___

• Akyazı, E. & Ünal, A. (2013). İletişim fakültesi öğrencilerinin amaç, benimseme, yalnızlık düzeyi ilişkisi bağlamında sosyal ağları kullanımı. Global Media Journal, 3(6). 1-24.
• Anderson, T. (2008). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning: AU Press.
• Attwell, G. (2007). Personal learning environments-the future of elearning?. eLearning Papers, 2(1), 1-8.
• Baird, D. & Fisher, M. (2006). Neomillennial user experience design strategies: Utilizing social networking media to support “always on” learning styles. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 34(1), 5-32.
• Barnes, K., Marateo, R. C. & Ferris, S. P. (2007). Teaching and learning with the net generation. Journal of Online Education, 3(4). 19 Şubat 2013 tarihinde http://www.editlib.org/p/104231 adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Bosch, T., E. (2009). Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the university of cape town. South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research. 35(2), 185-200.
• Bray, J. H., & Maxwell, S. E. (1985). Multivariate Analysis of Variance. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
• Capogna, S. (2010, October). Learning and social networks newforms of sociability. ESA Research Network Sociology of Culture Midterm Conference: Cultureand The Making of Worlds, pp.1-15. 20 Şubat 2013 tarihinde http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1692082## adresinde alınmıştır.
• Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B., & Ingraffea, A. (2007). Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers & Education, 49(2), 309-329.
• Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W. and Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the web? the intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behaviour, 26, 247-253.
• Curran, Sara R. & Saguy, Abigail C. (2001). Migration and cultural change: A role for gender and social networks?. Journal of International Women's Studies, 2(3), 54-77.
• De Vita, G. (2001). Learning styles, culture and inclusive instruction in the multicultural classroom: A business and management perspective. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(2), 165–174.
• Dippold, D. (2009). Peer feedback through blogs: Student and tutor perceptions in an advanced german class. ReCALL, 21(1). 18 - 36.
• Dunn, R. & K. Dunn. (1992). Teaching Elementary Students Through Their İndividual Learning Styles: Practical Approaches For Grades. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Edmunds, R. & Richardson, J. T. E. (2009). Conceptions of learning, approaches to studying and personal development in UK higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 295-309.
• Ellison, N., Steinfield, C. & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of facebook ‘‘friends’’: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
• Felder, R. M. & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
• Fer, S. (2003). Matematik, fizik ve kimya öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin öğrenme biçemlerine göre kolay öğrendikleri öğrenme etkinlikleri. Çağdaş Eğitim, 28(304), 33-43.
• Graf, S. & Lui, T. C. (2010). Analysis of learners’ navigational behaviour and their learning styles in an online course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26 (2), 116-131.
• Gregorc, A. F. (1979). Learning styles: Differences which the profession must address. Reading Through Content, 29-34.
• Hackman, M. Z., & Walker, K. B. (1990). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of systems design and teacher ımmediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education, 39(3), 196-206.
• Hannafin, M. J. & Hooper, S.R. (1993). Learning Principles. In M. Fleming and H. Levie (Eds.). Instructional Message Design. New Jersey: Educational techology publications englewood cliffs.
• Hansen, D., Shneiderman, B. & Smith, M. A. (2010). Analyzing Social Media Networks with Nodexl: Insights From A Connected World. Burlington, USA.
• Harrison, R. & Thomas, M. (2009). Identity in online communities: social networking sites and language learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 7(2), 109-124.
• Hsieh, S. W., Jang, Y. R., Hwang, G. J., & Chen, N. S. (2011). Effects of teaching and learning styles on students’ reflection levels for ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1194-1201.
• Huang, E., Wei Lin, S. & Huang, T. (2012). What type of learning style leads to online participation in the mixed-mode e-learning environment? A study of software usage instruction. Computers & Education, 58, 338-349.
• Karal, H., & Kokoç, M. (2010). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal ağ siteleri kullanım amaçlarını belirlemeye yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 1(3), 251-263.
