Duran KARATAŞ, İbrahim KETENCİ, Fatih YÜKSEL, Mehmet ŞENTÜRK

Rhinomanometric Assessment of The Impact of High Altitude on Nasal Airway Resistance

Bu çalışmanın amacı yüksek irtifa değişikliğinin burun havayolu direnci üzerine etkisinin rinomanometrik olarak değerlendirilmesidir. Öncelikle 100 sağlıklı kişide rinomanometri standart değerleri belirlendi(sagda 0, 53 solda 0, 55 Pa / cm³ /sn).Çalışmaya 42 kişi alındı.2 gruba ayrıldı.Grup 1 de 1050 den 2215 m ye çıkışta grup 2 de ise 2215 den 1050 ye inişte nazal direnç hesaplandı.Nazal dirençler ve total nazal dirençler karşılaştırıldı. Grup 1 de sagda 0,54 solda 0,54 grup 2 de ise sagda 0,52 solda 0,59 Pa / cm³ / sn ortalama nazal direnç tesbit edildi. Grup 1 ve 2 de irtifa değişikliğinin sag ve sol nazal dirençlerde istatiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkisinin olmadıgı gözlendi (Mann Whitney u testi). Total dirençte de degisiklik tesbit edilmedi (Student t testi). Bu çalışmada alçaktan yükseğe veya yüksekten alçağa irtifa değisikliği nazal direnci etkilememektedir şeklinde sonuç çıkmasına rağmen yüksek irtifada burun fizyolojisini etkileyen çok sayıda faktör olduğundan kesin sonuç söylenemez.Çok faktörlü çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Rakım değişikliği, anterior rinometre, yüksek rakım, nazal direnç, rinomanometre

Rhinomanometric Assessment of The Impact of High Altitude on Nasal Airway Resistance

Aim of this study is to carry out a rhinomanometric assessment for the impact of altitude variation (1050–2215m) on nasal airflow. First of all, rhinomanometry standard values were specified in 100 healthy people (0.53 on the left; 0.55 Pa/cm³/sec on the right). 42 people were enrolled into the study. Nasal resistance was calculated for Group 1 when ascending from 1050m to 2215m and for Group 2 when descending from 2215m to 1050m. Nasal resistances and total nasal resistances were compared. Mean nasal resistances were determined as 0.54 Pa/cm³/sec on the right and 0.54 Pa/cm³/sec on the left for Group 1 and as 0.52 Pa/cm³/sec on the right and 0.59 Pa/cm³/sec on the left for Group 2. Altitude variation in Group 1 and 2 was detected to have no statistically significant effects on right and left nasal resistances. No variation in total resistance was determined either. Although ,Altitude variation from 1050 m to 2215 m or from 2215 m to 1050 m does not affect the nasal resistance in this study, due to the many factors that affect the physiology of the nose at high altitude a decisive conclusion can not be said. multi-factorial studies are needed.

Keywords:

Altitude variation, anterior rhinomanometry, high altitude, nasal resistance, rhinomanometry,

PDF

___

Ward MP, Milledge JS, West JB. High altitude Medicine and Physiology. 2nd Ed. London, Chapman 81 Hall 1995; pp, 221–5.
Mason NP, Barry PW, Pollard AJ, et al. Serial changes in spirometry during an ascent to 5300 m in the Nepalese Himalayas. High Alt Med Biol 2000;1(3):185-95.
Barry PW, Mason NP, O’Callaghan C. Nasal Mucociliary transport is impaired at altitude. Eur Respir J 1997;10(1): 35–7.
Gertner R, Podoshin L, Fradis M. A simple method of mea- suring the nasal airway in clinical work. J Laryngol Otol 1984;98(4):351-5.
Schumacher MJ, Cota KA, Taussig LM. Pulmonary response to nasal–challenge testing of atopic subjects with stable asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986; 78(1 Pt 1): 30-5.
Forsyth R et al. Effect of cold air and exercise on nasal patency. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983;92(2 Pt 1):196–8.
Ivarsson A, Malm L. Nasal airway resistance at difference. Description of on climate aggregate and its use. Am J Rhinol 1990; 4(6): 211–3.
Cole P, Fastag O, Forsyth R. Variability in nasal resistance measurement. J Otolaryngol 1980; 9(4) : 309–15
Jones AS, Lancer JM, Moir AA, et al. The effect of aspirin on nasal resistance to airflow. Br Med J 1985; 290(6476): 1171-3.
Cole P, James S, Haight M. Posture and the nasal cycle. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986; 95(233 Pt -6) :
Andrew J Peacock. Oxygen at high altitude. BMJ 1998; 317 : 1063–6.
Devries HA. Physiology of Exercise for Physical Education and Athletics. WMC Brown Puhlishers. OIWA 1986.
Yaman M, Coskunturk OS. Limits of Athletic Performance. Ankara. Barıs Press 1982.
Mc Caffery TV, Kern EB : Response of nasal airway resis- tance of hypercapnia and hypoxia in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1979; 88(2 Pt 1) : 247–52.
Schumacher MJ, Cota KA, Taussig LM. Pulmonary response to nasal – challenge testing of atopic subjects with stable asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986; 78(1 Pt 1): 30-5.
Eccles R. Neurological and pharmacological consider- ations. In: Proctor DF,Andersen IP, eds. The nose: upper airway physiology and the atmospheric environment. Amsterdam, Elsevier Biomedical Press 1982; pp.191-214
Widdicombe JG. Nasal airflow resistance at simulated al- titude. Eur Respir J 2002 ;19(1): 4-5.
Cingi C, Selcuk A, Oghan F, Firat Y, Guvey A. The physi- ological impact of high altitude on nasal and lower airway parameters.Eur ArchOtorhinolaryngol 2011;268(6):841-4. PMID:21181178
Oghan F, Cingi C, Seren E, Ural A, Guvey A. Assessment of the impact of altitude on nasal airflow via expiratory nasal sound spectral analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010;267(11):1713-8PMID:20401663