Correlation of bacterial biofilm grade with clinical features in chronic rhinosinusitis

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, polip olmayan kronik rinosinüzit (KRS) hastalarında bakteriyel biyofilm varlığını taramalı elektron mikroskopu (TEM) ile göstermek ve biyofilm evresi ile hastaların klinik özellikleri arasında korelasyon olup olmadığını araştırmaktı. Yöntemler: Bu prospektif klinik çalışmada iki grup yer aldı: ilk grup endoskopik sinüs cerrahisi uygulanacak olan 20 KRS hastasından; kontrol grup ise KRSsi olmayan ve septoplasti ya da septorinoplasti cerrahisi uygulanacak olan 15 hastadan oluştu. Ameliyat öncesinde klinik bilgiler kaydedildi; cerrahi sırasında ise mukoza örnekleri ve kültür materyalleri elde edildi. Spesmenler biyofilm varlığı açısından TEM ile incelendi. Yüzeydeki biyofilm prevalansına göre, evre 0 ile 4 arasında biyofilm evrelemesi önerildi ve kullanıldı. Hastaların semptom skoru, alerji varlığı, önceki ESC öyküsü, bilgisayarlı tomografideki (BT) Lund-Mackay skoru ve kültür sonuçları ile biyofilm evresine göre karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Biyofilm varlığı KRS hastalarının 16/20 (%80)sında gözlenirken, kontrol gruptaki hiçbir hastada tespit edilmedi. KRS grubunda biyofilm varlığı mevcut olmayan hasta sayısının düşük olması (n=4) nedeniyle, bu grupta biyofilm olan ve olmayan hastaların birbiri ile istatistiksel karşılaştırması yapılmadı. Ancak yüksek biyofilm evresi (evre 3 ve 4) ile önceki ESC öyküsü ve kültür pozitifliği arasında bağlantı olabileceği, ameliyat öncesi semptom skoru, Lund-Mackay BT skoru ve alerji öyküsü ile ise korelasyon olmadığı izlenimine ulaşıldı. Sonuç: KRS patofizyolojisini daha iyi anlamak ve yeni tedavi hedefleri belirlemek için bir biyofilm evreleme sisteminin oluşturulması gerekmektedir.

Kronik rinosinüzitte bakteriyel biyofilm evresi ile klinik özelliklerin korelasyonu

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the presence of bacterial biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) without polyps using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and to investigate whether there was correlation between grade of biofilm formation and clinical features of patients. Methods: This was a prospective observational study with two groups: the first group was composed of 20 CRS patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and the control group included 15 patients without CRS, undergoing septoplasty or septorhinoplasty surgery. Clinal data were recorded preoperatively; mucosal samples and culture materials were obtained intraoperatively. Specimens were investigated for detection of biofilms with SEM. A biofilm grading system from grade 0 to 4, according to biofilm prevalence on the surface, was proposed. Symptom score, allergy presence, previous ESS history, Lund-Mackay computed tomography (CT) score and culture results of patients were compared according to biofilm grade. Results: Biofilm formation was found in 16/20 (80%) CRS patients, yet none in 15 controls. Among CRS group, number of patients without biofilms (n=4) was too low to compare CRS patients with and without biofilms with each other, statistically. However, higher biofilm grades (grade 3 and 4) seemed to correlate with previous ESS and culture positivity but not with preoperative symptom score, Lund-Mackay CT score or allergy. Conclusion: A grading system for biofilms is essential and it should be established in order to perceive CRS pathophysiology and find new treatment targets.

