A Comparative Assessment of Five Different Distributions Based on Five Different Optimization Methods for Modeling Wind Speed Distribution

A Comparative Assessment of Five Different Distributions Based on Five Different Optimization Methods for Modeling Wind Speed Distribution

Determining wind regime distribution patterns is essential for many reasons; modelling wind power potential is one of the most crucial. In that regard, Weibull, Gamma, and Rayleigh functions are the most widely used distributions for describing wind speed distribution. However, they could not be the best for describing all wind systems. Also, estimation methods play a significant role in deciding which distribution can achieve the best matching. Consequently, alternative distributions and estimation methods are required to be studied. An extensive analysis of five different distributions to describe the wind speeds distribution, namely Rayleigh, Weibull, Inverse Gaussian, Burr Type XII, and Generalized Pareto, are introduced in this study. Further, five metaheuristic optimization methods, Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm, Grey Wolf Optimization, Moth-Flame Optimization, Salp Swarm Algorithm, and Whale Optimization Algorithm, are employed to specify the optimum parameters per distribution. Five error criteria and seven statistical descriptors are utilized to compare the good-of-fitness of the introduced distributions. Therefore, this paper provides different important methods to estimate the wind potential at any site.

___

  • [1] Wadi, M., Elmasry, W., “Statistical analysis of wind energy potential using different estimation methods for Weibull parameters: a case study”, Electrical Engineering, 103(6): 2573-2594, (2021).
  • [2] Wadi, M., Elmasry, W., “Different Statistical Distributions and Genetic Algorithms”, International Conference on Electric Power Engineering–Palestine (ICEPE)-IEEE, 1–7, (2021).
  • [3] Shi, J., Erdem, E., “Estimation of wind energy potential and prediction of wind power”, In Wind Energy Engineering, Academic Press, 25-49, (2017).
  • [4] Pishgar, S., Keyhani, A., and Sefeedpari, P., “Wind speed and power density analysis based on Weibull and Rayleigh10distributions (a case study: Firouzkooh county of Iran”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42: 313–322, (2015).
  • [5] Morgan, E.C., Lackner, M., Vogel R.M., and Baise, L.G., “Probability distributions for offshore wind speeds”, Energy Conversion and Management, 52(1): 15–26, (2011).
  • [6] Crutcher, H.L., Baer, L., “Computations from elliptical wind distribution statistics”, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 1(4): 522–530, (1962).
  • [7] Dutta, S., Genton, M.G., “A non-Gaussian multivariate distribution with all lower-dimensional Gaussians and related families”, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 132: 82–93, (2014).
  • [8] Yuan, K., Zhang, K., Zheng, Y., Li, D., Wang, Y., and Yang, Z., “Irregular distribution of wind power prediction”, Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 6(6): 1172–1180, (2018).
  • [9] Garcia, A., Torres, J., Prieto, E., and De Francisco, A., “Fitting wind speed distributions: a case study”, Solar Energy, 2062(2): 139–144, (1998).
  • [10] Scerri, E., Farrugia, R., “Wind data evaluation in the Maltese Islands”, Renewable Energy, 7(1): 109–114, (1996).
  • [11] Ahsanullah, M., Alzaatreh, A., “Some Characterizations of the Log-Logistic Distribution”, Stochastics and Quality Control, 33(1): 23–29, (2018).
  • [12] Yilmaz, V., Celik, H. E., “A statistical approach to estimate the wind speed distribution: the case of Gelibolu region”, Dogus Universitesi Dergisi, 9(1): 122-132, (2011).
  • [13] Alavi, O., Mohammadi, K., and Mostafaeipour, A., “Evaluating the suitability of wind speed probability distribution models: A case of study of east and southeast parts of Iran”, Energy Conversion and Management, 119: 101–108, (2016).
  • [14] Mert, I., Karakus, C., “A statistical analysis of wind speed data using Burr, generalized gamma, and Weibull distributions in Antakya, Turkey”, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 23(6): 1571-1586, (2015).
  • [15] Rajabi, M., Modarres, R., “Extreme value frequency analysis of wind data from Isfahan, Iran”, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96(1): 78–82, (2008).
  • [16] El-Shanshoury, G.I., Ramadan, A., “Estimation of extreme value analysis of wind speed in the North-Western coast of Egypt”, Arab Journal of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, 45: 265–274, (2012).
