Correlations between Teachers’ Personality, Psychological Safety Perception and Teacher Voice

Correlations between Teachers’ Personality, Psychological Safety Perception and Teacher Voice

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the level of the teacher's voice, and to examine the relationships between voice, five-factor personalitytraits and psychological safety.Research Method: The study was conducted with a correlational survey model. The sample of the study consisted of 475 teachers in public primary schools.Three instruments were applied in the study; Employee Voice Scale, Quick Big Five Personality Test, and Psychological Safety Scale.Findings: Results showed that the level of teacher's voice was at level “Often”, and there were significant and positive correlations between agreeableness extraversion, emotional stability and openness to experience, and teacher's voice; and also between psychological safety and teacher's voice; and lastly, between psychological safety and agreeableness and emotional stability.Implications for Research and Practice: Significant and positive relationships were found between teacher voice, and psychological safety and personality while the strength of the relationships was low. Therefore, future studies might focus on other individual and organizational factors related to the teacher's voice.

___

  • Ashford, J. B., & LeCroy, C. (2009). Human behavior in the social environment: A Multidimensional Perspective. Toronto: Nelson Education.
  • Bulut H., & Bayramlik H. (2015). The analysis of employee voice behaviour of teachers: A study in Balikesir state schools. Paper presented at II. Yuksekogretim Stratejileri ve Kurumsal İsbirligi Sempozyumu (YOSKIS) (444-449). Mersin: Mersin University.
  • Buyukgoze, H. (2015). A comparison of the employment of public sector teachers in EU and Turkey. Journal of Aksaray University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 7(2), 57-65.
  • Buyukozturk, S., Kilic Cakmak, E., Akgun, E.A., Karadeniz S., & Demirel, F. (2012). Scientific Research Methods (11th edition). Ankara: Pegem Publication.
  • Cetin, S., & Cakmakci, C. (2012). Adaptation of the employee voice scale into Turkish. Science Journal of Turkish Military Academy, 22(2), 1-19.
  • Cetin, S. (2013). Impact of teachers’ perceptions of organizational support, management openness and personality traits on voice. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(18), 1709-1721.
  • Cheng, J., Chang, S. C., Kuo, J. H., & Lu, K. M. (2014). Social relations and voice behavior: The mediating role of psychological safety. Criticism, 32, 58.
  • Cingi, H. (2009). Ornekleme Kurami (3rd ed.). Ankara: Bizim Buro Basimevi Yayin Dag. Tic. Ltd. Sirketi.
  • Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2003). Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8(4), 247-265.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Arastirma deseni, nitel, nicel ve karma yontem yaklasimlari (2nd ed.) (S.B. Demir Trans.). [Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.]. Ankara: Egiten Kitap
  • Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Latent voice episodes: The situation-specific nature of speaking up at work. Harvard Business School Working Paper, 6-24.
  • Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
  • Dundar, T., & Tabancali, E. (2012). The relationship between organizational justice perceptions and job satisfaction levels. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5777-5781.
  • Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., Lawrence, K. A., & Miner-Rubino, K. (2002). Red light, green light: Making sense of the organizational context for issue selling. Organization Science, 13(4), 355-369.
  • Edmondson, A., & Mogelof, J. P. (2005). Explaining psychological safety in innovation teams: Organizational culture, team dynamics, or personality? In Thompson, L. L., & Choi, H. S. (Eds.), Creativity and Innovation in Organizational Teams (129- 156), Psychology Press.
  • Edmondson, A. C., & Roloff, K. S. (2009). Overcoming barriers to collaboration: Psychological safety and learning in diverse teams. In Salas, E., Goodwin, G. F., & Burke, C. S. (Eds.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Crossdisciplinary perspectives and approaches (183-208), 34.
  • Eggers, J. T. (2011). Psychological safety influences relationship behavior. Corrections Today, 73(1), 60-61.
  • Folger, R., & Martin, C. (1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and Procedural justice effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(6), 531-546.
  • George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: Simple guide and reference 17.0 update, 10. Boston: Pearson.
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist,48, 26-34.
  • Honingh, M., & Hooge, E. (2014). The effect of school-leader support and participation in decision making on teacher collaboration in Dutch primary and secondary schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(1), 75-98. doi: 10.1177/1741143213499256
  • Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G., (2015). Egitim yonetimi: Teori, arastirma ve uygulama (7th ed.) [Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice] (S. Turan Trans.) Nobel Yayin Dagitim.
  • Istanbul Provincial Directorate of National Education (2017). 2016-2017 Istanbul Provincial National Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://istanbul.meb.gov.tr
  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. Kalayci, S. (2009). SPSS applied multivariate statistical techniques. Ankara: Dinamik Akademi.
  • LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 326. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.326
  • McShane, S., & Von Glinow, M. (2011). M: Organizational behavior (3rd ed.). Irwin: McGraw-Hill.
  • Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of management studies, 40(6), 1453-1476.
  • Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725.
  • Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2011.574506.
  • Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 173-197. doi: 0.1146/annurevorgpsych-031413-091328
  • Morsunbul, U. (2014). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of quick big five personality test. Dusunen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 27(4), 316-322. doi: 10.5350/DAJPN2014270405
  • Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (2008). Wrongdoing, whistle-blowing, and retaliation in the US government: What have researchers learned from the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) survey results. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28(3), 263-281.
  • Nikolaou, I., Vakola, M., & Bourantas, D. (2008). Who speaks up at work? Dispositional influences on employees' voice behavior. Personnel Review, 37(6), 666-679. doi: 10.1108/00483480810906892
  • Ozyilmaz A., & Taner D. (2018): Communication skills shape voice effects in organizations, The Service Industries Journal, doi: 10.1080/02642069.2018.1506444
  • Parker, L. E. (1993). When to fix it and when to leave: Relationships among perceived control, self-efficacy, dissent, and exit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 949– 959.
  • Prouska, R., & Psychogios, A. G. (2018). Do not say a word! Conceptualizing employee silence in a long-term crisis context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29 (5). doi: 10.1080/09585192.2016.1212913
  • Sagnak, M. (2017). Ethical leadership and teachers' voice behavior: The mediating roles of ethical culture and psychological safety. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 17(4), 1101-1117. doi: 10.12738/estp.2017.4.0113
  • Smylie, M. A. (1992). Teacher participation in school decision making: Assessing willingness to participate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 53- 67.
  • Stamper, C. L., & Dyne, L. V. (2001). Work status and organizational citizenship behavior: A field study of restaurant employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 22(5), 517-536.
  • Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Employee silence on critical work issues: The cross-level effects of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 61(1), 37-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00105
  • Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
  • Wilkinson, A., Gollan, P. J., Kalfa, S., & Xu, Y. (2018). Voices unheard: employee voice in the new century, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(5), 711- 724, doi: 10.1080/09585192.2018.1427347.
  • Yener, S. (2015). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the psychological safety, ODU Journal of Social Sciences Research, 280-305.
  • Yeniceri, O., & Demirel, Y. (2007). A study on organizational and individual impediments against knowledge sharing in organizations. Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University Journal of Social and Economic Research, (1), 221-234.