___

• Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considera- tions in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 565-7.
• Gutmann JL. The dentin-root complex: anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 458-67.
• Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1540-4.
• Wagnild G, Mueller K. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. In: Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Pathways of the Pulp, 9th Ed. St Louis, USA: CV Mosby, 2006; 786-821.
• Jagadish S, Yogesh B. Fracture resistance of teeth with class II silver amalgams, posterior com- posites and glass cermet restorations. Oper Dent 1990; 15: 42-7.
• Fissore B, Nicholls JI, Youdelis RA. Load fatigue of teeth restored by a dentine bonding agent and a posterior composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 80- 5.
• Johnson ME, Stewart GP, Nielsen CJ, Hatton JF. Evaluation of root reinforcement of endodonti- cally treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 90: 360-4
• Teixeira FB, Teixeira ECN, Thompson JY, Leinfelder KF, Trope M. Dentinal bonding reaches the root canal system. J Esth Rest Dent 2004; 16: 348-54.
• Bateman G, Ricketts DNJ, Saunders WP. Fibre-based post systems: a review. Br Dent J 2003; 195: 43-8.
• Robbins JW. Guidelines for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 120: 558-66.
• Turner CH. The utilization to carry post- retained crowns. J Oral Rehabil 1982; 9: 193-202.
• Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Endodontically treated teeth as abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 631-6.
• Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 29: 427-33.
• Guzy GE, Nicholls JI. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and with- out endo-post reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 42: 39-44.
• Kane JJ, Burgess JO. Modification of the resistance form of amalgam coronal radicular restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 470-4.
• Fernandez AS, Shetty S, Couthinho I. Factors determining post selection: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 6: 556-62.
• Robbins JW. Restoration of the endodonti- cally treated tooth. Dent Clin North Am 2002; 46: 367-84.
• King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evalu- ation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post deve- loped for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1990; 17: 599-609.
• Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27: 275-8.
• Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a lite- rature review. J Endod 2004; 30: 289-301.
• Iglesia AM, Cabornero AA. Fiber rein- forced post and core adapted to a previous metal ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 215-21.
• Schwartz RS, Murchison DF, Walker WA. Effects of eugenol and noneugenol endodontic sealer cements on post retention. J Endod 1998; 24: 564-7.
• Berekally T. Contemporary perspectives on postcore systems. Aust Endod J 2003; 29: 120-7.
• Fokkinga WA, Le Bell AM, Kreulen CM, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK, Creugers NHJ. Ex vivo fracture resistance of direct resin composite complete cowns with and without posts on maxillary premo- lars. Int Endod J 2005; 38: 230-7.
• Lindemuth JS, Hagge MS, Broome JS. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 177-81.
• Dias de Souza GM, Pereira GDS, Dias CDS, Paulillo LAMS. Fracture resistance of premo- lars with bonded class II amalgams. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 349-53.
• Cobankara FK, Ungör M, Belli S. The effect of two different root canal sealers and smear layer on resistance to root fracture. J Endod 2002; 28: 606-9.
• Teixeira FB, Teixeira ECN, Thompson JY, Trope M. Fracture resistance of roots endodontically treated with with a new resin filling material. JADA 2004; 135: 646-52.
• Hayashi M, Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Ebisu S. Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 477-85.
• Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 15-8.
• Cormier CJ, Burns R, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic and conventional post sys- tems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont 2001; 10: 26-36.
• Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 5-9.
• Shipper G, Orstavik D, Teixeira FB, Trope M. An evaluation of microbial leakage in roots filled with a thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based root canal filling material. J Endod 2004; 30: 342-7.
• Ribeiro FC, Souza-Gabriel AE, Marchesan MA, Alfredo E, Silva-Sousa YT, Sousa-Neto MD. Influence of different endodontic filling materials on root fracture susceptibility. J Dent. 2008; 36: 69-73.
• Ulusoy OI, Genç O, Arslan S, Alaçam T, Görgül G. Fracture resistance of roots obturated with three different materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 104: 705-8.
• Hunter AJ, Feiglin B, Williams JF. Effects of post placement on endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 166-72.
• Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in-vitro study. J Dent 2001; 29: 427-33.
• Swanson K, Madison S. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. J Endodon 1987; 16: 566-9.