  • [17] Nagatsuka, H., Balakrishnan, N., “A method for estimating parameters and quantiles of the three-parameter inverse Gaussian distribution based on statistics invariant to unknown location”, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 84(11): 2361–2377, (2014).
  • [18] Alayat, M.M., Kassem, Y., and Camur H., “Assessment of wind energy potential as a power generation source: A case study of eight selected locations in Northern Cyprus”, Energies, 11(10): 2697, (2018).
  • [19] Lee, D., Baldick, R., “Probabilistic wind power forecasting based on the laplace distribution and golden search”, IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition, 1–5, (2016).
  • [20]Wallner, M., “A half-normal distribution scheme for generating functions”, European Journal of Combinatorics, 187: 103138, (2020).
  • [21] Gomez, Y.M., Vidal, I., “A generalization of the half-normal distribution”, Applied Mathematics-A Journal of Chinese Universities, 31(4), 409-424, (2016).
  • [22] Ayuketang, A.N., Joseph, E., “Generalized extreme value distribution models for the assessment of seasonal wind energy potential of Debuncha, Cameroon”, Journal of Renewable Energy, (2016).
  • [23] Sarkar, A., Deep, S., Datta, D., Vijaywargiya, A., Roy, R., and Phanikanth, V., “Weibull and Generalized Extreme Value Distributions for Wind Speed Data Analysis of Some Locations in India”, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 823(8): 3476–3492, (2019).
  • [24] Singh, V.P., Guo, H., “Parameter estimation for 3-parameter generalized Pareto distribution by the principle of maximum entropy (POME)”, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 40(2): 165–181, (1995).
  • [25] D’Amico, G., Petroni, F., and Prattico, F., “Wind speed prediction for wind farm applications by extreme value theory and copulas”, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 145: 229–236, (2015).
  • [26] Zhang, J., Chen, T., and Xu, L., “Wind power fluctuation characteristics of wind farms”, In Atlantis Press, 24: 1478-1481, (2015).
  • [27] Sohoni, V., Gupta, S., and Nema, R., “A comparative analysis of wind speed probability distributions for wind power assessment of four sites”, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 24(6): 4724–4735, (2016).
  • [28] Wadi, M., Elmasry, W., Shobole, A., Tur, M.R., Bayindir, R., and Shahinzadeh, H., “ Wind Energy Potential Approximation with Various Metaheuristic Optimization Techniques Deployment”, 7th International Conference on Signal Processing and Intelligent Systems (ICSPIS)-IEEE, 1-6, (2021).
  • [29] Akinci, T.C., Nogay, H.S., “Wind speed correlation between neighboring measuring stations”, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 37(4): 1007-1019, (2012).
  • [30] Jung, C., Schindler, D., “Global comparison of the goodness-of-fit of wind speed distributions”, Energy Conversion and Management, 133: 216–234, (2017).
  • [31] Saxena, B.K., Rao, K.V.S., “Comparison of Weibull parameters computation methods and analytical estimation of wind turbine capacity factor using polynomial power curve model: case study of a wind farm”, Renewables:Wind, Water, and Solar, 2(1): 1–11, (2015).
  • [32] Pobocikova, I., Sedliackova, Z., and Michalkova, M., “Application of four probability distributions for wind speed modeling”, Procedia Engineering, 192: 713-718, (2017).
  • [33] Drobinski, P., Coulais, C., and Jourdier, B., “Surface wind-speed statistics modelling: Alternatives to the Weibull distribution and performance evaluation”, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 157(1): 97–123, (2015).
  • [34] Abolpour, B., Abolpour, B., Bakhshi, H., and Yaghobi, M., “An Appropriate Extreme Value Distribution for the Annual Extreme Gust Winds Speed”, Journal of Fundamentals of Renewable Energy and Applications, 7(1): 2-4, (2017).
  • [35] Quan, Y., Wang, F., and Gu, M., “A method for estimation of extreme values of wind pressure on buildings based on the generalized extreme-value theory”, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, (2014).
  • [36] Zhao, X., Zhang, Z., Cheng, W., and Zhang, P., “A new parameter estimator for the Generalized Pareto distribution under the peaks over threshold framework”, Mathematics, 7(5): 406, (2019).
  • [37] Wadi, M., Baysal, M., and Shobole, A., “Reliability and Sensitivity Analysis for Closed-Ring Distribution Power Systems”, Electric Power Components and Systems, 49(6-7): 696-714, (2022).
  • [38] Krishnamoorthy, R., Udhayakumar, K., Raju, K., Elavarasan, R.M., and Mihet-Popa, L., “An Assessment of Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Potential in India Using Moth Flame Optimization”, Energies, 13(12): 1–41, (2020).
