___

• Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent, 1992; 20: 3-10. 2.
• Kidd EA. Microleakage in relation to amalgam and composite restorations. A laboratory study. Br Dent J, 1976; 16: 305-310. 3.
• Gwinnett JA, Tay FR, Pang KM, Wei SH. Comparison of three methods of critical evaluation of microleakage along restorative interfaces. J Prosthet Dent, 1995; 74: 575-585. 4.
• Ferrari M, Mason PN, Fabianelli A, Cagidiaco MC, Kugel G, Davidson CL. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations. Am J Dent, 1999; 12: 134-142. 5.
• Déjou J, Sindres V, Camps J. Influence of criteria on the results of in vitro evaluation of microleakage. Dent Mater, 1996; 12: 342-349. 6.
• Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA.
• restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol, 1982; 11: 439-450. dental 7.
• Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc, 1972; 84: 1349-1357. 8.
• Grossman ES, Matejka JM. In vitro marginal leakage in varnished and lined amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent, 1993; 69: 469- 474. 9.
• Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Endodontic leakage studies reconsidered. Part I. Methodology, application and relevance. Int Endod J, 1993; 26: 37-43.
• Dauvillier BS, Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Visco-elastic parameters of dental restorative materials during setting. J Dent Res, 2000; 79: 818-823.
• Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater, 1999; 15: 128-37. 12. Retief DH. Do adhesives
• prevent microleakage? Int Dent J, 1994; 44: 19-26.
• Setcos JC, Staninec M, Wilson NH. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects. Oper Dent, 2000; 25: 121-129.
• Muniz M, Quioca J, Dolci GS, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Bonded amalgam restorations: microleakage and tensile bond strength evaluation. Oper Dent, 2005; 30: 228-233.
• Jedrychowski JR, Bleier RG, Caputo AA. Shrinkage stresses associated with incremental composite filling techniques in conservative Class II restorations. ASDC J Dent Child, 2001; 68: 161-167.
• Yap AU, Ng SC, Siow KS. Soft-start polymerization: influence on effectiveness of cure and post-gel shrinkage. Oper Dent, 2001; 26: 260-266.
• Yap AU, Seneviratne C. Influence of light energy density on effectiveness of composite cure. Oper Dent, 2001; 26: 460-466.
• Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res, 1990; 69: 913-914.
• Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res, 1996; 75: 871-878.
• Dayangaç B. Kompozit rezin restorasyonlar. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi, 2000, 85-91.
• Watts DC, Marouf AS. Optimal specimen geometry in bonded-disk shrinkage-strain measurements on light-cured biomaterials. Dent Mater, 2000; 16: 447-451.
• Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin literature
• recommendations. Quintessence Int, 1999; 30: 249-257. "filled and review
• clinical 23. Lovell LG, Newman SM, Bowman CN. The effects of light intensity, temperature, and comonomer
• polymerization behavior of dimethacrylate dental resins. J Dent Res, 1999; 78: 1469- 1476. on the polymerization shrinkage
• of 31. Elledge DA. Multifunctional bases and liners. Dent Clin North Am, 1998; 42: 739-754.
• Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent, 1997; 25: 435-440.
• Estafan AM, Estafan D. Microleakage study of flowable composite resin systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2000; 21: 705-712. 34. Estafan D, Agosta C.
• Eliminating microleakage from the composite resin system. Gen Dent, 2003; 51: 506-509.
• Sakaguchi RL, Ferracane JL. Stress transfer from polymerization shrinkage of a chemical- cured composite bonded to a pre-cast composite substrate. Dent Mater, 1998; 14: 106-111.
• Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Märkl A. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization". Oper Dent, 2000; 25: 26-32.
• Leinfelder KF. Is it possible to control the directional
• composites? J Am Dent Assoc, 2001; 132: 782-783. of
• resin-based 38. Applequist EA, Meiers JC. Effect of bulk insertion, prepolymerized resin composite balls, and beta-quartz inserts on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int, 1996; 27: 253-258.
• Aw TC, Nicholls JI. Polymerization shrinkage of densely-filled resin composites. Oper Dent, 2001; 26: 498-504.
• Noort RV. Introduction to dental materials. Mosby, London; 1994: p.89-105.
• O'Brien WJ. Dental Materials and their selection. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc., 1997.
• Sideridou I, Achilias DS, Kyrikou E. Thermal expansion characteristics of light-cured dental resins and resin composites. Biomaterials, 2004; 25: 3087-3097. 43. Sidhu SK, Carrick mediated coefficient of Temperature
• dimensional change of dental tooth-colored restorative materials. Dent Mater, 2004; 20: 435-440.
• Vaidyanathan J, Vaidyanathan TK, Wang Y, Viswanadhan
• characterization of visible light cure dental composites. J Oral Rehabil, 1992; 19: 49-64.
• Peterson EA, Phillips RW, Swartz ML. A comparison of the physical properties of four restorative resins. J Am Dent Assoc, 1966; 73: 1324-1336.
