The Characteristics of Non-Diabetic Mothers with Macrosomic Newborns

Giriş: Fetal makrozomi heterojen etiyolojik faktörlere sahip bir durumdur ve sıklığı son yıllarda giderek artmaktadır. Birçok makrozomik bebek belli bir risk faktörü olmaksızın doğar ve makrozominin doğru tahmini tek bir risk faktörü ile öngörülemez. Bu çalışmanın amacı makrozomik bebek doğuran diyabeti olmayan sağlıklı annelerin özelliklerini araştırmaktır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu olgu-kontrol çalışması Mardin Kadın Doğum ve Çocuk Hastanesi'nde izlenmiş ve doğum yapmış 291 sağlıklı gebe kadından oluşmaktadır. Çalışmaya dahil edilme kriterleri (a) doğum ağırlığını etkileyecek hastalık veya durum olmaması, (b) normal sağlıklı gebelik ve (c) 37-42 hafta arası yapısal defekti olmayan tekiz bebek doğurma idi. Dört bin gr üzeri doğum ağırlığı makrozomi olarak tanımlandı. Çalışma grubu ikiye ayrıldı; grup 1 4,000 gr altı doğum ağırlığı ve grup 2 4,000 gr üzeri doğum ağırlığı. Anne ve bebek özelliklerinin makrozomi ile ilişkisi olup olmadığı incelendi. Bulgular: Lojistik regresyon analizi sonuçlarına göre makrozomik bebek sahibi olma riskleri erkek cinsiyet [odds oranı (OR) 3,39, %95 güven aralığı (GA): 2,010-5,211; p

Makrozomik Bebek Doğuran Diyabeti Olmayan Annelerin Özellikleri

Introduction: Fetal macrosomia is a condition with heterogeneous etiologic factors and its' frequency is increasing in recent years. Many macrosomic infants are born without any risk factors and accurate prediction of macrosomia is not possible with only single risk factor. The aim of this study was to research the characteristics of healthy mothers without diabetes who gave birth to macrosomic infants.Materials and Methods: This case-control study comprised 291 healthy pregnant women who were monitored and delivered at Mardin Women and Children's Hospital. Inclusion criteria were (a) no disease or conditions that may affect birth weight, (b) normal healthy pregnancy and (c) singleton live infants born between 37-42 weeks with no structural defects. A birth weight above 4.000 g was defined as macrosomic neonate. The study group was divided in two; group 1 had a birth weight less than 4.000 g and group 2 had a birth weight above 4.000 g. Characteristics of mother and newborn were analyzed to determine any association with macrosomia.Results: The logistic regression analysis results indicated that the risk of macrosomic infant were male gender of the infant [odds ratio (OR): 3.39; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.010-5.211; p

___

  • Langer O. Prevention of macrosomia. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1991;5:333-47.
  • Zamorski MA, Biggs WS. Management of suspected fetal macrosomia. Am Fam Physician 2001;63:302-6.
  • Langer O, Kozlowski S, Brustman L. Abnormal growth patterns in diabetes in pregnancy: a longitudinal study. Isr J Med Sci 1991;27:516-23.
  • Oral E, Cağdaş A, Gezer A, Kaleli S, Aydinli K, Oçer F. Perinatal and maternal outcomes of fetal macrosomia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001;99:167-71.
  • Kadanalı S, Önvural A, Erten O. Doğum kilosunu etkileyen faktörler. Perinatoloji Dergisi 1994;2:89-93.
  • Bhattacharya S, Campbell DM, Liston WA, Bhattacharya S. Effect of Body Mass Index on pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women delivering singleton babies. BMC Public Health 2007;7:168.
  • Yanıkkerem E, Mutlu S. Maternal Obesity: consequences and prevention strategies. TAF Prev Med Bull 2012;11: 353-64.
  • Schieve LA, Cogswell ME, Scanlon KS. An empiric evaluation of the Institute of Medicine's pregnancy weight gain guidelines by race. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:878-84.
  • Lazer S, Biale Y, Mazor M, Lewenthal H, Insier V. Complications associated with the macrosomic fetus. J Reprod Med 1986;31:501-5.
  • Okun N, Verma A, Mitchell BF, Flowerdew G. Relative importance of maternal constitutional factors and glucose intolarence of pregnancy in the development of newborn macrosomia. J Matern Fetal Med 1997;6:285-90.
  • Spellacy WN, Miller S, Winegar A, Peterson PQ. Macrosomia- -maternal characteristics and infant complications. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:158-61.
  • Berard J, Dufour P, Vinatier D, Subtil D, Vanderstichele S, Monnier JC, et al. Fetal macrosomia: risk factors and outcome. A study of the outcome concerning 100 cases >4500. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998;77:51-9.
  • Sinclair BA, Rowan JA, Hainsworth OT. Macrosomic infants are not all equal. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2007;47:101-5.
  • Tsai YL, Chong KM, Seow KM. Following the 2009 American Institute of Medicine recommendations for normal body mass index and overweight women led to an increased risk of fetal macrosomia among Taiwanese women. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2013;52:341-6.
  • Cesur R, Kelly IR. From cradle to classroom: high birth weight and cognitive outcomes. Forum Health Econ Policy 2010;13:1558-9544.
  • Rachel Webb. High Birth Weight and Socio-Economic Status University of Canterbury.
  • Lepercq J, Timsit J, Hauguel-de Mouzon S. Etiopathogeny of fetal macrosomia. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2000;29(Suppl 1):6-12.
  • Chen YP, Xiao XM, Li J, Reichetzeder C, Wang ZN, Hocher B. Paternal body mass index (BMI) is associated with offspring intrauterine growth in a gender dependent manner. PLoS One 2012;7:36329.