Dakriyosistorinostominin baflarısız olduğu hastalarda endoskopik inceleme ve paranazal bilgisayarlı tomografi bulgularının değerlendirilmesi

Dakriyosistorinostominin başarısız olduğu hastalarda endoskopik inceleme ve paranazal bilgisayarlıtomografi bulgularının değerlendirilmesiAmaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı başarısız dakriyosistorinostomi (DSR) olgularında endoskopik inceleme ve paranazal bilgisayarlı tomografi(PNBT) bulgularını değerlendirmektir.Yöntem:Çalışma 30 başarısız olunmuş DSR hastası (yaş ortalaması:49.9±18.9; 18 kadın ve 12 erkek) ve 30 başarılı olunmuş DSR hastasını (yaş ortalaması: 56.3±15.9; 20 kadın ve 9 erkek) kapsamaktadır.Ameliyat öncesi endoskopik muayene ve PNBT bulguları kullanılarakhastalığın nüks etme nedenleri değerlendirildi. Bulgular:Otuz başarısız olgunun 24'ünde (%80), 30 başarılı olgununise 12'sinde (%40) endoskopik patoloji saptandı (p

Evaluation of endoscopic examination and paranasal computed tomography findings in failed dacryocystorhinostomy patients

Objective:The aim of this study is to evaluate endoscopic andparanasal computed tomography (PNCT) findings in cases of faileddacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Methods:This study included 30 cases of failed DCR (18 females, 12males; mean age: 49.9±18.9 years) and 30 successful DCR patients (20females, 9 males; mean age: 56.3±15.9 years). The reasons for the recurrence of the disease were evaluated using preoperative endoscopic examination and PNCT findings. Results: Endoscopic pathology was identified in 24 out of 30 failed cases(80%), while endoscopic pathology was identified in 12 out of 30 successful cases (40%) (p<0.05). PNCT revealed nasal pathology in 24 out of 30failed cases (80%), and in 15 out of 30 successful cases (50%) (p<0.05). Conclusion:Endonasal and sinonasal pathologies may be associatedwith DCR failure. Before the commencement of revision DCR, endoscopic examination and PNCT may provide valuable informationregarding the underlying etiology

