MIRJAN DAMAŠKA’NIN ‘AMAÇLAR VE BAŞARILAR ARASINDA ULUSLARARASI CEZA MAHKEMESİ’ ADLI MAKALESİ ÜZERİNE BİR ELEŞTİRİ: ULUSLARARASI CEZA MAHKEMESİNİN ÇELİŞKİLERİ
Bu çalışmanın amacı Mirjan’nın ‘Amaçlar ve Başarılar Arasında
Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi’ adlı çalışmasını tartışmaya açmaktır.
Damaška ilgili makalede bir yandan Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi’nin
normatif yapısını ele alırken, diğer yandan da mahkemenin amaçları
ve başarıları arasındaki artan ayrışmayı incelemektedir. Mirjan
Damaška mahkemenin birçok başarısı arasında, mağdurların ve
tanıkların korunması noktasındaki sorunların aşıldığına önemle
vurgu yapmıştır. Ne var ki, Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi varoluş
amacı olan yaptırım uygulama noktasında kapasite eksikliği çekmektedir ve de bağımsız bir kuruluş olma karakterinden yoksundur.Buradan hareketle, makalede Mirjan Damaška’nın makalesine
eleştirel açıdan yaklaşmakta; mevcut sorunların Uluslararası Ceza
Mahkemenin meşruiyetini sorgulamaya açtığını ve Mahkemeye
yöneltilen eleştirilerin mahkemenin karşıtlarını güçlendirdiği yönündeki argümanlar tartışılacaktır.
A Critique to Mirjan Damaška’ ‘International Criminal Court between Aspiration and Achievement’ Article: The Paradoxes of the International Criminal Court
This research aims to examine Mirjan Damaka's article "The International Criminal Court between Aspiration and Achievement."
Mirjan Damaka examined the International Criminal Court's normative structure and the growing gap between its aspiration and
achievements in his paper. The International Criminal Court, among
its many accomplishments, overcomes challenges by protecting and
helping victims and witnesses. Despite its founding aims, however,
the International Criminal Court lacks enforcement ability and independent structural characteristics. As a result, this study will argue
Mirjan Damaka's missing points by examining how these challenges
call into question the Court's credibility and empower the Court's
adversaries.
___
- Akande, D. (2012). “The Effect of Security Council Resolutions and
Domestic Proceedings on State Obligations to Cooperate with
the ICC”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10(2), pp.299-
324.
- Askin, K.D. (2005). ‘The Jurisprudence of International War Crimes
Tribunals’, in Helen Durham and Tracey Gurd, (eds), Listening
to the Silences: Women and War, Martinus Nijhoff , Leiden.
- Balachandran, G., & Sethi, A. (2015). Israel–Gaza Crisis: Understanding the War Crimes Debate. Strategic Analysis, 39(2), 176-183.
- Blatmann, R. and Bowman, K. (2008). “Achievements and Problems of
the International Criminal Court: A View from Within”, Journal
of International Criminal Justice, 6(4), pp.711-730.
- Bolton, J.R. (2001). “International Criminal Law vs. State Sovereignty:
Another Round”, Law and Contemporary Problems,64(1),
pp.167-180.
- Brown, B. S. (1998). “US Objections to the Statute of the International
Criminal Court: A Brief Response”. NewYork University Journal
of International Law and Policy,31, pp.855-866.
- Burke-White, W. W. (2008). “Proactive Complementarity: The International Criminal Court and National Courts in the Rome System of International Justice”, Harvard International Law Journal,
49, pp.53-108
.
Cassese, A., Gaeta, P., Baig, L., Fan, M., and Gosnell, C. (2013). “Cassese's
International Criminal Law”, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Cogans, J.K. (2002). “International Criminal Courts and Fair Trials:
Difficulties and Prospects”, Yale Journal of International Law, 27,
2002, pp.111-140.
- Crowe, D. (2014). War Crimes, Genocide, and Justice: A Global History.
Springer, p.161.
- Cryer, R. (2005). “International Criminal Law vs. State Sovereignty:
Another Round”, European Journal of International Law, 16(5),
pp.979-1000.
- Damaška, M. (2009). “The International Criminal Court Between Aspiration and Achievement”, UCLA Journal of International Law and
Foreign Affairs, 19, pp.19- 35.
- Du Plessis, M. (2013). Universalising international criminal law-the
ICC, Africa and the problem of political perceptions. Institute for
Security Studies Papers, 2013(249), p.12.
- Human Rights Watch/Africa and Human Rights Watch/Women’s
Rights Project (1996). “Shattered Lives: Sexual Violence During the Rwandan Genocide and its Aftermath”, Human Rights Watch,
New York.
- Human Rights Watch Report, See http://www.hrw.org/ world-report2010/israel-occupied-palestinian-territoriesopt
Kaul, H.P. (2007). “The International Criminal Court: Current Challenges and Perspectives”, Washington University Global Studies
Law Review, 6, pp.75-583.
- Keppler, E. (2012). “Managing Setbacks for the International Criminal
Court in Africa”, Journal of African Law, 56(1), pp.1-14.
- Kirsch, P. (2001). “The International Criminal Court: Current Issues
and Perspectives”, Law and Contemporary Problems,64(1),
2001, pp.3-11.