  • [39] Zhang, L., Li, Q., Guo, Y., Yang, Z., and Zhang L., “An investigation of wind direction and speed in a featured wind farm using joint probability distribution methods”, Sustainability, 10(12): 4338, (2018).
  • [40] Ahsanullah, M., Alzaatreh, A., “Parameter estimation for the log-logistic distribution based on order statistics”, REVSTAT Statistical Journal, 16(4): 429–443, (2018).
  • [41] Lin, L., Ang, A.H., Fan, W., and Xia, D., “A probability-based analysis of wind speed distribution and related structural1response in southeast China”, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 15(1): 14–26, (2019).
  • [42] Markose, S., Alentorn, A., “The generalized extreme value distribution, implied tail index, and option pricing”, The Journal of Derivatives, 18(3): 35–60, (2011).
  • [43] Kang, S., Song, J., “Parameter and quantile estimation for the generalized Pareto distribution in peaks over threshold framework”, Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 46: 487–501, (2017).
  • [44] Brabson, B., Palutikof, J., “Tests of the generalized Pareto distribution for predicting extreme wind speeds”, Journal of Applied Meteorology, 39(9): 1627–1640, (2000).
  • [45] Holmes, J., Moriarty, W., “Application of the generalized Pareto distribution to extreme value analysis in wind engineering”, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 83(1-3): 1–10, (1999).
  • [46] Steinkohl, C., Davis, R.A., and Kluppelberg, C., “Extreme value analysis of multivariate high-frequency wind speed data”, Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, 7(1): 73-94, (2013).
  • [47] Ersoz, S., Akinci, T.C., Nogay, H.S., and Dogan, G., “Determination of wind energy potential in Kirklareli-Turkey”, International Journal of Green Energy, 10(1): 103-116, (2013).
  • [48] Sohoni, V., Gupta, S., and Nema, R., “A comparative analysis of wind speed probability distributions for wind power assessment of four sites”, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 24(6): 4724–4735, (2016).
  • [49] Arikan, Y., Arslan, O.P., and Cam, E., “The analysis of wind data with rayleigh distribution and optimum turbine and cost analysis in Elmadag, Turkey”, Istanbul University-Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, (2015).
  • [50] Bidaoui, H., El -Abbassi, I., El-Bouardi, A., and Darcherif, A., “Wind speed data analysis using Weibull and Rayleigh distribution functions, case study: five cities northern Morocco”, Procedia Manufacturing, 32: 786–793, (2019).
  • [51] Maleki-Jebely, F., Zare, K., and Deiri, E., “Efficient estimation of the PDF and the CDF of the inverse Rayleigh distribution”, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 88(1): 75–88, (2018).
  • [52] Kumar, M.B.H., Balasubramaniyan, S., Padmanaban, S., and Holm-Nielsen, J.B., “Wind Energy Potential Assessment by Weibull Parameter Estimation Using Multiverse Optimization Method: A Case Study of Tirumala Region in India”, Energies, 12(11): 2158, (2019).
  • [53] Justus, C., Hargraves, W., Mikhail, A., and Graber, D., “Methods for estimating wind speed frequency distributions”, Journal of Applied Meteorology, 17(3): 350–353, (1978).
  • [54] Khan, M.S., Pasha, G., and Pasha, A.H., “Theoretical analysis of inverse Weibull distribution”, WSEAS Transactions on Mathematics, 7(2): 30–38, (2008).
  • [55] Dokur, E., Kurban, M., and Ceyhan, S., “Wind speed modelling using inverse weibull distrubition: a case study for Bilecik, Turkey”, International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, 3(2): 55–59, (2016).
  • [56] Seshadri, V., “The inverse Gaussian distribution: some properties and characterizations”, Canadian Journal of Statistics, 11(2): 131–136, (1983).
  • [57] Pant, M.D., Headrick, T.C., “A Method for Simulating Burr Type III and Type XII Distributions through Moments and Correlations”, International Scholarly Research Notices, (2013).
  • [58] Tsogt, K., Zandraabal, T., and Lin, C., “Diameter and height distributions of natural even-aged pine forests (Pinus sylvestris) in Western Khentey, Mongolia”, Taiwan Journal of Forest Science, 28(1): 29–41, (2013).
  • [59] Ismail, N.H.B., Khalid, Z.B.M., “EM algorithm in estimating the 2-and 3-parameter Burr Type III distributions”, American Institute of Physics, 1605(1): 881–887, (2014).
  • [60] Kumar, D., “The Burr type XII distribution with some statistical properties”, Journal of Data Science, 15(3): 509-533, (2017).
  • [61] Kim, C., Kim, W., “Estimation of the parameters of burr type III distribution based on dual generalized order statistics”, The Scientific World Journal, (2014).
  • [62] Wadi, M., Baysal, M., and Shobole, A., “Comparison between open-ring and closed-ring grids reliability”, 4th International Conference on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ICEEE), 290-294, (2017).
