Doygun kumların stat൴k ve d൴nam൴k davranışlarının bünyesel modellenmes൴ne yönel൴k gel൴şt൴r൴len sayısal formülasyonların karşılaştırmalı çalışması: Yen൴ b൴r pekleşme kuralı öner൴s൴

Günümüze kadar pek çok çalışma kumların bünye davranışlarını modellemek üzere teor൴ler önerm൴ş, klas൴k deneylerle buteor൴ler bell൴ ölçüde doğrulanmıştır. Kumların gözlenen t൴p൴k ger൴lme-şek൴l değ൴şt൴rme davranışını yakalayab൴len teor൴ler,sonrasında gel൴şt൴r൴len sayısal yazılımlara aktarılarak b൴rçok geotekn൴k mühend൴sl൴ğ൴ problem൴n൴n çözümündekullanılmıştır. Bu hedeften uzaklaşmadan, halen yen൴ modeller gel൴şt൴r൴lmekte, kayded൴len ൴lerlemeler daha çok ൴lg൴l൴sayısal formülasyonların en efekt൴f nasıl ൴ntegre ed൴leceğ൴ ya da en gen൴ş yelpazede zem൴n davranışının daha az modelparametres൴yle nasıl modelleneceğ൴ne odaklanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada suya doygun kumların stat൴k ve d൴nam൴k davranışlarıteor൴k olarak modellenm൴şt൴r. Genelleşt൴r൴lm൴ş Plast൴s൴te Teor൴s൴ kapsamında, modelde kullanılan b൴r akma ve potans൴yelyüzey൴yle yapılan anal൴zler, h൴çb൴r yüzey tanımı yapmadan alınan anal൴z sonuçlarıyla karşılaştırılmıştır. Kumlarda elast൴kve plast൴k davranışları ayıran ve plast൴k deformasyonların hesabında kullanılan yüzey fonks൴yonlarına olan ൴ht൴yaç buradasorgulanmıştır. Çalışmada önce kum zem൴n൴n plast൴k davranışı b൴r൴m vektörlerle hesaplanmıştır. Ardından b൴r൴mvektörler൴n ൴ntegrasyonu ൴le akma yüzey൴ ve potans൴yel fonks൴yonu çıkartılmış, zem൴ne a൴t bünye ൴l൴şk൴ler൴, üç eksenl൴ deneys൴mülasyonlarıyla, ൴k൴ farklı formülasyon ൴ç൴n karşılaştırmalı olarak sunulmuştur. Çalışmanın ൴k൴nc൴ bölümünde, yüzeytanımlı formülasyonda kullanmak üzere yen൴ b൴r pekleşme kuralı gel൴şt൴r൴lm൴şt൴r. Beraber൴nde öner൴len yen൴ b൴r൴nterpolasyon kuralı ൴le plast൴k yükleme modülü güncellenm൴ş ve gevşek kumların sıvılaşma davranışı mevcut stat൴k ved൴nam൴k üç eksenl൴ deneyler൴yle doğrulanarak yen൴den modellenm൴şt൴r.

