___

• American Convention on Human Rights, Pact of San Jose, Costa Rica, 1969
• André Janssen, (2002), The New Regulation of Voluntary Euthanasia and Medically Assisted Suicide in the Netherlands, Int J Law Policy Family (2002) 16(2): 260-269
• Aydin Ünver, Tülay: Ceninin Hukuki Konumu, Xİİ Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul 2011, s. 17
• Aynur Ramazanova, (2014), Abortion Rates in Azerbaijan, social, http://crrc-caucasus.blogspot. com/2014/05/abortion-rates-in-azerbaijan.html
• Ben Saul, David Kinley and Jaqueline Lowbray, (2014), The International Covenant on Economic, Social
• and Cultural Rights: Commentary, cases and materials, Oxford University Press, London, Great Britain. p. 798
• Bernadette Rainey and et. al,(2014), Jakobs, White and Ovey, Oxford University Press, Sixth Edition, p. 166; see also at A. Plomer, A Faetal Right to Life?, The Case of Vo. v. France (2005),5 HRLR 311
• V. Božidar BANOVIC and Veljko TURANJANIN, (2014), Euthanasia: Murder or Not: A Comparative Approach, in Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2014 Oct; 43(10): 1316–1323
• Brigit Thoebes, the Right to Health, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Textbook, Asbjorn Eide, v.d. (ed.), Dodrecht/Boston/London, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, (Second revised Edition), 2001,p. 170
• Campbell S. (1980), Diagnosis of fetal abnormalities by ultrasound, in Milunski A (ed) Genetic Disorders and the fetus. Plenum, New York, pp.431-467
• CESCR, Concluding Observations: Kazakhstan, E/C.12/KAZ/CO/1, (7 June 2010), para. 133 Nicaragua E/C.12/NIC/CO/4, (28 November 2008), para.26
• CESCR, Concluding Observations: Mauritius, E/C.12/MUS/CO/4, (8 June 2010), para. 25
• Criminal Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan, 2000
• Dana J. Lawrence, 2007, The Four Principles of Biomedical Ethics: A Foundation for Current Bioethical Debate, Journal of Chiropractic Humanities, p. 35
• Erdem Aydın, Nermin Ersoy, Tıp Etiğı İlkeleri, T Klin Tıbbi Etik, 1995, 2-3, s. 52
• Erhan Büken, Nüket Örnek Büken, Yasal ve Etik Yönleriyle Türkiyede Tıbbi Malpraktı, Ed. Ayşegül Demirhan Erdemir ve dig. Çağdaş Tıp Etiği, Nobel Tıp Kitapevleriç İstanbul 2003, p. 163
• Factsheet of the UK Organization Birthrights: protecting human rights in childbirth on Human Rights in maternity care
• Francisco Forest, Martin Stephen and et.al, (2006), International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: treaties, cases and analysis, Cambridge University Press, USA, First edition, p. 333
• Jonathan Herring (2014), Medical Law and Ethics, Ch.9 Dying and Death, p.519
• Henderson JT, Harper CC, Gutin S, et al. Routine bimanual pelvic examinations: practices and beliefs of US obstetrician-gynecologists. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208:109.e1-7
• Iqbal H. Shah, Elisabeth Åhman and Nuriye Ortayli, “Access to Safe Abortion: Progress and Challenges since the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD)”, Background Paper No. 3, p. 13
• Jakob Pichon, Does the Unborn Child Have a Right to Life? The Insufficient Answer of the European Court of Human Rights in the Judgment Vo v. France, in German Law Journal Vol. 07, No. 04, (2006), pp. 435-436
• Kamil Sarıtaş, 2012, Kürtajın Ahlakiliği Sorunu/ Ethicality Problem of Abortion, İnternational Journal of Social Studies, Vol. 5, p.587-608, p.590
• VI. Kathy Waldman, (2014 Jan.), Does Looking at the Ultrasound Before an Abortion Change Women’s Minds? see at http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/01/09/ultrasound_viewing_before_an_ abortion_a_new_study_finds_that_for_a_small.html [Accessed on 21 June 2014]
• Linda M. Keller, (2001), Indivisibility of Economic and Political Rights, in Human Rights and Human Welfare, Vol.1:3, A review of Development as Freedom by Amartya Sen. New York: Knopf, 1999 (Paperback Edition: Random House, 2000). 366 pp., p. 10
• Linda J. Mad, General Principles of Human Rights Law Recognized by All Nations: Freedom From
• Arbitrary Arrest and Detention, 10 CAL. W. INT’L LJ. 272,301-02 (1980)
• Marc Groenhuijsen, (2007), Euthanasia and the Criminal Justice System, in Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 11.3, p. 21
