Denetimin Gözetimi, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Kamu Gözetimi Kurulu

Bu çalışmada, ilk olarak Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Kamu Gözetimi Kurulu (PCAOB)’nun ortaya çıkışı, günümüzdeki önemi ve denetim süreci açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır. Daha sonra Kurul’un zayıf ve güçlü yanları ile ilgili literatürdeki gö- rüşlere değinilmiştir. Ayrıca Kurul’un denetimleri sonunda oluşturduğu raporların, bağımsız denetim şirketlerinin kalite kontrol düzeyi, değişim riski ve denetim ücretleri ile ilişkisi incelenmiştir.

Inspection of Audit, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

In this study, firstly, the emergence, current importance and inspection process of U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board has been evaluated. Then, the opinions on the Board’s strengths and weaknesses have been addressed based on the related literature. In addition, the relationship between the Board’s reports generated at the end of its inspections and quality control levels, switching risk and audit fees of the independent audit companies were examined.

___

  • ARENS, Alvin., ELDER, Randar and BEASLEY, Mark. (2014).; Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach, fifteenth edition, Pearson Education Limited, England.
  • BOONE, Jeff., KHURANA, Inder., & RAMAN, K. (2015).; “Did the 2007 PCAOB Disciplinary Order Against Deloitte Impose Actual Costs on The Firm or Improve Its Audit Quality?”, Accounting Review, 90(2), 405-441.
  • CALDERON, Thomas. G., & SONG, Hakjoon. (2014).; “PCAOB International Inspections.“, The CPA Journal, 84(1), 30.
  • CARMICHAEL, Douglas. R. (2014).; “Reflections on The Establishment of The PCAOB and Its Audit Standard-setting Role.”, Accounting Horizons, 28(4), 901-915.
  • CENTER FOR AUDIT QUALITY, (2015); “Guide to PCAOB Inspections”, http://www.thecaq.org/docs/for-investors/guideto-pcaob-inspections.pdf?sfvrsn=0
  • COPPAGE, R. & SHASTRI, T. 2013, "Using PCAOB Settled Disciplinary Orders to Improve Audit Quality Education", The CPA Journal, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 46.
  • DOTY, James. R.; (2011). “Keynote Address: The Reliability, Role and Relevance of the Audit: A Turning Point.”, http://pcaobus.org/News/Speech/Pages/05052011_KeynoteAddress. aspx.
  • FRANZEL, Jeanette. M. (2014).; “A Decade After SarbanesOxley: The Need for Ongoing Vigilance, Monitoring, and Research.”, Accounting Horizons, 28(4), 917-930.
  • GRADISON, Bill. (2014).; “A Former PCAOB Board Member Looks to The Past and to The Future.”, Accounting Horizons, 28(4), 931-935.
  • KGK Kamu Gözetimi Muhasebe ve Denetim Standartları Kurumu. (2014).; “2013 Faaliyet Raporu”, http://www.kgk.gov.tr/ contents/files/KGK_Faaliyet_Raporu_2013.pdf
  • PCAOB Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. (2015).; “PCAOB Rules”, http://pcaobus.org/Rules/PCAOBRules/Pages/default.aspx
  • PCAOB Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. (2014).; “PCAOB Strategic Plan: Improving The Quality of The Au -dit for The Protection and Benefit of Investors 2014-2018”, http://pcaobus.org/About/Ops/Documents/Strategic%20 Plans/2014-2018.pdf
  • PCAOB Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. (2015).; “Auditing Standards”, http://pcaobus.org/Standards/Auditing/ Pages/default.aspx
  • UZAY, Şaban. (2006) “Denetçilerin Denetiminde Yeni Bir Model Olarak Kamu Gözetim Kurulu ve Türkiye’de Uygulanabilirliği”, MÖDAV - Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, Cilt:8, Sayı 4, 175-210.
  • WEDEMEYER, Phil. D.; (2014). “A Perspective on The PCAOB: Past and Future.”, Accounting Horizons, 28(4), 937-947.