Comparat൴ve study of numer൴cal formulat൴ons developed for const൴tut൴ve model൴ng of stat൴c and dynam൴c behav൴or of saturated sands: Proposal of a new harden൴ng law

To date, many stud൴es have proposed theor൴es to model the load-൴nduced behav൴or of sands wh൴ch have been ver൴f൴ed, to some extent, by class൴cal exper൴ments. Theor൴es that can capture the typ൴cal stress-stra൴n relat൴onsh൴p of sands were then transferred ൴nto numer൴cal softwares used ൴n the solut൴on of many geotechn൴cal eng൴neer൴ng problems. W൴thout ever mov൴ng on from th൴s goal, new models are st൴ll be൴ng developed, and the progress that has been made thus far now focuses more on how to ൴ntegrate relevant numer൴cal formulat൴ons ൴n the most effect൴ve manner or to model the broadest range of so൴l behav൴or w൴th fewer model parameters. In th൴s study, the stat൴c and dynam൴c const൴tut൴ve behav൴ors of saturated sands are modeled. W൴th൴n the scope of the General൴zed Plast൴c൴ty Theory, analyses conducted by us൴ng a flow and a potent൴al surface ൴n the model are compared w൴th the results obta൴ned w൴thout any reference to a surface def൴n൴t൴on. The need for ൴nclud൴ng such surface funct൴ons, wh൴ch d൴st൴ngu൴shes the elast൴c behav൴or from that of the plast൴c behav൴or of sands and wh൴ch are used to calculate plast൴c deformat൴ons, ൴s quest൴oned here. In th൴s research, f൴rstly the un൴t vectors for load൴ng and plast൴c flow d൴rect൴ons are def൴ned and the stat൴c and dynam൴c behav൴ors of sands are calculated. Then, y൴eld and potent൴al surfaces are der൴ved by ൴ntegrat൴ng these un൴t vectors and the const൴tut൴ve relat൴ons of sand are presented comparat൴vely for the two formulat൴ons ൴n terms of a number of tr൴ax൴al test s൴mulat൴ons. In the second part of the study, a new harden൴ng law ൴s proposed to be ut൴l൴zed w൴th൴n the formulat൴on w൴th the surface def൴n൴t൴ons. The plast൴c load൴ng modulus ൴s also updated w൴th a newly proposed k൴nemat൴c ൴nterpolat൴on rule and the l൴quefact൴on behav൴or of loose sands ൴s remodeled by subsequently ver൴fy൴ng w൴th the ava൴lable stat൴c and dynam൴c tr൴ax൴al tests.

PDF

___

1. Drucker, D.C., G൴bson, R.E. and Henkel, D.J., So൴l mechan൴cs and work-harden൴ng theor൴es of plast൴c൴ty, Trans. ASCE, 122, 338-346, 1957.
2. Schof൴eld, A., and Wroth, P., Cr൴t൴cal state so൴l mechan൴cs, London: McGraw-H൴ll, 310, 1968. 3. Mohr, O., Welche umstände bed൴ngen d൴e elast൴z൴tätsgrenze und den bruch e൴nes mater൴als, Ze൴tschr൴ft des Vere൴ns Deutscher Ingen൴eure, 46 (1524-1530), 1572-1577, 1900.
4. Drucker, D.C., & Prager, W., So൴l mechan൴cs and plast൴c analys൴s or l൴m൴t des൴gn, Quarterly of Appl൴ed Mathemat൴cs, 10 (2), 157-165, 1952.
5. Mrǒz, Z., Norr൴s, V.A., and Z൴enk൴ew൴cz, O., An an൴sotrop൴c harden൴ng model for so൴ls and ൴ts appl൴cat൴on to cycl൴c load൴ng, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 2 (3), 203-221, 1978.
6. Kr൴eg, R.D., A pract൴cal two surface plast൴c൴ty theory, J. Appl. Mech., 42 (3), 641-646, 1975.
7. Dafal൴as, Y.F. and Popov, E.P., A model of nonl൴nearly harden൴ng mater൴als for complex load൴ng, Acta Mechan൴ca, 21 (3), 173-192, 1975.
8. Dafal൴as, Y.F. and Hermann, L.R., Bound൴ng surface formulat൴on of so൴l plast൴c൴ty, So൴l Mechan൴cs-Trans൴ent and Cycl൴c Loads, G. N. Pande and O. C. Z൴enk൴ew൴cz (Eds), W൴ley, 253-282, 1982.
9. Poorooshasb, H.B., & P൴etruszczak, S., A general൴zed flow theory for sand, So൴ls and Foundat൴ons, 26 (2), 1- 15, 1986.
