İrem BUDAKOĞLU, Özlem COŞKUN, Vildan ÖZEKE, Hamza NAZLI, Münevver AKSOY, Berksun TUTAN

Ders Çalışma Becerileri ve Yaklaşımı Ölçeğinin Uyarlanması: Tıp Fakültesi Öğrencileri için Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Amaç: Öğrencilerin ders çalışma becerileri ve yaklaşımını belirlemeye yönelikolarak geliştirilen ASSIST (Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students:Öğrencilerin Ders Çalışma Becerileri ve Yaklaşımları Envanteri) isimli ölçmearacının “Tıp Fakültesi öğrencileri” örneklemi için Türkçe’ye uyarlanarakgeçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmasının gerçekleştirilmesidir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Orijinal ölçek beşli Likert tipinde derecelendirilen 52maddeden oluşmakta ve öğrenenlerin derin, stratejik ve yüzeyselyaklaşımları buradan elde edilen verilere göre belirlenmektedir. Türkçe ’yeuyarlanması için aracı geliştirenlerden izin alınmış ve maddelerin dil çevirisineilişkin adımlar gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çeviri süreci sonrasında ölçme aracıTürkiye’de bir devlet üniversitesindeki 373 tıp fakültesi öğrencisineuygulanmıştır. 186 kadın ve 187 erkekten oluşan çalışma grubunun yaşortalaması 20,30 (±2,78) olup; Dönem 1 (n: 90), Dönem 2 (n: 83), Dönem 3(n: 64), Dönem 4 (n: 51), Dönem 5 (n: 62) ve Dönem 6 (n: 23) olmak üzeretüm sınıflardan öğrenci yer almaktadır. Orijinal formdaki üç ana ve 13 altfaktörlü yapıyı doğrulamak üzere veriler, birinci ve ikinci düzey doğrulayıcıfaktör analizi ile test edilmiştir.Bulgular: Ölçekten dört madde ve bir alt boyut olmak üzere toplam sekizmadde çıkarılmıştır. Çıkarma işlemi sonrasında ölçeğin orijinal faktöryapısıyla uyumlu sonuçlar elde edilmiştir. Ortaya çıkan modelin veri-modeluyumu ve hataları kabul edilebilir düzeydedir (GFI=0.84; RMSEA=0.069;CFI=0.94; NNFI=0.93; SRMR=0.072). Uyarlanan ölçek, üç ana boyut altında 12alt boyut içermektedir. Bu ölçekten elde edilen puanlarla bireylerin baskınolan ders çalışma yaklaşımı belirlenmektedir.Sonuç: Türkçe uyarlaması yapılarak Tıp Fakültesi öğrencilerinde geçerli vegüvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu belirlenen ASSIST’in 44 maddelik versiyonu,ileri dönem çalışmalarda başka değişkenlerle birlikte kullanılabilir.

Adaptation of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory: A Validity and Reliability Study for Turkish Medical Students

Objective: The aim of this study is to carry out the validity and reliability of ASSIST (Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students) by adapting to Turkish for the sample of medical students. Materials and methods: The original scale consists of 52 items rated on the five-point Likert type, and the deep, strategic and surface approaches of the learners are determined according to the data obtained here. In order to adapt the scale, a permission was obtained from those who developed the tool. The translation steps were carefully conducted. The scale applied to 373 medical students in a state university in Turkey. The study group consist of 186 female and 187 mail students with the mean age of 20.30(±2.78) years. There are 90 students from Year-1; 83 students from Year-2; 64 students from Year-3; 51 students from Year-4; 62 students from Year-5, and 23 students from Year-6. The data were analyzed by using first and second order confirmatory factor analysis to verify the original factorial structure. Results: Four items and one sub-dimension were subtracted from the scale. After the subtraction, the results were consistent with the original factor structure. The model fit and error variances were acceptable (GFI=0.84; RMSEA=0.069; CFI=0.94; NNFI=0.93; SRMR=0.072). The adapted scale includes 12 sub-dimensions under three main dimensions. The scores obtained from this scale determine the predominant approach and study skills. Conclusion: The 44-item adapted version of ASSIST, which is determined as a valid and reliable scale for medical students can be used with other variables in further studies.

