___

• Aijmer, K. Stenstrom, A. (Eds.) (2004). Discourse Patterns in Spoken and Written Corpora. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• Biber, D. Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal ofEnglishfor Specific Purposes, 9, 2—20.
• Biber, D. (2006). University Language: Corpus—Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• Biber, D. (2009). corpus—driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi—word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14, 275—31 1.
• Biber, D. Finegan, E. (2001). Intra—textual variation within medical research articles. In S. Conrad, and D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multidimensional Studies, pp. 108—124, London: Longman.
• Biber, D. Burges, J. (2000). Historical change in the language use of women and men: gender differences in dramatic dialogue. Journal ofEnglish Linguistics, 28, 21—37.
• Biber, D., Conrad, S., &Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
• Brodkey, L. (1987). Academic Writing as Social Practice. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
• Carrio—Pastor, M. L. (2009). Contrasting specific English corpora: Language variation. International Journal of English Studies, Special Issue, 221—233.
• Colson, J—P. (2008). Cross—linguistic phraseological studies: An overview. In S. Granger F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 191—206), John Benjamins Publishing Company
• Conrad, S. (2000). Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In S. Hunston& G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial Stance and the construction of Discourse (pp. 56 73), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Conrad, S. (2001). Variation among disciplinary texts: comparison of textbooks and journal articles in biology and history. In S. Conrad, and D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multidimensional Studies (pp.94—108), London: Longman.
• Cronin, B. Franks, S. (2006). Trading Cultures: Resource Mobilization and Service Rendering in the Life Sciences as Revealed in the Journal Article’s Paratext. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1909—1918.
• Cronin, B. Overfelt, K. (1994). The scholar’s courtesy: survey of acknowledgment behavior. Journal of Documentation, 50, 165—196
• Cronin, B., Mc. Kenzie, G. &Stiffler, K. (1992). Patterns of acknowledgment. Journal of Documentation, 48, 491—516
• Cronin, B., Shaw, D., La Barre, K. (2003). cast of thousands.Coauthorship and sub—authorship collaboration in the twentieth century as manifested in the scholarly literature of psychology and philosophy. Journal of the American Societyfor Information Science and Technology, 54, 855—871.
• Anthony, L. (2011). AntConc (Version 3.2.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/
• Cronin, B., Shaw, D., La Barre, K. (2004). Visible, less visible, and invisible work: Patterns of collaboration in twentieth century chemistry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 160— 168.
• Crowley, S. (1991).A personal essay on freshman English.Pre/Text, 12, 155—176.
• De Cock, S. (2000). Repetitive phrasal chunkiness and advanced EFL speech and writing.In Mair, C., and Hundt, M.
• (Eds.), Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory (pp. 51—68), Amsterdam: Rodopi,. Giles, C.L. Councill, I. G. (2004). Who gets acknowledged: Measuring scientific contribution through automatic acknowledgment indexing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, USA, 101, 17599—17604
• Granger, S. (1998). Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations and formulae. In Cowie, A.P. (ed.), Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp.l45—l60), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Hyland, K. &Tse, P. (2004). “I would like to thank my supervisor”: Acknowledgments in graduate dissertations. International Journal oprplied Linguistics, 14, 259—275
• Hyland, K. (2008). Academic clusters: text patterning in published and postgraduate writing, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18, 40—62
• Kachru, Y. (2008). Language variation and corpus linguistics. World Englishes, 27, 1—8
• Laufer, B. (2000). Avoidance of idioms in second language: The effect of L1—L2 degree of similarity. Studia Linguistica 54, 186—196.
• Laufer, B., Eliasson, S. (1993). What causes avoidance in L2 learning: L1—L2 difference, L1—L2 similarity, or L2 complexity? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 35—48.
• Martin—Martin, P., Burgess, S. (2004). The rhetorical management of academic critisim in research article abstracts. Text, 24, 171—195
• McCain, K.W. (1991). Communication, competition, and secrecy: The production and dissemination of research— related information in genetics. Science, Technolog Human Values, 16, 491—516.
• Ozturk, I. (2007). The textual organization of research article introductions in applied linguistics: variability within single discipline. Englishfor Specific Purposes, 26, 25—38
• Phillips, S. G. (2009). Authorship and writing practices in the health care industry. AMWA Journal, 24, 4—8
• Romer, U. (2010). Establishing the phraseological profile of text type: the construction of meaning in academic book reviews. English Text Construction,3, 95—1 19
• Salager—Meyer, F.; Ariza, M. A. A.; Berbesi, M. P. (2009). “Backstage solidarity” in Spanish— and English—written medical research papers: Publication context and the acknowledgment paratext. Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 307—317
• Schmitt, N. (2010).Researching vocabulary: vocabulary research manual. New York: Pelgrave Macmillan.
• Uzun, L., E. Huber (2002) (Eds.).Türkçede Bilgi Yapısı ve Bilimsel Metinler. Essen: Die Blaue Eule.
• Williams, I. (2010). Cultural differences in academic discourse: Evidence from first—person verb use in the methods sections of medical research articles. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15, 214—239