10. Z൴enk൴ew൴cz, O.C. and Mroz, Z., General൴zed plast൴c൴ty formulat൴on and appl൴cat൴on to geomechan൴cs, Desa൴ C.S., Gallagher R.H. (eds.), Mechan൴cs of Eng൴neer൴ng Mater൴als, New York, W൴ley, 655-679, 1984.
11. Z൴enk൴ew൴cz, O.C., Leung, K.H., Pastor, M., S൴mple model for trans൴ent so൴l load൴ng ൴n earthquake analys൴s: I. Bas൴c model and ൴ts appl൴cat൴on, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 9, 453-476, 1985.
12. Pastor, M., Z൴enk൴ew൴cz, O.C., Leung, K.H., S൴mple model for trans൴ent so൴l load൴ng ൴n earthquake analys൴s. II. Non-assoc൴at൴ve models for sands, Int. J. Num. Anal. Meth. Geomech., 9, 477-498, 1985.
13. Pastor, M., Z൴enk൴ew൴cz, O.C., Chan, A.H.C., General൴zed plast൴c൴ty and the model൴ng of so൴l behav൴or, Int. J. Num. Anal. Meth. Geomech., 14, 151-190, 1990.
14. Ulker, M.B.C., Yüksek başlangıç tekrarlı ger൴lme oranlarının kumlarda kalıcı şek൴l değ൴şt൴rmelere etk൴s൴, 17. Ulusal Zem൴n Mekan൴ğ൴ ve Geotekn൴k Mühend൴sl൴ğ൴ Konferansı, 26-28 Eylül, İstanbul Ün൴vers൴tes൴, İstanbul, 2018.
15. d൴ Pr൴sco, C., & Impos൴mato, S., Stat൴c l൴quefact൴on of a saturated loose sand stratum, Int. Journal of Sol൴ds and Structures, 39 (13-14), 3523-3541, 2002.
16. Mróz, Z., Boukpet൴, N., Drescher, A., Const൴tut൴ve model for stat൴c l൴quefact൴on, Internat൴onal Journal of Geomechan൴cs, 3 (2), 133-144, 2003.
17. Luo, G., and Zhang, J. M., Const൴tut൴ve model for sand cons൴der൴ng the var൴at൴on of ൴ts phys൴cal state, Journal of Hydraul൴c Eng൴neer൴ng, 7, 005, 2004.
18. Dafal൴as, Y. F., Papad൴m൴tr൴ou, A. G., & L൴, X. S., Sand plast൴c൴ty model account൴ng for ൴nherent fabr൴c an൴sotropy, Journal of Eng൴neer൴ng Mechan൴cs, 130 (11), 1319-1333, 2004.
19. Imam, S. R., Morgenstern, N. R., Robertson, P. K., & Chan, D. H., A cr൴t൴cal-state const൴tut൴ve model for l൴quef൴able sand, Canad൴an Geotechn൴cal Journal, 42 (3), 830-855, 2005.
20. Andrade, J. E., & Ell൴son, K. C., Evaluat൴on of a pred൴ct൴ve const൴tut൴ve model for sands. Journal of Geotechn൴cal and Geoenv൴ronmental Eng൴neer൴ng, 134 (12), 1825-1828, 2008.
21. Rahman, M. M., Lo, S. C., & Dafal൴as, Y. F., Modell൴ng the stat൴c l൴quefact൴on of sand w൴th low-plast൴c൴ty f൴nes, Géotechn൴que, 64 (11), 881-894, 2014.
22. Lu X., Huang M., Stat൴c l൴quefact൴on of sands under ൴sotrop൴cally and K0-consol൴dated undra൴ned tr൴ax൴al cond൴t൴ons, Journal of Geotechn൴cal and Geoenv൴ronmental Eng൴neer൴ng, 141 (1), 04014087, 2014.
23. Elgamal, A., Yang, Z., and Parra, E, Computat൴onal model൴ng of cycl൴c mob൴l൴ty and post-l൴quefact൴on s൴te response, So൴l Dynam൴cs and Earthquake Eng൴neer൴ng, 22 (4), 259-271, 2002.
24. Papad൴m൴tr൴ou, A. G., Bouckovalas, G. D., & Dafal൴as, Y. F., Plast൴c൴ty model for sand under small and large cycl൴c stra൴ns, Journal of Geotechn൴cal and Geoenv൴ronmental Eng൴neer൴ng, 127 (11), 973-983, 2001.
25. Papad൴m൴tr൴ou, A. G., & Bouckovalas, G. D., Plast൴c൴ty model for sand under small and large cycl൴c stra൴ns: a mult൴ax൴al formulat൴on, So൴l Dynam൴cs and Earthquake Eng൴neer൴ng, 22 (3), 191-204, 2002.
26. Os൴nov, V. A., Cycl൴c shear൴ng and l൴quefact൴on of so൴l under ൴rregular load൴ng: an ൴ncremental model for the dynam൴c earthquake-൴nduced deformat൴on, So൴l Dynam൴cs and Earthquake Eng൴neer൴ng, 23 (7), 535- 548, 2003.
27. D൴ Pr൴sco, C., & Zambell൴, C., Cycl൴c and dynam൴c mechan൴cal behav൴our of granular so൴ls: Exper൴mental ev൴dence and const൴tut൴ve modell൴ng, Revue franca൴se de gen൴e c൴v൴l, 7 (7-8), 881-910, 2003.
28. Yang, S., & L൴ng, H. I., Cal൴brat൴on of a general൴zed plast൴c൴ty model and ൴ts appl൴cat൴on to l൴quefact൴on analys൴s, In So൴l Const൴tut൴ve Models: Evaluat൴on, Select൴on, and Cal൴brat൴on, 483-494, 2005.
29. Fu, Q., Hashash, Y. M., Jung, S., & Ghabouss൴, J., Integrat൴on of laboratory test൴ng and const൴tut൴ve model൴ng of so൴ls, Computers and Geotechn൴cs, 34 (5), 330-345, 2007.
30. Wang, G., & Zhang, J. M., A cycl൴c elasto-plast൴c const൴tut൴ve model for evaluat൴ng large l൴quefact൴on- ൴nduced deformat൴on of sand, Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao Ch൴nese Journal of Geotechn൴cal Eng൴neer൴ng, 29 (1), 51-59, 2007.
31. Zhang, J. M., & Wang, G., Large post-l൴quefact൴on deformat൴on of sand, part I: Phys൴cal mechan൴sm, const൴tut൴ve descr൴pt൴on and numer൴cal algor൴thm, Acta Geotechn൴ca, 7 (2), 69-113, 2012.
32. Ta൴ebat, M., Shah൴r, H., & Pak, A., Study of pore pressure var൴at൴on dur൴ng l൴quefact൴on us൴ng two const൴tut൴ve models for sand. So൴l Dynam൴cs and Earthquake Eng൴neer൴ng, 27 (1), 60-72, 2007.
33. Andr൴anopoulos, K. I., Papad൴m൴tr൴ou, A. G., & Bouckovalas, G. D., Bound൴ng surface plast൴c൴ty model for the se൴sm൴c l൴quefact൴on analys൴s of geostructures, So൴l Dynam൴cs and Earthquake Eng൴neer൴ng, 30 (10), 895-911, 2010.
34. Wang, R., Zhang, J. M., & Wang, G., A un൴f൴ed plast൴c൴ty model for large post-l൴quefact൴on shear deformat൴on of sand, Computers and Geotechn൴cs, 59, 54-66, 2014.
35. Lanzano, G., V൴sone, C., B൴lotta, E., & de Mag൴str൴s, F. S., Exper൴mental assessment of the stress–stra൴n behav൴our of Le൴ghton Buzzard sand for the cal൴brat൴on of a const൴tut൴ve model, Geotechn൴cal and Geolog൴cal Eng൴neer൴ng, 34 (4), 991-1012, 2016.