• Wendt SL, McInnes PM, Dickinson GL. The effect of thermocycling in microleakage analysis. Dent Mater, 1992; 8: 181-184.
• Wahab FK, Shaini FJ, Morgano SM. The effect of thermocycling on microleakage of several commercially available composite Class V restorations in vitro. J Prosthet Dent, 2003; 90: 168-174.
• Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Overhang of Class V composite resin restorations from hygroscopic expansion. Quintessence Int, 1989; 20: 551-553.
• Thonemann BM, Federlin M, Schmalz G, Hiller KA. SEM analysis of marginal expansion and gap formation in Class II composite restorations. Dent Mater, 1997; 13: 192-197.
• Burrow MF, Inokoshi S, Tagami J. Water sorption of several bonding resins. Am J Dent, 1999; 12: 295-298.
• Fabre HS, Fabre S, Cefaly DF, de Oliveira Carrilho MR, Garcia FC, Wang L. Water sorption and solubility of dentin bonding agents light-cured with different light sources. J Dent, 2007; 35: 253-258.
• Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, de Goes MF, Svizero N, Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu CK, Carrilho MR. Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater, 2006; 22: 973-980.
• Boston DW, Kerzie M. An improved technique for Class V composite resin inlays. Quintessence Int, 1993; 24: 19-24.
• Duquia Rde C, Osinaga PW, Demarco FF, de V Habekost L, Conceição EN. Cervical microleakage in MOD restorations: in vitro comparison of indirect and direct composite. Oper Dent, 2006; 31: 682-687.
• Soares CJ, Celiberto L, Dechichi P, Fonseca RB, Martins LR. Marginal integrity and microleakage of direct and indirect composite inlays: SEM and stereomicroscopic evaluation. Braz Oral Res, 2005; 19: 295-301.
• Isidor F, Brİndum K. A clinical evaluation of porcelain inlays. J Prosthet Dent, 1995; 74: 140-144.
• Lange RT, Pfeiffer P. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations. Oper Dent, 2009; 34: 263-272.
• McLaughlin G. Porcelain veneers. Dent Clin North Am, 1998; 42: 653-656.
• Jun SK, McConnell S. Enhancing natural aesthetics via porcelain laminate veneers. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent, 2007; 19: 369-371.
• Della Bona A, Kelly JR. The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc, 2008; 139 Suppl:8S-13S.
• Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: an in vitro study. J Dent, 1994; 22: 147-153.
• Hasegawa EA, Boyer DB, Chan DC. Microleakage of indirect composite inlays. Dent Mater, 1989; 5: 388-391.
• Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Dent Mater, 2008; 24: 185- 191.
• Burke FJ, McCaughey AD. Resin luting materials: the current status. Dent Update, 1993; 20: 109-115.
• Uctasli S, Hasanreisoglu U, Wilson HJ. The attenuation of radiation by porcelain and its effect on polymerization of resin cements. J Oral Rehabil, 1994; 21: 565-575.
• el-Mowafy OM, Rubo MH, el-Badrawy WA. Hardening of new resin cements cured through a ceramic inlay. Oper Dent, 1999; 24: 38-44.
• Gwinnett AJ, Baratieri LN, Monteiro S Jr, Ritter amalgam:
• Quintessence Int, 1994; 25: 687-695. the guidelines for
• clinician. 68. Charlton DG, Moore BK, Swartz ML. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations. Oper Dent, 1992; 17: 112-119.
• Pashley EL, Comer RW, Parry EE, Pashley DH. Amalgam buildups: shear strength and dentin sealing properties. Oper Dent, 1991; 16: 82-89. 70. Johnson GH, Gordon sensitivity associated with Postoperative
• posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Oper Dent, 1988; 13: 66-73.
• Burke FJ, McHugh S, Hall AC, Randall RC, Widstrom E, Forss H. Amalgam and composite use in UK general dental practice in 2001. Br Dent J, 2003; 194: 613-618.
• Fuks AB. The use of amalgam in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent, 2002; 24: 448-455.
• Lacy AM, Staninec M. The bonded amalgam restoration. Quintessence Int, 1989; 20: 512- 514.
• Browning WD, Johnson WW, Gregory PN. Clinical performance of bonded amalgam restorations at 42 months. J Am Dent Assoc, 2000; 131: 607-611.
• Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater, 2007; 23: 2-8.
• Ben-Amar A. Reduction of microleakage around new amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc, 1989; 119: 725-728.
• Powell GL, Daines DT. Solubility of cavity varnish: a study in vitro. Oper Dent, 1987; 12: 48-52.
• Büyükgökçesu S. “Dispersalloy” amalgamların kavite duvarı ile olan ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, 1980.
• Büyükgökçesu S. Dişhekimliğinde amalgam. İstanbul Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi, Ders notu. İstanbul, 1994.
