___

• Aldrich, H. and Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645-670.
• Ashforth, B. E. and Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177-194.
• Bansal, P. and Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (1), 93-103.
• Berger, J., Ridgeway, C., Fisek, M. H. and Norman, R. Z. (1998). The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review, 63, 379-405.
• Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151-179.
• Bitektine, A. and Haack, P. (2015). The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49-75.
• Boje, D.M., Oswick, C. and Ford, J.D. (2004). Language and organization: the doing of discourse. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 571-577.
• Boxenbaum, E. (2008). The process of legitimation. In Scheuer, S. and Schewer, J.D.(Eds) The anatomy of change. 237-262. CBS Press.
• Boyd, J. (2000). Actional legitimacy: No crisis necessary. Journal of Public Relations Research, 4, 341-353.
• Brown, A.D. (1997). Narcissism, idendity and legitimacy. Academy of Management Review. (22)3, 643-686.
• Brown, A.D. and Humphreys, M. (2006). Organizational identy and place: A discoursive exploration of hegemony and resistance. Journal of Management Studies, 43(2), 231-257.
• Collins, R. (1981), On the microfoundations of macrosociology. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 984-1014.
• Cornelissen, J. P., Durand, R., Fiss, P. C., Lammers, J. C. and Vaara, E. (2015). Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 10-27.
• Creed, W. E. D., Scully, M. A. and Austin, J. R. (2002). Clothes make the person? The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity. Organization Science, 13(5), 475-496.
• David, R. J., Sine, W. D. and Haveman, H. A. (2013). Seizing opportunity in emerging fields: How institutional entrepreneurs legitimated the professional form of management consulting. Organization Science, 24(2), 356-377.
• Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate?. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024-1039.
• Deephouse, D.L. and Carter, S.M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329-360.
• DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1991). Introdiction. In Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (Eds) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. 1-38. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
• DiMaggio, P. J. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263-287.
• Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136.
• Elsbach, K. D. and Sutton, R. I. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 699-738.
• Elsbach, K. D. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 57-88.
• Etzion, D. and Ferraro, F. (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21(5), 1092-1107.
• Fligstein, N. (1997). Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 397-405.
• Friedland, R. and Alford, R.R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practies ve institutional contradictions. In Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (Eds) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis.232-263. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Autline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
• Glynn, M. A. and Abzug, R. (2002). Institutionalizing identity: Symbolic isomorphism and organizational names. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 267-280.
• Glynn, M. A. and Navis, C. (2013). Categories, identities and cultural classification: Moving beyond a model of categorical constraint. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1124-1137.
• Golant, B. D. and Sillince, J. A. A. (2007). The constitution of organizational legitimacy: A narrative perspective. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1149-1167.
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure. The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
• Grant, D., Keenoy, T. and Oswick, C. (2001). Organizational discourse. International Studies of Management and Organization, 31(3), 5-24.
• Green, S. E. (2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 653-669.
• Green, S. E., Li, Y. and Nohria, N. (2009). Suspended in self-spun webs of significance: A rhetorical model of institutionalization and institutionally embedded agency. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 11-36.
• Green, S. E. and Li, Y. (2011). Rhetorical institutionalism: Language, agency and structure in institutional theory since Alvesson 1993. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7), 1662-1697.
• Haack, P., Pfarrer, M. D. and Scherer, A. G. (2014). Legitimacy as feeling: How affect leads to vertical legitimacy spillovers in transnational governance. Journal of Management Studies, 51(4), 634-666.
• Habermas, J. (2001). İletişimsel Eylem Kuramı. (Çev. Mustafa Tüzel), Kabalcı Yayınevi, İstanbul.
• Hardy, C. and Maguire, S. (2010). Discourse, field-configuring events and change in organizations and institutional fields: Narratıves of DDT and the Stockholm convention. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1365-1392.
• Harmon, D. J., Green, S. E. and Goodnight, G. T. (2015). A model of rhetorical legitimation: The structure of communication and cognition underlying institutional maintenance and change. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 76-95.
• Hasselbladh, H. and Kallinikos, J. (2000). The Project of rationalization: A critique and reappraisal of neo-istitutionalism in organization studies. Organization Studies, 21(4), 697-720.
• Heracleous, L. and Barrett, M. (2001). Organızational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation. Academy of Management Journal. 44(4) 755-778.
• Heracleous, L. and Marshak, R.J. (2004). Organizational discourse as situated symbolic action: Application through and intervention. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper, ODC, 1-6.
• Hirsch, P.M. (1997). Sociology without social structure: Neo-institutional theory meets brave new World. American Journal of Sociology, 102(6), 1702-1723.
• Hybels, R.C. (1995) On legitimacy, legitimation, and organizations: A critical review and integrative theoretical model. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 241-245.
• Jepperson, R.L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects and institutionalism. In Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (Eds) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis.143-163. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
• Jepperson, R.L. and Meyer, J.W. (1991). The puclic order and the construction of formal organization. In Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (Eds) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis.204-231. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
• Jepperson, R.L. and Meyer, J.W. (2011). Multiple levels of analysis and the limitations of methodological individualisms sociological theory, 29(1), 54-73.
