___

• 1. H. Zhang, L. Yang, B. Zhou, X. Wang, G. Liu, W. Liu, P. Wang, Investigation of biological cell-protein interactions using SPR sensor through laser scanning confocal imaging-surface plasmon resonance system, Spectrochim. Acta. A. Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 121 (2014) 381-386.
• 2. J. Buijs, G.C. Franklin, SPR-MS in functional proteomics, Brief. Funct. Genomic. Proteomic. 4 (2005) 39-47.
• 3. W.M. Mullett, E.P. Lai, J.M. Yeung, Surface plasmon resonance-based immunoassays. Methods. 22 (2000) 77-91.
• 4. G. Krishnamoorthy, E.T. Carlen, A. Van Der Berg, R.B.M. Schasfoort, Surface plasmon resonance imaging based multiplex biosensor: integration of biomolecular screening detection and kinetics estimation. Sensor. Actuators B 148 (2010) 511-521.
• 5. A.S. Kushwaha, A. Kumar, R. Kumar, and S.K. Srivastava, A study of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) based biosensor with improved sensitivity, Photonics Nanostruct. 31 (2018) 99–106.
• 6. S. Zeng, D. Baillargeat, H.P. Ho, and K.T. Yong, Nanomaterials enhanced surface plasmon resonance for biological and chemical sensing applications, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014) 3426-3452.
• 7. F.R. Caetano, E.A. Carneiro, D. Agustini, L.C.S. Figueiredo-Filho, C.E. Banks, M.F. Bergamini, L.H. Marcolino-Junior, Combination of electrochemical biosensor and textile threads: A microfluidic device for phenol determination in tap water, Biosens. Bioelectron. 99 (2018) 382–388.
• 8. H. Li, C. Han, Sonochemical Synthesis of Cyclodextrin-Coated Quantum Dots for Optical Detection of Pollutant Phenols in Water, Chem. Mater. 20 (2008) 6053–6059.
• 9. L. Wu, X. Lu, Dhanjai, Z. Wu, Y. Dong, X. Wang, S. Zheng, J. Chen, 2D transition metal carbide MXene as a robust biosensing platform for enzyme immobilization and ultrasensitive detection of phenol, Biosens. Bioelectron. 107 (2018) 69–75.
• 10. X.H. Zhou, L.H. Liu, X. Bai, H.C. Shi, A reduced graphene oxide based biosensor for high-sensitive detection of phenols in water samples, Sens. Actuators B Chem. (2013) 661–667.
• 11. L. Lu, L. Zhang, X. Zhang, S. Huan, G. Shen, R. Yu, A novel tyrosinase biosensor based on hydroxyapatite–chitosan nanocomposite for the detection of phenolic compounds, Anal. Chim. Acta 665 (2010), 146–151.
• 12. E. Bazrafshan, F.K. Mostafapour, H.J. Mansourian, Phenolic compounds: health effects and its removal from aqueous environments by low cost adsorbents, Health Scope. 2 (2013) 65–66.
• 13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Toxicological Review Phenol. In: Support of summary information on integrated risk information system (IRIS), CAS No. 108-95-2: 104. 2002.
• 14. C.L. Dang, Y. Lin, Detection of phenol by defective inorganic BN nanosheet: A DFT study, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 117 (2020) 107977.
• 15. X.D. Lv, P. Gao, An optical sensor for selective detection of phenol via double cross-linker precipitation polymerization, RSC Adv. 10 (2020) 25402-25407.
• 16. A. Puszkarewicz, J. Kaleta, D. Papciak, Adsorption of phenol from water on Natural Minerals, Ecol. Eng. 19 (2018) 132–138.
• 17. M.H. Aliabadi, N. Esmaeili, H.S. Jahromi, An electrochemical composite sensor for phenol detection in waste water, Appl. Nanosci. 10 (2020) 597–609.
• 18. R. Wahab, F. khan, N. Ahmad, M. Alam, J. Ahmad, A.A. Al-Khedhairy, Rapid sensing response for phenol with CuO nanoparticles, colloids and surfaces a-physicochemical and engineering aspects, Colloids Surf. A 607 (2020) 125424.
• 19. C.A. Arenal, B.E. Sample, Chapter 29:Wildlife toxicity assessment for phenol. In: Wildlife toxicity assessments for chemicals of military concern. Elsevier; 2015. p. 555–579.
• 20. IARC, International Agency for Research on Cancer Phenol. In: IARC Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans, World Health Organization, 47 (1989) 263-287.
• 21. A. Rico-Yuste, S. Carrasco, Molecularly imprinted polymer-based hybrid materials for the development of optical sensors, Polymer, 11 (2019) 1173.
• 22. C. Alexander, H.S. Andersson, L.I. Andersson, R.J. Ansell, N. Kirsch, I.A. Nicholls, J. O'Mahony, M.J. Whitcombe, Molecular imprinting science and technology: a survey of the literature for the years up to and including 2003, J. Mol. Recognit. 19 (2006) 106-180.
• 23. J.E. Lofgreen, G.A. Ozin, Controlling morphology and porosity to improve performance of molecularly imprinted sol–gel silica, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014) 911-933.
• 24. O.K. Castell, D.A. Barrow, A.R. Kamarudin, C.J. Allender, Current practices for describing the performance of molecularly imprinted polymers can be misleading and may be hampering the development of the field, J. Mol. Recognit. 24 (2011) 1115-1122.
• 25. L. Chen, S. Xu, J. Li, Recent advances in molecular imprinting technology: current status, challenges and highlighted applications, Chem. Soc. Rev. 40 (2011) 2922-2942.
• 26. R. Schirhagl, Bioapplications for Molecularly Imprinted Polymers, Anal. Chem 86 (2013) 250-261.
• 27. X. Zhou, W. Li, X. He, L. Chen, Recent Advances in the Study of Protein Imprinting, Sep. Purif. Rev. 36 (2007) 257–283.
• 28. R. Schirhagl, Bioapplications for Molecularly Imprinted Polymers, Anal. Chem. 86 (2013) 250-261.
• 29. S. Li, S. Cao, M. J. Whitcombe, S.A. Piletsky, Size matters: Challenges in imprinting macromolecules, Prog. Polym. Sci. 39 (2014) 145-163.
• 30. L. Chen, X. Wang, W. Lu, X. Wua, J. Lia, Molecular imprinting: perspectives and applications, Chem. Soc. Rev. 45 (2016) 2137.
• 31. Ş. Öncel, L. Uzun, B. Garipcan, A. Denizli, Synthesis of Phenylalanine-Containing Hydrophobic Beads for Lysozyme Adsorption, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (2005)7049–7056.
• 32. R.J. Umpleby, S.C. Baxter, Y. Chen, R.N. Shah, K.D. Shimizu, Characterization of molecularly imprinted polymers with the Langmuir-Freundlich isotherm, Anal. Chem. 73 (2001) 4584-4591.