct of Workmanship and the Irksomens of Labor”, American Journal of Sociology, 14(2),187-201.
Veblen, T.B. (1909) “The Limitations Marginal Utility”, Journal of Political Econonomy, 17(9), 620-636.
Veblen T.B. (1946) The Instinct of Workmanship: And the State of the Industrial Arts, New York: The Viking Press.
Veblen, T.B. (1964) “The Place of Science in Modern Civilization” in W. Mitchell (ed), What Veblen Taught: Selected Writings of Thorstein Veblen, 1936, New York: A.M. Kelley.
Veblen, T.B. (1964) Absentee Ownership and Business Enterprise in Recent Times, New York: Augustus M. Kelley, Bookseller, 1923.
Veblen, T.B. (1965) The Engineers and The price System, New York: A.M. Kelley.
Veblen, T.B. (1975) The Theory of Business Enterprise, New Jersey: A.M. Kelley.
Veblen Thorstein. B. (1990) “The Preconceptions of Economic Science I-II-III”, içinde The Place of Science in Modern Civilization and Other Essays, New York, Huebsch, (1919), 82-179.
Weber, M., (1997) Protestan Ahkalı ve Kapitalizmin Ruhu, (Çev. Z. Aruoba), İstanbul: Hil Yayın.