Bina inşaatındaki çalışan duruşlarının farklı ergonomik risk değerlendirme yöntemleri ile değerlendirilmesi

İnşaat sektörü hem Türkiye hem de Dünya için lokomotif sektörlerden bir tanesidir. İnşaat sektörü ekonomikaçıdan önemli bir yere sahip olmasına rağmen iş kazaları ve meslek hastalıklarının da en fazla görüldüğüsektörlerden bir tanesidir. İnşaat sektöründeki elle taşıma işlerinin fazla olmasından dolayı kas iskelet sistemirahatsızlıklarının görülme sıklığı fazladır. Mevcut çalışmada, bina inşaatlarındaki çalışan duruşlarının 3farklı ergonomik risk değerlendirme yöntemi ile analiz ederek aralarındaki farklılıklar belirlenmiş ve binainşaat faaliyetleri için uygun yönteme karar vermek amacıyla 4 farklı görevdeki toplam 39 çalışma duruşuREBA, OWAS ve QEC ergonomik risk değerlendirme yöntemleri ile analiz edilmiştir. Değerlendirmesonuçları Kruskal - Wallis testi ile analiz edilmiş ve QEC yöntemi analiz çıktılarının diğer metotlardanayrıldığı belirlenmiştir. Bununla birlikte, çalışan vücut ağrı haritasını oluşturmak için bina inşaatında farklıgörevler yapan toplam 93 işçi ile İskandinav Kas-İskelet Sistemi Anketi uygulanmıştır. Anket sonuçlarınagöre değerlendirilen 4 farklı görev için çalışan vücut ağrı haritası oluşturulmuştur. Vücut ağrı haritasına görebina inşaatlarında çalışanların daha fazla “bel” bölgesinde rahatsızlıkları olduğu belirlenmiştir.Değerlendirilen dört görev arasında vücudun farklı bölgelerine maruziyet bakımından en riskli görevin“Tuğla/Sıva işleri”, ağrı şiddeti bakımından ise “İskele işleri” olduğu belirlenmiş ve riskleri azaltıcı önerilerverilmiştir.

Evaluation of employee postures in building construction with different ergonomic risk assessment methods

The construction sector is one of the locomotive sectors for both Turkey and the World. Although the construction sector has an important economic place, it is one of the sectors where work accidents and occupational diseases are most common. Due to the excessive amount of manual transport in the construction sector, musculoskeletal disorders are more common. In the current study, a total of 39 working positions in 4 different tasks were analyzed by REBA, OWAS, and QEC risk assessment methods in order to determine the differences between methods and to determine the appropriate method for building construction activities. When the evaluation results were analyzed with the Kruskal - Wallis test, the QEC method output was separated from the other methods. Additionally, the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire was conducted, with a total of 93 workers doing different tasks in building construction to map the working body pain. According to the results of the survey, the Worker Body Pain Map was created for 4 different tasks. When the results of the survey are examined, the employees have more “Low back” disorders. Among the tasks evaluated, the riskiest tasks were “Brick / Plaster Works” and “Scaffolding Works

PDF

___

1. Chiasson, M. E., Imbeau, D., Aubry, K., Delisle, A., Comparing the results of eight methods used to evaluate risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42 (5), 478-488, 2012.
2. Akay, D., Kurt, M., Dağdeviren, M., Ergonomic analysis of working postures, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 18 (3),73-84, 2003.
3. Cote, J. N., Ngomo, S., Stock, S., Messing, K., Vezina, N., Antle, D., St-Vincent, M., Quebec research on workrelated musculoskeletal disorders: Deeper understanding for better prevention, Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations, 68 (4), 643-660, 2013.
4. Lu, J. M., Twu, L. J., Wang, M.J.J., Risk assessments of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among the TFTLCD manufacturing operator, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 52, 40-51, 2016.
5. Dalkılıç, B., Gayrimenkul ve konut sektörüne bakı, Emlak Konut: G. Y. O., 2018.
6. Karluk, S.R., Cumhuriyet’in İlanından Günümüze Türkiye Ekonomisi’nde Yapısal Dönüşüm, Gözden Geçirilmiş 10. Baskı, Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A. Ş, İstanbul, Türkiye, 2005.
