sekonder osteoporozlu çocuklarda alendronat tedavisinin etkinliği

Giriş: Daha çok erişkinlerin hastalığı olarak bilinen osteoporoz çocuklarda kronik hastalıklara bağlı olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Tedavide bifosfonatlar güvenli olarak kullanılmakta olup yararları kanıtlanmıştır. Alendronat oral kullanım avantajı nedeniyle daha çok tercih edilmektedir. Burada kliniğimizde izlenen sekonder osteoporozlu hastalarda alendronatın etkinliği değerlendirilmiştir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Sekonder osteoporozlu toplam 46 hasta [28 erkek (%60,9), 18 kız (%39,1)] çalışmaya dahil edildi. Alendronat oral olarak günlük doz 30 kg için 10 mg verildi. Kemik mineral yoğunluğu (KMY) DEXA ile değerlendirildi. Bazal DEXA çekiminden sonra, tedavinin etkinliği açısından 6. ay, 12. ay ve 24. ay tekrar DEXA çekimi yapıldı. Bulgular: Ortalama boy, kilo ve vücut kitle indeksi standart deviasyon skoru (SDS) sırasıyla -2,43, -2,82 ve -1,72 idi. Serum Ca, P ve ALP değerleri normaldi. Tedavinin başındaki ortalama KMY SDS -4,03±0,96 iken 6. ay, 12. ay ve 24. ayda DEXA Z skorları sırayla -3,51±1,02, -2,82±1,09 ve -2,43±0,93 idi. KMY Z-skorlarında 6’ıncı, 12’inci ve 24’üncü aylarda bazale göre elde edilen artışlar istatistiksel olarak anlamlı idi. Sonuç: Oral bifosfonat tedavisinin kullanımı parenteral tedaviye göre daha konforlu ve daha ucuzdur. Sonuçlarımız; oral alendronat tedavisinin erişkinlerde olduğu gibi çocuklardaki sekonder osteoporoz tedavisinde de güvenle kullanılabileceğini, KMY’de belirgin düzelme sağladığını, hastalar tarafından iyi tolere edilebilen bir tedavi yöntemi olduğunu göstermektedir. Çocuklarda da birçok çalışma olmasına rağmen osteoporozun çocuklardaki tedavisinde ilacın yaş, doz ve süresi konusunda uzlaşı yoktur.

The efficacy of alendronate in children with secondary osteoporosis

Introduction: Osteoporosis which is primarily known as an adult disease may be encountered secondarily due to chronic diseases in children. Biphosphonates can be safely used in treatment with proven benefits. Alendronate is often preferred because of its advantage of oral use. Here, the efficiency and safety of alendronate in children with secondary osteoporosis were evaluated. Materials and Method: A total of 46 children (28 boys; 60.9% and 18 girls; 39.1%) with secondary osteoporosis were included. Alendronate was given orally at a dose of 5 mg once daily for children less than 30 kg and 10 mg once daily for those weighing 30 kg or more. Bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated with DEXA taken at baseline, at 6th month, at 12th month and at 24th month. Results: Mean standard deviation scores (SDS) of height, weight and body mass index were -2.43, -2.82 and -1.72, respectively. Serum Ca, P and ALP levels were all normal. Mean BMD SDS at baseline, 6th month, 12th month and 24th month were -4.03±0.96 -3.51±1.02, -2.82±1.09 and -2.43±0.93, respectively. Improvements in BMD z-scores at 6th, 12th and 24th months compared to baseline were all statistically significant. Conclusion: Our results showed that oral alendronate treatment which is more comfortable and cheaper than parenteral ones results in significant improvements in BMD, can be safely used and easily tolerated in children with secondary osteoporosis, as in adults. Though a plenty of studies were performed in children, there is still no consensus on the preferred and safe dose of the drug and the duration of treatment, as well as from the beginning of what age can the drug be introduced to the children requiring osteoporosis treatment.

___

  • 1. Bachrach LK, Ward LM. Clinical review 1: Bisphosphonate use in childhood osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:400-9.
  • 2. Russell RG. Bisphosphonates: mode of action and pharmacology. Pediatrics 2007;119:150-62.
  • 3. Ward L, Tricco AC, Phuong P, Cranney A, Barrowman N, Gaboury I et al. Bisphosphonate therapy for children and adolescents with secondary osteoporosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;17:CD005324.
  • 4. Lethaby C, Wiernikowski J, Sala A, Naronha M, Webber C, Barr RD. Bisphosphonate therapy for reduced bone mineral density during treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood and adolescence: a report of preliminary experience. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2007;29:613-6.
  • 5. Wiernikowski JT, Barr RD, Webber C, Guo CY, Wright M, Atkinson SA. Alendronate for steroid-induced osteopenia in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a pilot study. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2005; 11:51-6.
  • 6. van der Sluis IM, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM. Osteoporosis in children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008; 50: 474-8.
  • 7. Sholas MG, Tann B, Gaebler-Spira D. Oral bisphosphonates to treat disuse osteopenia in children with disabilities: a case series. J Pediatr Orthop 2005;25:326-31.
  • 8. Speiser PW, Clarson CL, Eugster EA, Kemp SF, Radovick S, Rogol AD et al. Bisphosphonate treatment of pediatric bone disease. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 2005;3:87-96.
  • 9. Madenci E, Yilmaz K, Yilmaz M, Coskun Y. Alendronate treatment in osteogenesis imperfecta. J Clin Rheumatol 2006; 12:53-6.
  • 10. Saggese G, Baroncelli GI, Bertelloni S. Osteoporosis in children and adolescents: diagnosis, risk factors and prevention. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2001;14:833-59.
  • 11. Unal E, Abaci A, Bober E, Büyükgebiz A. Efficacy and safety of oral alendronate treatment in children and adolescents with osteoporosis. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2006;19:523-8.
  • 12. Unal E, Abaci A, Bober E, Buyukgebiz A. Oral alendronate in osteogenesis imperfecta. Indian Pediatr 2005;42:1158-60.
  • 13. DiMeglio LA, Peacock M. Two-year clinical trial of oral alendronate versus intravenous pamidronate in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. J Bone Miner Res 2006;21:132-40.
  • 14. Golden NH, Iglesias EA, Jacobson MS, Carey D, Meyer W, Schebendach J, et al. Alendronate for the treatment of osteopenia in anorexia nervosa: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:3179-85.
  • 15. Rudge S, Hailwood S, Horne A, Lucas J, Wu F, Cundy T. Effects of once-weekly oral alendronate on bone in children on glucocorticoid treatment. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44:813-8.