___

  • 1.Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002; 15:167-93.
  • 2.Marple BF, Stankiewicz JA, Baroody FM, Chow JM, Conley DB, Corey JP et al. Diagnosis and management of Chronic rhinosinusitis in adults. American Academy ofOtolaryngic Allergy Working Group on Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Postgrad Med 2009;121:121-39.
  • 3.Davies DG, Parsek MR, Pearson JP, Iglewski BH, Costerton JW, Greenberg EP. The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science1998; 280:295-8.
  • 4.Hoyle BD, Costerton WJ. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics: the role of biofilms. Prog Drug Res 1991; 37:91-105.
  • 5.Potera C. Forging a link between biofilms and disease. Science 1999; 283:1837-9.
  • 6.Post JC, Hiller NL, Nistico L, Stoodley P, Ehrlich GD et al. The role of biofilms in otolaryngologic infections: update 2007 [review]. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 15:347-51.
  • 7.Hunsaker DH, Leid JG. The relationship of biofilms to chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 16:237-41.
  • 8.Suh JD, Cohen NA, Palmer JN. Biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 18:27-31.
  • 9.Benninger MS, Ferguson BJ, Hadley JA, Hamilos DL, Jacobs M, Kennedy DW et al. Adult chronic rhinosinusitis: definitions, diagnosis, epidemiology, and pathophysiology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129 (3Suppl): S1-S32.
  • 10.Costerton W, Veeh R, Shirtliff M,Pasmore M, Post C, Ehrlich G et al. The application of biofilm science to the study and control of chronic bacterial infections.J Clin Invest 2003; 112:1466-77.
  • 11.Sanderson AR, Leid JG, Hunsaker D. Bacterial biofilms on the sinus mucosa of human subjects with chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 2006; 116:1121-6.
  • 12.Cryer J, Schipor I, Perloff JR, Palmer JN. Evidence of bacterial biofilms in human chronic rhinosinusitis. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2004; 66:155-8.
  • 13.Perloff JR, Palmer JN. Evidence of bacterial biofilms on frontal recess stent in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol 2004; 18:377-80.
  • 14.Sanclement JA, Webster P, Thomas J, Ramadan HH et al. Bacterial biofilms in surgical specimens of patients with Chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 2005; 115:578-82.
  • 15.Prince AA, Steiger JD, Khalid AN, Dogrhamji L, Reger C, Eau Claire S et al. Prevalence of biofilm-forming bacteria in chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol 2008;22:239-45.
  • 16.Perloff JR, Palmer JN. Evidence of bacterial biofilms in a rabbit model of sinusitis.Am J Rhinol 2005; 19:1-6.
  • 17.Ramadan HH, Sanclement JA, Thomas JG. Chronic rhinosinusitis and biofilms. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 132:414-7.
  • 18.Keir J, Pedelty L, Swift AC. Biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis:systematic review and suggestions for future research. J Laryngol Otol 2011; 125:331-7.
  • 19.You H, Zhuge P, Li D, Shao L, Shi H, Du H. Factors affecting bacterial biofilm expression in chronic rhinosinusitis and the influences on prognosis. Am J Otolaryngol 2011; 32:583-90.
  • 20.Al-Mutairi D, Kilty SJ. Bacterial biofilms and the pathophysiology of chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Opin All Clin Immunol 2011; 11:18-23.
  • 21.Bezerra TF, Padua FG, Gebrim EM, Saldiva PH, Voegels RL. Biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 144:612-6.
  • 22.Mladina R, Skitarelic N, Music S, Ristic M. A biofilm exists on healthy mucosa of the paranasal sinuses: a prospectively performed, blinded, scanning electron microscope study. Clin Otolaryngol 2010; 35:104-10.
  • 23.Ha KR, Psaltis AJ, Tan L, Wormald PJ. A sheep model for the study of biofilms in rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol 2007; 21:339-45.
  • 24.Psaltis AJ, Ha KR, Beule AG, Tan LW, Wormald PJ et al. Confocal scanning laser microscopy evidence of biofilms in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 2007; 117:1302-6.
  • 25.Tatar EÇ, Tatar I, Ocal B, Korkmaz H, Salyam G, Ozdek A et al. Prevalence of biofilms and their response to medical treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis without polyps. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 146:669-75.
  • 26.Chen HH, Liu X, Ni C, Lu YP, Xiong GY, Lu YY et al. Bacterial biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis and their relationship with inflammation severity. Auris Nasus Larynx 2012; 39:169-74.
  • 27.Hochstim CJ, Masood R, Rice HD. Biofilm and persistent inflammation in endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 143:697-8.
  • 28.Li H, Wang D, Sun X, Hu L, Yu H, Wang J. Relationship between bacterial biofilm and clinical features of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 269:155-63.
  • 29.Toth L, Vajas A, Csomor P, Berta A, Sziklai I, Karosi T. Optical coherence tomography for biofilm detection in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 270: 555-63.
  • 30.Singhal D, Psaltis AJ, Foreman A, Wormald PJ. The impact of biofilms on outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2010; 24:169-74.
  • 31.Psaltis AJ, Weitzel EK, Ha KR, Wormald PJ. The effect of bacterial biofilms and post-sinus surgical outcomes. Am J Rhinol 2008; 22:1-6.
  • 32.Zhang Z, Han D, Zhang S, Han Y, Dai W, Fan E et al. Biofilms and mucosal healing in post-surgical patients with Chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2009; 23:506-11.
  • 33.Hai PV, Lindstone C, Wallwork B. The effect of endoscopic sinus surgery on bacterial biofilms in Chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 142(3Suppl 1):S27-32.
  • 34.Zhang Z, Kofonow JM, Finkelman BS, Doghramji L, Chiu AG, Kennedy DW et al. Clinical factors associated with bacterial biofilm formation in chronic rhinosinusitis.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 144:457-62.
  • 35.Singhal D,Foreman A, Jervis-Bardy J, Wormald PJ. [Staphylococcus aureus biofilms:nemesis of endoscopic sinus surgery]. Laryngoscope 2011; 121:1578-83.
  • 36.Foreman A, Wormald PJ. Different biofilms, different disease? A clinical outcomes study. Laryngoscope 2010; 120:1701-6.
Gazi Medical Journal-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Gazi Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Lingual hemanjioma: Olgu sunumu

Yalçın BAYRAM, Ugur KARAPINAR, Muzaffer DURMUŞ, Şükrü YILDIRIM

Kliniğimiz 2009-2012 yılları arasında saptanan sezaryen oranları: Sezaryen oranlarındaki artış kaçınılmaz mı?

İlknur MUTLU, Ahmet DEMİR, Mehmet Fırat MUTLU, Tünay EFETÜRK, Mine KİSELİ

Opg-rankl levels after continuous orthodontic force

Burcu TUNCER BALOŞ, Nurdan ÖZMERİÇ, Duygu BOYNUEĞRİ, İmge ERGÜDER, İdil KARAKAYA BAVBEK, Burcu ÖZDEMİR ÇAKILCI, Latife Arzu ARAL, Ayşegül YÜCEL ATAK

Increased serum cholesteryl ester transfer protein in Syrian obese humans

Soumaia Sayed RAMMADAN, Faizeh AL-QUOBAİLİ

Correlation of bacterial biofilm grade with clinical features in chronic rhinosinusitis

Hakan Hamdi ÇELİK, Serdar ÖZER, Gamze ATAY, Metin ÖNERCİ, Oğuz ÖĞRETMENOĞLU, Ömer Taşkın YÜCEL, İlkan TATAR

Gestasyonel diabetes mellitusta gebelik öncesi vücut ağırlığının yenidoğanın doğum ağırlığına etkisinin incelenmesi

Serdar BEKEN, Nuri ÇAKIR, Esra ÖNAL, Yıldız ATALAY, Füsun BALOŞ TÖRÜNER, Alev ALTINOVA EROĞLU, Özlem Turhan İYİDİR

Akut bulber güçsüzlükle prezente olan guillian-barre sendromu olgusu

M.Fevzi ÖZTEKİN, Nilüfer İNCE ERDOĞMUŞ

Beş aylık bebekte deri tutulumu ile saptanan langerhans hücreli histiyositoz: olgu sunumu

Merih TEPEOĞLU, Nesibe Deren ÖZCAN, Özlem ÖZEN, Alev ATILGAN OK, Seda PÜRNAK

Metastatik gastrik karsinomlu bir olguda metoklopropamid ilişkili nöroleptik malign sendrom

Süleyman BÜYÜKBERBER, Umut DEMİRCİ, Meltem BAYKARA, Efnan ALGİN, Gülnihal TUFAN, Burçak CAVNAR, Uğur COŞKUN, Mustafa BENEKLİ

Aıds demans kompleksi olgu sunumu

Suat KAMIŞLI, Özden KAMIŞLI, Sinan GÖNÜLLÜ, Sibel ÇIPLAK