• Harris RK. Dental amalgam: success or failure? Oper Dent, 1992; 17: 243-252.
• Karamürsel-Ulukapi I, Lussi A, Stich H, Hotz P. Comparison of the sealing ability of four cavity varnishes: an in vitro study. Dent Mater, 1991; 7: 84-87.
• Marchiori S, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Monteiro Jşnior S, Ritter AV. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage. Quintessence Int, 1998; 29: 637-642.
• Cobb DS, Denehy GE, Vargas MA. Amalgam shear bond strength to dentin using single- bottle primer/adhesive systems. Am J Dent, 1999; 12: 222-226.
• Meiers JC, Turner EW. Microleakage of dentin/amalgam alloy bonding agents: results after 1 year. Oper Dent, 1998; 23: 30-35.
• Cenci MS, Piva E, Potrich F, Formolo E, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials. Braz Dent J, 2004; 15: 13- 18.
• Mueninghoff LA, Dunn SK, Leinfelder KF. Comparison of dye and ion microleakage tests. Am J Dent, 1990; 3: 192-194.
• Erdilek D, Dörter C, Koray F, Kunzelmann KH, Efes BG, Gomec Y. Effect of Thermo- mechanical Load Cycling on Microleakage in Class II Ormocer Restorations. Eur J Dent, 2009; 3: 200-205.
• Heintze SD. Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent, 2007; 9 Suppl 1: 77-106.
• Holan G, Chosack A, Casamassimo PS, Eidelman E. Marginal leakage of impregnated Class 2 composites in primary molars: an in vivo study. Oper Dent, 1992; 17: 122-128.
• Sparks JD, Hilton TJ, Davis RD, Reagan SE. The influence of matrix use on microleakage in Class 5 glass-ionomer restorations. Oper Dent, 1992; 17: 192-195.
• Piva E, Meinhardt L, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Dyes for caries detection: influence on composite and compomer microleakage. Clin Oral Investig, 2002; 6: 244-248.
• Loguercio AD, de Oliveira Bauer JR, Reis A, Grande RH. In vitro microleakage of packable composites
• Quintessence Int, 2004; 35: 29-34. II
• restorations. 93. Williams PT, Schramke D, Stockton L. Comparison of two methods of measuring dye penetration
• studies. Oper Dent, 2002; 27: 628-635.
• microleakage 94. Heinrich R, Kunzel W. Diagnosis and treatment of carious dentine. J Int Assoc Dent Child, 1986; 17: 5-8.
• Roulet JF, Reich T, Blunck U, Noack M. Quantitative margin analysis in the scanning electron microscope. Scanning Microsc, 1989; 3: 147-158.
• Chan KC, Swift EJ Jr. Leakage of chemical and light-cured basing materials. J Prosthet Dent, 1989; 62: 408-411.
• Charlton DG, Moore BK. In vitro evaluation of two microleakage detection tests. J Dent, 1992; 20: 55–58.
• Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent, 1997; 22: 173-185.
• Shortall AC. Microleakage, marginal adapta- tion and composite resin restorations. Br Dent J, 1982; 153: 223-227.
• Powis DR, Prosser HJ, Shortall AC, Wilson AD. Long-term monitoring of microleakage of composites. Part I: Radiochemical diffusion technique. J Prosthet Dent, 1988; 60: 304-307. 101. Crim GA, Swartz ML, Phillips
• RW. Comparison of four thermocycling techniques. J Prosthet Dent, 1985; 53: 50-53.
• Tangsgoolwatana J, Cochran MA, Moore BK, Li Y. Microleakage evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations: confocal microscopy versus radioisotope. Quintessence Int, 1997; 28: 467-477.
• Lacy AM, Wada C, Du W, Watanabe L. In vitro microleakage at the gingival margin of porcelain and resin veneers. J Prosthet Dent, 1992; 67: 7-10. 104. Tiritoglu
• M. Kenar sızıntısı belirleme yöntemleri. Ege Universitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 1994; 15: 132-138.
• Zivković S, Bojović S, Pavlica D. Bacterial penetration of restored cavities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2001; 91: 353-358.
• Pickard HM, Gayford JJ. Leakage at the margins of amalgam restorations. Br Dent J, 1965; 119: 69-77.
• Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Marginal adaptation. J Dent, 1993; 21: 265-273.
• Pameijer CH. Replication techniques with new dental impression materials in combination with different negative impression materials. Scan Electron Microsc, 1979; 2: 571-574.
• Pioch T, Stotz S, Staehle HJ, Duschner H. Applications of confocal laser scanning microscopy to dental bonding. Adv Dent Res, 1997; 11: 453-461.
• Watson TF. Applications of high-speed confocal imaging techniques in operative dentistry. Scanning, 1994; 16: 168-173.
• Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Duschner H, García- Godoy F. Nanoleakage at the composite-dentin interface: a review. Am J Dent, 2001; 14: 252- 258.