- Kyriakakis, J. (2008). “Corporations and the International Criminal
Court: the Complementarity Objection Stripped Bare”, Criminal
Law Forum,19, pp.115-151.
- Malekian, F. (2009). “The Homogeneity of International Criminal
Court with Islamic Jurisprudence”, International Criminal Law
Review, vol.9, pp.595-621.
- Moreno-Ocampo, L. (2007). “The International Criminal Court: Seeking Global Justice”, Case Western Reserv Journal of International
Law, 40, pp.215-227.
- Moreno‐Ocampo, L. (2010). “Keynote Address—Interdisciplinary
Colloquium on Sexual Violence as International Crime: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Evidence”, Law & Social Inquiry, 35(4),
pp.839-846.
- Newton, M.A. (2001). “Comparative Complementarity: Domestic Jurisdiction Consistent with the Rome Statute of the International
Criminal Court”, Military Law Review, 167, pp.20-74.
- Oosterveld, V. (2009). “Th e Special Court of Sierra Leone’s Consideration of Gender-Based Violence: Contributing to Transitional Justice?”, Human Rights Review, 10. pp.73-98.
- Pikis, G. M. (2010). “The Rome Statute for the International Criminal
Court Analysis of the Statute, the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, the Regulations of the Court and Supplementary Instruments”, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
- Press Release, Int’l Criminal Court, The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Fatou Bensouda, Requests Judicial Authorisation to Commence an Investigation into the Situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (Nov. 20, 2017)
- Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu (Appeal Judgment), ICTR-96-4-A,
International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), 1 June
2001, available at:
https://www.refworld.org/cases,ICTR,4084f42f4.html [accessed 6 April 2021]
- Prosecutor v. Tihomir Blaskic (Trial Judgement), IT-95-14-T, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 3
March 2000, available at:
https://www.refworld.org/cases,ICTY,4146f1b24.html [accessed 6 April 2021].
- Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac, Radomir Kovac and Zoran Vukovic
(Trial Judgment), IT-96-23-T & IT-96-23/1-T, International
Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 22 February 2001, available at:
https://www.refworld.org/cases,ICTY,3ae6b7560.html [accessed 6 April 2021]
- Raynor, K. (2019) ‘International Criminal Justice: Where Does It Go
from Here?’ (Speech, Lincoln’s Inn, 22 May 2019) [available at
https://opiniojuris.org/wp-content/uploads/Lincolns-22-
May_ForKevinJonHeller-2.pdf]
- ‘Report of the Bureau on Non-Cooperation (11th ASP)’ (Assembly of
States Parties 2012) ICC-ASP/11/29 Available at
https://asp.icccpi.int/en_menus/asp/sessions/documentation/11th%20session/Pages/eleventh%20session%20of%20the%20assembly%2
0of%20states%20parties.aspx, [accessed 12 March 2021].
- Request for Assistance on behalf of the Government of the Republic of
Kenya pursuant to Article 93(10) and Rule 194 [2011] ICC PreTrial Chamber II ICC-01/09-58 21-04-2011, 21 April 2011.
available at https://www.icccpi.int/pages/record.aspx?uri=1062611 [accessed 12 March
2021].
- Sachs, N. (2015). Why Israel Waits: Anti-solutionism as a strategy. Foreign Affairs, 94(6), 74-82.
- Schabas, W. A. (2007). International Criminal Tribunals: A Review of
2007, Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, 6,
pp.382-314
- Scheffer, D. (1999). “The International Criminal Court: The Challenge
of Jurisdiction”, America Society of International Law Proceedings, 93, pp.68-72.
- Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Prosecutor v.
Lubanga Dyilo), Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06-1136, Application
for Leave to Appeal Trial Chamber I's January 18, 2008 Decision
on Victims' Participation 3. Available at < http://www.icccpi.
int/library/cases/ICC-01-04-01-06-1136-ENG.pdf> [accessed
28 january 2021].
- The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 1998, [online]
Available at <
http://untreaty.un.org/cod/icc/statute/romefra.htm> [accessed 28 January 2021].
- Than, C. and Shorts, E. (2003). “International Criminal Law and Human
Rights”, Sweet & Maxwell, London.
- Tolbert, D. (2008). “International Criminal Law: Past and Future”, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law,
30, p.1281-1294.
- Trumbull, C.P. (2008).“The Victims of Victim Participation in International Criminal Proceedings”, Michigan Journal of International
Law, 29, 2008, pp.777-826.
- UNFPA, Gender-based violence in Kosovo – A Case Study , May-July
2005, available at http://
www.unfpa.org/women/docs/gbv_kosovo.pdf . [accessed 12
March 2021].
- UN News Service, ICC sentences former Congolese vice-president Bemba to 18 years in prison for war crimes, 21 June 2016, available
at
https://www.refworld.org/docid/576a466b40c.html [accessed
6 April 2021].
- UN Security Council (2012), Statute of the Special Court for Sierra
Leone, 16 January 2002, available at:
https://www.refworld.org/docid/3dda29f94.html [accessed 6
April 2021].
- Walker, A.J. (2004). “When a Good Idea Is Poorly Implemented: How
the International Criminal Court Fails to Be Insulated from International Politics and to Protect Basic Due Process Guarantees”, West Virginia Law Review, 106, pp.245- 305