• Kaplan, A., M. & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social Media. Business Horizons, 53, 59-68.
• Keefe, J.W. (1982). Student Learning Styles and Brain Behaviour. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
• Kirschner, P. A. & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Behaviour, 26, 1237-1245.
• Klasnja-Milicevic, A., Vesin, B., Ivanovic, M. & Budimac, Z. (2011). E-learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification. Computers & Education, 56, 885–899.
• Lau, W.W.F. & Yuen, A. H. K. (2010). Promoting conceptual change of learning sorting algorithm through the diagnosis of mental models: The effects of gender and learning styles. Computers & Education, 54, 275-288.
• Lenhart, A. & Madden, M. (2007). Teens, Privacy & Online Social Networks: How Teens Manage Their Online Identities And Personal Information in The Age Of Myspace. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
• Mazman, G. & Usluel, Y. (2011). Gender differences in using social networks. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10 (2), 133-139.
• Moallem, M. (2007). Accommodating individual differences in the design of online learning environments: A comparative study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(2), 217-245.
• Morris, J., & Meyer, J. H. F. (2003). Variation in the Conceptions of Learning of Physiotherapy Students in England and Wales. C. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning Theory and Practice (235−250). Oxford, UK: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
• Mupinga, D. M., Nora, R. T., & Yaw, D. C. (2006). The learning styles, expectations, and needs of online students. College Teaching, 54(1), 185-189.
• Muscanell, N. and Guadagno, R. (2012). Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (1), 107–112.
• Ortigosa, A., Paredes, P. & Rodriguez P. (2010). AH-questionnaire: An adaptive hierarchical questionnaire for learning styles. Computers & Education, 54, 999-1005.
• Pempek, T, A.,Yermolayeva, Y. A. & Calvert, Sandra L. (2009). Collegestudents' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 227-238.
• Rasmussen, K. L. (1998). Hypermedia and learning styles: Can performance be influenced? Journal of Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7 (4), 291-308.
• Rennie, F. & Morrison, T. (2013). E-Learning and Social Networking Handbook. UK: Routledge Publishing.
• Riding, R., & Grimley, M. (1999). Cognitive style and learning from multimedia materials in 11-year children. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(1), 43-59.
• Roblyer, M., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J. & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134–140.
• Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault J. M., Simmering, M. G. & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with facebook use. Computers in Human Behaviour, 25, 578-586.
• Saeed, N., & Yang, Y. (2008, July). Using learning styles and preferences to incorporate emerging e-learning tools in teaching. In Advanced Learning Technologies, 2008. ICALT'08. Eighth IEEE International Conference on (pp. 967-971). IEEE.
• Shaw, R. (2012). A study of the relationships among learning styles, participation types, and performance in programming language learning supported by online forums. Computers & Education, 58, 111-120.
• Şener, G. (2009). Türkiye’de Facebook kullanımı araştırması. 14. Türkiye’de İnternet Konferansı’nda sunulmuş bildiri, Bilgi Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Tınmaz, H. (2013). Sosyal Ağ Web Siteleri ve Sosyal Ağların Eğitimde Kullanımı. K. Çağıltay ve Y. Göktaş (Editörler). Öğretim Teknolojilerinin Temelleri: Teoriler, Araştırmalar, Eğilimler (615-630). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
• Yan Yu, A., Wen Tian, S., Vogel, D., & Kwok, R. C. (2010). Can learning be virtuallyboosted? An investigation of online social networking impacts. Computers & Education, 55, 1494-1503.
• Valkenburg, P. M., Schouten, A. P., & Peter, J. (2005). Adolescents' identity experiments on the Internet. New Media & Society, 7(3), 383–402.
• Van Zwanenberg, N., Wilkinson, L. J. & Anderson, A. (2000). Felder and silverman’s ındex of learning styles and honey and mumford’s learning styles questionnaire: How do they compare and do they predict academic performance?. Educational Psychology, 20(3), 365-380.
• Zacharis, N. (2011). The effect of learning style on preference for web-based courses and learning outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2(5). 790-800.