Üç farklı apeks bulucunun NAOCI varlığında kanal çalışma boyu belirleme etkinliklerinin in vitro karşılaştırılması

Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı, üç farklı gelişmiş elektronik apeks bulucunun kanal çalışma boyunu tesbitinde ki başarısını belirlemek ve birbirleriyle karşılaştırmaktır.Çalışmamızda kök oluşumunu tamamlamış rezorpsiyon bulunmayan, çürüksüz 36 adet üst santral diş kullanılmıştır. Belirli bir referans olması için dişler mine sement sınırından kesilmiştir. Kök kanallarının 1/3 lük kısmında Gates glidden frezler kullanılarak eğelere rahat bir giriş sağlanmıştır. Her dişin uzunluğu #15 nolu K-file kullanılarak X8 büyütmeli stereomikroskop altında eğenin ucu apikal foramenden görülünceye kadar ilerletilerek ölçülmüştür. Ölçümler üç kere tekrarlanmış ve ortalamalar her diş için gerçek uzunluk olarak kaydedilmiştir. Sonra dişler aljinat modele gömülmüş ve elektronik apeks bulucular ile ölçümler yapılmıştır. Bu ölçümler de 3 kez tekrarlanarak ortalaması alınmıştır. Ortalamalar Root ZX Mini uzunluğu RU , Propex Pixi uzunluğu PU , Ipex II uzunluğu I2U olarak kaydedilmiştir. Her elektronik apeks bulucularla ölçülen değerler birbirleriyle ve gerçek uzunluklar ile karşılaştırılmıştır. İstatistiksel analizler Sample Paired t testi kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Parametreler arasındaki anlamlılık düzeyi p

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Elektronik apeks bulucu, çalışma uzunluğu, Mini Root ZX, Propex Pixi

In vitro comparison of canal working length determination with NaOCl of three different apex locators

In vitro comparison of Canal working length determination with NaOCl of three different apex locators. The aim of this in vitro study is the compare and determine the success of three different modern electronic apex locators. In this study 36 undecayed upper central teeth have been used. To have a certain reference the teeth have been cut from the cemento enamel junction limit. Easy access has been achieved by using gates-glidden drills to the files of 1\3 of the coronal root canals. Each teeth length has been measured by using #15 K-File X8 magnified stereomicroscope pushing forward until the tip is visible from the apical foramen. The measurements have been repeated three times and the mean for each tooth has been recorded as actual lengths AL . Later the teeth have been embeded to the alginate placed in plastic boxes and are measured with %5.25 NaOCl in the root canals via #15 K-File electronic apex locators. The mean of the measurements has been taken after repeating them thrice. They are recorded as RU, PU and I2U. All values measured from each electronic apex locator have been compared with the results and actual lengths. The statistical analysis has been made with Sample paired t test. The relevance between the parameters is determined as p

Keywords:

Electronic Apex Locator working length, Propex Pixi, Mini Root ZX, Ipex II,

PDF

___

1. Sjögren HB, Sandqvist, G ,Wing K. Factors effecting the long-term resulst of endodontic treatment, J Endod, 1990; 16:498-504.
2. Ricucci D.,Langeland K Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 2.A histological study. Int Endod J. 1998; 31:394-409.
3. Gordon MPJ ,Chandler NP. Electronic apex locators. Int Endod J.2004;37: 425- 37.
4. Dummer P.M.H,Mcginn, J H Rees, D G The position and topography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen, Int Endod J;1984;17:192-8.
5. Tınaz C A . Kanal tedavisinde çalışma boyutu. G.Ü. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.2001;18: 31-7.
6. Guise G M ,Goodell GG, Imamura G.M. In vitro comparison of three electronic apex locators. J. Endod.2010;36(2):279- 81.
7. Sunada I. New method for measuring the length of therootcanal. J. Dent Res. 1962;41: 375-87.
8. Ushiyama J. New principle and method for measuring the root canal length. J Endod, 1983;9: 97-104.
9. Christie W Clinical observation on a newly designed electronic apex locator. Can Dent J. 1994;59: 756-62.
10. Alaçam T Endodonti, 2012. Özyurt Matbaacılık Ankara, s.521.
11. Frank A L ,Torabinejad, M. An in vivo evaluation of Endex electronic apexlocator. J. Endod. 1993;19: 177-9.
12. Welk A R,Baumgartner JC, Marshall J.G. An in vivo comparison of two frequencybased electronic apex locators. J. Endod. 2003; 29: 497–500.
13. Hoer D , Atin T. The accuracy of electronic working length determination. Int Endod J.2004; 7: 125-31.
14. Tınaz A C , Sevimli S L, Görgül G, Türköz E G The effects of sodium hypocholorite concentrations on theaccuracy of an apex locating device. J. Endod, 2002; 28: 160-2.
15. Plotino G, Grande NM , Brigante L, Lesti B, Somma F. Ex vivo accuracy of three electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator and ProPex. Int Endod J. 2006; 39 (5):408-14.
16. He L, Hu T Q, Zhao H., Lin J Q, Li, P. Effect of four different solutions on the accuracy of electronic apex locators. Shangai Kou Qiang Yi Xue, 2008;17: 304- 7.
17. Meares A.W. Steiman R. The influence of sodium hypochlorite irrigation on the accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apexlocator. J Endod, 2002;28: 595–8.
18. Pilot T.F., Pitts D.L.Determination of impedance changes at varying frequencies in relation to root canal file position and irrigant. J Endod. 1997;23: 719-24.
19. Özsezer E, İnan U., Aydın U. In vivo evaluation of Propex electronic apex locator. J. Endod .2007; 33 : 974-7.
20. Kim E., MarmoM., Lee CY, Oh, N S, Kim, I K. An in vivo comparison of working length determination by only rootZX apex locator versus combining root-ZX apex locator with radiographs using a new impression technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 105:79-83.
21. Krajczar K,Marada G., Gyulaı G., Toth V. Comparison of radiographic and electronical working length determination on palatal and mesio-buccal root canals of extracted upper molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106 :90-3.
22. Campbell D, Friedman S, Nguyen H.Q, Kaufman, AY, Keila S. Apical extent of rotary canal instrumentation with an apexlocating hand piece in vitro.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.1998;5(3):319-24.
23. Kaufman, AY, Keila S ,Yosphe, M. Accuracy of a newapexlocator: an in vitrostudy. Int Endod J.2002;35: 186-92.
24. Wrbas K T, Ziegler A.A., Altenburger M J, Schirrmeister J F. In vivo comparison of working length determination with two electronic apex locators.Int Endod J. 2007;40 (2):133-8.
25. Venturi M,Breschi L. A comparison between two electronic apex locators: an ex vivo investigation. Int Endod J. 2007 ;40(5):362-73.
26. Pascon E A, Marrelli M , Congi O, Cincio R., MiceliI F., Veriani M.A.An ex vivo comparison of working length determination by 3 electronic apex locators.OralSurg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. . 2009;108 (3):147-51.
27. ;Herrera M, Abalos C, Planas A J,Liamas R. Influence of apical constriction diameter on Root ZX apex locator precision. J. Endod, . 2007;33: 995-8.
28. Huang L. An experimental study of the principle of electronic root canal measurement .J. Endod. 1987; 13: 60-4.
29. KaufmannAY, Katz A. Reliability of Root ZX apex locator tested by an in vitro model. J. Endod, 1993;19: 201.
30. Donnelly JC. A simplified model to demonstrate the operation of electronic root canal measuring devices. J. Endod.1993;19: 579-80.
31. Czerw R J ,Fulkerson M.S., Donnelly J.C. An in vitro test of a simplified model to demonstrate the operation of electronic root canal measuring devices. J. Endod, 1994;20: 605-6.
32. Meares A.W.,Steiman R. The influence of sodium hypochlorite irrigation on the accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apex locator. J Endod, 2002;28: 595–8.
33. Bodur H, Odabaş, M., Tulunoğlu O., Tınaz, A.C. Accuracy of two different apex locators in primary teeth with and without root resorption. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2008;12: 137-41.
34. Ebrahim AK,Wadachi R, Suda H. An in vitro evaluation of theaccuracy of Dentaport ZX apex locator in enlarged root canals. Aust Dent J, 2007;52: 193-7.
35. Shabang S,Goon W, Gluskin A. An in vivo evaluation of Root ZX electronic apex locator. J. Endod.1996;22: 616-18.
36. Dunlap C, Remeikis N, Begole E, Rauschenberger C. An in vivo evaluation of an electronic apex locator that uses the ratio metod in vital and necrotic canals. J Endod, 1998;24: 48-50.
37. Ounsi HF Naaman A.In vitro evaluation of the reliability of the Root ZX electronic apex locator. Int Endod J.1999;32: 120-3.
38. Tselnik M., Baumgartner J C, Marshall J.G. An evaluation of Root ZX and Elements diagnostic apex locators. J. Endod, 2005;31: 507-9.
39. D’Assuncao F L, De Albuquerque D S, De Queiroz Ferrerira LC. The ability of two apex locators to locate the apical foramen: an in vitro study. J Endod, 2006; 32: 560-2.
40. Bernardes RA,Duarte M A H, Vasconcelos B C, Moares, IG, Bernerdineli N , Garcia R B, Baldi JV, Victorino F R, Bramente CM. Evaluation of precision of length determination with 3 electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unitand Apex Locator and Romi Apex D30. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2007;104: 91-4.
41. Mancini M, Felici R, Conte G, Costantini M., Cianconi L. Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in anterior and posterior teeth: an ex vivo study. J Endod. 2011;37(5):684-7.
42. Stöber E K, Sindreu F D, Mercade M, Vera J, Bueno R. An evaluation of Root ZX and IpexApex locators: an in vivo study. J. Endod, 2011; 37: 608-10.
43. Aggarwal V,Singla M, Kabi D. An in vitro evaluation of performance of two electronic root canal length measurement devices during retreatment of different obstructing materials. J. Endod, . 2010;36: 1526-30.
44. Kang JA, Kim SK.Accuracies of seven different apex locators under various conditions.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.106 (4):57-62.
45. Somma F, Castagnola R, Lajolo C., Paterno H L, Marigo L. In vivo accuracy of three electronic root canal length measurement devices: Dentaport ZX, Raypex 5 and ProPex II. Int Endod J. 2012;45 (6):552-6.
46. De Vasconcelos B C, Do Vale T M, De Menezes AS, Pinheiro-Junior EC, Vivacqua-Gomes N., Bernardes R.A., Hungaro Duarte M A. An ex vivo comparison of root canal length determination by three electronic apex locators at positions short of the apical foramen.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;110 (2) :57-61.