___

  • 1. Ozkaya A, Gurcan Z, Ozusan S. Comparing pimary external dacryocystorhinostomy operations with or without silicone tube intubation. [Article in Turkish]. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Ophthalmology 2007;16:77-81.
  • 2. Caldwell GW. Two new operations for obstruction of the nasal duct. NY Med J 1893;57:581-2.
  • 3. Yakopson VS, Flanagan JC, Ahn D, Luo BP. Dacryocystorhinostomy: history, evolution and future directions. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2011;25:37-49.
  • 4. Yigit O, Samanc>o¤lu M, Taskin U, Ceylan S, Eltutar K, Yener M. External and endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in chronic dacryocystitis: comparison of results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 264:879-85.
  • 5. Rice DH. Endoscopik intranasal dacryocystorhinostomy results in four patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:1061.
  • 6. Metson R, Woog JJ, Puliafito CA. Endoscopik laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 1994;104:269-74.
  • 7. Konuk O, Kurtulmusoglu M, Knatova Z, Unal M. Unsuccessful lacrimal surgery: causative factors and results of surgical management in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmologica 2010;224:361- 6.
  • 8. Onerci M. Dacryocystorhinostomy. Diagnosis and treatment of nasolacrimal canal obstructions. Rhinology 2002;40:49-65.
  • 9. Karim R, Ghabrial R, Lynch TF, Tang B. A comparison of external and endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Clinical Ophthalmology 2011;5: 979-89.
  • 10. Balbaba M, Toplu Y, Ulas F. Association of nasolacrimal canal obstruction and nasal pathologies. [Article in Turkish]. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Ophthalmology 2013;22:5-9.
  • 11. Piédrola Maroto D, Franco Sánchez J, Reyes Eldblom R, Monje Vega E, Conde Jiménez M, Ortiz Rueda M. Endonasal versus trans-canalicular endoscopic dacriocystorhinostomy using diode laser. Surgical techniques and outcomes. [Article in Spanish] Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2008;59:283-7.
  • 12. Pittore B, Tan N, Salis G, Brennan PA, Puxeddu R. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy without stenting: results in 64 consecutive procedures. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2010;30:294- 8.
  • 13. Hart RH, Powrie S, Rose GE. Primary external dacryocystorhinostomy. In: Cohen AJ, Mercandetti M, Brazzo BG, editors. The lacrimal system: diagnosis, management and treatment. New York, NY: Springer; 2006. p. 127-43.
  • 14. Welham RA, Wulc AE. Management of unsuccessful lacrimal surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 1987;71:152-7.
  • 15. Saratziotis A, Emanuelli E. Osteoma of the medial wall of the maxillary sinus: a primary cause of nasolacrimal duct obstruction and review of the literature. Case Rep Otolaryngol 2014;348459.
  • 16. Lee J, Choi SY, Lee H, Chang M, Park M, Baek S. The clinical effectiveness of transcanalicular diode laser-assisted revision surgery for failed endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Br J Ophthalmol 2015;99:1130-3.
  • 17. Rose GE. The lacrimal paradox: toward a greater understanding of success in lacrimal surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;20: 262-5.
  • 18. Weidenbecher M, Hosemann W, Buhr W. Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 56 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994;103:363-7.
  • 19. Onerci M, Orhan M, Ogretmeno¤lu O, _____rkec M. Long-term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol 2000;120:319-22.
  • 20. Basmak H, Cakl> H, Sahin A, et al. Comparison of endocanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy with and without endonasal procedures. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011;249:737-43.
  • 21. Golan S, Leibovitch I, Landsberg R. Unexpected pathologies in patients referred for endoscopic DCR. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;271:3053-8.
  • 22. Ricardo LA, Nakanishi M, Fava AS. Transillumination-guided study of the endoscopic anatomy of the lacrimal fossa. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2010;76:34-9.
  • 23. Aydin S, Acikgoz C, Altin G, Demir MG. Role of nasal and paranasal sinus pathologies in failed external dacryocystorhinostomy. National Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 2015;3:4-7.
  • 24. Hurwitz JJ, Edward Kassel EE, Jaffer N. The lacrimal system. In: Hurwitz JJ, editor. Computed tomography and combined CTdacryocystography (CT-DCG). New York, NY: Raven Press; 1996. p. 83-5.
ENT Updates-Cover
  • ISSN: 2149-7109
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Prof.Dr.Murat Demir
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Dakriyosistorinostominin baflarısız olduğu hastalarda endoskopik inceleme ve paranazal bilgisayarlı tomografi bulgularının değerlendirilmesi

Emine ŞAKALAR GÜVEN, Hikmet BAŞMAK, Hüseyin GÜRSOY, Hamdi ÇAKLI

Koklear implantl> çocuklarda sesin artikülasyon özelliklerinin de¤erlendirilmesi

Gökçe AKSOY, Abdullah DALGIÇ, Tolga KANDOĞAN, Levent OLGUN

Ağır konjenital iflitme kayb>nda glutatyon peroksidaz ve katalaz enzim gen polimorfizmleri

ORHAN TUNÇ, ELİF BAYSAL, SİBEL OĞUZKAN BALCI, LÜTFİ SEMİH MUMBUÇ, SACİDE PEHLİVAN, MUZAFFER KANLIKAMA

Reinke ödeminde enflamatuvar hücre tipleri

H Bengü ÇOBANOĞLU, SELÇUK ARSLAN, Ümit ÇOBANOĞLU, Mehmet İMAMOĞLU

Steroidlerin başarısız kalmasından sonraki ani sensörinöral iflitme kaybında hiperbarik oksijen kurtarma tedavisinin terapötik etkinliğii

Abdulkadir İMRE, İbrahim ALADAĞ, Ercan PINAR, Hale ASLAN, Rıdvan DURAN, Mustafa YAZIR

Juvenile psammomatoid ossifying fibroma with skull base and orbital wall invasion: a rare case report

Özlem ÜNSAL, Pınar SOYTAS, Fevziye KABUKÇUOĞLU, Berna COŞKUN USLU

Do diabetic patients with Bell's palsy benefit from corticosteroids?

Ali BAYRAM, Mustafa ŞAHİN, Murat DOĞAN, Cemil MUTLU

Evaluation of olfactory functions in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux

Yusuf Çağdaş KUMBUL, Hüseyin IŞIK, Aykut Erdem DİNÇ, DUYGU ERDEM, Sultan Şevik ELİÇORA

Nasal nitric oxide and its metabolites as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and follow-up of allergic rhinitis

Zerrin COŞKUN ÖZERGİN, SELÇUK ARSLAN, Orhan DEĞER, Mehmet İMAMOĞLU