Market, Capitalism and Development:Development Theory in the Light of Braudel
In “Civilisation and Capitalism” Fernand Braudel made one of the most comprehensive analysis of all times on the emergence of capitalism. Yet, he did not explicitly discuss the relevance of his analysis to the efforts to “build” capitalism. Starting with the assumption that Braudel’s work has important implications for develop‐ment efforts, this work tries to figure out those implications for contemporary development efforts. While doing this, we take the “Develop‐mental State Theory” as reference point which we believe to have a considerable explanatory power on the deliberative and succesful efforts of catching‐up in the post‐war era.
___
- Amsden , A. (1989), Asia’s Next Giant, New York:Oxford University Press.
- Braudel, F. (1992), Civilisation and Capitalism Vol II The Wheels of Commerce Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Braudel, F. (1984), Civilisation and Capitalism Vol III Perspective of The World, New York: Harper&Row Publishers.
- Deyo, F. (1987), The Political Economy of The New AsianIndustrialism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- Dornbusch, R. ve Y. Park (1987), “Korean Growth Policy” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987(2), 389‐454.
- Evans, P. (1995), Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Johnson , C. (1982), MITI and The Japanes eMiracle,Chicago:Stanford University Press.
- Öniş , Z. (1991), “The Logic of Developmental State” Comparative Politics, 24(1),109‐126.
- Storm, S. ve C. W. M. Naastepad (2005), “Strategic Factors in Economic Development: East Asian Industrialization 1950‐2003, Development and Change, 36(6), 1059‐1094.
- Rodrik, D. (1995), “Getting Interventions Right: How South Korea and Taiwan Grew Rich?” Economic Policy, 20, 55‐108.
- Wade, R. (1990), Governing The Market: Economic Theory and The Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization, Princeton: Princeton University Press.