Telekomünikasyon Sektöründe Liberalizasyon ve Türkiye

Ekonomik ve sosyal amaçlara ulaşmada bir araç olarak telekomünikasyonun önemi gittikçe artıyor. Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerindeki hızlı büyümeyle birlikte, ülkeler telekomünikasyon sektöründe reformlar başlatmışlardır. Reformlar bir süreci içermektedir. Liberalizasyon ve özelleştirme bu sürecin temel aşamalarıdır. Liberalizasyon, sektörde rekabetin gelişmesine önemli katkı sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, liberalizasyon aşaması, önemi ve Türkiye uygulaması incelenmektedir.

The Liberalization and the Case of Turkey in Telecommunications Sector

The importance of telecommunications as a tool to achieve economic and social goals is getting increase. With rapid growth in information and communication technologies, countries have started reforms in telecommunications sector. Reforms include a progress. Privatization and liberalization are the main stages of reforms. Liberalization contributes to enhance competition in the sector. In this study, the stage and importance of liberalization and the implementation of Turkey are investigated.

___

  • - Aktan, C.C., Vural İ. (Nisan, Mayıs, Haziran, 2005),”Telekomünikasyon Sektöründe Reform Süreçleri”, Telekomünikasyon ve Regülasyon, Yıl:1, Sayı:2, 81-95.
  • - Baumol, W. Panzar, J. and Willing, R. (1982), Contestable Markets and Theory of Industry Structure, New York.
  • - Brown, A. (February, 1996), “Should Telstra Be Privatised?“, Working Paper, Griffth University School of Economıcs, 1-43.
  • - Buckingham, A., Bustani, C., Satola, D. And Schwarz, T. (2005), “Telecommunications Reform in Developing Countries”, Telecommunications Law and Regulation, (Ed: I. Walden and J. Angel), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 586-642.
  • - Buigues, P.A. (2004), “The Competition Policy Approach”, The Economics of Antitrust and Regulation in Telecommunications, (Ed: P.A. Buigues, P. Rey), Cheltenhem: Edwar Elgar Publishing Limited, 9-26.
  • - Cave, M. (2004), “Economic Aspects of the New Regulatory Regime for Electronic Communication Services”, The Economics of Antitrust and Regulation in Telecommunications, (Ed: P.A. Buigues, P. Rey), Cheltenhem: Edwar Elgar Publishing Limited, 27-41.
  • - Chamberlin, E.H. (1933), The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, Cambridge.
  • - Choumelova, D. and Delgado, J. (2004), “Monitoring Competition in the Telecommunications Sector: European Commission Sector Inquiries”, The Economics of Antitrust and Regulation in Telecommunications, (Ed: Pierre A. Buigues and Patrick Rey), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 269-284.
  • - Corbett, D. (1996),Australian Public Sector Management, Second Edition, St. Leonards:Allen &Unwin.
  • - Çakal, R. (1996), Doğal Tekellerde Özelleştirme ve Regülasyon, Ankara: DPT Yayını No:2455.
  • - Çetin, T. (Nisan, Mayıs, Haziran, 2005), “Regülasyon İktisadı Üzerine Farklı Yaklaşımlar”, Telekomünikasyon ve Regülasyon, Yıl:1, Sayı:2, 106-123.
  • - Demsetz, H. (1968), “Why Regulate Utilities”, Journal of Law and Economics, 11.
  • - eEurope + Action Plan (June, 2004).
  • - Garrison, W.B. (2007), Telecom Privatization and liberalization, The Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise.
  • - GIPI (May, 2002), Best Prectice for Telecommunications Reform. www.internetpolicynet/practices/telecomreform.pdf
  • - GIPI (2007), Telecommunications “Liberalization” http://www.internetpolicy.net/telco/.
  • - Hutchinson, G. (1991), “Efficiency Gains Through Privatization of UK Industries”, Privatization and Economic Efficiency A Comparative Analysis of Developed and Developing Countries, (Ed: Attiat F. Ott and Keith Hartley), Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • - Healey, N. and Cook, M. (1996), Supply Side Economics, Third Edition, Oxford: Heinemann Educational.
  • - ITU Indicators 2006
  • - Kessides, L. N. (2004), Reforming Infrastructure: Privatization, Regulation, and Competition, Washington: The World Bank.
  • - Noam, E. (1992), Telecommunications in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • - OECD Telecommunications Database 2005.
  • - Özmen, S. (1987), Türkiye’de ve Dünyada KİT’in Özelleştirilmesi, Istanbul: Met-Er Matbaası.
  • - Petrazzini, B. and Clark, T. (1996), Costs and Benefits of Telecommunications Liberalization in Developing Countries.
  • - Pirie, M. (1985), Privatization: The Bristish Experience and Its Application to Australia, Sidney: Adam Smith Institute.
  • - Pitt, E. (2005), “Competition Law in Telecommunications”, Telecommunications Law and Regulation, (Ed: I. Walden and J. Angel), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 293-340.
  • - Selvarajah, K. (February, 1999), “Telecoms Transition in Sri Lanka a Model for Small Countries?”, The Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications Information and Media, 1 (1), 77-93.
  • - Singh, J.P. (2000), “The Institutional Environment and Effects of Telecommunication Privatizations and Market Liberalization in Asia”, Telecommunication Policy, (24), 887-898.
  • - Walden, I. (2005), “European Union Communications Law”, Telecommunications Law and Regulation, (Ed: I. Walden and J. Angel), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 107-149.
  • - Wallsten, S. J. (March, 2001), “An Econometric Analysis of Telecom Competition, Privatization, and regulation in Africa and Latin America”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 49(1), 1-19.
  • - Waverman, L. and Sirel, E. (Autumn, 1997), “European Telecommunications Markets on the Verge of Full Liberalization”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(4), 113-126.
  • - WEF (2003), Global Information Technology Report (2002-2003), New York: World Economic Forum.
  • - Wellenius, B. (1999), “Telecommunications Reform-How to Succeed”, Public Policy for the Private Sector, The World Bank, Note No:13.
  • - Wellenius, B. (1997), Beyond Privatization the Second Wave of Telecommunications in Mexico, Washington: The World Bank.
  • - 2007 Middle Eastern Telecoms Statistiscs and market Overview, http://www.newswiretoday.com/news/22266/