___

• Byun, D.H.,“The AHP Approach for Selecting an
• Automobile Purchase Model”, Information &
• Management, 38, 289-297, 2001.
• Dağdeviren, M., Eraslan, E., Kurt, M. ve Dizdar,
• E., “Tedarikçi Seçimi Problemine Analitik Ağ
• Süreci İle Alternatif Bir Yaklaşım” Teknoloji,
• Cilt 8, Sayı 2, 115-122, 2005.
• Soner, S. ve Önüt, S., “Multi-Criteria Supplier
• Selection: An ELECTRE-AHP Application”,
• Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi,
• Cilt:4, s.110-120, 2006.
• Yousefi, A ve Vencheh, A. H., “An Integrated
• Group Decision Making Model and its Evaluation
• By DEA for Automobile Industry”, Expert
• Systems with Applications, 37, 8543–8556,
• -
• Bozdemir, Y. ve Yılmaz, İ. T., “Kural Tabanlı
• Karar Verme Mekanizmasına Sahip Sistematik
• Araç Seçim Modeli Geliştirilmesi”, Makine
• Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi Cilt: 6, No: 2,
• -27, 2009.
• Terzi, Ü., Hacaloğlu, S. E. ve Aladağ, Z.,
• “Otomobil Satın Alma Problemi İçin Bir Karar
• Destek Modeli”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi
• Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Yıl: 5 Sayı:10, s. 43-49,
• -
• Güngör, İ. ve İşler, D.B., “Analitik Hiyerarşi
• Yaklaşımı İle Otomobil Seçimi” ZKÜ Sosyal
• Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt 1, Sayı 2, s. 21-33, 2005.
• Vrkljan, B. H. ve Anaby, D., “What Vehicle
• Features are Considered Important When Buying
• an Automobile? An Examination Of Driver
• Preferences By Age And Gender”, Journal of
• Safety Research, 42, 61–65, 2011.
• Ballı, S., Karasulu, B. ve Korukoğlu, S., “En
• Uygun Otomobil Seçimi Problemi İçin Bir
• Bulanık Promethee Yöntemi Uygulaması”,
• D.E.Ü.İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, Cilt:22 Sayı:1, s,139-147,
• -
• Yi, H. C., Chen, K.T. ve Tzeng, G.H., “FMCDM
• with Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach for Customers’
• Choice Behavior Model”, International Journal
• of Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 9, No. 4, December 2007.
• Shyur, H.J. ve Shih, H.S., "A Hybrid MCDM
• Model for Strategic Vendor Selection",
• Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 44, 8,
• -761, 2006.
• Dağdeviren, M., Dönmez N. ve Kurt, M.,
• “Developing A New Model For Supplier
• Evaluation Process For A Company And Its
• Application”, J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ.,
• Vol.21, No.2, 247-255, 2006.
• Tuzkaya, U.R. ve Önüt, S., “A Fuzzy Analytic
• Network Process Based Approach to
• Transportation-Mode Selection Between Turkey
• and Germany: A Case Study” Information
• Sciences, 178, 3133–3146, 2008.
• Chen, H.H., Lee, H.I. ve Kang, H.Y., “A Model
• for Strategic Selection of Feeder Management
• Systems: A Case Study”, Electrical Power and
• Energy Systems , 32, 421–427, 2010.
• Köne, A.Ç. ve Büke, T., “An Analytical Network
• Process (ANP) Evaluation of Alternative Fuels for
• Electricity Generation in Turkey”, Energy Policy,
• , 5220–5228, 2007.
• Çelebi, D., Bayraktar, D. ve Bingöl, L.,
• “Analytical Network Process for Logistics
• Management: A Case Study in a Small Electronic
• Appliances Manufacturer”, Computers &
• Industrial Engineering, 58, 432–441, 2010.
• Güneri, A.F., Cengiz, M. ve Şeker, S., “A Fuzzy
• ANP Approach to Shipyard Location Selection”,
• Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 7992–
• , 2009.
• Tuzkaya, G., Gülsün, B., Kahraman, C. ve Özgen,
• B., “Integrated Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision
• Making Methodology for Material Handling
• Equipment Selection Problem and an
• Application”, Expert Systems with Applications,
• , 2853–2863, 2010.
• Bulut, K. ve Soylu, B., “Öğretim Üyelerinin İş
• Yükü Seviyelerinin Bir Analitik Ağ Modeli İle
• Değerlendirilmesi: Mühendislik Fakültesinde Bir
• Uygulama”, Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri
• Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25 (1-2), 150 – 167, 2009.
• Gümüş, A.T., Çetin, A. ve Kaplan, E., “A Fuzzy-
• Analytic Network Process Based Approach for
• Enterprise Information System Selection”,
• Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences
• Sigma, 28, 74-85, 2010.