PDF

___

Batı AH, Tetik C, Gürpınar E. Öğrenme Yaklaşımları Ölçeği Yeni Şeklini Türkçeye Uyarlama ve Geçerlilik Güvenirlilik Çalışması. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences. 2010;30:1639-46.
Diseth Å. Validation of a Norwegian Version of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST): Application of structural equation modelling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2001;45:381-94.
Byrne M, Flood B, Willis P. The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes: a study of Irish accounting students. Accounting Education. 2002;11:27-42.
Diseth Å, Pallesen S, Brunborg GS, Larsen S. Academic achievement among first semester undergraduate psychology students: the role of course experience, effort, motives and learning strategies. Higher Education. 2010;59:335-52.
Prevatt F, Petscher Y, Proctor BE, Hurst A, Adams K. The Revised Learning and Study Strategies Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2006;66:448-58.
Entwistle N, Ramsden P. Understanding Student Learning. London, England: Social Science Research Council; 1982. Report No.: ED244959 Contract No.: ISBN-0-89397-171-5.
Zhu C, Valcke M, Schellens T. A cross-cultural study of Chinese and Flemish university students: Do they differ in learning conceptions and approaches to learning? Learning and Individual Differences. 2008;18:120-7.
Marton F, Säljö R. On Qualitative Differences In Learning: I—Outcome And Process*. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1976;46:4-11.
Marton F, Säaljö R. On Qualitative Differences In Learning—Ii Outcome As A Function Of The Learner's Conception Of The Task. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1976;46:115-27.
Trigwell K, Prosser M. Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education. 1991;22:251-66.
Biggs J, Tang C. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press; 2007.
Biggs J, Kember D, Leung DYP. The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2001;71:133-49.
Gadelrab HF. Factorial Structure and Predictive Validity of Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) in Egypt: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology. 2011;9:1197-218.
Biggs JB. Study Process Questionnaire Manual. Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Hawthorn, : Australian Council for Educational Research; 1987. Report No.: ED308200 Contract No.: ISBN-0-86431-002-1.
Biggs JB. Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. ResearchMonograph. Hawthorn, : Australian Council for Educational Research; 1987. Report No.: ED308201 Contract No.: ISBN-0-85563-416-2.
Biggs JB. Learning Process Questionnaire Manual. Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Hawthorn, : Australian Council for Educational Research; 1987. Report No.: ED308199 Contract No.: ISBN-0-86431-001-3.
Duff A. The Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory (RASI) and its Use in Management Education. Active Learning in Higher Education. 2004;5:56-72.
Entwistle N, Tait H, McCune V. Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 2000;15:33.
Weinstein CE, Palmer DR. Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI): User’s manual. 2nd Edition ed. Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing; 2002.
Abedin NFZ, Jaafar Z, Husain S, Abdullah R. The Validity of ASSIST as a Measurement of Learning Approach among MDAB Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;90:549-57.
Trigwell K, Prosser M, Waterhouse F. Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education. 1999;37:57-70.
Akbaş G, Korkmaz L. Ölçek Uyarlaması (Adaptasyon). Türk Psikoloji Bülteni, 2007;13:15-7.
Tabachnick BG, Fidel LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. Fourth Edition ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.; 2001.
SPSS Statistics for Windows. 17.0 ed. Chicago: SPSS Inc; 2008.
Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8.51 ed. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software International; 2001.
Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, England: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009.
Yurdugül H, Aşkar P. Öğrencilerin Teknolojiye Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği Faktör Yapılarının İncelenmesi: Türkiye Örneği. İlköğretim Online. 2008;7:288-309.
Yurdugül H. Çoktan seçmeli test sonuçlarından elde edilen farklı korelâsyon türlerinin birinci ve ikinci sıralı faktör analizlerindeki uyum indekslerine etkisi. İlköğretim Online. 2007;6:154-79.
Çokluk Ö, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik, SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegema Yayıncılık; 2010.
Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociological Methods & Research. 1992;21:230-58.
Hu Lt, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999;6:1-55.
Browne MW, MacCallum RC, Kim CT, Andersen BL, Glaser R. When fit indices and residuals are incompatible. Psychol Methods. 2002;7:403-21.
Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin. 1980;88:588-606.
Senemoğlu N. College of Education Students’ Approaches to Learning and Study Skills. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2011;36:65-80.
Berberoglu G, Hei LM. A Comparison of University Students' Approaches to Learning Across Taiwan and Turkey. International Journal of Testing. 2003;3:173-87.
Diseth Å. Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement. European Journal of Personality. 2003;17:143-55.
Karagiannopoulou E, Naka K, Kamtsios S, Savvidou E, Michalis L. Medical students’ approaches to learning before and after the cardiology problem- based learning practice. Journal of Contemporary Medical Education. 2014;2:152-7.
Richardson JTE. Students’ Approaches to Learning and Teachers’ Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education. Educational Psychology. 2005;25:673-80.
Honkima ̈ki * S, Tynja ̈la ̈ Pi, Valkonen S. University students' study orientations, learning experiences and study success in innovative courses. Studies in Higher Education. 2004;29:431-49.
Reid WA, Duvall E, Evans P. Relationship between assessment results and approaches to learning and studying in Year Two medical students. Med Educ. 2007;41:754-62.