  • [63] Van-Montfort M., Witter, J., “The generalized Pareto distribution applied to rainfall depths”, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 31(2): 151–162, (1986).
  • [64] Lenz, R., “Generalized Pareto distributions application to autofocus in automated microscopy”, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 10(1): 92–98, (2015).
  • [65] Brabson, B., Palutikof, J., “Tests of the generalized Pareto distribution for predicting extreme wind speeds”, Journal of Applied Meteorology, 39(9): 1627–1640, (2000).
  • [66] El-Din, M., Sadek, A., and Sharawy, A.M., “Characterization of the generalized Pareto distribution by general progressively Type-II right censored order statistics”, Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society, 25(4): 369-374, (2017).
  • [67] Guha, D., Roy, P.K., and Banerjee, S., “Load frequency control of large scale power system using quasi-oppositional grey wolf optimization algorithm”, Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 19(4): 1693–1713, (2016).
  • [68] Saremi, S., Mirjalili, S., and Lewis, A., “Grasshopper optimisation algorithm: theory and application”, Advances in Engineering Software, 105: 30–47, (2017).
  • [69] Neve, A.G., Kakandikar, G.M., and Kulkarni, O., “Application of grasshopper optimization algorithm for constrained and unconstrained test functions”, International Journal of Swarm Intelligence and Evolutionary Computation, 186(3): 1–7, (2017).
  • [70] Ghulanavar, R., Dama, K.K., and Jagadeesh, A., “Diagnosis of faulty gears by modified AlexNet and improved grasshopper optimization algorithm (IGOA)”, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 34(10): 4173–4182, (2020).
  • [71] Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S.M., and Lewis, A., “Grey wolf optimizer”, Advances in Engineering Software, 69: 46–61, (2014).
  • [72] Mirjalili, S., “Moth-flame optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm”, Knowledge-based Systems, 89: 228–249, (2015).
  • [73] Talaat, M., Alsayyari, A.S., Farahat, M.A., and Said, T., “Moth-flame algorithm for accurate simulation of a non-uniform electric field in the presence of dielectric barrier”, IEEE Access, 7: 3836–3847, (2018).
  • [74] Mirjalili, S., Gandomi, A.H., Mirjalili, S.Z., Saremi, S., Faris, H., and Mirjalili, S.M., “Salp Swarm Algorithm: A bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems”, Advances in Engineering Software, 114: 163–191, (2017).
  • [75] Mirjalili, S., Lewis, A., “The whale optimization algorithm”, Advances in Engineering Software, 95: 51–67, (2016).
  • [76] VC, V.R., “Optimal renewable resources placement in distribution networks by combined power loss index and whale optimization algorithms”, Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, 5(2): 175–191, (2018).
  • [77] Wadi, M., Kekezoglu, B., Baysal, M., Tur, M.R., and Shobolec, A., “Feasibility Study of Wind Energy Potential in Turkey: Case Study of Catalca District in Istanbul”, 2nd International Conference on Smart Grid and Renewable Energy (SGRE)-IEEE, 1-6, (2019).
  • [78] Elmasry, W., Wadi, M., “EDLA-EFDS: A Novel Ensemble Deep Learning Approach For Electrical Fault Detection Systems”, Electric Power Systems Research, 207: 107834, (2022).
  • [79] Wadi, M., “Fault detection in power grids based on improved supervised machine learning binary classification”, Journal of Electrical Engineering, 72(5), 315-322, (2021).
  • [80] Wadi, M., Elmasry, W., “An anomaly-based technique for fault detection in power system networks”, International Conference on Electric Power Engineering–Palestine (ICEPE-P)-IEEE, 1-6, (2021).
  • [81] Willmott, C.J., Matsuura, K., “Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance”, Climate Research, 30(1): 79–82, (2005).
  • [82] Hyndman, R.J., Koehler, A.B., “Another look at measures of forecast accuracy”, International Journal of Forecasting, 4222(4): 679–688, (2006).
  • [83] Gul, M., Tai, N., Huang, W., Nadeem, M.H., and Yu, M., “Evaluation of Wind Energy Potential Using an Optimum Approach based on Maximum Distance Metric”, Sustainability, 12(5): 1999, (2020).
  • [84] Wadi, M., “Five different distributions and metaheuristics to model wind speed distribution”, Journal of Thermal Engineering, 7(14): 1898-1920, (2021).
  • [85] Elmasry, W., Wadi, M., “Enhanced Anomaly-Based Fault Detection System in Electrical Power Grids”, International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, (2022).
Gazi University Journal of Science-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1988
  • Yayıncı: Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