• Lin, H.T., “Personel Selection Using Analytic
• Network Process and Fuzzy Data Envelopment
• Analysis Approaches”, Computers & Industrial
• Engineering, 59, 937–944, 2010.
• Gümüş, A.T. ve Yılmaz, G. “Sea Vessel Type
• Selection via an Integrated VAHP–ANP
• Methodology For High-Speed Public
• Transportation in Bosphorus”, Expert Systems
• with Applications, 37, 4182–4189, 2010.
• Halouani, N., Chabchoub, H. ve Martel, J.M.,
• “PROMETHEE-MD-2T Method for Project
• Selection”, European Journal of Operational
• Research, 195(3), 841–895, 2009.
• Fernández-Castro, A.S., ve Jiménez, M.,
• “PROMETHEE: An Extension through Fuzzy
• Mathematical Programming”, Journal of the
• Operational Research Society, 56, 119–122,
• -
• Dulmin, R. ve Mininno, V., “Supplier Selection
• Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Aid Method”,
• Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management,
• , 177–187, 2003.
• Wang, J.J., Wei, C.M. ve Yang, D., “Decision
• Method for Vendor Selection Based on
• AHP/PROMETHEE/GAIA”. Journal of Dalian
• University of Technology, 46 (6), 926–931, 2006.
• Radojevic, D. ve Petrovic, S., “A Fuzzy Approach
• to Preference Structure in Multicriteria Ranking”,
• International Transaction in Operation
• Research, 4 (5/6), 419–430, 1997.
• Madlener, R., Kowalski, K. ve Stagl, S., “New
• Ways for the Integrated Appraisal Of National
• Energy Scenarios: The Case of Renewable Energy
• Use in Austria”, Energy Policy, 35, 6060–6074,
• -
• Roux, O., Duvivier, D., Dhaevers, V., Meskens,
• N. ve Artiba, A., “Multicriteria Approach to Rank Scheduling Strategies”, International Journal of
• Production Economics, 112 (11), 192–201, 2008.
• Dağdeviren, M., “Decision Making in Equipment
• Selection: An Integrated Approach with AHP and
• PROMETHEE”, Journal of Intelligent
• Manufacturing, 19, 397-406, 2008.
• Bouri, A., ve Martel, J.M., “A Multi-Criterion
• Approach for Selecting Attractive Portfolio”,
• Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 11,
• –277, 2002.
• Anand, G. ve Kodali, R. “Selection Of Lean
• Manufacturing Systems Using the
• PROMETHEE”, Journal of Modelling in
• Management, 3 (1), 40–70, 2008.
• Saaty, T.L., Decision Making with Dependence
• and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process,
• Pittsburgh, RWS Publications, 1996.
• Jharkharia, S. ve Shankar, R., “Selection of
• Logistics Service Provider: An Analytic Network
• Process (ANP) Approach”, Omega, 35, 274 –
• , 2007.
• Brans, J.P., “Lingenierie de la decision.
• Elaboration dinstruments daide a la decision:
• Methode PROMETHEE”, Presses de Universite
• Laval, Quebec, Canada, 183–214, 1982.
• Vincke, J.P. ve Brans, J.P., “A Preference Ranking
• Organization Method. The PROMETHEE Method
• for MCDM”, Management Science, 31, 641–
• , 1985.
• Brans, J.P., Vincke, Ph. ve Mareschal, B., “How
• to Select and How to Rank Projects: The
• PROMETHEE Method”, European Journal of
• Operational Research, 24 (2), 228–238, 1986.
• Goumas, M., ve Lygerou, V., “An Extension of
• the PROMETHEE Method for Decision Making
• in Fuzzy Environment: Ranking of Alternative
• Energy Exploitation Projects”, European Journal
• of Operational Research, 123, 606-613, 2000.
• Le Teno, J., F., ve Mareschal, B., “An Interval
• Version of PROMETHEE For the Comparison of
• Building Products’ Design with Ill-Defined Data
• on Environmental Quality”, Europal Journal of
• Operational Research, 109, 522–529, 1998.
• Dağdeviren, M. ve Eraslan, E., “Supplier
• Selection Using PROMETHEE Sequencing
• Method”, J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ., Vol.
• , No.1, 69-75, 2008.
• Brans, J.P., ve Mareschal, B., “PROMETHEE V –
• MCDM Problems with Segmentation
• Constraints”, INFOR, 30 (2), 85–96, 1992.
• Mareschal, B. ve Brans, J.E., "Geometrical
• Representations for MCDM" (GAIA), EJOR,
• Vol. 34, 69-77, 1988.
• Mareschal, B., “What is the Delta Value in
• GAIA?”. http://www.prometheegaia.
• net/faqpro/index.php?action=article&cat_
• id=003& id =17&lang.