Fiskal ve ekstrafiskal amaçlar bağlamında 1970’lerden günümüze çevre vergileri

Küresel ısınmanın yarattığı iklim değişimi, hava kirliliği, ses kirliliği(gürültü), ozon tabakasına zarar veren gazların salınımı, çevreye zararlı çeşitli atıklar, kimyasal maddeler, ulaşım ve enerji kaynaklı emisyonlarla mücadele edilmesi gereğinin günden güne artması gibi unsurlar çevre vergilerinin düzenleyici etkilerine duyulan ihtiyacı şiddetlendirmiştir. Bu doğrultuda günümüzde gerek gelişmiş gerek gelişmekte olan ülkelerde yeni çevre vergileri getirilmesi eğiliminin sürdüğü görülmektedir. 1970’lerin başında, gelişmiş ekonomiler kirleten öder ilkesini benimsemişlerdir. 1991’de Avrupa Komisyonunda karbon vergisi kabul edilmiştir. 1997 yılında imzalanıp, 2005 yılında yürürlüğe giren Kyoto protokolü sayesinde dünyada çevre vergileri uygulamaları yaygınlaşmıştır. Günümüzde OECD ülkelerinde çevre ile ilgili 375 civarında vergi türü ve 250 tür de harç ve ceza türü bulunduğu ileri sürülmektedir. Ülkemizde ise çevre vergileri olarak sadece çevre ve temizlik vergisi ile çeşitli enerji ürünleri üzerinden alınan özel tüketim vergisi bulunmaktadır. Çalışmada çevre vergilerinin kavramsal açıklamasına, çevre vergilerinin türleri ile teorik bağlamda çevre vergilerine, çevre vergilerinin gelişimi ve yabancı ülkelerdeki ve Türkiye’deki çevre vergileri uygulamaları ile bu uygulamaların birbiri ile karşılaştırılmasına değinilmektedir.

Envıronmental taxes from the 1970s to present in the context of Fiscal And extra Fiscal aims

To take necessary action on like factors which are day by day growing with the climate change which caused by global warming, air pollution, noise pollution (noise), the ozone layer damaging gas emissions, various wastes, chemicals, transportation and energy source emissions of harmful to the environment, the need of eco taxes regulatory effects is intensified. Environmental taxes are utilized financial instruments on the environmental protection and ensuring sustainability of environment. However, in the literature of environmental taxes is not the only benefit to protect the environment, but they also provide other benefits. A second benefit of the environmental taxes, its gaining revenues, to compensate for the decline in the other taxes. According to the OECD and Eurostat classification of environmental taxes; it can be analyzed in four groups. These groups, energy taxes, transportation taxes ,pollution taxes and source taxes.Therefore in practice in many countries, water pollution, noise pollution to reach locations of various types of environmental taxes are given. However, it can be said that today’s both developing and developed countries have continued to increase the tend to bring new environmental taxes .World in the early 1970s, developed economies have adopted the principle of polluter pays. OECD countries in 1972, when accepting this policy which was in the European Community's first Environmental Action Programme in 1973, the Treaty of Rome in 1985, were interviewed. Environmental taxes principles established in EU countries and the carbon tax was adopted in 1991 by the European Commission. the principle of limiting CO2 emissions in the 2000s was adopted in the Rio Convention in 1992 by EU member countries. Hence environmental taxes which are the examples of Pigouvian taxes, have been integrated into the tax system of many countries via green tax reform in OECD countries throughout the early 1990s. In 1994, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change came into effect. the Kyoto protocol, signed in 1997 and its came into effect in 2005. With the Kyoto protocol practices of environmental taxes have become widespread around the world. Members of the European Union carbon dioxide emissions and its additional payments related to the agreement process, initiated in 2005. Today, around 375 environment-related taxes in OECD countries, and 250 types of fees and fines such species are suggested. But %90 of them(of these) composed of motor vehicles taxes and motor vehicle fuel taxes.In 1990, the carbon tax for the first time enforced in Finland. With EU accession of this country, electricity tax with the carbon tax instead of carbon tax was introduced in 1997. Types of environmental taxes in EU countries are much more than our country’s for the quantity and variety. In EU countries there are a lot of environmental taxes like nitrogen compounds tax, the water consumption fee tax, waste water, pesticides limit the use tax, fertilizer taxes and fees, landfill tax, construction-building tax, recyling containers and drums and many other types of taxes. In our country there are excise taxes on some energy products and one type of environmental taxes on buildings, which is called environmental and purification tax. Its environmental tax liability starts with the using of buildings. Determination of the tax scale of this taxation changes according to buildings outside the metropolitan areas municipalities or in the metropolitan areas municipalities. Compared to other municipalities in the metropolitan areas municipalities environmental and purrification tax executed for the tax rate more than 25% rate. Tax buildings comes from five degrees in the tax scale of environmental and purification which are classified according to the cost of the building, also the buildings are divided into 7 groups.İn this taxation residential water consumption based on cubic meters. Per cubic meter is calculated by multiplying the amount of specified price for the year. These amounts are increased each year at the rate of revaluation. The other related taxes on the environment are excise taxes on some energy products in Turkey. They are listed in A and B category of excise taxes. Some of them are on the aircraft fuel, unleaded super gasoline, unleaded regular gasoline, leaded regular and super petrol, natural gas, fuel oiller, lubricating oil, differential oil, base oil, such as jet fuel and diesel oil and oil products, and benzol, solvents, varnishes, pentane, ether, thinner. Although in our country there is no tax deduction for hybrid vehicles, developed countries are applying various tax incentives for hybrid vehicles. In this study, conceptual description of environmental taxes, environmental tax types, environmental taxes for the theoretical context, environmental taxes development in Turkey and in some practices in developed countries, so comparisons about the environmental taxation in some developed countries and between Turkey are examined.