• Mehmet Emin Özgül, (2010), Yeni Tıbbi Yöntemlerin Hukuka Uyğunluğu, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, Türkiye, p. 95
• Michael Cholbi (2007), Self-manslaughter and the forensic classification of self-inflicted death, in J Med Ethics 2007;33:155–157
• Neil Moonie, (2005), Health and Social Care, Heinemann Educational Publishers, p. 25
• Norman St. John-Stevas, (2002). Life, Death and the Law: Law and Christian Morals in England and the United States, BeardBooks Washington D.C. p.264
• Quoted in Debating the Moral Status of the Embryo, (July-Aug. 2014), Harward magazine
• VII. J. Pereira, Erratum Legalizing euthanasia or assisted suicide: the illusion of safeguards and controls, in Current Oncology—Volume 19, Number 3, June 2012; Curr Oncol 2011;18:e38–45. Published online April 4, 2011; corrected after publication May 14, 2012
• D. Petchesky R. P. (1984) “Abortion and Woman’s Choice” Northeasterm University; see also Melissa Masden (1992), Pe-Natal Testing and Selective Abortion: The Development of a Feminist Disability Rights Perspective in Women With Disabilities Australia (WWA) online journal,
• A.E. Reading and S. Campbell, (1982), The psychological effects of Ultrasound Scanning and in Pregnancy, in Advances in Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp.371-373;
• Rita Joseph, (2009), Human Rights and the Unborn Child, (2009), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Chapter 13, p. 266, p.210
• Russel S. Fischer, 1951, Criminal Abortion, 42 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, p. 242
• VIII. Sanja Tomasovic and Maja Predojevic, 4D Ultrasound - Medical Devices for Recent Advances on the Etiology of Cerebral Palsy, (Online Article),
• Sharon Detrick, (1999), A Commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Right of the Child, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Hague, the Netherlands, p. 135
• Sultan Tahmazoglu Üzeltürk, Anayasa hükuku açısından sağlık hakkı (Ulusal ve Uluslararası boyutuyla), Legal Yayincilik San. Ve Tic. LTD.ŞTİ, İstanbul, Türkiye, (2012), p. 3, İSBN: 978-605-4354-57-3
• Saunders C. Terminal care in medical oncology. In: Begshawe KD, editor. Medical oncology. Oxford: Blackwell; 1975. pp. 563–76
• M. Sherif Bassiouni, (1994), Human Rights in the Context of Criminal Justice: identifying international procedural protections and equiavalent protections in national constitutions, in Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, Vol. (3), pp.235-297, p.248
• Sybe A. de Vries, Balancing Fundamental Rights with Economic Freedoms According to the European Court of Justice, in Utrecht Law Review, Volume 9, Issue 1 (January) 2013, pp. 169-192; p. 177
• TERRY BRANTLEY (1996), People v. Kevorkian: Michigan’s Supreme Court Leads the Way in Declaring No Fundamental Right to Assist Another in Suicide, in Mercer Law Review Vol. 47, (1996), 1191-1199, at 1192
• Turkish Civil Code, Law N. 4721, dated 7/12/2002
• UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Fact Sheet No. 31, The Right to Health, June 2008, No. 31
• UNGA Report, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, A/61/338, para. 13
• UNFPA, The Danish Institute for Human Rights and OHCHR (2014), Reproductive Rights are Human Rights: A handbook for national Human Rights Institutions: United Nations
• UN Human Rights Committee (HRC), CCPR General Comment No. 6: Article 6 (Right to Life), 30 April 1982, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/45388400a.html [accessed 29 January 2016]
• Yuelian Sun,Yan Che,, Ersheng Gao, Jİrn Olsen and Weijin Zhou, (2003),Induced abortion and risk of subsequent miscarriage, in Oxford Journals,, [online article]
• Zylicz Z, Finlay IG.(1999), Euthanasia and palliative care: reflections from The Netherlands and the UK. J R Soc Med. 1999;92:370–3 Cases:
• Lanham D (1990), the Right to choose to die with dignity 14 Crim L J (16) 401-30
• R.v Adomako [1995] 1 AC 171; [1994] 3 WLR 288, [1994] 3 All ER 79, 99 Cr App R 362, HL
• R v Bateman (1925) 19 Cr App R 8, (1925)? Cox 33, [1925] All ER Rep 45, CCA
• E. Cobbs v. Grant, 8 Cal. 3d 229, 502 P.2d 1, 104 Cal. Rptr. 505 (Cal. 1972) p. 240; para. 38 F.
• Makaratzis v. Greece, (App. No. 50385/99) (2004) Judgment 20.12. 2004 [Grand Chamber], para. 29, p. 20
• Vo v France ECtHR, judgment of 8 July 2004, no. 53924/00, para.84