Fatma İNAL, Behiç COŞKUN, Esat Sami POLAT, Emel GÜRBÜZ

Farklı saflıktaki gliserolün kuzularda besi performansı üzerine etkisi

Coşkun B, Polat ES, Gürbüz E, İnal F. Farklı saflıktaki gliserolün kuzularda besi performansı üzerine etkisi. Eurasian J Vet Sci, 2010, 26, 2, 75-79 Amaç: Çalışma, farklı üretim metotları ile farklı saflıklarda elde edilen gliserolün kuzu besisinde kullanılmasının besi performansı üzerine etkilerini incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırmada 32 baş yaklaşık 5 aylık yaşta Kangal Akkaramanı erkek kuzu kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada kontrol grubu, saf gliserol verilen grup, iki farklı saflıkta ham gliserol (% 4.14 ve % 9.80 metanol) verilen gruplar olmak üzere her biri 8 kuzudan oluşan 4 grup oluşturulmuştur. Araştırma bir hafta alıştırma ve 10 haftası deneme olmak üzere toplam 11 hafta sürdürülmüştür. Bulgular: Çalışmada gruplar arasında kuzuların canlı ağırlıkları bakımından farklılık gözlenmemiştir (p>0.05). Günlük canlı ağırlık artışları karşılaştırıldığında ise sadece 56- 70. günlerde ham gliserol verilen gruplarda artış önemli bulunmuştur (p

The effect of glycerol with different purity on fattening performance in lambs.

Coskun B, Polat ES, Gurbuz E, Inal F. The effect of glycerol with different purity on fattening performance in lambs. Eurasian J Vet Sci, 2010, 26, 2, 75-79 Aim: The effects of glycerol which is supplied from different production methods resulting in different purity were investigated on fattening lambs on nutrition performance. Materials and Methods: In the experiment, 32 of weaned Akkaraman Kangal male lambs, five months of age, were used in 4 groups, 8 animals each, formed as control, pure glycerol, and two various methanol acquired crude glycerol (4.14 and 9.80% methanol) groups. Experiment was continued 11 weeks including 1 week adaptation and 10 weeks experimental. Results: No significant difference was observed in terms of live weight (p>0.05). When daily live weight gains were compared, only in 56-70 days the crude glycerol group showed significance (p

PDF

___

Akçapınar H, 1981. Dağlıç, Akkaraman ve Kıvırcık kuzularının entansif beside büyüme ve yemden yararlanma kabiliyeti üzerinde karşılaştırmalı araştırmalar. AÜ Vet Fak Derg, 28, 112-129.
AOAC, 2003. International. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 17th Ed. 2nd Revision. Association of Analytical Communities, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
CFR (Code of Federal Regulations), 2004. §582.1320 Glycerine, Office of Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, USA.
Chung YH, 2007. The role of gluconeogenic precursors and methyl donors in periparturient Holstein dairy cows on milk yield and metabolic profiles (PhD). The Pennsylvania State University, The Graduate School, Department of Dairy and Animal Science, USA.
Chung YH, Rico DE, Martinez CM, Cassidy TW, Noirot V, Ames A, Varga GA, 2007. Effects of feeding dry glycerin to early postpartum Holstein dairy cows on lactational performance and metabolic profiles. J Dairy Sci, 90, 5682-5691.
DeFrain JM, Hippen AR, Kalscheur KF, Jardon PW, 2004. Feeding glycerol to transition dairy cows: effects on blood metabolites and lactation performance. J Dairy Sci, 87, 4195-4206.
Drouillard JS, 2008. Glycerin as a feed for ruminants: Using glycerin in high concentrate diets. J Anim Sci, 86, E-Suppl. 2/J, 392.
Elam NA, Eng KS, Bechtel B, Harris JM, Crocker R, 2008. Glycerol from biodiesel production: Considerations for feedlot diets. South West Management and Nutrition Conference Proceedings, Arizona, USA.
EPA, 1986. Rat oral subchronic toxicity study with methanol. Office of Solid Waste, Washington, DC, http://www.epa. gov/IRIS/subst/0305.htm, Erişim tarihi: 18.04.2010.
Geoering HK, Van Soest PJ, 1970. Forage fiber analysis (Apparatus, reagents and some applications). Handbook No: 379, ARS-USDA, Washington, USA.
İnal F, Tuncer ŞD, 1992. Kuzu beslemede enerji kaynağı olarak arpa yerine tapiokanın farklı azot kaynakları ile birlikte kullanılma imkanları. Hayvancılık Araştırma Dergisi, 2, 9-14.
İnal Ş, 2005. Biyometri, Selçuk Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Basım Ünitesi, Konya.
Kaiser G, Stokes S, Goff J, 2002. Effect of oral glycerol drench on transition dairy cattle. Proceedings of Mid-South Ruminant Nutrition Conference, Arlington, USA, pp: 31-36.
Lammers PJ, Kerr BJ, Weber TE, Bregendahl K, Lonergan SM, Prusa KJ, Ahn DU, Stoffregen WC, Dozier WA, Honeyman MS, 2008. Growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality, and tissue histology of growing pigs fed crude glycerin-supplemented diets. J Anim Sci, 86, 2962-2970.
Mach N, Bach A, Devant M, 2009. Effects of crude glycerin supplementation on performance and meat quality of Holstein bulls fed high-concentrate diets. J Anim Sci, 87, 632–638.
Osborne VR, Odongo NE, Cant JP, Swanson KC, McBride BW, 2009. Effects of supplementing glycerol and soybean oil in drinking water on feed and water intake, energy balance, and production performance of periparturient dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 92, 698-707.
Parsons GL, Shelor MK, Drouillard JS, 2009. Performance and carcass traits of finishing heifers fed crude glycerin. J Anim Sci, 87, 653-657.
Pyatt A, Doane PH, Cecava MJ, 2007. Effect of crude glycerin in finishing cattle diets. J Anim Sci, 85, suppl 1, 530. Schröder A, Südekum KH, 1999. Glycerol as a by-product of biodiesel production in diets for ruminants. Proceedings of the 10th International Rapeseed Congress, Canberra, Australia.
Sellers RS, 2008. Glycerin as a feed ingredient, official definition(s) and approvals. American Feed Industry Association, Arlington, VA. J Anim Sci, 86, E-Suppl, 2.
Şahin EH, Akmaz A, 2002. Farklı kesim ağırlıklarında Akkaraman kuzuların besi performansı, kesim ve karkas özellikleri. Vet Bil Derg, 18, 29-36.
Thompson JC, He BB, 2006. Characterisation of crude glycerol from biodiesel production from multiple feedstocks. Appl Eng Agric, 22, 261-265.
Wang C, Liu Q, Huo WJ, Yang WZ, Dong KH, Huang YX, Guo G, 2009. Effects of glycerol on rumen fermentation, urinary excretion of purine derivatives and feed digestibility in steers. Livest Sci, 121, 15-20.