Developing Professional Competence through Assessment:Constructivist and Reflective Practice in Teacher-Training
Developing Professional Competence through Assessment:Constructivist and Reflective Practice in Teacher-Training
Problem Statement: Traditional forms of assessment such as essays and end of term examinations are still widely used in higher education in Ireland as the sole assessment method. These forms of assessment, while they may be valid and reliable approaches for collecting evidence of the acquisition of theoretical knowledge, rarely afford students the opportunity to apply knowledge to key professional scenarios. In the context of teacher education, if the aim is to develop teacher competence beyond the mere possession of technical skills then appropriate pedagogic and curriculum interventions need to be developed, implemented and evaluated. Purpose of Study: This paper argues that reflection and experiential learning should be infused through effective assessment strategies and embedded in the training and formation of trainee-teacher attributes. The authors draw on their experience as lecturers and module/course designers for an 'Assessment' module within a teacher-training degree programme in a School of Education in the Republic of Ireland. Methods: This paper presents the findings of a 4-year study, which adopted a multi-methods approach. The research was conducted using both numerical and qualitative tools. A primary focus of the research used student reflection to generate relevant data suitable for analysis and this was then triangulated with module evaluations and numerical performance data. The paper describes the research that used constructivist principles to help foster the development of assessment competence through a cycle of action/critical reflection/revised action within an assessment portfolio design. Findings and Results: The research demonstrates that a learner-centred approach to assessment not only helps the student/trainee teacher in the development of their own professional competence but also shows teacher educators that they need to experience learning and reflection at a deep level in order to be able to develop the professional competence required of them as future teachers. Conclusions and Recommendations: Those students who participated in the study expressed their appreciation of the value of portfolio assessment and indicated that they would be prepared to use it in their future professional contexts. The research suggested that a number of recommendations be considered and these include enabling students to make sense of knowledge through reflection, and the design of assessments, which replicate authentic professional scenarios and require decision-making, in order to assist in developing a reflective capacity for appropriate professional judgment.
___
- Arter J. A. & Spandell, V. (1992). Using portfolios of student work in instruction and assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 11 (1) 3-44.
- Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal 93, 373-397.
- Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (1998). Assessment by portfolio: Constructing learning and designing teaching. In P. Stimpson, & P. Morris (Eds.), Curriculum and Assessment for Hong Kong: Two components, one system (pp. 443-462). Hong Kong: Open University of Hong Kong Press.
- Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1976). Unobtrusive measures: An Inventory of uses. Sociological Methods and Research, (4), 267-300.
- Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable Assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. Professional Education, 22 (2), 151-167.
- Cannella, G. S., & Reiff, J. C. (1994). Individual constructivist teacher education: Teachers as empowered learners. Teacher Education Quarterly, 21(3), 498-429.
- Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
- Darlington, Y. & Scott, D. (2002). Qualitative Research in Practice: Stories from the field. Australia: Allen and Unwin.
- Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. An introduction to the philosophy of education (1966 edn.). New York: Free Press.
- Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books.
- Freire, P. (1970). Cultural action for freedom. The Harvard educational review. Monograph series, no. 1. Massachusetts: Cambridge.
- Gardner, F. (2009). Affirming values: using critical reflection to explore meaning and professional practice. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 10 (2) 179-190
- Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
- Hickson, H. (2011). Critical reflection: reflecting on learning to be reflective. Reflective Practice, 12 (6), 829-839.
- Janssen-Noordman, A., Merrienboer, J., Van Der Vleuten, C. & Scherpbier, A. (2006). Design of integrated practice for learning professional competences. Medical Teacher, 28 (5), 447-452.
- Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
- Lane, R., McMaster., Adnum, J, & Cavanagh, M. (2014). Quality reflective practice in teacher education: a journey towards shared understanding. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 15:4, 481-494.
- Larrivee, B. (2000). Transforming teaching practice: becoming the critically reflective teacher. Reflective Practice, 1 (3), 293-307.
- Lemaitre, D., Le Prat, R. De Graaf, E. & Bot L. (2006). Editorial: Focusing on competence. European Journal Education 31 (1), 45 -53.
- Lyotard, J. (1992). The Post-modern Condition: A Report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
- Mason, J. (2006). Mixing Methods in a Qualitatively-Driven Way. Qualitative Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 9-26.
- Noddings, N. (2004). "Is teaching a practice?" In Education and Practice. Upholding the Integrity of Teaching and Learning (pp. 159-170). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
- Pennel, W.R., Fishman, B. J. Yamaguchi, R. & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44 (4), 921-958.
- Piaget, J. (1972). Psychology and Epistemology: Towards a Theory of Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
- Regehr, G. & Norman, G. R. (1996). Issues in cognitive psychology: implications for professional education. Academic Medicine 71 (9), 988-1001.
- Ritchie, J. & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman, & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp.173- 194). London: Routledge.
- Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: how professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.
- Srivastava, A. & Thomson, S. B. (2009). Framework Analysis: A Qualitative Methodology for Applied Policy Research. JOAAG, Vol. 4. No. 2.
- Tashakorri, A. & Teddlie, C. (2003c). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds). (1998). Mixed methodology: combining the qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage PublicationsThrelfall, S.J., (2014). E-journals: towards critical and independent reflective practice for students in higher education. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 15:3 pp.317-332.
- Threlfall, S. J., (2014). E-journals: towards critical and independent reflective practice for students in higher education. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 15:3, 317-332.
- Tisani, N. (2008). Challenges in producing a portfolio for assessment: in search of underpinning educational theories. Teaching in Higher Education, 13 (5), 549- 557.
- Van Huizen, P., Van Oers B. & Wubbels T. (2005). A Vygotskian perspective on teacher education. Curriculum Studies, 37 (3), 267-290.
- ISSN: 1302-597X
- Başlangıç: 2015
- Yayıncı: Anı Yayıncılık
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler
The Relationship Between Teacher Leadership, Teacher Professionalism, and Perceived Stress
Necati CEMALOĞLU, Ali Çağatay KILINÇ, Gökhan SAVAŞ
Seher ULUTAŞ, Nükhet DEMŞRTAŞLI
John LALOR, Francesca LORENZI, Justin RAMI
Ability Level Estimation of Students on Probability Unit via Computerized Adaptive Testing
Turkish Adaptation of the Utley Geometry Attitude Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study