___

  • ACEA(2009), “Overvıew Of Tax Incentives For Electric Vehicles in The EU”, http://www.acea.be/images/uploads/files/20091014_EV_incentives.pdf(20.03.2010).
  • AĞBAL N,(2001) Çevrenin Korunması ve Çevre Vergileri-I, E-Yaklaşım, Sayı 105, http://www.yaklasim.com.tr(23.03.2010).
  • AKTAN Can(2003), “Yeni Ekonominin Özellikleri”, http://www.canaktan.org/ yeni-trendler/yeni-ekonomi/ozellikleri.htm(26.04.2010).
  • ANONİM(2008), Kyoto Protokolüne Katılım Türkiye’nin Sanayileşmesini Frenlememeli”, İşveren Dergisi, Temmuz, ss.38-39.
  • ANONİM, “Benefits of Buying A Hybrid Car in Europe”(2009), http://www.wallstreet. ro/articol/English-Version/69515/Benefits-of-buying-a-hybrid-car-in- Europe.htm(24.04.2010).
  • ASLIHAK Alper(2008), “Melez Araçlar ve Hidrojenle Çalışan Araçlar İçin Vergi Teşvikleri”, Vergi Sorunları, Sayı 241, Ekim, s.63-64.
  • BBC(2008), “Switching To A Diesel Car”, http://www.bbc.co.uk/bloom/actions /dieselcars.shtml(25.04.2010).
  • BOVENBERG A. L.(1999), "Green Tax Reform” and the Double Dividend: an Updated Reader's Guide", International Tax and Public Finance, http://www.springerlink.com/content/qk37243t05622042/fulltext.pdf?page=12, (23.04.2010), pp.157-183
  • BÜLBÜL Duran(2001), “Yerel Yönetimlerde Mali Yapı, TODAİE, Yerel Yönetimler Merkezi Rapor, http://www.yerelnet.org.tr/mali_yapi/rapor_01.pdf, Ankara, ss.134-135.
  • CARRARO, C., GALEOTTİ, M. and GALLO, M.(1996), “Environmental Taxation and Unemployment: Some Evidence on the ‘Double Dividend Hypothesis’ in Europe”, Journal of Public Economics Volume 62, Issues 1-2, October, pp. 141-181.
  • DEĞİRMENDERELİ, Ali(2000), “Çeşitli Ülkelerde Uygulanan Ekolojik Vergiler”, Mevzuat Dergisi, Eylül, sayı 33, http://www.mevzuatdergisi.com/2000/09a/ 01.htm (22.02.2010).
  • EKİNS Paul(2009), European Environmental Taxes and Charges: Recent Experience, Issues and Trends”, Ecological Economics, Volume 31, Issue 1, October, Pages 39-62.
  • EKMEKÇİ, Esra(2003), Küreselleşme ve Vergilemede Yeni Eğilimler, İstanbul Kazancı Kitabevi, İstanbul.
  • EROĞLU, Veysel(2008), “Ülkemiz Kyoto Protokolüne En Kısa Sürede Taraf Olmalı”, İşveren Dergisi, ss.24-27.
  • EUROSTAT(2001), “Environmental Taxes: A Statistical Guide”, http://epp.eurostat. ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-07-001/EN/KS-SF-07-001-EN.PDF (21.04.2010).
  • EUROPEAN COMMİSSİON(2001), Study on Economic and Environmental Implications of the Use of Environmental Taxes and Charges in the European Union and its Member States , Ecotec.
  • EUROPEAN COMMİSSİON(2009), “Environmental Taxation in European Union”, http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/taxation/gen_info/econo mic_analysis/tax_structures/2009/2009_full_text_en.pdf(22.03.2010), pp.5-25.
  • EUROPEAN COMMİSSİON(2008), “Environment Policy Review”, http://ec.europa.eu/ environment/pdf/policy/5_1.pdf, 2008, page 55-56.
  • EUROSTAT(2009), Taxation Trends in the European Union, http://epp.eurostat.ec. europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-DU-07-001/EN/KS-DU-07-001-EN.PDF (25.04.2010), pp. 112-115.
  • FAURE, M. G. And NİESSEN Nicole (2006), Environmental Law in Development, MPG Books Ltd, USA.
  • FERHATOĞLU, Emrah(2003), “Avrupa Birliğinde Ortak Çevre Politikası Çerçevesinde Çevre Vergileri”, E-Yaklaşım, Sayı 3, http://www.yaklasim.com.tr (24.04.2010).