7. T.C Aile, Ç.v.S.H.B., İnşaat Sektörü 2017 İstatistikler, 22.03.2019.
8. Wibowo, A., The contribution of the construction industry to the economy of Indonesia: A systemic approach. 2009.
9. Elnamrouty, K., The Impact of Construction Sector on Palestinian Economy-Case Study: (Gaza Strip), 4 (5), 2012.
10. Kaya, V., Yalçınkaya, Ö., Hüseyni, İ., Ekonomik Büyümede İnşaat Sektörünün Rolü: Türkiye Örneği (1987-2010), Ataturk University Journal of Economics & Administrative Sciences, 27 (4), 148-167, 2013.
11. T.C Aile, Ç.v.S.H.B., Ölümlü İş Kazalarının Sebepleri, 22.03.2019.
12. Tam, C. M., Zeng, S. X.,Deng, Z. M., Identifying elements of poor construction safety management in China, Safety Science, 42 (7), 569-586, 2004.
13. Im, H. J., Kwon, Y. J., Kim, S. G., Kim, Y. K., Ju, Y. S., Lee, H. P., The characteristics of fatal occupational injuries in Korea's construction industry, 1997-2004, Safety Science, 47 (8), 1159-1162, 2009.
14. Kim, M. H., Yoo, W. G., Effect of a worktable position on head and shoulder posture and shoulder muscles in manual material handling, Work-a Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation, 51 (2),289-292, 2015.
15. Lee, T. H., Han, C. S., Analysis of Working Postures at a Construction Site Using the OWAS Method, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 19 (2), 245-250, 2013.
16. David, G.C., Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occupational Medicine-Oxford, 55 (3),190- 199, 2005.
17. Juul-Kristensen, B., Hansson, G.-Å., Fallentin, N., Andersen, J., Ekdahl, C., Assessment of work postures and movements using a video-based observation method and direct technical measurements, Applied ergonomics, 32 (5), 517-524, 2001.
18. Valero, E., Sivanathan, A., Bosche, F., Abdel-Wahab, M., Musculoskeletal disorders in construction: A review and a novel system for activity tracking with body area network, Applied Ergonomics, 54, 120-130, 2016.
19. Takala, E.-P., Pehkonen, I., Forsman, M., Hansson, G.- Å., Mathiassen, S. E., Neumann, W. P., Winkel, J., Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 36 (1), 3-24. 2010
20. Drinkaus, P., Sesek, R., Bloswick, D., Bernard, T., Walton, B., Joseph, B., Counts, J. H., Comparison of ergonomic risk assessment outputs from Rapid Upper Limb Assessment and the Strain Index for tasks in automotive assembly plants. Work, 21 (2), 165-172, 2003.
21. Motamedzade, M., Ashuri, M. R., Golmohammadi, R., & Mahjuba, H., Comparison of ergonomic risk assessment outputs from rapid entire body assessment and quick exposure check in an engine oil company, Journal of research in health sciences, 1 (1), 26-32, 2011.
22. Jones, T., Kumar, S., Comparison of Ergonomic Risk Assessment Output in Four Sawmill Jobs, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 16 (1), 105-111, 2010.
23. Jones, T., Kumar, S., Comparison of ergonomic risk assessments in a repetitive high-risk sawmill occupation: Saw-filer, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37 (9-10), 744-753, 2007.
24. Enez, K., Nalbantoğlu, S. S., Comparison of ergonomic risk assessment outputs from OWAS and REBA in forestry timber harvesting, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 70, 51-57, 2019.
25. Berlin, C., Örtengren, R., Lämkull, D., Hanson, L., Corporate-internal vs. national standard–A comparison study of two ergonomics evaluation procedures used in automotive manufacturing, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39 (6), 940-946, 2009.
26. Gönen, D., Ali, O., Özcan, C., A new risk assessment approach for the analysis of musculoskeletal disorders, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 33 (2), 423-438, 2018.
27. Nadri, H., Fasih, F., Nadri, F., Nadri, A., Comparison of ergonomic risk assessment results from Quick Exposure Check and Rapid Entire Body Assessment in an anodizing industry of Tehran, Iran, Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology, 2 (4), 195-202, 2013.
28. Kong, Y.K., Lee, S.Y., Lee, K.S., Kim, D.M., Comparisons of ergonomic evaluation tools (ALLA, RULA, REBA and OWAS) for farm work, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics, 24 (2), 218-223. 2018.
29. Gönen, D., Ali, O., Özcan, C., Analysis of working postures in the assembly process of wheel hay rake using anybody modelling system, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 32 (3), 651-660, 2017.
30. Kee, D., Karwowski, W., A comparison of three observational techniques for assessing postural loads in industry, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 13 (1), 3-14, 2007.
31. Mattila, M., Karwowski, W., Vilkki, M., Analysis of working postures in hammering tasks on building construction sites using the computerized OWAS method, Applied ergonomics, 24 (6), 405-412, 1993.