• Johnson, C., Dowd, T. J. and Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Legitimacy as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 53-78.
• Kraatz, M. S. and Zajac, E. J. (1996). Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 812-836.
• Lawrence, T. B. (1999). Institutional strategy. Journal of Management, 25(2), 161-188.
• Lawrence, T.B. and Phillips, N. (2004). From moby dick to free willy: Macro-cultural discourse and institutional entrepreneurship in emerging institutional fields. Organization, 11(5), 689-711.
• Leeuwen, T. V. and Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse historical analysis. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 83-118.
• Lounsbury, M. and Glynn, M.A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 545-564.
• Massey, J. E. (2001). Managing organizational legitimacy: Communication strategies for organization in crisis. Journal of Business Communication, 38(2), 153-183.
• Mazza, C. (1999). Claim, intent, and persuasion: Organizational legitimacy and the rhetoric of corporate mission statements. Springer Science-Business Media.
• Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony . The American Journal of Sociology, (83)2, 340-363.
• Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony . In Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (Eds) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis.41-62. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
• Meyer, J. W. and Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The actors of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency, Sociological Theory, 18(1), 101-120.
• Meyer, J.W. (2008). Reflections on institutional theories of organizations. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R. and Andersson, K.S., (Eds.). Handbook of organizational institutional. 788-809. Sage.
• Meyer, J. W. (2010). World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1-20.
• Navis, C. and Glynn, M. A. (2010). How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990-2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(3), 439-471.
• Oakes, L. S., Townley B. and Cooper, D. J. (1998). Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 257-292.
• Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179.
• Oliver, C. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13(4), 563-588.
• Patriotta, G., Gond, J. P. and Schultz, F. (2011). Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1804-1836.
• Phillips, N., Lawrence, T.B., and Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635-652.
• Phillips, N. and Oswick, C. (2012). Organizational discourse: Domains, debates, and directions. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 435-481.
• Pollock, T. G. and Rindova, V. P. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631-642.
• Powell, W.W. (1991). Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (Eds) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis.183-203. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
• Powell, W. W. and Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby (Eds) The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 276-298. London: Sage.
• Ridgeway, C. L. and Berger, J. (1986). Expectations, legitimation and dominance behavior in task groups. American Sociological Review, 51(5), 603-617.
• Ruef, M. and Scott, W. R. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 877-904.
• Scott, W.R. (1991). Unpacking institutional arguments. In Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (Eds) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis.164-182. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
• Scott, W.R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory Sociology. 37, 427-442.
• Searle, J.R. (2005). Toplumsal Gerçekliğin İnşası. (Çev. Muhittin Macit ve Ferruh Özpilavcı), Litera Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
• Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1-29.
• Sillince, J.A. (2005). A contingency theory of rhetorical congruence. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 608-621.
• Strang, D. and Bradburn, E.M. (2001). Theorizing legitimacy or legitimating theory? Neoliberal discourse and HMO policy, 1970-1989. In The second movement in institutional analysis. neoliberalizm in perspective, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Stryker, R. (1994). Rules, resources and legitimacy processes: Some implications for social conflict, order and change. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 847-910.
• Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.
• Suddaby, R. and Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35-67.
• Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273-286.
• Tolbert, P. S. and Zucker, L. G. (1996). The institutionalization of institutional theory. In Clegg, S., Hardy, C. and Nord, W. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies.175-190. London: Sage.
• Tost, L. P. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 686-710.
• Vaara, E., Tienari, J. and Laurila, J. (2006). Pulp and paper fiction: On the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring. Organization Studies, 27(6), 789-810.
• Vaara, E. and Tienari, J. (2008). A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 985-993.
• Vaara, E. and Monin, P. (2010). A recursive perspective on discursive legitimation and organizational action in mergers and acquisitions. Organization Science, 21(1), 3-22.
• Vaara, E. and Tienari, J. (2011). On the narrative construction of multinational corporations: An antenarrative analysis of legitimation and resistance in a cross-border merger. Organization Science, 22(2), 370-390.
• Waeraas, A. and Ihlen, Q. (2009). Green legitimation: The construction of an environmental ethos. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 17(2), 84-102.
• Westphal, J. D., Gulati, R. and Shortell, S. M. (1997). Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the contentand consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 366-394.
• Wiley, N. (1988). The micro – macro problem in social theory. Sociological Theory, 6(2), 254-261.
• Woodward, D. G., Edwards, P. and Birkin, F. (1996). Organizational legitimacy and stakeholder information provision. British Journal of Management, 7, 329-347.
• Zbaracki, M. J. (1998). The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 602-636.
• Zelditch, M. J. (2001). Processes of legitimation: Recent developments and new directions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64, 4-17.
• Zimmerman, M. A. and Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. The Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414-431.
• Zucker, L.G. (1991). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. In Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (Eds) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. 83-107. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.