  • GENÇER, Çağlan Ahmet ve GERŞİL, Aydın (2007), “Çevre Kanunun ve Vergi Politikalarının İşletmelerin Çevre Maliyetleri Üzerindeki Etkileri”, Vergi Sorunları, Sayı 221, ss. 49-61.
  • GUBANDRU, Cristian (2009), “Benefits of Buying a Hybrid Car in Europe”, http://www.wall-street.ro/articol/English-Version/69515/Benefits-of-buying-ahybrid- car-in-Europe.htm, 11 August 2009.
  • İKTİSADİ KALKINMA VAKFI (1998), Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye’nin Çevre Politikalarının Karşılıklı İncelenmesi, İstanbul, İKV Yayınları No:153, 83.
  • JACSES(2010) ,“What Are Environmental Taxes?, http://www.jacses.org/en/ paco/envtax.htm, (18.04. 2010).
  • KULU, Bahattin (2001), “Çevre Vergileri ve Gelişmiş Ülkelerdeki Uygulaması”, Vergi Dünyası, Şubat, ss.229-234.
  • MARK, P. and STEPHEN, S., (1991) “The European Carbon Tax”, http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/17288/1/17288.pdf(24.03.2010), pp.58-65.
  • MEDEMA, S. and ZERBE Richard O. (1999), “The Coase Theorem”, http://encyclo.findlaw.com/0730book.pdf, pp.1-3.
  • MORRIS, David (2003), “Green Taxes”, Institue for Local Self Reliance, http://www.ilsr.org/ecotax/greentax.html(28.04.2010).
  • OECD (2005), “Environmental Taxes”, http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID= 6437(22.03.2010).
  • OECD (2009), “Environmentally Related Taxes in the OECD Countries”, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/27/23/36966499.pdf(23.03.2010).
  • OECD(2010), Database, http://www2.oecd.org/ecoinst/queries/index.htm (25.03.2010)
  • ORTAÇ, Rifat(2004), “Global Kamu Malları Finansmanı”, Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • ÖKTEM, Ayşe Uyduranoğlu(2007), “Çevre Vergileri Ve Çevre İçin Fedakârlık”, http://www.radikal.com.tr/haber.php?haberno=240844(16.03.2010).
  • PILLET, Gonzague(2006), “Environmental Fiscal Reform”, http://www.mesoplatform. org/spec/meso/download/MESO%20formation/MESO%20PSUT_Lec ture_5.pdf (14.03.2010).
  • SANDMO, Agnar(2009), “The Scale and Scope of Environmental Taxation”, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1554948, pp 1-34.
  • SARIKAYA Hasan, “AB Uyum Sürecinde Çevre Politikaları ve Uygulamaları, SKKD Cilt 14, Sayı 1, 2004, s.2-3.
  • SMİTH, Stephen(1995), The Role of the European Union in Environmental Taxation, International Tax and Public Finance, http://www.springerlink.com/ content/j784p0224654k212/fulltext.pdf?page=1.2:375-387, 1995.
  • STEİNBACH N., VİVEKA P., CEDERLUND M., GEORGESCU A. and HASS J.(2009), “Environmental Taxes”, http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/ londongroup/meeting14/LG14_18a.pdf, 14th Meeting of the London Group on Environmental Accounting Canberra, 27 – 30 April 2009, pp.1-13.
  • TAVŞANCI, Aykut(2005), “AB Çerçevesinde Çevre Vergileri”,İktisat İşletme Finans, Kasım, ss.36-45.
  • TOBB, Vergilemede Global Eğilimler AB ve Türk Vergi Sistemi, Ankara: TOBB Özel İhtisas Raporu, Mayıs, s.41-42.
  • UNDP(2008), “A Pigouvian Tax”, http://www.undp.org.ar/docs/taller_ecosistemico/ 2_7.pdf(21.04.2010), pp.1-2.
  • UZUN, İbrahim, “Kullanılmayan Binalardan Çevre Temizlik Vergisi Alınır mı?”, Lebib Yalkın Mevzuat Dergisi, Şubat 2006, Sayı:90, s. 27.
  • YALÇIN, Sedat(2010), “Ekolojik Vergi Reformu Ve Rekabet”, Ekonomik Pusula, http://www.ekonomikpusula.com/sedat-yalcin/ekolojik-vergi-reformu-ve-rekabet (25.03.2010).
  • YILDIZ, Habib(2005), “Küreselleşmenin Vergileme Üzerine Etkileri ve Türkiye Açısından Değerlendirilmesi, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara.