Kimyasal denge ve çözünürlük konularındaki kavram yanılgıları

Kimya konularında geçen kavramların etkili bir şekilde öğretimi ve öğrenilmesi sürecinde, ilgili konularda öğrencilerin sahip olduğu kavram yanılgılarının belirlenmesi, önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. Ayrıca, kavram yanılgılarının ortaya çıkarılması hem program geliştiricilere hem de öğrencilerin kavramsal düzeyde öğrenmelerini sağlamak amacı ile onlara rehberlik eden öğretmenlere yardımcı olur. Bu nedenle, öğrencilerin ön kavramlarının tespiti, kavram öğretimine yönelik yapılan araştırmaların başlangıç noktasını oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, öğrencilerin kimyanın temel konularından olan kimyasal denge ve çözünürlük konuları ile ilgili kavram yanılgılarının tespitine yönelik bir literatür araştırması yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, öğrencilerin ilgili konularda, çok sayıda kavram yanılgısına sahip olduklarını göstermektedir.

Misconceptions in chemical equilibrium and solubility

In the effectively teaching and learning processes of chemical concepts, that students misconceptions is determined is important. In addition, it has the capacity to inform curriculum processes and to help teachers guiding students to improve their conceptual learning of notions. The identification of students' preconceptions is starting point on research relating conceptual teaching because of their importance in construction of effective programmes in these issues. In this study, research literature was examined to define misconceptions in chemical equilibrium and solubility. The results show that there are plenty of misconceptions in these subjects.

PDF

___

1.Ö. Geban, H. Ertepınar, T. Topal, ve A.M. Önal, Asit-baz Konusu ve Benzetme Yöntemi. Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu, K.T..Ü., Trabzon, 1998.
2.G. J. Posner, K. A. Strike, P. W. Hewson, and W. A. Gertzog, Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change. Science Education, 66, 211-227,1982.
3.K. Doymuş, N. Canpolat, T. Pınarbaşı, S. Bayrakçeken, ve A. Gürses, Üniversite Kimya Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Bazı Kimya Kavramlarını Anlama Düzeyleri. Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu, K.T.Ü., Trabzon, 1998.
4.M.B. Nakleh, and R.C. Mitchell, Concept Learning Versus Problem Solving. Journal of Chemical Education, 70, 3, 190, 1993.
5.S.C. Nurrenbern, and M. Pickering, Concept Learning Versus Problem Solving: Is There a Difference?. Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 6, 508, 1987.
6.N. Vanorden, Is Writing an Effective Way to Learn Chemical Concepts?. Journal of Chemical Education, 67, 7, 583, 1990.
7.M.B. Nakleh, Why Some Students Don't Learn Chemistry? Chemical Misconception. Journal of Chemical Education, 69, 3, 191, 1992.
8.M.W. Hackling, and P.J. Garnett, Misconceptions of Chemical Equilibrium. Eur. Journal of Science Education, 7, 2, 205, 1985.
9.P.A. Huddle, and A.E. Pillay, An In-Depth Study of Misconceptions in Stoichiometry and Chemical Equilibrium at a South African Universty. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 65-77,1996.
10.H. Hameed, M.W. Hackling, and P.J. Garnett, Facilitating Conceptual Change in Chemical Equilibrium Using a CAI Strategy. International Journal of Science Education, 15(2), 221-230, 1993.
11.P.J. Garnett, P.J. Garnett, and M.W. Hackling, Students' Alternative Conceptions in Chemistry: A Review of Research and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Studies in Science Education, 25,69-95, 1995.
12.M. Niaz, Relationship Between Student Performance on Conceptual and Computational Problems of Chemical Equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 3, 343, 1995.
13.W. Bergquist, and H. Heikkinen, Student Ideas Regarding Chemical Equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 67, 12, 1000, 1990.
14.A.C. Banerjee, Teaching Chemical Equilibrium and Thermodynamics in Undergraduate General Chemistry'.Classes. Journal of Chemical Education, 72(10), 879-881, 1995.
15.A.E. Wheeler, and H. Kass Student Misconceptions in Chemial Equilibrium. Science Education, Science Education, 62, 2, 223-232, 1978.
16.E. Gussarsky, and M.J. Gorodetsky, On the Chemical Equilibrium Concept: Constrained Word pl Associations and Conception. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 5, 319-333, 1988.
17.J.H. Van Driel, Developing Secondary Students' Conceptions of Chemical Reactions: The pp Introduction of Chemical Equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 379-392, 1998.
18.P.L. Thomas, and R.W. Schwenz, College Physical Chemistry Students' Conceptions of Equilibrium and Fundamental Thermodynamics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1151-1160,1998.
19.M. Gorodetsky, and E. Gussarsky, Misconceptualization of the Chemical Equilibrium Concept as Revealed by Different Evaluation Methods. European Journal of Science Education, 8(4), 427-441,1986.
20.A.C. Banerjee, Misconceptions of Students and Teachers Chemical Equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 4, 487-494, 1991.
21.K.W. Voska, and H.W. Heikkinen, Idendification and Analysis of Student Conceptions Used to Solve Chemical Equilibrium Problems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 160-176, 2000.
22.J. Quilez-Pardo, and J.J. Solaz-Poroles, Students' and Teachers' Misapplication of Le Chateliers Principle: Implications For the Teaching of Chemical Equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 9, 939-957, 1995.
23. A.H. Haidar, and M.R. Abraham, Acomparasion of Applied and Theoretical Knowledge of Concepts Based on the Paniculate Nature of Matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 919-938, 1991.
24.O. Lee, D.C. Eichinger, C.W. Anderson, G.D. Berkheimer, and T.D. Blakeslee, Changing Middle School Students' Conceptions of Matter and Molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, |p 30(3), 249-270, 1993.
25.R. Stavy, Children's Conception of Changes in the State of Matter: From Liquid (or Solid) to Gas. Hi Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(3), 247-266, 1990.
26.M.R. Abraham, V.M. Williamson, and S.L. Westbrook, Children's Conception of Changes in the State of Matter: From Liquid (or Solid) to Gas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 147-165, 1994.
27.J.K. Gilbert, R.J. Osborne, and PJ. Fensham, Children's Science and Its Consequences For Teaching, Science Education. Science Education, 66(4), 623-633, 1982.
28.N.J. Fellows, A Window Into Thinking: Using student Writing to Understand Conceptual Change in Science Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 985-1001, 1994.
29.T. Prieto, A. Blanco, and A. Rodriguez, The Ideas of 11 to 14-Year-Old Students About the Nature of Solutions. International Journal of Science Education, 11(4), 451-463, 1989.
30.A. Blanco, and T. Prieto Pupils' Views on How Stirring and Temperature Affect the Dissolution of a Solid in a Liquid: a Cross-Age Study (12 to 18). International Journal of Science Education, 19(3),303-315,1997.
31.J.V.Ebenezer and G.L. Erickson, Chemistry Students' Conceptions of Solubility: A Phenomenography. Science Education, 80(2), 181-201, 1996.
32.K- Longden, P. Black, and J. Solomon, Children's Interpretation of Dissolving. International Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 59-68, 1991.
33.J.V.Ebenezer, and P.J. Gaskel, Relational Conceptual Change in Solution Chemistry. Science Education, Science Education, 79(1), 1-17, 1995.
34.J.V. Ebenezer, A Hypermedia Environment to Explore and Negotiate Students' Conceptions: Animation of the Solution Process of Table Salt. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(1), 73-92, 2001.
35.M. Slone, and F.D. Bokhurst, Children's Understanding of Sugar Water Solutions. International Journal of Science Education, 14(2), 221-235, 1992.
36.P. Kokkotas, and I. Vlachos, Teaching the Topic of the Particulate Nature of Matter in Prospective Teachers' Training Course. International Journal of Science Education, 20(3), 291-303, 1998.
37.P. Johnson, Progression in Children's Understanding of a Basic Particle Theory: Longitudinal Study. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 393-412, 1998.
38.E. Uzuntiryaki, ve Ö. Geban, Kavramsal Değişim Yaklaşımının Öğrencilerin Çözeltileri Anlamalarına Etkisi. Eğitim 97-98, TED Ankara Koleji, 1(1), 51-56, 1998.
39.J.V. Ebenezer, and D.M. Fraser, First Year Chemical Engineering Students' Conceptions of Energy in Solution Processes: Phenomenographic Categories For Common Knowledge Construction. Science Education, 85, 509-535, 2001