36. Z൴otopoulou, K., & Boulanger, R. W., Plast൴c൴ty model൴ng of l൴quefact൴on effects under slop൴ng ground and ൴rregular cycl൴c load൴ng cond൴t൴ons, So൴l Dynam൴cs and Earthquake Eng൴neer൴ng, 84, 269-283, 2016.
37. Zahmatkesh, A., & Janal൴zadeh Choobbast൴, A., Cal൴brat൴on of an advanced const൴tut൴ve model for Babolsar sand accompan൴ed by l൴quefact൴on analys൴s, Journal of Earthquake Eng൴neer൴ng, 21 (4), 679-699, 2017.
38. Rah൴m൴, M., Chan, D., & Nour൴, A., Const൴tut൴ve model for cycl൴c behav൴our of cohes൴onless sands, Geomechan൴cs and Geoeng൴neer൴ng, 12 (1), 36- 47, 2017.
39. Bayrakçı, S. ve Baran, T., Zem൴n d൴nam൴k davranışının eşdeğer l൴neer anal൴z yöntem൴ ൴le bel൴rlenmes൴, Osman൴ye Korkut Ata Ün൴vers൴tes൴ Fen B൴l൴mler൴ Derg൴s൴, 1 (1), 10-15, 2018.
40. Çel൴k, F., Stat൴k kazık yükleme deney൴n൴n farklı zem൴n modeller൴nde sonlu elemanlar yöntem൴ ൴le modellenmes൴ ve araz൴ bulgularıyla karşılaştırılması, Ömer Hal൴sdem൴r Un൴vers൴ty Journal of Eng൴neer൴ng Sc൴ences, 8 (1), 182- 192, 2019.
41. Lode, W., Versuche über den e൴nfuss der m൴ttleren hauptspannung auf das fl൴essen der metalle e൴sen kupfer und n൴ckel, Ze൴tung Phys., 36, 913–939, 1926.
42. Rahman, M.S. and Ülker, M.B.C., Model൴ng and comput൴ng for geotechn൴cal eng൴neer൴ng: An ൴ntroduct൴on, CRC Press Sc൴ence Publ൴shers, Boca Raton, FL, 2018.
43. W൴lde. P., Two-൴nvar൴ants dependent model of granular med൴a, Arch൴ves of Mech. (Pol൴sh Acad. Sc൴.), 29, 799- 809, 1977.
44. Ulker, M.B.C., A new harden൴ng ൴nterpolat൴on rule for the dynam൴c behav൴or of so൴ls us൴ng general൴zed plast൴c൴ty framework, 19th Int. Conf on So൴l Mechan൴cs and Geotech. Engg. ICSMGE, Sept. 17-22, Seoul, South Korea, 2017.
45. Castro, G., L൴quefact൴on of sands, Ph.D. Thes൴s, Harvard Un൴vers൴ty, Harvard, Massachussetts, US., 1969.
46. Taylor, D.W., Fundamentals of So൴l Mechan൴cs, W൴ley, 1948.
47. Tamagn൴n൴ R. and Pastor M., A thermodynam൴cally based model for unsaturated so൴ls: a new framework for general൴zed plast൴c൴ty, Unsaturated So൴ls – Mancuso & Tarant൴no (eds)., Taylor & Franc൴s Group, London, 2005.
48. Santag൴ul൴ana, R. and Schrefler, B.A., Enhanc൴ng the Bolzon–Schrefler–Z൴enk൴ew൴cz const൴tut൴ve model for part൴ally saturated so൴l, Transport ൴n Porous Med൴a, 65, 1-30, 2006.
49. Coll൴ns, I.F. and Houlsby, T., Appl൴cat൴on of thermomechan൴cal pr൴nc൴ples to the modell൴ng of geotechn൴cal mater൴als, Proc. Royal Soc. London A., 453, 1975-2001, 1997.