32. Kivi, P., Mattila, M., Analysis and improvement of work postures in the building industry: application of the computerised OWAS method, Applied ergonomics, 22 (1), 43-48, 1991.
33. Louhevaara, V., Is the physical work load equal for ageing and young blue-collar workers? International journal of industrial ergonomics, 24 (5), 559-564, 1999.
34. Saurin, T. A., de Macedo Guimarães, L.B., Ergonomic assessment of suspended scaffolds, International journal of industrial ergonomics, 36 (3), 229-237, 2006.
35. Li, K. W., Lee, C. L., Postural analysis of four jobs on two building construction sites: An experience of using the OWAS method in Taiwan. Journal of Occupational Health, 41 (3), 183-190, 1999.
36. Domingo, J.R.T., De Pano, M.T.S., Ecat, D.A.G., Sanchez, N.A.D., Custodio, B.P., Risk assessment on Filipino construction workers, Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 1854-1860, 2015.
37. Vachhani, T. R., Sawant, S. K., Pataskar, S., Ergonomics Risk Assessment of Musculoskeletal Disorder on Construction Site, Journal of Civic Engineering and Environmental Technology, 3, 228- 231, 2016.
38. Budhiman, M.A., Analisis penilaian tingkat risiko ergonomi pada pekerja konstruksi proyek Ruko Graha Depok,Lisans Tezi, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan,Jakarta, 2015.
39. Kuorinka, I., Jonsson, B., Kilbom, A., Vinterberg, H., Biering-Sørensen, F., Andersson, G., Jørgensen, K., Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms, Applied ergonomics, 18 (3), 233-237, 1987.
40. Baron, S., Hales, T., Hurrell, J., Evaluation of symptom surveys for occupational musculoskeletal disorders, American journal of industrial medicine, 29 (6), 609- 617. 1996.
41. Kahraman, T., Genç, A., Göz, E., The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation into Turkish assessing its psychometric properties, Disability and rehabilitation, 38 (21), 2153- 2160, 2016.
42. Başkurt, F., Başkurt, Z., Gelecek, N., Prevalence of selfreported musculoskeletal symptoms in teachers, SDÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2 (2), 58-64, 2011.
43. Aghilinejad, M., Javad Mousavi, S. A., Nouri, M. K., Ahmadi, A. B., Work-related musculoskeletal complaints among workers of Iranian aluminum industries, Archives of environmental & occupational health, 67 (2),98-102, 2012.
44. Kemmlert, K., A Method Assigned for the Identification of Ergonomic Hazards - Plibel. Applied Ergonomics, 26(3), 199-211, 1995.
45. Burgess-Limerick, R., Straker, L., Pollock, C., Egeskov, R., Manual Tasks Risk Assessment Tool (ManTRA) V 2.0, in Human Factors and Ergonomics Society of Australia workshop at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society of Australia annual conference, 2004.
46. Hignett, S., McAtamney, L., Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA), Applied Ergonomics, 31 (2), 201- 205, 2000.
47. Karhu, O., Kansi, P., Kuorinka, I, Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis, Applied Ergonomics, 8 (4), 199-201. 1977.
48. Li, G. Y., Buckle, P., A practical method for the assessment of work-related musculoskeletal risks - Quick exposure check (QEC), Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, Vols 1 and 2, 1351-1355, 1998
49. Esen, H., Fığlalı, N., Çalışma duruşu analiz yöntemleri ve çalışma duruşunun kas-iskelet sistemi rahatsızlıklarına etkileri, SAÜ. Fen Bil. Der., 17 (1), 41- 51, 2013.
50. Ayan, B., Montaj hattında ergonomik risk unsurlarının incelenmesi: otomotiv sektörüne yönelik bir uygulama, Uzmanlık Tezi, T.C. Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı, İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, 2015.
51. Sağıroğlu, H., Coşkun, M. B., Erginel, N., REBA ile bir üretim hattındaki iş istasyonlarının ergonomik risk analizi, Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, 3 (3),339-345, 2015.
52. Brandl, C., Mertens, A., Schlick, C. M., Effect of sampling interval on the reliability using the Ovako working posture analysing of ergonomic analysis system (OWAS). International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 57, 68-73, 2017.
53. Kant, I., Notermans, J. H. V., Borm, P.J.A., Observations of Working Postures in Garages Using the Ovako Working Posture Analyzing System (Owas) and Consequent Workload Reduction Recommendations, Ergonomics, 33 (2), 209-220, 1990.