ANN Identification technique and fuzzy PI Control of a Hybrid Indirect Matrix Converter with a Flying Capacitor three level Inverter in Power Active Filtering Application

Taki Eddine AMEUR, Aissa AMEUR, Benalia ATALLAH

Numerical Analysis of Air Flow in an Industrial Refrigeration System and Its Effect on Energy Consumption

Serhat KARYEYEN, Mustafa AKTAŞ, Alperen OKUR, Fatma Nur ERDOĞMUŞ

Determination freeze-drying characteristics of ottoman strawberries

Bahadir ACAR, Abdullah DAĞDEVİREN, Büşra Meryem YILDIZ, Prof. Dr. Mehmet ÖZKAYMAK

A Simple Selection Method of PV Systems for University Campuses

Marıam BARA, Gülsu ULUKAVAK HARPUTLUGİL

Comparison of the Performance of Solar Panels Designed in Three Different Ways under the Same Conditions

Mehmet Ali SALDAMLI, Yusuf Alper KAPLAN, Gülizar Gizem ÜNALDI

Discrete-Time Gompertz Model for Adana Breed Pigeons

Levent ÖZBEK

Rotor Field-Oriented Control of Doubly Fed Induction Generator in Wind Energy Conversion System

Zeki OMAÇ, İrfan ERDEM

Indoor Lighting Conversion Approach for Sustainable Energy Efficiency Applications in Campus Buildings: Hitit University Engineering Faculty Study

Sertac Samed SEYITOGLU, Ömer Faruk TOZLU, Emir AVCIOĞLU

A Comparative Study on Denoising from Facial Images Using Convolutional Autoencoder

Muazzez Buket DARICI, Zeki ERDEM

The Comparison of Classical and Bayesian Structural Equation Models Through Ordered Categorical Data: A Case Study of Banking Service Quality

Gizem ERKAN, Murat DOĞAN, Hüseyin TATLIDİL