Sultandağı İlçesindeki Kiraz Bahçelerinden İki Osmia Türünün (Hym.:Megachilidae) yuvalarında Rastlanan Polenler

Osmia türleri (Hym.:Megachilidae) bal arısı için uygun olmayan hava koşullarında bile meyve bahçelerindeki polinasyon aktivitelerini devam ettirebildikleri için önemlidir. Çalışmada, kiraz bahçelerinde popülasyonlarını desteklemek için yapay yuvalarda yuvalandırılan Osmia bicornis (L.) ve O. caerulescens (L.)’in yuvalarında rastlanan polenler analiz edilmiştir. Yuvalar, Sultandağı ilçesinin (Afyonkarahisar, Türkiye) iki kiraz bahçesine 2009 ve 2010 yıllarının Nisan ayında kurulmuş, aynı yılların Eylül ayında kaldırılmıştır. Polen örnekleri, O. bicornis’in 11, O. caerulescens’in ise 6 yuvasından elde edilmiştir. Toplam 4800 polen zerresinin incelenmesi sonucunda, iki türün 6 familyanın polenlerini topladığı ve dominant polen grubunun O. bicornis için Brassicaceae (%60.1)’ye, O. caerulescens için Fabaceae (%48.2)’e ait olduğu belirlenmiştir. İkinci polen grubu O. caerulescens için Asteraceae (%11.8) iken, O. bicornis için Rosaceae (%20.7) olmuştur. O. caerulescens yuvalarında %2.8 oranında Rosaceae polenine rastlanmıştır. Bu sonuçlara göre, O. bicornis’in kirazın polinasyonundaki etkisi O. caerulescens’inkinden daha yüksek gibi görünmektedir.

Encountered Pollen in Nests Two Osmia Species (Hym.:Megachilidae) from Sweet Cherry Orchards in Sultandağı Town (Afyonkarahisar, Turkey)

Osmia species (Hym.: Megachilidae) are important because they can continue even their pollinator activity in orchards in the unfavourable weather conditions for honey bees. In the study, the pollen encountered in the artificial nests of Osmia bicornis (L.) and O. caerulescens (L.) used for supporting their populations in the sweet cherry orchards were analysed. The nests were established in two cherry orchards of Sultandağı town (Afyonkarahisar, Turkey) in April of 2009 and 2010 and removed in September of the same years. Pollen samples were obtained from total 11 nests of O. bicornis and 6 nests of O. caerulescens. Total 4800 pollen grains were examined. As a result of the diagnosis studies of pollen grains, it determined that two species collected the pollens of 6 families and that the dominant pollen group belonged to the Brassicaceae (60.1%) for O. bicornis while Fabaceae (48.2%) for O. caerulescens. The second pollen group were Rosaceae (20.7%) for O. bicornis while Asteraceae (11.8%) for O. caerulescens. In the nests of O. caerulescens, 2.8% Rosaceae pollen were encountered. According to these results, the effect of O. bicornis is higher than O. caerulescens’s on sweet cherry pollination.

PDF

___

1. D. Goulson, Conserving Will Bees for Crop Pollination. Food, Agriculture and Enviroment, 1 (2003) 142-144.
2. M. Krunic and L. Stanisavljevic, Population Management in the Mason Bee Species Osmia cornuta and O. rufa (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) for Orchard Pollination in Serbia. Entomologia Generalis, 29 (2006) 29-38.
3. Y. Güler and F. Dikmen, Potential Bee Pollinators of Sweet Cherry in Inclement Weather Conditions. Journal of the Entomological Research Society, 13 (2013) 9-19.
4. Y. Güler, Sultandağı (Afyonkarahisar) Kiraz Bahçelerinde Osmia (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) Türlerine Yönelik Yürütülen Yapay Yuva Çalışmaları. Bitki Koruma Bülteni, 52 (2012) 325-336.
5. Y. Güler and K. Sorkun, Analysis of Pollen Collected by Andrena flavipes Panzer (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) in Sweet Cherry Orchards, Afyonkarahisar Province of Turkey. Psyche, vol. (2010), Article ID 160789, 1-5. doi:10.1155/2010/160789.
6. J. Banaszak and L. Romasenko, Megachilid bees of Europe. Pedagogical University of Bydgoszcz, Poland, (1998) 239.
7. A. Müller, Palaearctic Osmiine Bees, (2013) ETH Zürich, http://blogs.ethz.ch/osmiini.
8. R.R. James and T.L. Pitts-Singer, Bee pollination in agricultural ecosystems. Oxford University Press US, (2008) 232 p.
9. E. Scheuchl, Illustrierte Bestimmungstabellen der Wildbienen Deutschlands und Österreichs. Band 2:Megachilidae und Melittidae. Preisinger KG, Landshut, (2006) 192 p.
10. R.P. Wodehouse. Pollen grains. McGraw, Hill N.Y, (1935) 574 p.
11. L. Persano Oddo and R. Piro, Main European Unifloral Honeys: Descriptive Sheets. Apidologie, 35 (2004) 38-81.
12. A. Özkök Tüylü and K. Sorkun, The Investigation of Morphologic Analysis of Pollen Grains Which are Economically Important and Collected by Apis mellifera L. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, 35 (2007) 31-38.
13. K. Sorkun, 2008. Türkiye’nin nektarlı bitkileri, polenleri ve balları. Palme Yayıncılık, Ankara, (2008) 341 p.
14. M. Giovanetti and G. Aronne, Honey Bee Interest in Flowers with Anemophilous Characteristics: First Notes on Handling Time and Routine on Fraxinus ornus and Castanea sativa. Bulletin of Insectology, 64 (2011) 77–82.
15. M. Percival, Pollen Collection by Apis mellifera. New Phytologist, 46, (1947) 142–165.
16. A. Gathmann and T. Tscharntke, Foraging Ranges of Solitary Bees. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71 (2002) 757-765.
17. A. Raw, Pollen preferences of three Osmia species (Hymenoptera). Oikos, 25 (1974) 54-60.
18. E. Strohm, H. Daniel, C. Warmers and C. Stoll, Nest Provisioning and a Possible Cost of Reproduction in the Megachilid Bee Osmia rufa Studied by a New Observation Method. Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 14 (2002) 255-268.
19. M. Krunic, A. Pinzauti, A. Felicioli and L. Stanisavljevic, Further Observations on Osmia cornuta Latr. and O. rufa L. as Alternative Fruit Pollinators, Domestication and Utilization. Archives Biological Sciences Belgrade, 47 (1995) 59-66.