54. Buchholz, B., Paquet, V., Punnett, L., Lee, D., Moir, S., PATH: A work sampling-based approach to ergonomic job analysis for construction and other non-repetitive work, Applied Ergonomics, 27 (3), 177-187, 1996.
55. White, H. A., Kirby, R. L., Folding and unfolding manual wheelchairs: an ergonomic evaluation of healthcare workers, Applied Ergonomics, 34 (6),571-579, 2003.
56. Hignett, S., Postural analysis of nursing work, Applied Ergonomics, 27 (3), 171-176, 1996.
57. Perkio-Makela, M., Hentila, H., Physical work strain of dairy farming in loose housing barns, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35 (1), 57-65, 2005.
58. Carrasco, C., Coleman, N., Healey, S., Lusted, M., Packing Products for Customers - an Ergonomics Evaluation of 3 Supermarket Checkouts, Applied Ergonomics, 26 (2), 101-108, 1995.
59. Kjellberg, K., Lindberg, P., Nyman, T., Palm, P., Rhen, I.-M., Eliasson, K., Forsman, M., Comparisons of six observational methods for risk assessment of repetitive work-results from a consensus assessment, in Proceedings 19th Triennial Congress of the IEA, Melbourne, 2015.
60. Hoy, J., Mubarak, N., Nelson, S., de Landas, M. S., Magnusson, M., Okunribido, O., Pope, M., Whole body vibration and posture as risk factors for low back pain among forklift truck drivers, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 284 (3-5), 933-946, 2005.
61. Gomez-Galan, M., Perez-Alonso, J., Callejon-Ferre, A.- J., Lopez-Martinez, J., Musculoskeletal disorders: OWAS review, Industrial health, 55 (4), 314-337, 2017.
62. Figlali, N., Cihan, A., Esen, H., Figlali, A., Cesmeci, D., Gullu, M. K., Yilmaz, M. K., Image processing-aided working posture analysis: I-OWAS, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 85, 384-394, 2015.
63. Karwowski, W. ve Marras, W. S., The occupational ergonomics handbook, Crc Press,Florida, A.B.D., 1998.
64. David, G., Woods, V., Li, G. Y., Buckle, P., The development of the Quick Exposure Check (QEC) for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders, Applied Ergonomics, 39 (1), 57-69, 2008.
65. Cheng, A. S. K., So, P. C. W., Development of the Chinese version of the Quick Exposure Check (CQEC). Work-a Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation, 48 (4), 503-510, 2014.
66. Özcan, E., İşyerinde ergonomik risklerin değerlendirilmesi ve hızlı maruziyet değerlendirme(HMD) yöntemi, Engineer & the Machinery Magazine,52 (616), 86-89, 2011.
67. Holmström, E., Lindell, J., Moritz, U., Low back and neck/shoulder pain in construction workers: occupational workload and psychosocial risk factors. Part 1: Relationship to low back pain, Spine, 17 (6), 663- 671, 1992.
68. Damlund, M., Gøth, S., Hasle, P., Munk, K., Low-back pain and early retirement among Danish semiskilled construction workers, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 8 (1), 100-104, 1982
69. Merlino, L. A., Rosecrance, J. C., Anton, D., Cook, T. M., Symptoms of musculoskeletal disorders among apprentice construction workers, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene, 18 (1), 57-64, 2003.
70. Kohammadi, Y., Sohrabi, Y., Poursadeghiyan, M., Rostami, R., Tabar, A. R., Abdollahzadeh, D., Tabar, F. R., Comparing the posture assessments based on RULA and QEC methods in a carpentry workshop, Res J Med Sci, 10 (3), 80-83, 2016.
71. Qutubuddin, S., Hebbal, S., Kumar, A., An ergonomic study of work related musculoskeletal disorder risks in Indian Saw Mills, Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 7 (5), 7-13, 2013.
72. Rahmadhan, D.K.B., Perbandingan Sensitivitas Metode REBA, OWAS dan QEC dalam Evaluasi Tingkat Risiko Postur Kerja (Studi Kasus di WL Aluminium Giwangan), 93-102, 2017.
73. Wittmann, F. H., ve Balkema, A., Advances in autoclaved aerated concrete, Citeseer, New Jersey, A.B.D., 1992.
74. Vatin, N. I., Gamayunova, O. S., Using plastering machines to improve the efficiency of finishing works. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 635, 2049-2053, 2014.
75. Kangari, R., Yoshida, T., Automation in construction. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 6 (4), 327-335, 1990.